General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
BHARATH CHANDRAN, JUST REMVER THAT
NDTV
comments
Comments by "BHARATH CHANDRAN, JUST REMVER THAT" (@Your-god150) on "10 Soldiers Including 4 Officers Released By Chinese Army After Talks" video.
ย @tk9060ย 1) Hindustan Times 2) ndtv 3) India today 4) cnnibn 5) wire 6) news scroll have all report same story copy one another. They are tied up to leftist political parties. All these channels told congress will win 2019 and finally bjp won. So I lost hopes in all these channels . These are the list of channels that showed fake crowd favoring congress win 2019. But when results came it's again bjp winning ( instances when these channels lied blatently) Only times now have reported 30 pla soldiers demise. But then they took it from whatsup therefore fake. Next day even 'times-now' reported 10 indian soldiers released by citing from the above news channels. When you copy another news report then that report is not reliable source of information. Actual source of information is indian army report itself: they told nobody held in captive. "Wion-news" told there are uncertain number of soldiers taken into hostage! but next day after indian army confirmed ( no hostage), wion rectified their earlier news and declared no hostage taken, after confirming from indian army and also Chinese foreign minister. Neither did Chinese source report any hostage release immediately before these indian news sources report. ANI report states : 43 pla causality ( wounded and death) and their sources = "Chinese intercept" US intelligence report = 35 pla demise including 1 senior officer. My questions 1) why did Chinese media not report the release immediately if this is release is really true? the world will only appreciate China for good will ( if this release is really true) and china could remove huge burdens of criticism off of shoulder. Then why did China not report the news ( if the news was really true)? 2) if this is secret deal then why is this media reporting it? ๐ 3) if this is sensitive deal then how did indian govt have guts to go on with cancellation of all Chinese business in india amidst border tension and sensitive negotiation? ๐ค๐ค๐ค
4
Fake. Indian army officially told no indian soldiers were taken to custody. One news channel spread a fake news and thst circulated to other news channels is the reality. None of the sources in China too supports this story "10 indian soldiers held in captive"
3
ย @tk9060ย yaaaaarkita! ๐คจ..Sangam di!โ๏ธ
2
Fake. Indian army officially told no indian soldiers were taken to custody on the night of clash. One news channel took it from another media and it spread to other media.
1
ย @rashid4779ย none of the international source said what you claim. Where are the sources?
1
๐
1
Fake. Indian army officially told no indian soldiers were taken to custody.
1