Comments by "SNS" (@Rahultharki420) on "IAF's Su-30 MKI Vs U.S. Air Force F-15 Strike Eagle | 'Cope India' Exercise Begins" video.

  1. This is not the first time. In 2004 Gwalior exercise, we won 9:1
    11
  2. Kaveri engine has achieved success with 48.3 KN
    6
  3.  @wolfvale7863  But they came back in 2005 in greater numbers. What was the result in 2005? Also BVR handicap was removed in 2005 exercise
    1
  4.  @VAIBHAV_108  Kyun nahi? Su-30 2004 wala nahi hai
    1
  5.  @VAIBHAV_108  Super Sukhoi ke bina bhi ham Aaj ke technology se jit sakte hai
    1
  6.  @wolfvale7863  Retired U.S. Air Force Major General Michael Snodgrass, then a colonel commanding the 3rd Wing at Elmendorf Air Force Base in Alaska, which had sent jets to take part in the exercise, said that the Bisons and the Su-30MKIs proved to be the most formidable opponents. “The outcome of the exercise boils down to [the fact that] they ran tactics that were more advanced than we expected... They could come up with a game plan, but if it wasn't working they would call an audible and change [tactics in flight],” he explained in a 2004 interview with Aviation Week & Space Technology. Still, the exercise’s results prompted an uproar in Washington. The United States returned for the 2005 iteration of the drill with improved tactics and procedures, but the outcome still featured notable Indian successes. It reportedly became an argument in some defense circles for restarting production of the F-22 Raptor stealth fighter and helped spur the fielding of the Joint Helmet Mounted Cueing System (JHMCS) and AN/APG-63(V)3 AESA radar. It helped inform later upgrades, some of which are still in the pipeline, such as infrared search and track (IRST) pods, too. The U.S. Air Force returned to India again for the exercises in 2006 and 2009. The latter of these drills, however, was entirely airlift focused, involving only American C-130s and C-17s. It’s not immediately apparent why the exercises came to an end
    1
  7.  @nimipisho  dentist ne saare nikaal diye??? Isliye mummy kehti thi jyada chocolate mat khaya karo
    1
  8.  @nimipisho  hum Indians ko ghanta farak nahi padta duniya ham pe hase yaa naa hase par tum konse mulk se ho???
    1
  9.  @nimipisho  Katora bheek mang raha hai lekin tumhare pe koi has nahi raha?🤣 Kaha kaha bheek mange? Phir bhi line me khade ho? Aur "Endia" ko khatam karoge 🤣 Tumhare upar toh khud tumhare media waale has rahe he. Aur Abhinandan ne tum naukaro se achhi seva le li. Abhinandan ke boot polish karne ke liye thanks😂
    1
  10.  @nimipisho  brahmos was fantastic Imrand is fantastic Currency ban is fantastic Durand line is fantastic Cooking gas in plastic bag is fantastic
    1
  11. Retired U.S. Air Force Major General Michael Snodgrass, then a colonel commanding the 3rd Wing at Elmendorf Air Force Base in Alaska, which had sent jets to take part in the exercise, said that the Bisons and the Su-30MKIs proved to be the most formidable opponents. “The outcome of the exercise boils down to [the fact that] they ran tactics that were more advanced than we expected... They could come up with a game plan, but if it wasn't working they would call an audible and change [tactics in flight],” he explained in a 2004 interview with Aviation Week & Space Technology. Still, the exercise’s results prompted an uproar in Washington. The United States returned for the 2005 iteration of the drill with improved tactics and procedures, but the outcome still featured notable Indian successes. It reportedly became an argument in some defense circles for restarting production of the F-22 Raptor stealth fighter and helped spur the fielding of the Joint Helmet Mounted Cueing System (JHMCS) and AN/APG-63(V)3 AESA radar. It helped inform later upgrades, some of which are still in the pipeline, such as infrared search and track (IRST) pods, too. The U.S. Air Force returned to India again for the exercises in 2006 and 2009. The latter of these drills, however, was entirely airlift focused, involving only American C-130s and C-17s. It’s not immediately apparent why the exercises came to an end
    1
  12. Retired U.S. Air Force Major General Michael Snodgrass, then a colonel commanding the 3rd Wing at Elmendorf Air Force Base in Alaska, which had sent jets to take part in the exercise, said that the Bisons and the Su-30MKIs proved to be the most formidable opponents. “The outcome of the exercise boils down to [the fact that] they ran tactics that were more advanced than we expected... They could come up with a game plan, but if it wasn't working they would call an audible and change [tactics in flight],” he explained in a 2004 interview with Aviation Week & Space Technology. Still, the exercise’s results prompted an uproar in Washington. The United States returned for the 2005 iteration of the drill with improved tactics and procedures, but the outcome still featured notable Indian successes. It reportedly became an argument in some defense circles for restarting production of the F-22 Raptor stealth fighter and helped spur the fielding of the Joint Helmet Mounted Cueing System (JHMCS) and AN/APG-63(V)3 AESA radar. It helped inform later upgrades, some of which are still in the pipeline, such as infrared search and track (IRST) pods, too. The U.S. Air Force returned to India again for the exercises in 2006 and 2009. The latter of these drills, however, was entirely airlift focused, involving only American C-130s and C-17s. It’s not immediately apparent why the exercises came to an end
    1