Comments by "Owain Shebbeare" (@shebbs1) on "Biographics"
channel.
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@CommodoreFloopjack78 It depends, as the initial version was precise and definitely specific, the later modern version is also designed to convey a certain message. You might call it a technicality, but communication often requires parsing between similar, but not identical words. This might seem pedantic, but it is indeed true that "- not commit murder" and "-not kill" are not precisely the same, and were written deliberately to convey different interpretations of the law. The first is a clear command not to murder, specifically, at the time other Israelites. Like today's legal definitions, not all killing is defined as murder, and these were laws crafted for a specific cultural setting. Commanding not to kill is more inclusive.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I went to school in Australia, and at a Lutheran school. They were quite open about Hitler, Stalin, various other dictators, tyrants and the problems of colonialism, especially British colonialism, which seemed a little biased given they were hardly to only ones in on that game. Nothing was ever mentioned of Leopold II or the atrocities in the Congo. Belgium is seen as a sort of quiet, anonymous Euro state filled with pompous EU bureaucrats, and not much else besides great beer. It might have been the school, the curriculum in the 1980's or something else, but this was never mentioned.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2