Comments by "Terje Oseberg" (@terjeoseberg990) on "Jake Broe" channel.

  1. There’s absolutely no way that Russia will be able to supply 1.2 million Russians on the front lines. They can barely deliver supplies for 150,000 Russians.
    2300
  2. Turkey could confiscate Russia’s ships and soldiers by Syria and hold them hostage until Russia had cleaned up the mess they made in the Black Sea.
    928
  3. If Russian air defenses are so good, why would Putin care about what Ukraine is allowed to do with western weapons?
    471
  4. “How much is that in Russian missiles?” Well, since it takes 100 Russian missiles to finally hit something strategic, it’s equivalent to 1,000,000 Russian missiles.
    389
  5. All the drones were neutralized. They are east to take care of. If only Ukraine had the air defenses that Israel has in sufficient quantities to matter.
    164
  6. At 25:13, “How do we fix all this?” Simple. We fix Russia. Russia caused all this. Fortunately Ukraine is fixing Russia for us. We should be grateful.
    139
  7. If it violates federal law to campaign in a military cemetery, what’s the penalty, and why hasn’t Trump been arrested? Is he above the law?
    118
  8.  @JonTull-ug7sm , Exactly. That’s where the blame belongs.
    57
  9. They obviously made a mistake.
    47
  10. No international cooperation required.
    47
  11. Military aid shouldn’t cost the west or Ukraine anything. Russia should pay us back. The money should come from Russia’s natural resources, not Ukraine’s.
    45
  12. Why can’t Zelensky offer Trump Russia’s natural resources? After helping Ukraine win, isn’t that fair?
    43
  13.  @arkkrogue3870 , Yes. Because of what they’ve done in Ukraine, Georgia, Belarus, and many other countries.
    40
  14.  @HellaSayHella , Mainstream Media needs to be held to a higher standard.
    36
  15.  @Basieeee , Ukraine never joined NATO. If Ukraine did join, Putin wouldn’t have invaded.
    32
  16.  @paulbedichek5177 , Russia can’t even defeat Ukraine. They wouldn’t stand a chance against France.
    30
  17.  @Phonehomefool , The United States has around 6,000 tanks and has given Ukraine around 30. The United States has over 2,000 F-16s and has given Ukraine none. If the United States wanted Ukraine to win, Ukraine would have already won.
    29
  18. ⁠ @zbyszanna , We care about today, not a few years ago. Obviously he was wrong, and obviously he recognizes that mistakes. Some are still pro Russian today.
    28
  19.  @sunnyboner676 , It’s 1/5th or 20% of Ukraine that Russia currently occupies, and half of that was already occupied before 2022, so it’s really only 10% that Ukraine lost. And the majority of that 10% was taken by surprise in the first months. During the last 4 months Russia has taken less than 1% of Ukraine. At the current rate, Russia will completely occupy Donbas by 2040. Get your facts straight bro…
    27
  20. “I want to give him credit. He gave a good answer.” If Tiny Johnson really cares about Ukraine, after delaying aid for 6 months, he would have at least doubled it.
    25
  21. Why would Finland give anyone coming from Russia asylum? Regardless of where they’re from, they can live in Russia.
    24
  22. Unfortunately it takes a little brains to understand this, which neither Trump nor his supporters have.
    23
  23.  @supersasquatch , Did you watch this video? Do you understand English. The United States has never told Ukraine not to target Russian oil refineries. I’m pretty sure that the United States understands Russian oil refineries have no impact on the global oil prices. If anything, it might decrease global oil prices when Russia is forced to sell crude oil that they’d otherwise refine.
    23
  24. Is Sarah Bils actually pro Russian? Or was she merely exploiting the pro Russian clowns?
    22
  25.  @pepsi4798 , Why can’t Putin defend Russia’s weapons depots, oil refineries, and oil depots? If Russia’s air defenses work, why are these things still being hit?
    21
  26. Ukraine needs to disable all of Russia’s refineries and oil depots.
    21
  27.  @jameswadsworth7951 , How about it come from the $300 billion and then any remaining balance, which will likely be $1 trillion, should come from Ukraine receiving ownership of Russia’s natural resources.
    20
  28.  @varkcoldguru9368 , Russia is not defending their cities. They know that Ukraine isn’t interested in going after non military targets so it’s only necessary to defend military targets. But it’s obvious that Russia’s air defenses can’t even do that.
    20
  29.  @ninemoonplanet , Finland could take it back now if they wanted to. Russia is in no position to do anything about it.
    20
  30.  @gratius1394 , Finland ceded 9% of its territory to the Soviet Union. That was not a “win”. They wanted the entire country. Just like that wanted all of Ukraine, but since this invasion also failed, they changed their goals so they could call their failure a “win”. This is a common Russian strategy.
    20
  31.  @AH-yg5dk , Russia should not only pay for the damage that they’ve done to Ukraine, but also for all the aid that the west has had to provide. —————— Russia should pay back everyone. They have plenty of natural resources that we can take if they can’t pay cash.
    19
  32. At 11:56 in this video you describe exactly Trump’s plans for the United States if he’s elected.
    19
  33. The price of oil and refined petroleum products in the United States has nothing to do with Russian oil refineries.
    18
  34. Russia’s military is pathetic. They can’t even defeat Ukraine with 0 US aid and minimal European aid.
    18
  35.  @roboticgamer8990 , Absolutely. Russia is pretty much screwed. They lost when they failed to take Kyiv within the first two weeks.
    17
  36.  @VajrahahaShunyata , Sure. They could try that. “500,000 on the ground and 500,000 supplying them…” If they had enough trucks. Russia doesn’t even have enough ball bearings to maintain their trains. How are they going to make trucks? Does Iran or North Korea have truck manufacturing capacity? How about Belarus? Look at the lend/lease supplies that China received from the United States during WW2. Russia received a LOT of trucks. Pretty much Russia’s manufacturing capacity sucks.
    17
  37.  @RingoBars , Jake was awesome on that show. I hope he gets on there more. He needs more people to see him debunking the MAGA bull chit.
    17
  38.  @marcus_ohreallyus , No. The US military does not use consumer products or products manufactured by the same factories as consumer products. Even small US companies that manufacturer weapons for the United States military are required to design and manufacture their own chips in their own fabs. Everyone involved requires a security clearance.
    17
  39. At 11:56 in this video you describe exactly Trump’s plans for the United States if he’s elected.
    17
  40.  @Silveirias , Finland could easily take back everything that Russia took from. Russia isn’t in a position to resist right now. It would be easy.
    16
  41.  @HellaSayHella , War is messy and weapons aren’t perfect. They sometimes malfunction, and are quite often shot down by the enemy. In such situations, there are often civilian casualties, but Ukraine has never once targeted civilians. Russia targets civilians more often than they target military targets. The two countries are very different and the people within them are very different.
    16
  42.  @yeenmachine206 , Ukraine has not once deliberately hit a civilian building in Russia or anywhere else.
    16
  43.  @ytdertignulses201 , Yes. Remembered as a traitor.
    16
  44.  @JakeBroe , Ukraine should never have to pay anything. Russia should have to.
    15
  45.  @thegeneral565 , Why did Poland become part of the Soviet Union after WW2? Why couldn’t they become an independent nation? In your opinion was giving Poland to the nation that started WW2 by invading Poland not a betrayal?
    15
  46.  @Funtarez , How can you tell when a Russian is lying? . . . His lips are moving…
    15
  47.  @williamshaneblyth , Political gains for who? Putin?
    14
  48.  @Funtarez , Tell me, Russian liar, how exactly does it benefit Ukraine to target civilians when it’s a waste of expensive military equipment? It would be incredibly stew pid for Ukraine to waste their limited supplies of military equipment targeting civilians. Russia does it because they don’t value human life, and because they inherited a nearly unlimited supply of military equipment from the Soviet Union.
    14
  49. “What do you do about the civilians in Belgorod?” Ukraine shouldn’t worry about civilians. Russia doesn’t.
    13
  50.  @nhaskin5638 , You didn’t answer my question. Why it’s Putin so bent out of shape? And why do my questions appear to upset you?
    13