General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Terje Oseberg
Anders Puck Nielsen
comments
Comments by "Terje Oseberg" (@terjeoseberg990) on "Anders Puck Nielsen" channel.
Previous
5
Next
...
All
@cambs0181 , It would be easy for Poland to conquer Belarus all by themselves.
1
@Gopferteckel , Problems for Belarus happened from within right after Russia installed Lukashenko. Unfortunately the police were able to stop the revolution.
1
“The real numbers are somewhere between those numbers.” Why would Ukraine lie? What difference would it make if they said it was 70,000 dead Russians? It’s apparently what people believe anyway, so how would it be different if that’s what Ukraine said?
1
@afcgeo882 , Wrong. When Korea split, North Korean had all the natural resources and factories while South Korea had all the farms. This is because North Korea has a lot of natural resources. The problem is that natural resources are useless if nobody wants to buy them. There are plenty of natural resources all over the world.
1
@afcgeo882 , Russia’s GDP means absolutely nothing. It’s fake. Most of it is due to Putin squandering Russia’s sovereign wealth fund on this pointless war of his. Once the money runs out, the GDP will plummet.
1
@afcgeo882 , Russia’s GDP means absolutely nothing. It’s fake. Most of it is due to Putin squandering Russia’s sovereign wealth fund on this pointless war of his. Once the money runs out, the GDP will plummet.
1
@afcgeo882 , Russia’s GDP means absolutely nothing. It’s fake.
1
@jtf2dan , Let’s hope so.
1
@tomk3732 , There’s no evidence whatsoever in the video that you posted that the bridge is capable of supporting a truckload of Russia supplies. Maybe a small car, or people can walk across the bridge, bat that’s it. There’s a reason the guy in the video didn’t pan around and show the damage to the whole bridge.
1
@dIRECTOR259 , If I was in an echo chamber I wouldn’t be here reading your garbage comments.
1
@dIRECTOR259 , “When watching an offensive day by day, it consists of many small movements.” Sure, but at the rate that Russia has progressed during the past 5 months, it’ll be 2040 before Russia occupies all of Donbas. And at the current rate that Russia is using up their missiles and artillery, they’ll run out long before then. And since the HIMARS were delivered, Russia’s ammo has been turning into mushroom clouds so fast that they’ll be demilitarized within months, not years. Maybe 11 months? Maybe 15 months? What’s your guess?
1
@Chaldon-hl6yk , What has MSM been saying? I haven’t been watching…
1
@emojidinosaur7300 , Ukraine is not drafting women. They are accepting female volunteers, but they are not drafting them.
1
@tomk3732 , You need to look up Dunning Kruger bro. “The ATACMS can be fired from the tracked M270 Multiple Launch Rocket System (MLRS), and the wheeled M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS).” What are the ATACMS, the tracked M270 MLRS, and wheeled M142 HIMARS systems in the above quote? Which ones are rockets and which are vehicles that fire those rockets?
1
@ptonpc , Probably. Who knows? They could have at least tried to hide everything inside boxes so it’s not visible to the general public.
1
They should have started training 1,000 Ukrainian pilots and 10,000 jet mechanics over a year ago. They should be ready already.
1
“Both sides believe they’re winning.” If the west increases support for Ukraine, then Ukraine wins sooner. If the west decreases support, it takes longer. The only chance Russia has is that the west completely stops supporting Ukraine.
1
@nickduxfield4324 , If they don’t, those workers might choose to go work at a weapons factory instead of a gold mine.
1
@goenzoy712 , I went and looked up Russian gold. It turns out that they produce around 300 tons per year, not 1000, and Russia’s largest gold producer make around $8 billion per year profit.
1
Trump wants Europe to buy American weapons. But will they be new weapons or old weapons that the United States manufactured and paid for 20, 30, and 40 years ago?
1
The weapons we’ve given Ukraine are old weapons that we paid for 20, 30, and 40 years ago.
1
Mike Johnson doesn’t understand, nor does he care.
1
He’s an ignore ant fool.
1
@xisotopex , Whoever is in charge is obviously incompetent. I mean everyone who’s in charge is incompetent.
1
@TheSteinbitt , Why would Putin care about that? He can recruit them anyway and force them to be factory workers just like he can recruit them and use them as cannon fodder. Did you forget that he’s a dictator?
1
@theorenhobart , Anyone who complains or tries to organize protests would obviously be sent to the front lines. Russians are experts at forcing people to do things they don’t way to do.
1
@BjorckBengt , Russia doesn’t build advanced military equipment. Russia doesn’t build advanced anything. Advanced Russian technology is a myth that’s been debunked by Ukraine.
1
@jgw9990 , Yes. Russia would become a slave state. It practically already is. My question is what would happen if Putin did this.
1
@jgw9990 , Exactly. What would happen if Putin did that?
1
@georgelionon9050 , They can slaughter all the Russian Nazis within Ukraine, then take 100 miles of Russia all along Ukraine’s northern border and everything between Ukraine and Kazakhstan blocking Russia from access to the Black Sea. Ukraine can then allow the United States to occupy the military base in Crimea and join NATO.
1
@Princip666 , Ok. Then educate me. Where’s the money coming from that’s paying for Russia’s GDP?
1
@arbitersincantations6519 , And Russia’s nukes don’t even work. Russia inherited them over 30 years ago, the half life of tritium is 12.3 years, and Russia is so corrupt that even if Putin has allocated money to maintain the nukes he inherited, the money would have been stolen and the maintenance wouldn’t have been done. You should also understand that everyone who designed and built those nukes died of old age years ago. Probably nobody in Russia even knows how to maintain those nukes.
1
@Ikkeligeglad , That GDP is Russia’s savings. It’s running out. Once Russia’s savings are depleted, Russia’s GDP will plummet, because everyone in Russia is dirt poor.
1
@martstam2016 , People are not dying in droves on Ukraine’s side. Ukraine doesn’t use the meat wave strategies that Russia uses. Ukraine is willing to give up territory to save the lives of its soldiers. Russia is not. Russia will try to take territory regardless of the cost. This is obviously unsubstantiated for Russia, but Putin doesn’t care. All he cares about is territory.
1
@antonystringfellow5152 , Putin has already escalated as much as he can.
1
So what you’re saying is that journalist are stew pid?
1
@danielhutchinson6604 <—— Obviously brainwashed by Russian propaganda… Keep coping bro, if it makes you feel better, but the guy in this video is 100% correct. If Russia wants to win, they need to put 1 million troops on the front line and bombard the Ukrainians like they did in Severodonetsk and Lysychans'k. The fact is, Russia doesn’t have the resources to do that. Those 20,000 troops that Russia has near Kherson would be extremely useful somewhere else, but if Russia moves them, Ukraine will take Kherson. And if Russia doesn’t move them, Russia will continue to invest heavy losses for tiny gains. Look at how much the front lines have moved in the past 30 days and you’ll see that Russia has made absolutely no progress at all. If they continue like this, Russia will be 100% demilitarized before they take all of Donbas. This will leave them as sitting ducks for an invasion by China. I’m pretty sure China has their eyes on Siberia. They could really use the natural resources there.
1
@stasguivan4680 , Jason Davis obviously lacks the capacity required to understand your comment.
1
@danielhutchinson6604 , Russia started this war. Russia invaded Ukraine. Nobody invaded Russia. So if you are actually against war, then you should support the withdrawal of the Russian Nazis that Putin sent to invade Ukraine.
1
@danielhutchinson6604 , The only Nazis in Ukraine are the ones sent by Putin to murder Ukrainians. The CIA has absolutely nothing to do with that, so whatever the CIA did or didn’t do after WW2 is irrelevant.
1
What if Putin were to mobilize 10 million and forced them to be factory workers?
1
There’s absolutely nothing wrong with being on the defensive when you’re winning.
1
Russia is expending far more resources than Ukraine. Eventually they’ll run out.
1
As long as the Russians continue with their current strategy, it would be a mistake for Ukraine to mount an offensive.
1
As long as the Russians continue with their current strategy, it would be a mistake for Ukraine to mount an offensive.
1
https://youtu.be/4dmrYCPOKTs
1
In war, nobody gives a chit about international law, nor should they. Russia is the agressor, so everything Ukraine does to Russia is Russia’s fault, and Russia should take the blame. Ukraine can and should do whatever they want to defend their country and their freedom.
1
Everything Russia is doing is illegal and nothing Ukraine is doing is illegal. If Russia or Russians don’t like it, they can withdraw from Ukraine and start paying reparations.
1
Maybe Trump knows that Russia is on its last leg. That the longer this war drags on, the more desperate Putin will become. So maybe Trump is leading Putin to believe that he has a chance so Putin will continue to squander all of Russia’s resources on this war until Russia has nothing left. Time is on Ukraine’s side.
1
@seancidy6008 , Because the longer they drag things out, the longer Putin believes he can win, the longer Russia keeps dumping weapons and other resources into the black hole called Ukraine. The longer this continues, the more demilitarized Russia becomes before Putin gives up and surrenders, at which point Russia will be utterly defeated so Ukraine can demand whatever they want from Russia and get it.
1
Previous
5
Next
...
All