Comments by "BHARATH CHANDRAN, JUST REMVER THAT" (@Your-god150) on "Russia ups its offensive against Ukraine, Kyiv says 'battle for Donbas has begun' | Latest News" video.

@thelxesly no no no that is an irrelevant question you asking. If I may suggest a relevant question = why is the comedian president of Ukraine killing those innocent civilians of ukraine by playing pro US intest in russian border if you remember the promise signed by both US and Russia during that Cuba crisis 1960s?🤔
10
@renemartin5729 "india obeys Washington by buying Russian oil" -Washington DC.
7
@jamesmorrow1646 india went deep into paxtan and butchered all the USA weapons the US supplied to paxtan in all wars. So no question if surrender.☝️🥳
6
@neevgrover007 hi virodhee. 🙋‍♂️
4
@renemartin5729 washintons next order to India will be indo-sino-Russo alliance. Washington will be pleased to know India obeying Washington's marching order.☝️🥳🥳🥳🥳
3
@christophermanabat1934 and why are you laughing at your own jokes? 🤔
3
@christophermanabat1934 eastward expansion into russian border?
3
@christophermanabat1934 why are still laughing? Would you like to give me whatever you smoking so that even I can join you and laugh please?🤔🤔🤔
3
@christophermanabat1934 forget 1990 reunification agreement fine. Then what about the expression NATO? NATO is living with same expression principles thus the USSR is automatically living till now.🤷‍♂️
2
@christophermanabat1934 I'm not assuming anything. USA themselves did not destroy the Soviet union by keeping alive the nato. NATO was formed in written agreement to counter USSR. Even half of the Soviet union gone means renaming half is still there. You just telling like "I cut the snake into 2 halves leaving the head". But body will regenerate and grow. You did a terrible mistake that you let the wounded tiger live which will cost you.🤦‍♂️
2
@TorianTammas forget the agreement. NATO is still there. NATO was formed to counter Soviet union and it is still countering😂
2
@christophermanabat1934 no. My point is NATO was formed to counter USSR. But now USSR is no more, then why is NATO still in existence + expanding? So this means USSR is still in existence and have started to expand. See now they going to fully occupy Ukraine. Now they gave warning to Finland also. Nobody will stop that. US is bringing back USSR.
2
@christophermanabat1934 I completely 99.99% agree with you but .09% I disagree because since NATO members chose not to disband, ussr also chose not to give up. Unfortunately .09% is going to become in effect and that is what happening in ukrain now.
2
@krishnapole5282 Bobby's world = ✔ if you wikipedia what is let's go Brandon.
2
@christophermanabat1934 yes but that was a reaction by russia invade ukraine because US breached the first promise cuba crisis treaty☝️🥳🥳🥳🥳
1
@christophermanabat1934 your logic is ussr collapsed so no need for usa to agree to Russian federation demand? Ok let's go by your logic, if thats the case why is NATO still expanding if ussr collapsed? Then nato should also stop expanding isnt it? You gave verbal promises to the USSR and now you cheating how fair? If nato is not collapsed then USSR is still in existence because nato was formed to counter USSR by written agreement. It seems the USSR were more open and willing to trust the USA in goodwill and in return all what the USA did was a back stab exactly like as usual. 🤷‍♂️
1
@christophermanabat1934 If that's the case the Soviets have rights to get back their lost territories because of breach of trust.
1
@christophermanabat1934 Budapest agreement is in 1992 I think. But reunification of germany agreement happens in 1991 as per google sources. Okai. Now 1991 agreement is breached by USA after 1991 where the ussr agreed to let states reunification with Germany yes? So if this 1991 agreement is breached by USA then automatically the 1992 agreement becomes null and void!☝️🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳🥳
1
@christophermanabat1934 well usa itself turned ussr collapse into a choice by breach of agreement. Breach of agreement = 1) nato still living under same expression "nato" without dissolution. 2) and continuous expansion of that NATO not just once or twice but more that 3 times!☝️😊
1
@christophermanabat1934 no no no no. You are wrong. Because👇 👉there is a written agreement that NATO was formed to counter USSR. So now if according to you ussr is dead means then the expression NATO must also die. Otherwise USSR is was and till NATO expression and rules get revised till then USSR in existence. 👉russia before signing or letting or accepting the German territory reunification, they took the verbal promise in goodwill. So usa has breached a written agreement + a verbal agreement that russia has taken it in goodwill. Therefore the USSR ( russian federation. Because ussr is still in existence because NATO expression as in agreement is not yet changed ) is perfectly right in doing what they are doing now. ☝️🥳
1
@christophermanabat1934 "US did cause the collapse of USSR" is not the point of this discussion here. That is another topic to argue.☝️🥳
1
*ruble
1