Comments by "" (@pierreollivier1) on "Gemini WONT SHOW C++ To Underage Kids "ITS NOT SAFE"" video.

  1. memory safety not guaranteed, but mental breakdowns are. that should be the mantra of any new C++ standard.
    21
  2. Completely agree with Gemini, no kids should be exposed to that pervert atrocity of a language, let C++ rot to the trash where it belongs, and let's protect our kids mental health from C++, we shall only teach to our youth good language, like C/Zig/Rust/Assembly/Odin/Ocaml. Language where you spend more time writing code, and less time writing 25 buggy constructors just to segfault that smart pointer anyway, where the compiler and the type system are actually helpful and usable (albeit C/Assembly but at least they are not full of over complicated nonsensical crap). Let's our kids enjoy a good build system that actually works and doesn't spit out some time waster trash. We shall prevent our kids from ever having to debug to Templates or glance at.... the..... std code. Our effort should be on educating our kids to be part of helpful positive community that help you grow in your coding skills, and not supporting them into taking part into becoming the evil crowd of pesky douchy pretentious C++ users. Noe we ought to be better than that and Gemini understands that as human we shall move forward from our dirty past, away from C++
    1