Comments by "1midnightfish" (@1midnightfish) on "" video.
-
@АндрейЛарин-в6н Thank you for demonstrating to the whole comment section what russian propaganda looks like in practice, and while it's ridiculous to even think that we could leave politics out of any discussion about language.
Ukrainian, Belarusian and Polish are all different languages, which are much closer to each other than they are to russian, and all four languages are descended from a common ancestor. The Cyrillic script was first developed in modern-day Bulgaria specially for Slavic languages, that's why it's more economical than the Latin script for these languages. It was Catholicism that led to Poland adopting the Latin script - nothing to do with the supremacy of russian culture, which in fact took a lot longer to develop than the others (and as we can see, never got very far).
Another interesting fact about modern russian is the high percentage of foreign loan words, which were then imposed on languages like Ukrainian over centuries of colonialism. russian isn't a particularly original language. I recommend people look into the work of the Kazakh author Olzhas Suleimenov, whose seminal book АЗ и Я (a play on words, which means Asia but also reads like "Asia and I") was censored in the soviet union for analysing, with linguistic evidecen, the possible Turkic origin of the Russian chronicle "The Tale of Igor's Campaign".
6
-
4
-
3
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1