Comments by "BHARATH CHANDRAN, JUST REMVER THAT" (@Your-god150) on "World of Antiquity" channel.

@UmairSajid "Every country has good and bad pts.." See yes I agree. But the question is is paxtan a country? If it was then how was imran Khan thrown out by USA? Who votes the pm of paxtan is it usa or paxtan awaaaams? See basically paxtan was created on basis of "hate" against Hindus just because your Quran brainwashed you = bitter truth which you will not accept but I can debate it proof that your Quran brainwash you against Hindus and infidels that's a different topic to be discussed in different argument. Paxtsn was not taken, it was gifted to you by india. Today we dont want it back. You keep it. We dont want it back even if you give it back for free. Paxtan had better economy than India till 1979. In 1979 paxtans Islamic jingoism wanted Afghanistan ruled by paxtani puppet ie Taliban and you helped Taliban take over Afghanistan eyeing India. Ever since 1979 paxtans economic growth went down the hill. "Hillary Clinton: you cannot expect peace in your own home if you nurture snakes in your backyard and think it would only hurt your neibhour and not you" Then ossama issue 9/11 US helped psxtan financially and that was the last golden chance for paxtan to rebuild your economy by clearing up terrorism in your house. But paxtsn continued to accept US money not for your development but just to hurt India and today you are a failure. Then shamelessly you are giving lectures about human rights?😏
1
@UmairSajid today India india is in a position to even save Russia from swift sanctions. But China itself can do it. But indias position is that. USA cannot command indias foreign policies like they command paxtsn and throw out paxtani pm and appoint favorable paxtani PM. If USA sanctions India then USA will only suffer not India because the US markets in India would collapse. Imran Khan a fool is going and demanding alms. A beggar cannot demand but imran Khan crossed his limits. He is showing jayshankar video to paxtan awaaams and dreaming to have somebody like him in his cabinet and fooling an already foolish paxtsn awaaams. Because without having power in the world how can you go and dictate your terms your foreign policies to the world like India is able to do it?
1
@GaneshPalraj1991 it seems like that their whole idea behind this aryan invasion propoganda was to remove fascism. Fascism seen mostly abrahamic culture not hindu bhuddhist jain Sikhs. They might have thought Hinduism have fascism too so they trying to propagate their version of history. Their idea is destory all religion. In India they want to finish hindu cultural influence in west they want to remove abrahamic influence. In middle east Islam. But in British rule time they propagated this theory in order to spread abrahamic influece in India. So they divided india north south, minority majorty, stimulated castes division, linguistic division etc.
1
@brucetucker4847 there is no proof th vedas took ideas from prevedic era to claim it is "inevitable". So far all those theories that states vedic ideas came from outside to India did not have consistency, they kept on changing claims made for eg from invasion to peaceful migration, from Tamil being most ancient language predating sanskrit to sanskrit older than Tamil and Greek older than sanskrit, it look like a naratives being framed to suit certain group/ culture alone. Whereas the counter theory had consistency banked on same concept that vedas originated in India and sanskrit predates all languages. It is possible the vedic Indians went outside and spread sanskrit there according to the counter theory.
1
@someone-w9n there is nothing called "draviduan religion". It is vedic only. Because they worshiped vedic gods. Even the worship of surya the sun God is tamiz festival called pongal. Surya karthikeya are all vedic gods only. No proof to claim "assimilation"
1
@GaneshPalraj1991 this AIT itself was a propoganda created under britush rule period. At that time their idea was to use that theory to promote seperatist activities to weaken hindu culture by division and promote abrahamic beliefs into India. But now that same theory is mitigated into "migration theory". And now it seems like they are using it to uproot not only hindu culture alone but all culture from all countries. Their motive besides doing this seems like for good reason ie to demotivate fascism. But in eastern philosophies like hindu bhuddhist jain there is no fascism in it unlike the middle eastern and western European abrahamic culture it's full of fascism. In fact wherever they went they used cannons and forces to suppress local and spread their alien culture.
1
@someone-w9n what you saying is on basis of no evidence. Bhuddist emerged from vedas ( hindu philosophy). So is jains and Sikhs. Sikhism assimilated some Islam but root is hindu philosophy only. Guru nanak was born of hindu parents. Bhuddha was born of hindu parents. All of us 4 hindu bhuddhist jain Sikhs all of us have the concept of om kara. Om symbol emerged in vedas first. All the 3 philosophies ie bhuddhist jain Sikhs have the hindu concept of karma dharma moksha artha kama etc all the 3 have the concept of hindu calendar year ie the yugams ie ages 1) satya 2) treta 3) dwapara 4 kali. All emerged from hindu philosophy and developed into independent new philosophies.
1
@brucetucker4847 not you but those AIT historians first told Tamil is older than sanskrit and greek and now they themselves saying greek is oldest and that sanskrit came from greek so sanskrit is older than Tamil. Thus they were not consistent in their various claims. The mahabartha itself is dated to somewhere around 3000 bce. But the European historians dated vedic age as 1500 bce which is false because vedic age predates mahabartha by more than 5000 years. Vedas came first whereas mahabartha is during krishnas time which is much later.
1