Comments by "DEXTER\x27S LURE LAB" (@secretbassrigs) on "serpentza"
channel.
-
30
-
28
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
17
-
16
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
11
-
10
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@M3ganwillslay the people of Taiwan definitely do not need China. It is the people of China that desperately need the people of Taiwan to save their Han identities.
So whatever the figure is, we both know it's bad for the people of mainland China as is historically predictable. Let's all do what we can for the innocent. That means talking to our family, friends, and neighbors about what we know, and what they should know. Also, please take a few minutes to write your local congressman about not enabling China through Bill Clinton's China Relations Act.
There are so many laws passed under the Bill Clinton Administration that has made "our" government vulnerable, on so many fronts, to propaganda from Communist China. Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 is also one of them. Social Media platforms are free to profit from the artificial social, cultural, and political discourse that creates profits for them through the artificially induced traffic caused by foreign operatives.
I hope we all know about CHINA being ushered into the WTO by Bill Clinton also. It's where the nefarious economic influence was enabled to become so monstrous and damaging, not only to American values, but also normalized corporate and political corruption in the world.
Actions speak louder than words, and the US Constitution protects the People's right to take action over government, instead of government taking action over the people. When government controls the people, there will always be tyranny. When the people control the government, there will always be FREEDOM!
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@RogerWilco1 US law states if you publicly give permission for others to use your work freely, you've made a legal proclamation. Unless he attempts to change his position, he must do so legally. At this point, it's too late for him to do anything against anyone that used his work, and probably too late to prevent any future usage of anything he'll do, until he makes legal copy right claims correcting his previous free public usage claims.
If he didn't take advantage of claiming copyright protection through YOUTUBE, how can Youtube do anything about it but profit from it themselves? is this really about him becoming rich off the suffering of our mainland people?
He wanted to virtue signal the fact that he's being altruistic, but in reality he complained about it to virtue signal even more.
If he wanted to be smart about looking altruistic with his work, while having some property claims, he should have used a Creative Commons Copyright. It doesn't even cost anything, and all he had to do was mark it CC for it to automatically apply.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1