General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Zach B
Veritasium
comments
Comments by "Zach B" (@zachb1706) on "Veritasium" channel.
Previous
2
Next
...
All
Except for the one that said Pi was 3.2
1
Yes they did, at the start of the video
1
Most hypothesis are incorrect. Think about it, there’s hundreds of explanations for a specific thing, but only 1 is correct
1
Balker Kaler spot on
1
opollo isn’t it at safe levels
1
Ravengenocide chernobyl didn’t have a thermal nuclear explosion
1
The real question is why didn’t any other company with a lot of money pickup the research and make a longer lasting bulb? Just because the big players were conspiring doesn’t mean that every other company is
1
@dmitryloshkov1372 yes there is or no electric circuit would be created.
1
Vaccine testing has a far lower chance if being wrong. The sample size, amount of testing by multiple people, ect all make it far less likely fit a false positive. Not to mention that a lot of countries run their own tests, that have multiple stages and repeat trials. That gives you a far greater amount of certainty
1
It's 1-x Simply as x gets bigger (1-x) gets smaller. This is keeps the rabbit population in check, so it can't fly off to infinity
1
Ok
1
But it will be the sane temperature as the surrounding air as it is left to form an equilibrium
1
He went to university in Sydney
1
The power station sends out AC because it’s more efficient to transport over long range.
1
Where I come from, this isn't taught unless you purposely choose to do physics. Most students don't learn about it
1
There shouldn’t be a system that outright stops them, but more transparency on their past record would help.
1
Huh?
1
@rosstemple7617 what do you mean by “dead space”?
1
The volume of water is not constant, it varies depending on temperature, impurities, and the type of water
1
You can trade as much as you want?
1
@schmetterling4477 no he's right. Neither definition can explain all of the mechanics of light, like how can a light wave travel through a medium?
1
No
1
Yeah it only works for n>50
1
Which is great for us as we only need to know the cumulative probability of all loops of n>50 to determine the chance of success
1
How did you make the assertion that it wasn’t simply caused by the magnetic flux changing? What is the name of the physics law that dictates this “energy transfer”? And if the wire were insulated, would that stop this effect?
1
Aggelos Feanor *30 years ago
1
Probably not permanently, but small exposure should lot be dangerous
1
@Shakespeare1623 yeah but the mass standards have a weight of 1kg. They all diverged by 50 micrograms, meaning they all diverged by 50 parts per billion
1
@starandfox601 I live in Australia, we’re pretty accustomed to heat and have no issue figuring out if it’s hot or cold. 30+ hot 40+ blisteringly hot
1
AndyWitmyer what?
1
It has to be the prisoners number or they might be on the wrong loop
1
Less resistance means greater current, so yeah the electrons will physically move faster through the wire. However the current will still propagate at the speed of light
1
Vladimir Starnov same reason water boils at low pressures, it becomes too hard for the particles to bond together.
1
kg is the standard
1
The reason g is calculated is so it can be substituted out.
1
That does reduce the number of false studies, but it still isn’t perfect
1
Found what to be obvious
1
Prabably custom, or something like mathematica
1
Huh?
1
There is no point. There hasn’t been a point of day trading for a while
1
The physical universe is far more complicated than we know. We can only approximate the truth
1
Well it would either erode away, or we would have some records left over
1
It approaches 0
1
Less precise than what? A 1C temperature difference is almost imperceivable and of your measuring incredibly precise values you'd have to use decimals regardless of Fahrenheit or Celsius
1
Tagman Gangsta I’m pretty sure the levels of radiation are safe around the parts he went
1
We come into constant to radiation all the time, in a sense its not as bad as you think. But yes it’s not safe
1
That’s why it’s based off of atmospheric pressure at sea level. It’s easily reproducible - which it all it needs to be.
1
@Dreamspeak22 your wish has cube true. Since 2019, Celsius has decoupled from the boiling and freezing g point of water - it is now defined by the Boltzmann constant.
1
Previous
2
Next
...
All