Comments by "Terje Oseberg" (@terjeoseberg990) on "Asian Boss" channel.

@scottnyc6572 , It’s OK. Don’t worry. Darwin will take care of many of the antivaxxers. 98.4% of deaths are among the antivaxxers.
2
@thankmelatersport , They originally said that Pfizer was 95% effective at preventing symptoms. They originally said that they didn’t test for infection so they don’t know how effective it is at preventing infection and how effective it is at preventing transmission. What they said in this video is exactly this. The same with Moderna, but it was found to be 94.5% effective at preventing symptoms. You’re either confused, have bad memory, or you’re a liar.
2
@thankmelatersport , Apparently you’re confused. Who “they” are should be obvious to any intelligent person. Why don’t you try looking at the results of the Phase 3 clinical trial? I thought that they should have collected more data than just efficacy against symptoms, and was disappointed that they didn’t. The results were submitted to the FDA for approval. They have an 8 and a 9 hour video that’s still on YouTube where they reviewed the data publicly. It was broadcast live. Maybe you ought to stop wasting your time making ignore ant antivaxxer comments on YouTube and actually spend your time doing some research instead. But I’m guessing that you lack the capacity.
1
@cryptoinsider9305 , “Small bacteria or virus” WTF is wrong with you bro? Are you tarded or something? Did you already have Covid too? “People who have recovered from COVID-19 tend to score significantly lower on an intelligence test compared to those who have not contracted the virus, according to new research published in The Lancet journal Clinical Medicine. The findings suggest that the SARS-CoV-2 virus that causes COVID-19 can produce substantial reductions in cognitive ability”
1
@thankmelatersport , I’ll wait for you to learn how to use Google. But I won’t be holding my breath.
1
@cryptoinsider9305 , Some people can’t tell when they’ve been infected. Do du. mb people know they’re du. mb?
1
@cryptoinsider9305 , Thank Me Later certainly doesn’t know.
1
@sadiemakesmesmile , The original trial showed that it was 95% effective at preventing symptoms and they made no claims about infection. You must be an ignore ant antivaxxer who doesn’t understand English or something.
1
@sadiemakesmesmile , You must be confused too. They never said it was 91% effective at preventing infection. Is English your second language. Do you understand the difference between being infected and being sick? Vaccines can not prevent a virus from entering your body. They give you antibodies, which only work after the virus enters your body. That means you have to get infected in order for your immune system to fight the virus. What antibodies do is allow your immune system to win that fight. Maybe you should try learning some biology before making stew pid comments on YouTube.
1