Comments by "Paul Gerlach" (@pjhgerlach) on "Anders Puck Nielsen" channel.

  1. Europe should expand it's own nuclear arsenal as the nuclear umbrella from the US seems very faulty. That way invading a European NATO member could give Europe the possibility of a nuclear response. Also the dependency on American weapons should be tackled.
    45
  2.  @praveendreamer  Spoken like the true Russian aggressive expansionist. Full of BS. Remember if Russia uses nukes it will be the last thing they ever did. 😏
    25
  3.  @mickser101  <-- Russian bot. 12 subscribers and no content....
    18
  4. Great video. It all boils down to what we are all saying time and time again. Send more weapons and don't hold back. Make sure Ukraine wins this war so we don't have to fight another in the near future.
    14
  5.  @mahamadoutraore1077  The moment Russia uses nukes China will turn on them. Nothing personal, just business you see. Simply said, nukes are bad for business. And as a reminder we are talking about the use of small tactical nukes in Ukraine. Strategic nukes against the west are out of the question. That would mean the end of Russia. And using nukes in Ukraine would be of no benefit to Russia unless it is because they are desperate to lose the war. Even so in that case NATO will be forced to take a more active role in this conflict. I'm sure Biden made it very clear what the consequences would be. Those aircraft carriers in the Mediterranean sea are not only for Israel.
    9
  6. Yes I remember that Russian add. Europe would freeze without Russian gas. 😂
    6
  7. Restrictions, restrictions... Talk about asymmetric warfare.. 🙄
    5
  8. Ik ben het helemaal met je eens. Boeiend en goed gepresenteerd.
    5
  9.  @misterpinkandyellow74  They've never been higher than now.
    5
  10.  @Lipton16  Its getting more and more realistic. In fact I'm sure that Ukraine's focus is more on Kherson and Crimea than Donbass with a future offensive.
    4
  11. The side that succeeds in destroying the others logistics wins the war in the end.
    4
  12.  @WewasAtamans  Ukraine has huge losses as well. With one difference, they died defending their home, their loved ones. Which cannot be said from the Russians. Heroiam slava!
    3
  13.  @a.brekkan4965  The west also has a doctrine: we will call your bluff. What was that? Empty Russian nuclear threat 412? Threatening the west for something Russia has caused. How hypocritical.
    3
  14. @Notrusbot  The question is: do they have enough fuel to transport their product and can the average Russian (not the ones that live in Moscow or St. Petersburg and claim to be Russian) still pay for it with 30% inflation?
    3
  15. If Russia attacks NATO during the war in Ukraine then nothing keeps us from joining Ukraine in the fight directly.
    3
  16.  @Thewestcoastshooter  A weapon that cannot be used without serious consequences. So these things don't even come into the equation.
    2
  17. Europe needs to rearm!! Big time!! Yesterday!
    2
  18. Well Russians are known for doing stupid things...
    2
  19. Lets not wait and see and start pushing more heavy stuff to Ukraine. Long range missiles so Ukraine can even hit targets while being far from the frontline and hit Crimea. Start training people for M1 and Leopard.
    2
  20. If Russia would attack Finland what would keep us from attacking Russia in a totally different area? Moscow?
    2
  21. The wavering west has essentially forced Ukraine to this invasion.
    2
  22. Biden's strategy is foolish and dangerous and it will only prolong suffering. The USSR collapsed without and big problems for the rest of the world. The Russian federation will eventually collapsed as well. Will Biden follow the same strategy with Taiwan?
    2
  23.  @a.brekkan4965  British and Ukrainian intelligence.
    2
  24.  @WewasAtamans  Except that these fallen soldiers are buried at the spot an reported missing in action as not to have to pay. But you won't hear Russian cheerleaders talk about that.
    2
  25.  @a.brekkan4965  When the other side is trying to exterminate your people then no sacrifice is too high. Even direct involvement of NATO should not be ruled out if Russia is not willing to stop and completely withdraw. But that will not be necessary as Russia will not be able to sustain this war past 2026.
    2
  26.  @evgeniya7853  Those pale compared to Putin's crimes.
    2
  27. It all depends on the mindset of the west. Do we want Ukraine to win? We can out produce Russia tenfold if we want. Why isn't anyone saying that we will support Ukraine until victory instead of the political weak 'as long as it takes'? Why don't we have the balls to stand up to this aggression?
    2
  28. A kinetic attack requires a kinetic answer.
    1
  29. NATO should react with force if even an inch of a member is violated. Russia only respects strength. So Russian aggression should be met with equal if not more force.
    1
  30.  @markbryant4641  Funny, the only one acting hysterical in Russia.😏 I'm sure we'll slap them back to reality. But again, it's all Russian bluff. All bark, no bite. That's why the west should double down on aid for Ukraine.
    1
  31. Would even be better to do it like dd-mm-yyyy just like our numbers are arranged with the highest value on the right side.
    1
  32. If it's not about territory then why annex 4 oblast?
    1
  33. Ukraine is just messing with Russia until it has trained enough forces and the Lend Lease Act comes into play in October. Then the flow of weapons will increase significantly.
    1
  34. Putin wants to repair the Soviet Union as is shown by actions in Moldova, Georgia, Romania, Bulgaria. A pro-Russian government is the same as it being Russian. So it is about territory.
    1
  35.  @dpelpal  We are not laughing about the more than 30,000 war crimes Russia committed.
    1
  36.  @Smiley_McPants  Their 'mishandled' kidnapped spouse moved out and sought protection with NATO.
    1
  37. The East Germans should open there eyes and get over their Stockholm syndrome.
    1
  38. Fat chance that that will happen. And when it will then I just imagine how the Russian get blown up by western weapons when I take my cold shower.
    1
  39.  @a.brekkan4965  What's the price of freedom?
    1
  40.  @a.brekkan4965  If Russia can get it's missiles of the platform. 😏Besides, Ukraine is not Russian territory so the Russian doctrine is very clear about nuclear weapons.
    1
  41.  @a.brekkan4965  The US has made that commitment. But if China would attack the US being a NATO member then all bets are off.
    1
  42. @HumanResourceR1a  Strange, then why sign a contract for the meat grinder? Good luck. We know that the real inflation is about 20% and not 8%.
    1
  43.  @HumanResourceR1a  Criminals tend to stick together.
    1
  44.  @NDJ1978  We all know that's just Russian BS. Russia has nukes so the 'threat' of NATO is just propaganda. The real reason is expansion of the Russian empire. That's why all the former occupied East European countries wanted NATO membership.
    1
  45. Russia knows what the reaction from the U.S. will be if they use nuclear weapons in Ukraine. It will have serious consequences for the Russian troops in Ukraine.
    1
  46. They should be.
    1