Comments by "Zach B" (@zachb1706) on "" video.

  1. Anton Lutey more of a better argument is why people need them in the first place? I’m no gun expert, but I do believe this will make it harder to get a bump stock.
    1
  2. You don’t need them for hunting, it destroys stability. You don’t need it for defence - most of the time you are fighting 1 - 2 targets at short-medium range. Getting bullets on point is key. But a mass shooter does need them. They want quantity over quantity, a quick room clearer. You can’t defend against an attacker that’s spraying ferociously.
    1
  3. It will still be possible, for sure. But less common. Nor will it impact the pros of guns.
    1
  4. There’s a reason America brought in the Automatic Firearms Ban. Full auto, no matter the compromise, should not be legal. You don’t need full auto for hunting, or defence. It might be fun, but is that really worth it. How is someone supposed to defend themselves when a shooter can dispose of a room so quickly? By the way I’m a huge advocate for the Second Amendment.
    1