Comments by "BHARATH CHANDRAN, JUST REMVER THAT" (@Your-god150) on "Indian Army Defends Assam Rifles After Manipur Police FIR; 'Fabricated Attempts To Malign...'" video.

 @optimistprime2023 dont beg to differ even if truth is bitter to digest. Truth is like a fire it will just burn off the lies in the way.
8
the current issue had nothing to do with kuki vs methie. I read the whole issue. The trouble started while the insurgent groups in tribal influenced locals to do strike violating a 2008 temporary disengagement agreement ( and not exactly the day of high court order to extend st status for metie) 2008 temporary disengagement agreement: 1) the infiltrators should not wage war against govt of India. 2) they can carry limited arms to protect their insurgent leaders inside the camp provided in the tribal areas. 3) will respect constitution of India. Etc" Now the problem started while the insurgent leaders incited the tribal people to strike against govt's action on opium cultivation thus violating the 2008 agreement so their cm came out of 2008 agreement. The victim of this opium cultivation are methies kukies and all community in the tribal zone. So this had nothing to do with methie vs kuki. But the tribal insurgent groups made it look like methie vs kukie in order to prevent the cm taking action against opium cultivation.
4
This manipur issue is very notorious because more brutal crimes and rapes took place in manipur from 2004 to 2014 but back in time everything is ignored. But only 2023 Rape so special? Why is west Bengal rapes of 2023, 2019 ignored? Why no strike for that? Why is rajistan aligrah chatisgrah rapes all not even made famous like this one? What makes manipur rape of 2023 alone so special? Is only manipur is India? Is west Bengal rajistan aligrah chatisgrah all part of America?
3
@dopemanOG if everyone started taking crimes against women seriously then why west Bengal rapes of 2023 not even made issue by other states like it is happening for manipur?
3
@dopemanOG and our great chief justice delivered a beautiful judgement on rape and murder of 3 year old twinkle sharma "every sinners have a future..." how come such a person suddenly stand up only for manipur so is aligrah not under the jurisdiction of the supreme court of India or is manipur alone under jurisdiction of supreme court?
3
I respect Indian army too but not here. Because meties are victim for long long time. They were ethinic cleansed in their own land for more details refer topic settlement of kukies into mizoram, manipur, Nepal, assam- wikipedia. the current issue had nothing to do with kuki vs methie. I read the whole issue. The trouble started while the insurgent groups in tribal influenced locals to do strike violating a 2008 temporary disengagement agreement ( and not exactly the day of high court order to extend st status for metie) 2008 temporary disengagement agreement: 1) the infiltrators should not wage war against govt of India. 2) they can carry limited arms to protect their insurgent leaders inside the camp provided in the tribal areas. 3) will respect constitution of India. Etc" Now the problem started while the insurgent leaders incited the tribal people to strike against govt's action on opium cultivation thus violating the 2008 agreement so their cm came out of 2008 agreement. The victim of this opium cultivation are methies kukies and all community in the tribal zone. So this had nothing to do with methie vs kuki. But the tribal insurgent groups made it look like methie vs kukie in order to prevent the cm taking action against opium cultivation.
3
Here alone remove assam rifels and replace them with some other forces from the army. Assam rifels is not army exactly so replace them with army. Matter solved.
3
@Bussy_Cat the current issue had nothing to do with kuki vs methie. I read the whole issue. The trouble started while the insurgent groups in tribal influenced locals to do strike violating a 2008 temporary disengagement agreement ( and not exactly the day of high court order to extend st status for metie) 2008 temporary disengagement agreement: 1) the infiltrators should not wage war against govt of India. 2) they can carry limited arms to protect their insurgent leaders inside the camp provided in the tribal areas. 3) will respect constitution of India. Etc" Now the problem started while the insurgent leaders incited the tribal people to strike against govt's action on opium cultivation thus violating the 2008 agreement so their cm came out of 2008 agreement. The victim of this opium cultivation are methies kukies and all community in the tribal zone. So this had nothing to do with methie vs kuki. But the tribal insurgent groups made it look like methie vs kukie in order to prevent the cm taking action against opium cultivation.
2
@dopemanOG let's forget about 2020 rape victim of 3 year old girl twinkle shama because according to you "only now everybody started taking rape issue seriously" so lets take up recent 2023 west Bengal rapes itself ( forget for time being west Bengal 2019 rapes)?
2
@zaniel9924 that's what it will not fit their agenda. These people are behaving like they are they condemn all rape and crimes but they remain quite for more heinous rapes and crimes happening in west Bengal. Because their criminal politcal leaders like tmc are ruling in those states. According to highcourt of west Bengal "only 40% FIRs registered itself".
2
Govt must replace assam rifels with crpf or send an actual army into manipur tather then sending assam rifels because locals think assam rifels is biased against them.
2
Meities are indigenous people of manipure. Kukies have a history of ethinic cleansing off the locals wherever they migrate and settle. Look up settlement of kukies in manipur, mizoram, Nepal from Myanmar-wikipedia. These people wherever they went they ethnically cleansed the locals. Methies are actual victim of leftist politics media and Congress rule.
1
@topgearpusher1878 when you arm one militant x against another y here you are giving upper hand to x against y. Which is what happened in 2008 temporary disengagement agreement the kooki militants were allowed to carry arms to protect their leader inside the camp but they have misused and used it against methies to ethnic cleanse them.
1
@dopemanOG that's your stupid argument. You want to protect only one group of people against rapes and crimes and ignore crimes against another group of people and you are behaving like as if you dont want all rapes& crimes to be punished except those that happens in BJP states alone and you ignore rapes and crimes happening in non BJP states. So you just want to protect your favourite political forces from law. You should condemn all rapes and crimes without being selective. If you selectively chose to condemn crimes then people living in non BJP states will become vulnerable to crimes ecactly like it is happening now. Now using your own stupid logic I'm asking you will you remain quite if suppose your mom or daughter or sister gets raped in non BJP rules states just to protect your favourite political force?
1
@dopemanOG dope man. Come out of your dope effect.
1
 @healingcore9704 I respect assam rifels too except here. Assam rifels are not army. Govt must sent actual army into manipur instead will solve thos issue
1
@healingcore9704 the current issue had nothing to do with kuki vs methie. I read the whole issue. The trouble started while the insurgent groups in tribal influenced locals to do strike violating a 2008 temporary disengagement agreement ( and not exactly the day of high court order to extend st status for metie) 2008 temporary disengagement agreement: 1) the infiltrators should not wage war against govt of India. 2) they can carry limited arms to protect their insurgent leaders inside the camp provided in the tribal areas. 3) will respect constitution of India. Etc" Now the problem started while the insurgent leaders incited the tribal people to strike against govt's action on opium cultivation thus violating the 2008 agreement so their cm came out of 2008 agreement. The victim of this opium cultivation are methies kukies and all community in the tribal zone. So this had nothing to do with methie vs kuki. But the tribal insurgent groups made it look like methie vs kukie in order to prevent the cm taking action against opium cultivation.
1
@winstoncunningham4513 1* the current on going conflict had nothing to do with kooki vs methie. 2* this fight started not after high court order to give st status to methies. Fight started after 2008 temporary disengagement agreement was cancelled by cm of manipur. He cancelled it because the insurgent leaders were found inciting the locals to strike against govt's opium cultivation crackdown. This day started the fight. The tribal insurgent groups made it look like kooki vs methie becsuse their opium business was stopped.
1
@winstoncunningham4513 if that police officer couldnt prove it in high court then why she did not file for appeal? Hard to believe her. Just because she couldnt prove her case she blames the cm (instead of appeal???)and resigned she started a new party jdu and contested 2022 election and lost it.
1