Comments by "Larre Valentine" (@internetuser881) on "‘Rust’ Film Armorer Found Guilty of Involuntary Manslaughter | WSJ News" video.
-
5
-
3
-
You are missing a lot of common sense, for starters, this happened inside a movie set. Secondly, in this video it describes the specific case against the person who was responsible and legitimately licensed and obligated to follow safety regulations and standard procedures... which means she was indeed supposed to know what is going on with her prop department. On the other hand, the actor's job does not require any of that, he was not responsible for the prop gun nor did he knew what was going to happen. What do I mean by responsible? The actor's job does not require him to test or create props materials, his job is to act and follow the director's orders. now If you believe the actor's actions were intentional, then you are making serious accusations that require evidence...evidence that would have been helpful in court, and yet where were you? So just because you are looking at it from an audience perspective doesn't mean that what you are saying is the complete true of what actually happened. Fyi, the film armorer was found guilty while another individual was charged for tampering evidence but was not found guilty*
Update; For an example, do I believe tampering evidence is crucial to the investigation? Yes, but do I need to say that the system is rigged because the defendant was not found guilty? No. I know I am not qualified enough, nor do I have the ability to provide an expert opinion, or factual statements as to whether or not, Guitierrez Reed should be a free person. I have the common sense to know that I need sufficient amount of proof in order to be able to reach a proper conclusion. To know what is right, and to know what actually happened are two seperate aspects, and it looks like you are taking it based on faith and morality rather than logically, which I comprehend that both are two types of common sense. However, under the rule of law one of them is realistically taking upon consideration. In this matter, you should learn about innocent until proven guilty, since this is the common sense you should be using. @JinNani224
3