Comments by "BHARATH CHANDRAN, JUST REMVER THAT" (@Your-god150) on "Cyrus Janssen" channel.

 @FahadKhan-uz7dr you blame godi but your God imran Khan is praying to modi 😂
13
India never tried to be in US camp. May be putin did once. Not India. We allied with none including Russia. But if situation arise where we are given 2 options ie USA or Rissia then India will ally with Russia only. Dont see this as "Russian camp or China camp or US camp". India is in India camp.
5
@mamacryright5740 quad a bait for india to confront China = ❌. Quad : opportunity for India to get more US investments to help US counter China = ✅. We dont need US help to counter China. Quad was just a win win situation where both USA and India wanted to counter China. But India put demands to US for that. US was unwilling so India did not come to indo Pacific. This is the truth. The US unable to influence India because India did not request US military help like Japan nato all are doing.
4
Indian here. No you are wrong. India doesn't trust US anymore.
3
@stevewang2 so in other words just because India doesn't become a China stooge, you are seeing this as India is a western pawn? You are acting like a frustrated child.
3
*Brics+
2
@Animallover-j8y "America is not ally of India but business partners" according to external affairs minister, when America told quad is nato of Asia, jaishankar reminded the US what the US told India in 2008-10 that "India is not a US ally but business partner". Americas tactics will not become a success in India.
2
Coup in Bangladesh wake up for both China and India. They are trying to install a US puppet govt in bd. The us was trying regieme change in India for very long time. This is not something new. Now it is more tougher for usa than before mainly due to introducing of evm. In India evm is not attached to computer. It doesn't have a bluetooth also. They tried to play soros but failed in all attempts. Now recently they only involved in manipur riots kgalistan issues, attacking Indian high commission office in canada usa UK aus. Since 1950 the US is actively involved in trying destabilize india. They pushed democracy fedral law seculariam in India all to promote and protect non state actors inside India. We know what they are long ago.
1
Being in US camp India brought Russian oil? Fool are you? We never trusted usa. We just want business with all including usa but we know how to handle them. Still we are doing business with them.
1
Vladimir putin: Russia wanted to join nato.
1
@stevewang2 just because India doesn't become a China stooge, you thinking India becomes a western pawn? You are acting like a frustrated child. So using your same logic China doesnt listen to Russia in certain areas therfore china is UK fodder?. India is not a part of bri and this has nothing to do with supporting western interst. It is rather to promote indias interest alone we are rejecting to join bri but you think we are doing it because UK usa orderd india is it? While India rejects bri the west grabs the common interst that arise naturally by itself and that common interest is not given to west by India, instead it is arising by itself and you are seeing this natural occurrence of common interst (that arise as result of indias rejection to join bri ) as India subservient to west? This is your mistake. See now we are officially a brics partners after recent agreements but still India will not join bri then you will say India is subservient to west? So using that same logic i can tell China doesnt listens to India therefore China is UK puppet still. So stupid is your comment.
1
@stevewang2 just because India doesn't become a China stooge, you India becomes a western pawn? You are acting like a frustrated child. So using your same logic China doesnt listen to Russia in certain areas therfore china is UK fodder?. India is not a part of bri and this has nothing to do with supporting western interst. It is rather to promote indias interest alone we are rejecting to join bri but you think we are doing it because UK usa orderd india is it? While India rejects bri the west grabs the common interst that arise naturally by itself and that common interest is not given to west by India, instead it is arising by itself and you are seeing this natural occurrence of common interst (that arise as result of indias rejection to join bri ) as India subservient to west? This is your mistake. See now we are officially a brics partners after recent agreements but still India will not join bri then you will say India is subservient to west? So using that same logic i can tell China doesnt listens to India therefore China is UK puppet still. So silly is your comment.
1
@stevewang2 So using your same logic China doesnt listen to Russia in certain areas therfore china is UK fodder?. India is not a part of bri and this has nothing to do with supporting western interst. It is rather to promote indias interest alone we are rejecting to join bri but according to you, you think we are rejecting bri because UK usa orderd india is it? While India rejects bri the west grabs the common interst that arise naturally by itself and that common interest is not given to the west by India, instead it is arising by itself and you are seeing this natural occurrence of common interst (that arise as result of indias rejection to join bri ) as India subservient to west? This is your mistake. See now we are officially a brics ally after the recent agreements but still India will not join bri then you will say India is subservient to west? So using that same logic i can tell China doesnt listens to India therefore China is UK puppet?.
1