Comments by "BHARATH CHANDRAN, JUST REMVER THAT" (@Your-god150) on "GREAT HISTORY EN" channel.

  1. India is substitute name to original name bharath. The name bharath is time immemorial.
    6
  2. Muslim sultanate had help of rajputs and marathas the Hindu ruler. In the end marathas finished off the sultanate and mugals. The notion that Muslim sultanate alone defeated mongols is egocentric idea. Rajputs resisted mongols too. Rajputs were marvadees ( offshoot of hindu culture only).
    4
  3. ​ @koneos6580 dont spread misinformation. The term India is derived from name of a greek book named "Indus". The word Indus is substitute to name of "sindu river"( modern name indus valley civilisation). The British changed the word indus into "India" that's it. All the 3 names ie India, hindustan and Indus are colonial names. The original name = bharath. The hindu epic "Mahabaratha" means great India. The term bharath was actual name. Even though if the word india is gone we are happy to replace it with bharath. We dont want any colonial names be it from British greek or mugals. Both Islam and christianity are alien to India. The culture here are hindu alone. Hindu includes bhuddhist jains and Sikhs.
    4
  4.  @Milovan-c9x  it's a known fact that British army in India had predominantly Indian soldiers. Truth is fun or are you hiding the pain?🤔
    3
  5. British army were only Indian soldiers.
    2
  6. Truth.
    1
  7. ​​ @MasoodKhan-l2p if they save hindus means why they did not convert India into Islamic state?
    1
  8. ​ @Mirpurmad they did not settle down here. They were the locals who got converted to Islam due to genocide. None of those abrahamic religions are indigenous to this land. The Europeans introduced Christianity and mugals cane islam. The truth is ever since both came here they started all cunning activities like conversion thru illegal means.
    1
  9. ​ @kamranhashmi1575 *not all rajputs but only few cowards who fell to Islamic oppression alone got converted to Islam.😊
    1