Comments by "BHARATH CHANDRAN, JUST REMVER THAT" (@Your-god150) on "Pak Army commandos fail to rescue hostage personnel, all killed by Taliban in Bannu | Top Updates" video.

Peaceful community of 🇵🇰hoot in Jan 2021 in school: salaaaaaaaam Taliban!🤗😍😚 Peaceful community in🇵🇰hoot : dec 2022. 🤲😭🤲😭🤲😭🤲😭👈🤣
5
@BlueOcean... 2008 hostages were saved by Indian black cats commandos.
4
@mohammedusman8910 paxtan awaaams isi personals cant even save hostages and you are talking about retaliation?😂
3
"All hostages and terrorists killed by paxtan army fire" 👈🤣
3
We paxtans terrorist army stormed into terrorist brand 2's headquarters and stormed both hostages and terrorists to do mission akomplishh saccasfully. Macha lala 🤲🤤🤲🤤
3
@mubashirkhan6382 Serving fantastic tea for a man who shot down paxtans f16 and killed piolet and you are taking pride in that event and celebrating exactly like paxtan celebrated after losing all wars to India I don't understand why paxtan puncture putras celebrating all loses 😂
2
Incha lala 🤲😭🇵🇰
2
@tehminaadil6374 *inshagobarnathallah
2
@mohammedusman8910 see. Indua paxtan war 1947; 1965; 1971; 1989 ; 1999 Indua declared victory and celebrated victory. Immediately paxtan also declared false victory and celebrated. But 21 years later after paxtan isi people and army men retired and while sitting and discussing about India in open paxtan media, out of frustrations they told We paxtan started each an every war agsinst indua and lost all those wars 🤲😭🤲😭 Similarly in 2019 dec India air raided into psxtans 🇵🇰hoot and send attangvadhee camps to 72 virgins and created new job vacancies to paxtan awaaams for which many paxtan awaaams celebrate by giving tea and thinking abinandan. But now you say paxtan downed India's su 30 mki and f16 not lost? But rest assured after another 21 more years later after this paxtan army uncles and aunties retire then in open paxtan media they will sit and cry like this see👇 Dec 2019 ne modi humara paxtan ki gaaand maaar dhi with surgery air and we paxtan lost f16 to a mig 29 and the paxtan piolet went to 72 virgins which we hid that day out of shame ( but now no more shame left) 😫😫😫😫😫🤲😭🤲😭🤲😭🇵🇰🤲😭🇵🇰. 🤷‍♂️
1
Correct
1
@Luclfer819 common people also hates India because of following Quran deeply.
1
@Luclfer819 what is surah 9 At-Tawbah verse 5? What is surah Al-Ma'idah verse 14?
1
@Luclfer819 you are acting like the car was not speeding 140 km but was ruining only at 100km before hit and run over person.
1
@Luclfer819 can you copy paste the verse 5 of surah 9, At-Tawbah here fully?
1
@Luclfer819 9:2 " you polytheist may travel freely through the land for 4 months" How can you impose restrictions to polytheist like travel not more than 4 months? "9: 3 A declaration from Allah and his messenger is made to all people on day of the greater pilgrimage 1 that Allah and his messengers are free of the polytheist. So if you pagans repent it will be better for you" If Allah and his messengers declare to the pagans/ polytheist that they are free of the pagans and polytheists means why would any pagan repent? If you want to be free of pagan worship means why should pagans repent for you what kind of harsh rule is this? Explain verse 9 : 4. why would a pagan support an enemy against Islamic believers? Seems like basically islam invaded that land and Islam is putting rules to that alien territory yes? If that's the case why dont yall give free speech and democracy to non Islamic people of Islamic states first before demanding all sort of freedom from the invaded land? "Surah 9 : 5 but once the sacred months have passed kill the polytheist which violated this treaty..." This is explicit terrorism. Ie if they dont allow you practice your rules in their land then you kill them if they do not pay you tax? This is like making the indigenous people of that land to listen to the foreign culture rules that you impose into their land alien to you? "Verse 9 : 6 And if anyone from the polytheist asks for your protection o Prophet grant it to them so they may hear the word of Allah..." This sounds like forceful conversion into Islam after you invade their land. "How can such a polytheist have a treaty with Allah and his messengers, except those you have made a treaty with at the sacred mosque? So as long as they were true to you be true to them..." Define truth according to this passage first.
1
@Luclfer819 "first Muhammad and his companion were kicked out from their homeland makkah and Muhammad pbuh remained in madina and there all people accepted Islam" Why would all ( without any exception) the people of makkah kick out Muhammad without any reason? Are you saying all people of makkah were bad except Muhammad? And how come all people of madina accept Islam without any single exception? Or are you telling that only those pagans who accept Islam are good and those not are bad? "People of madina were allowed to do hajj in madina....When Muhammad and his companions left to makkah for hajj the pagans of makkah left their city for 2 days and makkah was free of pagans and Allah told them it should be better if you repent but nothing happened there after 3 days when Muhammad left all pagans were back" So according to the treaty are you saying that the pagans of makkah were supposed leave their own home ie makkah to some other place whenever Muhammad went to makkah to do hajj? You told that people of makkah already revolted against Muhammad and were not keen to accept Islam but at the same time people of medina accepted Islam and Muhammad then why is Muhammad again to makkah for hajj if medina is allowing hajj? And why exactly are the indigenous people of makkah supposed to leave makkah whenever Muhammad went to do hajj in makkah was it because of the treaty demanded by Allah or what else? "Why would pagans help enemies of muslims" mopla riots also happened because the pagans in India helped British because the converted muslims here wanted to establish Islamic state and help the enemies of pagans is an glimpse of circumstances from history. Else why would the pagans help enemies of Islam without any reason? "KAHLID BIN WALEED accepted islam and went to makkah" so this behaviour of Islam is seen since history. They want to genocide and convert the local culture into Islam. This drama is seen since birth of islam.
1
@Luclfer819 "Now I can confirm that you have 0% knowledge about Islam.." When did I say I have knowledge about islam? I dont have knowledge about Islam that's why I'm questioning you about the verses that prompted violence and genocide against non Islam culture in your Quran because that's how muslims behave today. "LOL"Why this over reaction? Either you give the answer or simply deny and accept Islam promotes terrorism (are both upto you) because that's what the violent verses in the Quran looks like. There is no justification to kill non muslims or people who reject Islam because that is an act of terror only. "Surah Torah aayat 5" "You know makkah is sacred place for arabs and thousands of arabs visit makkah for hajj" Back in time of Muhammad the region contained pagans; polytheists and Jews and it was Muhammad who introduced Islam then on what basis you say makkah is holy place for muslims back in time? "At the end Muhammad saw with 10 thousand army occupied makkah and all pagans were there and they were silent watching what will happen now.....Muhammad pbuh said you people know what I am going to do with you people.....but the people said you can kill us all and in response Muhammad said you are all free...... So tell me if Muhammad had to forcefully convert all..." This passage looks like the pagans were suppressed mentally after seeing ten thousand army men of Muhammad occupied mecca so the pagans were afraid to resist this they got converted.
1
@Luclfer819 "I can show you in vedas it is written to kill non Hindus..." if that's so then why Hindus not doing that. If that's the case then non Hindus would've perished in India. However you show me the verse that promotes killing of non Hindus in vedas.
1
@Luclfer819 there are no verses that promotes killing infidels in vedas or Hinduism nor are there any verses that supports to destroy non followers of hindu gods like Islam is doing. *"atharva veda 11 . 2 . 23 , the one who dwells and establishes oneself firmly among the sky and destroys those who do not sacrifice and insult divinities, salutations and homage to the anger / fierce one, we sign thy with 10 hymns shakavara saman, intermediate regions between , earth and heavenly realms" This is a hymn to rudra. It asking to destroy the Rakshasas or non human beings. It is not human. 2)* rigveda 9 . 13 . 9 "o pavmamas, driving of the godless, looking on the light, set in the place of sacrifice" This is worship to sun god. Godless here is I Rakshas. Rakshasas are non human. This has nothing to do with killing infidels. *rig veda 7 . 6. 3 the foolish faithless rudely speaking niggards eithout belief or sacrifice or worship, far sway hath agni chased those dasyus and in the cast, hath turned the godless westward." Dasyus are not non hindu worshipers or infidels. Dasyus are non human. "I can provide hundreds of verses can you explain these three as I explained mine" Difference = you are taking translations from anti hindu website like zakir naik and others v/s Me taking translations from your own Quran. But I can assure you there is no verses in vedas that promotes killing of non idol worshipers or non Hindus like Quran promotes.
1
@Luclfer819 I gave you the correct version of translation above now what?
1
@vedprakash2986 no need to offer any condolences to them. They wish you worst due to reading Quran that promotes hate agsinst non Islam. Even the Indian muslims they also stand only for Islamic nations against India with dream gazwa-e-hind.
1
@Luclfer819 "thats what I wanted to prove...you cannot just do that with Quran also...everything has different meaning..." Quran promotes to slay the indigenous pagans infidels and non muslims of that region ( and everywhere islam spreads) or convert them thru force is entirely different from killing of non human beings like Rakshasas and violent non godly dasyus of the vedas. Is this what you are trying to prove?
1
@Luclfer819 See. You tried to prove "Islam do not promotes terrorism after I point out terror quote number from Quran ie surah 9 At-tawbah. You replied : makkah war was done because the pagans and Jews persecuted Muhammad and gave him lots of troubles and hindrance in his way. etc. My reply after analysing your comment about makkah war and with all the sources you gave, my analysis = Muhammad tried to promote monotheism ie islam but that will certainly destroy all other religion so the locals tried to put resistance in makkah against Muhammad that's natural. Your reply = Muhammad gathered 10,000 soldiers and went into makkah and the people of makkah looking at the 10,000 troops of Muhammad they all "peacefully accepted Islam" My reply = it looks like the people of makkah were afraid of Muhammad's huge army so they converted to Islam. I studied the source you asked me to read "makkah war" in wikipedia there it states that Muhammad and his men of medina destroyed all statues of pagan worshipers in makkah in the end after Muhammad told "you are all free" . So it clearly looks like the pagans of Arabia were converted to Islam through a kind of psychological threat/ suppression of convert or die status👉 "Muhammad: you know very well what I'm going to do, Pagans of makkah looking at the 10,000 army of Muhammad ( naturally they are scared of huge army of Muhammad) said : you can kill us all....etc Muhammad: no you are all free" Then he breaks all the pagan idols yes? In your reply = you brought in hindu scriptures wrong quote from zakir naiks website as your defense to prove Hinduism promoted killing of infidels and non pagan worshipers to justify the cause of pagan genocide and forceful conversion in Quran. My reply = i gave you the exact translation and rectified your wrong translations and showed you scholarly correct translations that there is no verses in hindu text that supports persecution of non Hindus/ non pagans" now you are jumping to new blame ie trying to find falt with manu smrithies with your next excuse/ blame ""I have nothing for you know, it's not there eyes that are blind, their hearts are blind" = nothing but your mental projection. You are not blind but you pretend to be like blind. You are not asleep but you pretend like you are asleep. My question = so are you done with your argument about "persecution of non Hindus in vedas"? Now do you agree that there is no persecution of non Hindus in vedas? First you solve this then let's go to manusmrithi. Manusmrithi also the text is rewritten by different people during the 1000 plus years of foreign invasion in India. We don't know who all rewrote manusmrithi. Wikipedia manusmrithi and read the subtopic "authenticity of the manuscript" you will know that the text manusmrithi is distorted off of its originality. Below that subtopic you will find commentaries of Gandhi and other famous personalities of that contemporary period who admits that the original version of manusmrithi is lost in the course of time. You will also find British scholars who argued before the house of the lords of British India that the original text manusmrithi is lost. You will also find scholars agreeing that original manusmrithi is distorted. Reality = there is no caste system in hindu religion. Caste system is a medieval aged concept that crept into India after 5th century AD and it became stronger under the British rule. The author of ramayana was born to brahmin became a shudra before he write hindu epic ramayana. Vyasa maharishi was born to obc caste. Krishna was born to obc "yadavas caste" The Tamil brahmin scholars "alwar" belonged to all caste of the society ie from upper caste till lowest caste shudras, how did they all become brahmin? Etc etc are circumstantial historical evidence that proves that the different caste = depends upon qualities of a person. For eg a rapist will become a shudra ; a drug addict will become a shudra. A shudra through sacrifice can become a brahmin. A brahmin can become a shudra based on his qualities in life.
1
@Luclfer819 "manusmriti 8 : 279, 272..417" I have already mentioned it in previous comment that original manusmrithi is distorted and rewritten during the different foreign rule in India therefore manusmrithi is not followed today by any orthodox hindu school. Wikipedia manusmrithi, read the sub topic (authenticity and inconsistencies of various manuscript) "Shrimad bhagavathm 4 : 4 : 17" There is no killing of non pagan worshipers nor killing of non Hindus (like Quran promotes killing of pagan worshipers and non muslims). That passage is conversion between Gods alone and not applicable to humans. Goddesses sati; daksha ; and demigods are in that passage and not humans. Daksha is not human but a demigod. Goddess sati is wife of lord shiva. Again it do not talk about killing of non pagan worshipers or non Hindus like the Quran advocates the slaughter of non muslims and pagans. "Muhammad pbuh gathered 10,000 people just to save girls that were buried alive there by pagans..." But not mentioned by wikipedia makkah war nor mentioned by preislamic Arabia either. Preislamic Arabia talks about trade with Indian Ocean Syria and other parts which means the country is wealthy so no chance their men bury alive women. Another source( quizlet) also claims Muhammad wanted to establish monotheism so the pagans opposed Muhammad in makkah.
1
@Luclfer819 "a women killed the muhammads uncle and ate his heart" Dasyus were such kind of people too in the vedas. "Jewish women poisoned Muhammad Saw" That sounds like a reaction of that lady. Because Muhammad was invading nations to spread his Islam. So that's possible.
1
Inchala 🤲😭🇵🇰
1
But they hate us because we are pagans.
1