Comments by "BHARATH CHANDRAN, JUST REMVER THAT" (@Your-god150) on "Are \"Aryans\" Indigenous to India? The Archaeological Evidence" video.

*Aryans came from outside India is actually far left politcs and pseudo history
45
 @henk3202 you are right but in WhatsApp univ 😂
23
All languages in India have sanskrit influence. The term dravidian is not a race. It is direction. Aryans is not right word. It is aryavartha. Indians are aryavartha.
18
@human3213 india have mixture of all color
7
@GaneshPalraj1991 tamil itself is pure vedic culture. The tamiz God murugan is vedic ( karthikeya). Devas are god only. What do you mean it has nothing to do with Shiva and vishnu? Both are there in vedas also.
6
@jagatsimulation baduga is caste in Tamil tribe. Dravida means geographical south and not a race.
3
@jagatsimulation "draviduan" is a concept created by British and carried forward by dmk dk the British stooge. It was around the same period the kgaliatan movement all started in India. How Come all seperatist movement started around same period under britush?
3
@someone-w9n *gita is history book only.It is part of mahabartha.
2
@human3213 Krishna color description is sun rise cloud color with rainbearing in it. That color is color of Krishna according to description.
2
@someone-w9n far right is not racism. Far left is more racist il tell you why. Far right in India tries to preserve indigenous culture whereas far left in indus tries to destroy indigenous culture. So which is fascist? You are projecting your abrahamic mind set upon the peaceful vedic philosophies actually.
2
@GizzyDillespee 1) gita do not talk about Bollywood. It is history because it is a chapter of mahabaratha unlike bible. 2) description of Krishna arjuna,.see your mindset itself is very racist. You need to come out of the idea that Indians were inferior in looks and only Europeans were superior. The food they ate the atmosphere and age they lived and all are are completely different from now. 8000 years ago Europeans were dark according to studies so should we conclude Europeans were Indians based on their appearances? You make no sense.
2
@someone-w9n gita is part of mahabartha. That's history. 3024 bce means history. How is that story? Bible may be story because it was written 1st 3rd century ad after death of jesus. But mahabaratha is recorded during the time of Krishna.
2
@someone-w9n "everyone knows that" who is this "everyone"? You assuming this yourself. You are not everyone. Now world is more going towards right.
2
Elam? Entire Indian subcontinent worshiped vedic gods. So there is no absurdity in the claim of vedic Indians.
2
@jagatsimulation dmk dk both bats for English in tamiz nadu. Here you are posing like the need to promote indigenous language huh? You praising China? China suppressed 64 culture in China and imposed mandrian. But here in tamiz nadu you guys are killing tamiz culture by weaponizing the language to promote abrahamic philosophies. What your dmk does today, many years ago the british did.
1
@someone-w9n right is always more progressive than left. Examples are China Japan Singapore all developed under right. Left is about wiping history and bringing woke activities which will become detrimental to countries growth itself.
1
@GaneshPalraj1991 it seems like that their whole idea behind this aryan invasion propoganda was to remove fascism. Fascism seen mostly abrahamic culture not hindu bhuddhist jain Sikhs. They might have thought Hinduism have fascism too so they trying to propagate their version of history. Their idea is destory all religion. In India they want to finish hindu cultural influence in west they want to remove abrahamic influence. In middle east Islam. But in British rule time they propagated this theory in order to spread abrahamic influece in India. So they divided india north south, minority majorty, stimulated castes division, linguistic division etc.
1
@brucetucker4847 there is no proof th vedas took ideas from prevedic era to claim it is "inevitable". So far all those theories that states vedic ideas came from outside to India did not have consistency, they kept on changing claims made for eg from invasion to peaceful migration, from Tamil being most ancient language predating sanskrit to sanskrit older than Tamil and Greek older than sanskrit, it look like a naratives being framed to suit certain group/ culture alone. Whereas the counter theory had consistency banked on same concept that vedas originated in India and sanskrit predates all languages. It is possible the vedic Indians went outside and spread sanskrit there according to the counter theory.
1
@someone-w9n there is nothing called "draviduan religion". It is vedic only. Because they worshiped vedic gods. Even the worship of surya the sun God is tamiz festival called pongal. Surya karthikeya are all vedic gods only. No proof to claim "assimilation"
1
@GaneshPalraj1991 this AIT itself was a propoganda created under britush rule period. At that time their idea was to use that theory to promote seperatist activities to weaken hindu culture by division and promote abrahamic beliefs into India. But now that same theory is mitigated into "migration theory". And now it seems like they are using it to uproot not only hindu culture alone but all culture from all countries. Their motive besides doing this seems like for good reason ie to demotivate fascism. But in eastern philosophies like hindu bhuddhist jain there is no fascism in it unlike the middle eastern and western European abrahamic culture it's full of fascism. In fact wherever they went they used cannons and forces to suppress local and spread their alien culture.
1
@someone-w9n what you saying is on basis of no evidence. Bhuddist emerged from vedas ( hindu philosophy). So is jains and Sikhs. Sikhism assimilated some Islam but root is hindu philosophy only. Guru nanak was born of hindu parents. Bhuddha was born of hindu parents. All of us 4 hindu bhuddhist jain Sikhs all of us have the concept of om kara. Om symbol emerged in vedas first. All the 3 philosophies ie bhuddhist jain Sikhs have the hindu concept of karma dharma moksha artha kama etc all the 3 have the concept of hindu calendar year ie the yugams ie ages 1) satya 2) treta 3) dwapara 4 kali. All emerged from hindu philosophy and developed into independent new philosophies.
1
@brucetucker4847 not you but those AIT historians first told Tamil is older than sanskrit and greek and now they themselves saying greek is oldest and that sanskrit came from greek so sanskrit is older than Tamil. Thus they were not consistent in their various claims. The mahabartha itself is dated to somewhere around 3000 bce. But the European historians dated vedic age as 1500 bce which is false because vedic age predates mahabartha by more than 5000 years. Vedas came first whereas mahabartha is during krishnas time which is much later.
1