Comments by "BHARATH CHANDRAN, JUST REMVER THAT" (@Your-god150) on "Times Of India" channel.

  1. Just minding own business
    2
  2.  @jimorr5580  from river to sea to sky it was isreal.
    2
  3. How many people?🤔
    1
  4. What? Really?
    1
  5. Russia is only responding to us interference. So Russia not.
    1
  6. That's a suicidal message😂
    1
  7. What else would the US want? Kenya too is a US colony only.
    1
  8. Russia is having hypersonic missile tech ready to launch since atleast 2017. In 2019 they made it official. Usa did not have back in time and yet still they dont have one hypersonic ready to be used and whatecer they tested have all failed. Then with what guts do they want to go mess up with Russia i was wondering. 🤔
    1
  9. Netanyahu must be given noble peace award in india.
    1
  10.  @kmasif164  "I was born as a Hindu but i will not die as a Hindu..." this is far better than 😖👇 "To the Muslims, a Hindu is a Kaffir. A Kaffir is not worthy of respect. He is low-born and without status. That is why a country that is ruled by a Kaffir is Dar-ul-Harb to a Musalman. Given this, no further evidence seems to be necessary to prove that the Muslims will not obey a Hindu government. The basic feelings of deference and sympathy, which predispose persons to obey the authority of government, do not simply exist. But if a proof is wanted, there is no dearth of it. It is so abundant that the problem is what to tender and what to omit…In the midst of the Khilafat agitation, when the Hindus were doing so much to help the Musalmans, the Muslims did not forget that as compared with them the Hindus were a low and an inferior race,”
    1
  11.  @kmasif164  zakir naik advocates his followers to consume camel's dongue 🤲😖
    1
  12.  @kmasif164  joker naik advocates his misalmaaan followers to take 🐫's dongue.🤲😖
    1
  13.  @kmasif164  what is common sense choose only 1 best option from below👇 A) Islamophobia B) loose motion C) suicide.
    1
  14.  @kmasif164  venomous way"? For eg what ambedkar told I quoted here how is that venomous? Then musalmaaan maulanas issued fatwa against Abdul Kalam ( the one whom yall bring up as a defence to prove Islam is peaceful) just because he has feast in a hindu temple after inauguration is a fact to understand Islam is incompatible to non Islamic nation. Had Abdul kalam been born in Pakistan means they wouldve got him killed exactly like higher toxic abdoools finish off lesser abdools in Pakistan and other Islamic states in name of Islamic caste just like it happens in Islamic states. First you force convert all religion into Islam then yall start fighting internally by trying to prove only your caste Islam is more pure than other caste Islam. "Mob lynch tourists in Pakistan swat burns him alive" this happened yesterday Similar example : farkunda malikzada of Afghanistan. Followers have dont have any other works other than fighting and killing. Islam cannot survive without fighting and doing violence. You may say Islam was fastest growing once upon a time but even rabies spread faster ( quality is not always quantity)
    1
  15.  @kmasif164  venomous way"? For eg what ambedkar told I quoted here how is that venomous? Then musalmaaan maulanas issued fatwa against Abdul Kalam ( the one whom yall bring up as a defence to prove Islam is peaceful) just because he has feast in a hindu temple after inauguration is a fact to understand Islam is incompatible to non Islamic nation. Had Abdul kalam been born in Pakistan means they wouldve got him killed exactly like higher toxic abdoools finish off lesser abdools in Pakistan and other Islamic states in name of Islamic caste just like it happens in Islamic states. First you force convert all religion into Islam then yall start fighting internally by trying to prove only your caste Islam is more pure than other caste Islam. "Mob lynch tourists in Pakistan swat burns him alive" this happened yesterday Similar example : farkunda malikzada of Afghanistan.
    1
  16.  @captain._levi  check out the video on zakir naik : Using camel urineandmilk as a cure.
    1
  17.  @captain._levi  checkout video on zakir naik : Using camelurine&milk as a cure.
    1
  18.  @captain._levi  watchvideo of zakir naik : Using camelurine&milk as a cure.
    1
  19.  @captain._levi  watch that video of zakirnaik, using camilurne & milk as cure
    1
  20.  @captain._levi  see what zakirnaikvideo says about camlurin+itsmilk as cure
    1
  21.  @captain._levi  look what zakir naik tells in his video
    1
  22.  @tribhuvanraj1180  without knowing reality how will you develop? Development starts with curbing terrorism. Without putting your house in order you cannot develop.
    1
  23.  @kmasif164  "is Ambedkar god?..1935 US supreme court honoured Prophet Muhammad" Was US supreme court God in 1935?🤔
    1
  24.  @kmasif164  "2000 years of oppression accepted by Mohan Bhagavat" Do you accept his description on Islam's oppression world wide?🤔
    1
  25.  @kmasif164  "Sudhir Chaudhary himself did a show on.. Pew Research data...15 lakh converted in Islam in 5 years verses 30k in Hinduism" *pew research data status "nearly 30,000 Indian adults, very few said they had switched religions since childhood. In fact, 99% of adults who were raised Hindu are still Hindu....0.7% were raised Hindu but no longer identify as such, and 0.8% were raised outside of the religion and are now Hindu." Unquote This means .7 left Hinduism but .8% from outside Hinduism became Hindus. This is official data proving hindu religion growing and Islam is reducing officially 👉"fact, 99% of adults who were raised Hindu are still Hindu. Among those raised as Muslims, 97% are still Muslim as adults" unquote 1% Hindu adult left Hinduism whereas 3% musalmaaans left Islam. Sudhir did talk about "illegal conversion" that's not pew reseach data. That's illegal conversion which was further inquiry was orderd also gharwapasi movement is bringing them back to Hinduism. Islam fastest growing is not true anymore but used to be truth once.
    1
  26.  @kmasif164  "Ambedkar did not remain a Hindu because he faced reality of Hinduism." Ok. Did he convert into Islam?🤔
    1
  27.  @kmasif164  "And many of the Lower caste are still facing peaceful nature" Thats truth. Musalmaaan countries never recognize refugees of other musalmaan states because Shia caste vs sunni caste vs ahamadhiyas caste etc all think only each of them are pure musalmaaan and others are lower caste musalmaaan. A Bangladeshiman was shot dead by sheik of Saudi Arabia only because he trespassed into sheikh's garden without permission. Converts of India-pak-bangladesh are treated as 2nd and 3rd class civilians in upper caste muslamaan nations like Saudi Arabia. They dont even consider yall as musalmaans. Still tall try to pretend like more pure musalmaaan than actual pure original musalmaaan of middle east. This is the reason the duplicate convertmusalmaans of pak india and Bangladesh got paranoid when smrithi irani was given party in mecca.
    1
  28.  @kmasif164  "then prove those maulanas wrong by asking vegetarian....participate in Eid...." Have you seen any vegetarian org protesting against other vegetarians for participating in non hindu religious festival feast like musalmaaans does everywhere?
    1
  29. ​ @steveb890 the US is merely overeating themselves. You can't match Russia is truth so you use ukrain as your shield to test what power has with Russia.
    1
  30.  @peacekeeper4654  it does not make sense. 6000 years ago my ancestors lived in afganistan till Persia were all bharatha so if today india wants to reclaim all our lost property means and we keep sending rockets Into Afghanistan Iran means it doesn't make sense.
    1
  31.  @peacekeeper4654  also hamas must stop sending rockets into isreal and stop demanding that land. It's so stupid some 50 years over creation of isreal. Isreal ie not asking back Palestine land but it is the Palestine demanding the isreali land.
    1
  32.  @subysb9616  it's true that everyone is entitled to their own opinion like you blamed that "what'saapuniv A" sorces while you yourselves stay in "whatsaap univ B" just because it favors you some points. So historicity should not be weighed on merits of "favoritism" rather through critical observations and rational decisions based of reasoning alone it should be weighed. Kandhahar used to be kingdom of kandhari a prominent figure of hindu epic mahabaratha which is always there if you know the hindu epic but we are not asking it back. Idea of isreal is done back before 70 years ago or may be even more. Now it's over, now it doesnt make sense to claim back that land with an excuse that it was Palestine before isreal because that will also invoke war so dont ask back thus the problem solved. Im not asking you to give afganistan to India or isreal to Palestine because we dont want war. See but if you want to isreal to be given to and if you want to go back to history then go into the beginning and dont just go to medieval history and stop there to prove a point that favors your reasons and opinion alone instead if you are going to history then go to the earlier stages and weigh history from there to prevent any bias.
    1
  33.  @subysb9616  it's true that everyone is entitled to their own opinion like you blamed that "what'saapuniv A" sorces while you yourselves stay in "whatsaap univ B" just because it favors you some points. So historicity should not be weighed on merits of "favoritism" rather through critical observations and rational decisions based of reasoning alone it should be weighed. Kandhahar used to be kingdom of kandhari a prominent figure of hindu epic mahabaratha which is always there if you know the hindu epic but we are not asking it back did we? No. Idea of isreal is done back before 70 years ago or may be even more. Now it's over, now it doesnt make sense to claim back that land with an excuse that it was Palestine before isreal, problem solved. See but if you want isreal become Palestine by going into history then go into the beginning and dont just go to medieval history and stop there to prove a point that favors your reasons and opinion alone instead if you are going to history then go to the earlier stages and weigh history from there to prevent any bias.
    1
  34.  @subysb9616  it's true that everyone is entitled to their own opinion like you blamed about some "what'saapuniv A" sorces while you yourselves a member of your favourite "whatsaap univ B" source. So historicity should not be weighed on merits of "favoritism" rather through critical observations and rational decisions based of reasoning alone it should be weighed. Kandhahar used to be kingdom of kandhari a prominent figure of hindu epic mahabaratha which is always there if you know the hindu epic but we are not asking it back did we? No.
    1
  35.  @subysb9616  Idea of isreal is done back before 70 years ago or may be even more. Now it's over, now it doesnt make sense to claim back that land with an excuse that it was Palestine earlier before isreal, problem solved. See but if you want isreal become Palestine by going into history then go into the beginning of history and dont just go to medieval history to stop there just to prove a point that favors your reasons and opinion alone instead if you are going to history then go to the earlier stages and weigh history from there to prevent any bias.
    1
  36.  @subysb9616  in simplest words your views about isreal are liberal sources but you use conservative sources to favor your opinion and your agenda alone. That's why my reply first get rid of "WhatsApp univ source B" if you want to complain against "WhatsApp univ source A". Now dont reply me back if you have no job ( avoiding to you those who give back reply in you tube are jobless so same logic)
    1
  37.  @sherikoyoshizaki-47  my point is only musalmaaans are asking isreal land back thinking that it was Islamic land in history. So you pull up history means musalmaans will get defeated due to the fact that the kingdom of judha existed in history before Islamic rule and before birth of Palestine. So dont pull up history and get yourselves into trouble. That's my point. Native Americans did not pull up history and claim back their land from existing Americans then who are you to talk on behalf of native Americans are their mouth piece? No. If suppose native Americans also starts going into history to claim back America then one by one eventually everybody will start doing it which will eventually put musalmaans ownership to land of middle east in question and then they will have to step out of middle east and stand in a no mans land because Islam is medieval to middle east not ancient. So do not pull history and land yourself in a question mark. You have an entire big mass of middle east in giant green color so shut and be contented with that but the problem with those musalmaans is they want to wipe out that .1% blue color and make it green citing medieval period history but this is like cutting the end of your own branch where you yourself is sitting over because pulling history will be suicidal for musalmaans so keep quite and mind your own business.
    1
  38.  @sherikoyoshizaki-47  my point is only musalmaaans are asking isreal land back thinking that it was Islamic land in history. So you pull up history means musalmaans will get defeated due to the fact that the kingdom of judha existed in history much before Islamic& Palestine history. So dont pull up history and get yourselves into trouble. That's my point. See Native Americans did not pull up history and claim back their land from existing Americans then who are you to talk on behalf of native Americans are you their mouth piece? No. If suppose native Americans also starts going into history to claim back America then one by one eventually everybody will start doing it which will eventually put musalmaans ownership to land in middle east itself big question and then they will have to step out of middle east and stand in a no mans land because Islam is medieval to middle east not ancient. So do not pull up history and land up yourself in a big question mark. You have an entire big mass of middle east with giant green color so be contented with that but the problem is they want to wipe out that .1% blue color also and make it into green color citing medieval period history but that will be like cutting the end of your own branch where you yourself are sitting over.
    1
  39.  @subysb9616  I'm a tamiz from Tamiz naad. I dont have problem with musalmaan. I just told the truth that they better not claim territories based on history. If they do they will only loose. Aryan draviduan politcs is put to rest there no evidence of any aryan invasion. Moreover the aryan invasion theorists themselves have ruled out tamiz older than sanskrit theory recently. Aryan draviduan is a divisive/hate politics propagated by British and carried forward by ev ramaswamy the so called periyar which is based of "hate politcs" so you should be standing before mirror when you blame hate politcs. I myself am an ex musalmaan. The username jaibheem musalmaan was inspired from do you know who? I'm sure you know it is br Ambedkar the father of Indian constitution (maker and the one who criticized caste of hindu philosophy) described Islam in the following way 👉"Hinduism is said to divide people and in contrast, Islam is said to bind people together. This is only a half-truth. For Islam divides as inexorably as it binds. Islam is a close corporation and the distinction that it makes between Muslims and non-Muslims is a very real, very positive and very alienating distinction. The brotherhood of Islam is not the universal brotherhood of man. It is a brotherhood of Muslims for Muslims only. There is a fraternity, but its benefit is confined to those within that corporation. For those who are outside the corporation, there is nothing but contempt and enmity," br Ambedkar-division of India
    1
  40.  @subysb9616  I'm a tamiz from Tamiz naad. I dont have problem with musalmaan. I just told the truth that they better not claim territories based on history. If they do they will only loose. Aryan draviduan politcs is put to rest there no evidence of any aryan invasion. Moreover the aryan invasion theorists themselves have ruled out tamiz older than sanskrit theory recently. Aryan draviduan is a divisive/hate politics propagated by British and carried forward by ev ramaswamy the so called periyar which is based of "hate politcs" so you should be standing before mirror when you blame hate politcs. I myself am an ex musalmaan.
    1
  41.  @subysb9616  I gave up Islam in 2013. I'm still a musalmaan for name sake religion but a hindu by faith secretly. Every Friday noon I tell my boss that I have to go jammath and I tell my parents that my boss did not allow me to go for prayer and go roam outside.
    1
  42.  @subysb9616  My username jaibheem musalmaan was inspired from br Ambedkar the father of Indian constitution (maker and the one who criticized caste of hindu philosophy) described Islam in the following way 👇 👉"Hinduism is said to divide people and in contrast, Islam is said to bind people together. This is only a half-truth. For Islam divides as inexorably as it binds. Islam is a close corporation and the distinction that it makes between Muslims and non-Muslims is a very real, very positive and very alienating distinction. The brotherhood of Islam is not the universal brotherhood of man. It is a brotherhood of Muslims for Muslims only. There is a fraternity, but its benefit is confined to those within that corporation. For those who are outside the corporation, there is nothing but contempt and enmity," 👈br Ambedkar-division of India Hate is already in Islam. I'm not telling this instead the comstitution maker himself told this.
    1
  43.  @subysb9616  My username jaibheem musalmaan was inspired from br Ambedkar the father of Indian constitution (maker and the one who criticized caste of hindu philosophy) described Islam in the following way 👇 👉"Hinduism is said to divide people and in contrast, Islam is said to bind people together. This is only a half-truth. For Islam divides as inexorably as it binds. Islam is a close corporation and the distinction that it makes between Muslims and non-Muslims is a very real, very positive and very alienating distinction. The brotherhood of Islam is not the universal brotherhood of man. It is a brotherhood of Muslims for Muslims only. There is a fraternity, but its benefit is confined to those within that corporation. For those who are outside the corporation, there is nothing but contempt and enmity," 👈br Ambedkar-division of India
    1
  44.  @subysb9616  My username jaibheem musalmaan was inspired from br Ambedkar the father of Indian constitution and according to him👇 👉"Hinduism is said to divide people and in contrast, Islam is said to bind people together. This is only a half-truth. For Islam divides as inexorably as it binds. Islam is a close corporation and the distinction that it makes between Muslims and non-Muslims is a very real, very positive and very alienating distinction. The brotherhood of Islam is not the universal brotherhood of man. It is a brotherhood of Muslims for Muslims only. There is a fraternity, but its benefit is confined to those within that corporation. For those who are outside the corporation, there is nothing but contempt and enmity," 👈br Ambedkar-division of India
    1
  45.  @subysb9616  My username jaibheem musalmaan was inspired from br Ambedkar the father of Indian constitution and according to him👇 👉"Hinduism is said to divide people and in contrast, Islam is said to bind people together. This is only a half-truth. For Islam divides as inexorably as it binds. Islam is a close corporation and the distinction that it makes between Muslims and non-Muslims is a very real, very positive and very alienating distinction. The brotherhood of Islam is not the universal brotherhood of man. It is a brotherhood of Muslims for Muslims only. There is a fraternity, but its benefit is confined to those within that corporation. For those who are outside the corporation, there is nothing but contempt and enmity," 👈br Ambedkar-division of India
    1
  46.  @subysb9616  My username jaibheem musalmaan was inspired from br Ambedkar and according to him,👇 👉"Hinduism is said to divide people and in contrast, Islam is said to bind people together. This is only a half-truth. For Islam divides as inexorably as it binds. Islam is a close corporation and the distinction that it makes between Muslims and non-Muslims is a very real, very positive and very alienating distinction. The brotherhood of Islam is not the universal brotherhood of man. It is a brotherhood of Muslims for Muslims only. There is a fraternity, but its benefit is confined to those within that corporation. For those who are outside the corporation, there is nothing but contempt and enmity," 👈br Ambedkar-division of India
    1
  47.  @subysb9616  br Ambedkar said,👇 👉"Hinduism is said to divide people and in contrast, Islam is said to bind people together. This is only a half-truth. For Islam divides as inexorably as it binds. Islam is a close corporation and the distinction that it makes between Muslims and non-Muslims is a very real, very positive and very alienating distinction. The brotherhood of Islam is not the universal brotherhood of man. It is a brotherhood of Muslims for Muslims only. There is a fraternity, but its benefit is confined to those within that corporation. For those who are outside the corporation, there is nothing but contempt and enmity," 👈br Ambedkar-division of India.
    1
  48.  @markwilliams6994  whether black or white is the not question. Was is land of Judha or not is the question and the answer = affirmative.
    1
  49.  @NoemerAraullo  I'm not the one advocating Palestine to become isreal or isreal become Palestine either. My point is dont go back into history to decide terrotories atleast after the UN's 2 state solution order. Because despite the UN's 2 state solution and again if they go back to history beyond UN's order then isreal would get whole Palestine because by going to history there is a land of judha much earlier to Palestine history thus it questions existence of Palestine itself is this what you want?. So the solution is existence of 2 states ie isreal & Palestine as rightly decided by the UN to live and let live problem solved. But if you go back to history then everything will become messy and the problem will not settle but increase.
    1
  50. ​ @reeeeel2858 it's TRUE Iran is not Lebanon but its damn true Iran will be facing a clone of strength of US army.
    1