Comments by "BHARATH CHANDRAN, JUST REMVER THAT" (@Your-god150) on "“Don’t waste time in court, show them power of ballot” Chilkur Balaji Head Priest on Udhayanidhi" video.

  1. 7
  2. 7
  3. 7
  4. 5
  5. 3
  6. 3
  7. 3
  8. 3
  9. 2
  10. 2
  11. 2
  12. 2
  13. 2
  14. 2
  15. 1
  16.  @arunvg19  that's a dk dmk version of story that "Hindus did not accept low caste" in reality there is no evidence in dk dmk version of story that Hindus persecuted low caste. There are many circumstantial historical evidence that there is no caste discrimination in Hinduism for eg Lord Krishna was born to obc yadava dynasty and is worshiped as God. Valmiki was raised by low caste hunter but all brahmins read ramayana written by him. The alwar Tamil saints belonged to all sects of the society from upper class till lowest caste and in the end all became brahmins. Vyasa was born to lower caste but he became brahmin and brahmins thenselves glorify vyasa muni etc etc all proving that caste discrimination in Hinduism is unreal. Caste discrimination is seen in India from 6th century AD not before that. Adi sankara a tamilian born in keezadi ( today in kerela) fought against caste discrimination stating that it is not a part of Hinduism. Great brahmin scholars from guruvayoor, that famous "poonthanam namboothri" in 15-16 th century AD also told caste discrimination is not part of dharma ( Hinduism). Caste system came to India in 6th century ad, the British strengthened it during British rule in order to make Hinduism look dark so that they can successfuly indulge in rice bag conversion business. For Hindus just set aside all caste and vote for BJP that's only way to protect Hinduism if not dravidian hate politcs will destroy Hinduism thats their agenda sothey they can divide Tamil nadu and south India from India and merge with lanka and create a Christian state "Elam".
    1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. "Hinduism hintutwa are different" same logic = dravida and abrahamics are different. The dravidian politics did not exist pre British invasion. The term dravida is not a race but geographical south direction but the British stooge ev ramaswamy converted it into a race. Around same time only khalistan seperatist movement also started. Why all seperatist groups propogated at same time ie under British? "This man is becoming insecure" church priest in kerela and different parts of India while they organized prayer a day before 2019 elections to make modi step down, is not insecure to you but when a hindu priest for first time in history of India post independence feels Hinduism is threatened and therefore he steps out as defense to tell followers of Hinduism to vote someone who respects Hinduism is alone in- secure to you why this partiality? 🤨 "Sanathna Dharma" Hindu word came from sindhu the persians called us sindhu and British termed it hindu for sake of official Gazette. But the word dharma was always there. All Tamil sanskrit literatures stress about "Dharma; karma; moksham ; etc". Hinduism was never a religion but a way of life. Ever since abrahmics stepped in the actual hate division & persecuting non believers in name of God started. We wish to called as sanathani itself we dint need religion. Hinduism = bhuddhist jains siks. The bhuddhist jains Sikhs seperated from Hinduism post independence due to divisive leftist political groups created by congrsss and they did this to weaken unity of sanathies.
    1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34. 1
  35. 1
  36. 1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1
  51. 1
  52. 1
  53. 1
  54. 1