Comments by "DEXTER\x27S LURE LAB" (@secretbassrigs) on "Expert warns of 'chilling effect' from CCP's national security law" video.

The new HK national security law says that China can detain anyone for "up to" 16 years without a trial or right to speak to a lawyer. SO ABHORRENT!
46
Plausible Deniability
3
In the U.S. Supreme Court case Boumediene v. Bush, it was established Guantanamo detainees have a right to habeas corpus and are able to bring their petitions to U.S courts. The new Hong Kong National Security Law, Article 23, doesn't afford those detained under it that simple right for up to 16 years.
2
But I agree, Disney executives deserve to be investigated and indicted! NBA, RAY DALIO, BIDEN FAMILY, THE CLINTONS, ..... ETC.
1
@kenho-wr5ul2rh7m If you didn't know, your erroneous "whataboutism" is becoming more and more recognized by Americans using social media, far too familiar with the prolific tone of misinformation, vagaries, and treason by PRC China's propaganda campaigns in the US. Gaslighting the naive, ignorant, and gullible, are typically in the form of false equivalency narratives made by foreign agents impersonating Americans, online. You said, "So does US, US detains 911 suspects with a trial or right to speak to a lawyer till now in Guatamala." Your response to my comment looks like the CCP is truly getting desperate, having to resort to poor translation programs they're not checking for accuracy. It's so obvious I won't even bother correcting you.
1
@kenho-wr5ul2rh7m Not even close! DID YOU FORGET WHAT THE WORLD COULD LOOK LIKE TODAY IF GERMANY AND IMPERIAL JAPAN WERE VICTORIOUS IN WW2? CAN YOU IMAGINE WHAT CHINA COULD BE LIKE TODAY WITHOUT BEING LIBERATED BY THE US, BY DEFEATING IMPERIAL JAPAN? False equivalency narratives and influence pedaling has not erased or disguised the CCP'S historically unique criminality to their own citizens. What makes you think attempting the same on Americans will work? There are no AMERICAN citizens in (I'm assuming you meant) Guantanamo (not Guatamala). The National Defense Act is used for times of war against enemy combatants when there's no efficient or safe way to hold trials. Not "anyone can be subjected" to the Patriot Act "for any reason", or without the right to a lawyer. How many acts of terrorism did the people of Hong Kong commit? (They never even truly rioted. And they were viewed as the most organized and peaceful protests the whole world has ever seen. How many Uyghurs are there that already lost their lives from genocide by China's one party ruled government? How many Uyghurs are still being made to disappear in China by them today? When did the US ever make hundreds of human rights lawyers disappear overnight? HOW MANY TIMES HAS THE US GOVERNMENT COMMITTED A TIANANMEN SQUARE STYLE TANK MASSACRE AGAINST TENS OF THOUSANDS OF PEACEFULLY PROTESTING UNARMED CITIZENS? HOW MANY Liu Xiaobos, Li Wenliangs, Peng Shuais, journalists, religious figures, artists, honest party members..... Etc. Have to be made to disappear for trying to protect the people from their own CCP governments maligned corruption?
1
@kamsunleong6648 all of them non citizens and enemy combatants. Not even close to being equivalent.
1
@SimonCU look it up for yourself.
1
@kenho-wr5ul2rh7m they do have access to speak to lawyers in Guantanamo. Many know they're guilty and will be found guilty, so they don't want a trial.
1
@SimonCU that is such a ridiculously obtuse argument in favor of such a draconian "National Security" law. The purpose of this "law", as you agreed, is intended to coerce and instill fear into Hong Kong's population from protesting. It has nothing to do with crime. And from a purely statistical perspective, the crime rate was already low in Hong Kong before the CCP violated their legal agreement with the UK, and took away their freedoms. The corruption and HUMAN RIGHTS violations (to their own constitutions) by the CCP are so renowned, they literally try to excuse them as mere "CULTURAL DIFFERENCES" to the free world. Are such atrocities really a cultural tradition for Han Chinese? I beg to differ. And the people of Taiwan also prove such cultural claims by the CCP to be a tragic fallacy.
1
@pikachus5m166 lol, no. It's not really Hong Kong's law. It's Beijing's. Is Hong Kong a nation? How can it be a national security law if Hong Kong is not a nation?
1
@pikachus5m166 false equivalency is all you have. That's how deplorable governments like North Korea really are. Guess who is their most devout ally? 🇨🇳🩸🇰🇵
1
@pikachus5m166 at this point, it's obvious who the party fears is finding out the truth the most. It's the next self fulfilling prophecy. Then what? The SOVIET UNIONs Communist Authorities will be recognized as having abdicated power peacefully, in stark contrast to the way the CCP planned?
1
THE MORE ACCURATE DESCRIPTION IS, Xi Jinping (Xitler pronounced SHITLER) and Vladimir Putin VS. THE FREE WORLD! how much is the CCP paying you? YOU SHOULD GIVE THE MONEY BACK! CHINA IS BANKRUPT TODAY! You'll be working for food soon! 😂😂😂😂😂
1