Comments by "Zach B" (@zachb1706) on "Youtuber Gets 150 Video Takedowns in a Day" video.

  1. The whole copyright and patent process is meant to protect individuals or businesses from having their work stolen. It does protect individuals
    2
  2. Copyright uses the laws where the content was used, so if mark is American he will go through the US legal system with the US definition of copyright
    2
  3. He used songs he didn’t have the rights to
    2
  4. It protects the actual creators of the content, not people who reproduce it.
    2
  5.  @LinkTheFusky  fair use is a civil defence used in copyright infringement lawsuits, you must prove fair use in court for it to be considered exempt Until you prove it in court, you are legally liable for copyright infringement.
    2
  6.  •Doggy style  his intro theme
    1
  7. It only matters where the content was copied, not where it was created. If you live in the US, you are under US copyright law even if you stole Japanese content
    1
  8. They can’t do anything
    1
  9. Doesn’t matter unless mark lives in Japan
    1
  10. Copyright law only considers the country where the content is copied , not where it’s made
    1
  11. Ok
    1
  12. That’s not true, copyright only cares about the jurisdiction of the copier.
    1
  13. They can’t do much
    1
  14.  @librask3009  actually they can’t. YouTube, being a US based corporation in California, is bound to the copyright laws that exist in California. The copyright law in question is the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), which holds YouTube liable for copyrighted content on their platform. They can obtain “safe harbour” status however, which protects them from liability as long as they follow the guidelines set out in the Online Copyright Infringement Liability Limitation Act (OCILLA). In these guidelines it states that if YouTube receives a notice of copyright infringement, that they must immediately remove or restrict access to the content. And as YouTube is based in California, this applies everywhere. If YouTube receives a suitable claim they must remove the content worldwide.
    1
  15. YouTube isn’t at fault here
    1
  16.  @junkid3559  it’s actually up the the government to change copyright law
    1
  17.  @junkid3559  fair use is a legal defence used in court, you must prove that it is fair use in court. You can’t just say it’s fair use
    1
  18. If he lives in the US, then he can claim that the videos were fair use
    1
  19.  @tokidoki3405  it does work that way, copyright law pertains only to the country where the content was copied , not where it was created
    1
  20. What about him
    1
  21. It depends on the country where the content was copied
    1
  22. Ok now you’re just making up shit What law has YouTube broken?
    1
  23.  @LinkTheFusky  they can remove any content on their website for any reason, so they didn’t break a law doing that. And in the case of copyright claims if they don’t take the video down in a timely manner they can be legally liable to the claimant. Just stop talking shit.
    1
  24. Regardless of whether you prove it or not, YouTube still has the right to remove your video. They aren’t even apart of the lawsuit
    1
  25. By becoming the arbiter over copyright infringements, YouTube would forfeit their DMCA safe harbour protection, making them liable for the copyright infringement.
    1