Comments by "DEXTER\x27S LURE LAB" (@secretbassrigs) on "Jonathan Haidt: The Case Against Social Media | Lex Fridman Podcast #291" video.

It's enabled by the rampant corporate motivation for profit from increased traffic decidedly derived from discourse by any means, whether unifying or alienating, that is poisoning the well of social and cultural commonality.
7
@passiveaction malevolence vs benevolence. Inferiority Complexes and Self Fulfilling Prophecies vs Self Determination and Empathy. It's so obvious!
5
@passiveaction the psychology of prejudice.
4
@Temerator1 Putin Level is a Nazi level. Hitler would have loved Putin today, considering how Vladimir is more fascist than communist now. Maybe they can be bunkies in hell someday? 🤔 I hope Mao Zedong doesn't get jealous and accuse them of racism.
2
@ropro9817 do you remember what this episode is about?
2
Let's not forget the negative effects being influenced by nefarious origins such as China's influence on Silicone Valley, entertainment and network media. Today is the anniversary of the TIANANMEN SQUARE MASSACRE that happened in China, on June 4th 1989. Check to see how much recognition it gets on today's network news. Remember COVID-19 censored then uncensored. Remember Hunter Biden's laptop being censored then uncensored. Remember Hong Kong and Genocide being normalized by the NBA and other multinational corporations.
1
How much influence have covert foreign influencers, aka shills, had on the skyrocketing of American social discord? How many people know about the foreign government agencies that sponsor it, such as China's internet propaganda brigades, known as "wumao" and "50 centers"?
1
Tribal agendas being forced against diverse identities through psychological coercion. If they can't get you to consent with their nefarious straw man narratives, they try to ruin your credibility through ad hominem attacks. All motivated by the intention to manipulate the subjects definition of morality, ethics and values in favor of the subjugator's narrative of them, not necessarily by their actual beliefs in them.
1
@ropro9817 I really didn't like his interview with Oliver Stone. I felt like I needed to wash my hands after watching that. It's so difficult to really have an honest conversation in public for a public personality. Not just for what you say, but for who you treat as deserving of your interest. Oliver Stone was that guy when he talked about Vladimir Putin's possible motivation for committing war crimes against Ukrainian mothers and Children. It's not the type of convo I enjoy treating with objectively. I always feel dumber and lower as a human being after I do.
1