Comments by "Terje Oseberg" (@terjeoseberg990) on "Where is the Ukrainian counteroffensive?" video.

  1.  @attilamarics4808 , And now Ukraine is more militarized than its been in over 30 years, and the west keeps giving them more. Every country in Europe us increasing military spending and NATO is expanding. These are all thanks to Putin.
    11
  2.  @krakhedd , The cigarettes would have been find if it weren’t for the truckloads of Taco Bell smuggled into Crimea by the west. When the Russians found it, they had no idea what would result after consuming too much of that stuff.
    6
  3.  @tomk3732  <—— Misinformed and confused.
    6
  4.  @dIRECTOR259  <—— Comedian. ROTFLMAO!!!
    5
  5.  @dIRECTOR259 , Not any more. This video explained everything quite clearly and accurately. Of course you’re extremely confused though.
    5
  6.  Truth Be Told , Ukraine was never part of Russia. Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union. Russia was also part of the Soviet Union. Ukraine started the Soviet Union, not Russia. Therefore, maybe Russia should surrender their country to Ukraine. Putin should just give up and let Zelensky be president of both Ukraine and Russia.
    5
  7.  @NewOrleansSeptember , This video is an accurate description of the situation in Ukraine right now. If you don’t like it, too bad. What you like or don’t like has no impact on the truth.
    4
  8.  @r200ti  <—— Extremely confused. Why would Ukraine want to launch a counter offensive when we all know that the offensive side needs a minimum of 3x more troops and artillery. And apparently Russia needs 10x the artillery to advance at the pace of a crippled snail. The smartest plan for Ukraine is to let Russia keep struggling for every inch until they’ve been so demilitarized that a counter offensive could be won with a few thousand troops. Then they can march in and take everything with practically no resistance or casualties. If you had half a brain, you’d sew that Ukraine is doing exactly what they should do, and Russia is losing.
    3
  9.  @Lasse65 , If Russia voluntarily withdraws from Ukraine but not Crimea, then Ukraine will invade Crimea and Russia will have defend Crimea. I don’t believe that a voluntary withdrawal that doesn’t include Crimea is an option. The only way Russia would be able to continue to occupy Crimea would be for this to end at the negotiation table and Ukraine agrees to allow Russia to continue to occupy Crimea. And that would only happen if Russia isn’t completely defeated, or if the west withdraws support for Ukraine and forces them to accept such a deal.
    3
  10.  @pilotmanpaul , Russia is losing bro…
    3
  11.  @michealbaker8216 , So by “fortifications” you actually mean “trenches”? Are trenches really that difficult to make? Ever heard of a “Ditch Witch”?
    3
  12.  @neilcreamer8207 , He’s referring to the forest fire satellite images. They show how many fires are on either side of the front lines in Ukraine. Before the Ukrainians received the HIMARS and started taking out Russian ammo depots and supply lines there were significantly more fires on the Ukrainian side of the front lines. That changed very quickly after the Ukrainians received the HIMARS which is an indication of how effective the HIMARS have been at reducing the availability of Russian artillery rounds on the front lines.
    3
  13.  @arthurmoore9488 , “I would have enough troops to keep them pinned in and bleeding, then go for a surprise offensive somewhere else.” That’s exactly what I’d do. In fact, I’d start a surprise offense in one area first to get Russia to move their troops, then also attack wherever they moved those troops from. I’d wait for a whole bunch of freshly trained troops come from the UK, US, and elsewhere first so they could participate. I’d also be training a whole bunch of fresh new troops in Ukraine for these two surprise offensives.
    2
  14.  @Chaldon-hl6yk , Not when there are 20-25,000 enemy troops trapped on the wrong side of the bridge.
    2
  15.  @tomk3732 , “Only the deck is damaged.” So? Are you a structural engineer? Obviously not. So why didn’t he show us the whole bridge? Why focus real close on only two holes? Was he trying to hide all the damage?
    2
  16.  @tomk3732 , HIMARS are not rockets. HIMARS are trucks. Go educate yourself bro.
    2
  17.  @tomk3732 , HIMARS is a truck bro. There are other vehicles that accept the same rocket modules as the HIMARS. The benefit of the HIMARS is that it’s faster and smaller than the other vehicles, so they are “Highly Mobile” compared to the other vehicles. This is important because once you fire the rockets the enemy can see with their radar where you are, so you need to move quickly before they start shooting back at you. This allows you to fire the rockets from closer to the front lines, within artillery range of the enemy, which in turn allows you to shoot at targets deeper behind enemy lines. You really should educate yourself so you actually know what you’re talking about. And if replacing the deck on a bridge is so easy, why hasn’t Russia done it yet? What’s taking them so long?
    2
  18.  @danielhutchinson6604  <—— Extremely confused..
    2
  19.  Truth Be Told , Ukraine was never part of Russia. Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union. Russia was also part of the Soviet Union. Ukraine started the Soviet Union, not Russia. Therefore, maybe Russia should surrender their country to Ukraine. Putin should just give up and let Zelensky be president of both Ukraine and Russia.
    2
  20.  @davidfaraday7963 , Ukraine was never part of Russia. Both Russia and Ukraine were part of the Soviet Union. Claiming that Ukraine was part of Russia is like claiming that Florida was part of California.
    2
  21.  @davidfaraday7963 , The Russian Empire? That’s ancient history. And Ukraine founded the Soviet Union after WW1.
    2
  22.  @michealbaker8216 , Russia is shelling 70,000 rounds a day and Ukraine only 10,000? Then why isn’t the front lines moving? Do Russians have bad aim or something?
    2
  23.  @michealbaker8216 , So Ukraine is winning because they are experts at building fortifications? What if they are building new better fortifications behind the ones they spent 8 years building? And what if they are building more behind those? Or do you believe that they’ve been doing absolutely nothing to prepare for the possibility that Russia might break though those fortifications?
    2
  24.  @michealbaker8216 , What do these incredible fortifications look like? Do you have any pictures or videos that show them?
    2
  25.  @pilotmanpaul , “They can’t” I guess you have no clue what a “Ditch Witch” is.
    2
  26.  @michealbaker8216 , Did you bother looking up what a Ditch Witch is?
    2
  27.  @michealbaker8216 , If by “fortifications” you mean trenches, then one guy can dig all the trenches you could ever want within a few weeks using a Ditch Witch. I suppose the Russians don’t have and have never heard of such advanced technology, so they believe that it takes 8 years to dig a few trenches.
    2
  28.  @michealbaker8216 , You obviously still don’t understand what a Ditch Witch is. It’s not a guy with a shovel.
    2
  29.  @kevinprokopenko7023  <—— Brainwashed by Russian propaganda.
    1
  30.  @tomk3732 , There’s no evidence whatsoever in the video that you posted that the bridge is capable of supporting a truckload of Russia supplies. Maybe a small car, or people can walk across the bridge, bat that’s it. There’s a reason the guy in the video didn’t pan around and show the damage to the whole bridge.
    1
  31.  @dIRECTOR259 , If I was in an echo chamber I wouldn’t be here reading your garbage comments.
    1
  32.  @dIRECTOR259 , “When watching an offensive day by day, it consists of many small movements.” Sure, but at the rate that Russia has progressed during the past 5 months, it’ll be 2040 before Russia occupies all of Donbas. And at the current rate that Russia is using up their missiles and artillery, they’ll run out long before then. And since the HIMARS were delivered, Russia’s ammo has been turning into mushroom clouds so fast that they’ll be demilitarized within months, not years. Maybe 11 months? Maybe 15 months? What’s your guess?
    1
  33.  @Chaldon-hl6yk , What has MSM been saying? I haven’t been watching…
    1
  34.  @emojidinosaur7300 , Ukraine is not drafting women. They are accepting female volunteers, but they are not drafting them.
    1
  35.  @tomk3732 , You need to look up Dunning Kruger bro. “The ATACMS can be fired from the tracked M270 Multiple Launch Rocket System (MLRS), and the wheeled M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS).” What are the ATACMS, the tracked M270 MLRS, and wheeled M142 HIMARS systems in the above quote? Which ones are rockets and which are vehicles that fire those rockets?
    1
  36.  @danielhutchinson6604  <—— Obviously brainwashed by Russian propaganda… Keep coping bro, if it makes you feel better, but the guy in this video is 100% correct. If Russia wants to win, they need to put 1 million troops on the front line and bombard the Ukrainians like they did in Severodonetsk and Lysychans'k. The fact is, Russia doesn’t have the resources to do that. Those 20,000 troops that Russia has near Kherson would be extremely useful somewhere else, but if Russia moves them, Ukraine will take Kherson. And if Russia doesn’t move them, Russia will continue to invest heavy losses for tiny gains. Look at how much the front lines have moved in the past 30 days and you’ll see that Russia has made absolutely no progress at all. If they continue like this, Russia will be 100% demilitarized before they take all of Donbas. This will leave them as sitting ducks for an invasion by China. I’m pretty sure China has their eyes on Siberia. They could really use the natural resources there.
    1
  37.  @stasguivan4680 , Jason Davis obviously lacks the capacity required to understand your comment.
    1
  38.  @danielhutchinson6604 , Russia started this war. Russia invaded Ukraine. Nobody invaded Russia. So if you are actually against war, then you should support the withdrawal of the Russian Nazis that Putin sent to invade Ukraine.
    1
  39.  @danielhutchinson6604 , The only Nazis in Ukraine are the ones sent by Putin to murder Ukrainians. The CIA has absolutely nothing to do with that, so whatever the CIA did or didn’t do after WW2 is irrelevant.
    1
  40.  @seancidy6008 , Russia could not afford this war. They started it anyway because Putin is an ignore ant dum bass.
    1
  41.  @Lasse65 , If Russia did declare war and attempt to mobilize, there would be a massive revolt and Putin would be overthrown. The majority of Russians are already discontent with the state of affairs in Russia, and if they were forced to go sacrifice their lives in Ukraine they’d be extremely upset.
    1
  42.  @xavierg8985  <—— Brainwashed by Russian propaganda.
    1
  43.  @NewOrleansSeptember  <—— Obviously brainwashed by Russian propaganda.
    1
  44.  @davidfaraday7963 , But Putin is a dum bass.
    1
  45.  @yellowtunes2756 , Ukraine started the Soviet Union after WW1.
    1