Comments by "Larre Valentine" (@internetuser881) on "Channel 4 News" channel.

@ConsciusVeritasVids 1949
4
I think the failure to give Palestinians the right to know their decisions of October 7 was terrible which fell into the hands of Hamas. You may be wondering, but how? Considering what Israel is doing, it definitely points out the lack of empathy towards Gaza, as well as Hamas for Gaza. Why? Because Hamas's negligence in representing these people without helping them or giving them the opportunity to evacuate before October 7th out of Gaza caused their many lives... So yes, in a way, after October 12th, according to the population from areas like hospitals and schools, and the number of reports of people who were unable to evacuate showed that underneath these areas that are now occupied by Israel gave an idea of what was going on at the time, between the Palestinian people and hamas... and to be honest, it should be logical to diplomatically let the people who know as a body of government what they're going to do. Based of that, I think hamas could have done it deliberately, in one way or another, since it was their responsibility to prevent the numbers from increasing. Furthermore, what is even worse is that they brought hostages to Gaza, among them they were not Israelis, which further gave Israel the opportunity to act, but as many did not expect they were violent, which led to the Palestinians being stranded with hamas. in a place where the tolls described that most of them were innocent people. In addition to this, the real problem here is that we are witnessing the power differential between hamas and Israel. However, the problem here is that hamas continues to hide hostages, putting Palestinians at risk, which it considers a form of human protection. So yes, hamas is terrible for their decision that put thousands in danger, while also pointing a question about... how israel is going to rescue the hostages without losing casualties in areas they might not have had the chance to go through? If that scenario had occurred, I think to a large extent, it's another way to protect hamas by shielding them. @Just.in.case77
4
 @AgatBluvsky-ow9gp Bot, spreading false information. You're spamming the same thing without a source. 😂🤡
2
@arturferrao7353 i will take a good look at the source that you shared. So you are saying that hundreds of videos that were publicized by hamas killing innocent people in oct 7th were false?
2
@arturferrao7353 you are someone who is pointless to talk to. You contradicted yourself about the existing of oct 7th, and shared information talking about it that are either irrelevant, non factual, and or secondary sources writen by the observers' subjective opinions. You asked for prove, i already gave you two sources... two factual information about how oct 7 unfolded and who they went after. Your argument doesn't provide any of that, and only ppoints out that it was israeli fault for nova festival without any proof. Lol
2
Facts? sounds more like bs. Why would a group of Ts run through a warzone, a no men grounds? @whatsgoinon5516
1
Youtube should ban third world countries from using their platform because it looks like yall are spreading like roaches. @TheGhurabah
1
Who put them in a dire position? Mhmm.... I wonder who made their lives difficult without telling them what was going to happen? Mhmm...Did they ever had a chance to evacuated before oct 7th? Mhmmm... I wonder who decided not to say anything.... mhmm....
1
I think the failure to give Palestinians the right to know their decisions of October 7 was terrible which fell into the hands of Hamas. You may be wondering, but how? Considering what Israel is doing, it definitely points out the lack of empathy towards Gaza, as well as Hamas for Gaza. Why? Because Hamas's negligence in representing these people without helping them or giving them the opportunity to evacuate before October 7th out of Gaza caused their many lives... So yes, in a way, after October 12th, according to the population from areas like hospitals and schools, and the number of reports of people who were unable to evacuate showed that underneath these areas that are now occupied by Israel gave an idea of what was going on at the time, between the Palestinian people and hamas... and to be honest, it should be logical to diplomatically let the people who represent a government know what they're going to do. Instead, I think hamas could have done it deliberately, in one way or another, since it was their responsibility to prevent the numbers from increasing. Furthermore, what is even worse is that they brought hostages to Gaza, among them they were not Israelis, which further gave Israel the opportunity to act, but as many did not expect they were violent, which led to the Palestinians being stranded with hamas. in a place where the tolls described that most of them were innocent people. In addition to this, the real problem here is that we are witnessing the power differential between hamas and Israel. However, the problem here is that hamas continues to hide hostages, putting Palestinians at risk, which it considers a form of human protection. So yes, hamas is terrible for their decision that put thousands in danger, while also pointing a question about... how israel is going to rescue the hostages without losing casualties in areas they might not have had the chance to go through? If that scenario had occurred, I think to a large extent, it's another way to protect hamas by shielding them.
1
@arturferrao7353 To begin with, I would like to put appropriate layers on the base so that it is understandable how everything developed, like a historic timeline. What I am going to do next is follow a step by step process... We will start BEFORE October 7th. Here is a source you can watch and listen to as the individual provides information and evidence leading up to October 7th. The title is, inside the hamas operations order from Operation alaqsa Flood from Ryan Mcbeth. Once you have complete it the YT video, I will then provide the 2nd step of this process.
1
@agravemisunderstanding9668 You are lying. At this very moment... right now, hamas are still hiding from the IDF and are yet remaining underground from airstrikes because the odds are not at their favor. You are lying because hamas needed to use a surprise attack and within the matters of hours they had to retreat inside tunnels like a cockroach. Like a weak government who didn't warn their residents about their decision that caused many of them stranded. To being unable to defend themselves on land.
1
@agravemisunderstanding9668 I am guessing you are the type of person to say that people with sandals won against the US in afghanistan without considering the years that US had over afghanistan before they retreated in 2021, leading the afghanistan government on their own and forfeiting within 21 days, UNLIKE Ukraine.
1
@arturferrao7353 I will wait for your response because I provided the information that came before october 7th during operation al aqsa flood by hamas plan by Iran because it literally describes how it happened before your source, The Cradle's reported. In other words, evidences were found that hamas took 100s of people hostage during the very first hour start of the occupation before going in further, and escaping back to Gaza.
1
@yungslack7311 What did Israel set things up? And how did israel set this up?
1
@arturferrao7353 You are absolutely wrong, they did unalive them. 200 of the total 400 hostages have either been R, SA, or killed by now. I assumed you already watch the video source I shared by Ryan mcbeth, explaining how hamas prepared for oct 7th and how they operated. Evidence were found that hamas' goal was to annex certain parts of Israel and take 100s of hostages DURING THE FIRST HOUR, of their occupation into Israel BEFORE killing 1,200 people later in the process. So i already showed you hamas' Operation alsa aqsa flood. Step 2. I will share you the source called, Minute by Minute by Channel 4 news on YT. Watch the video as it describes minute by minute in details of hamas' actions on oct 7th.
1
@arturferrao7353 253* my mistake. I was thinking about a type of model from a different topic. did you watch the first source I shared?
1
@arturferrao7353 It's interesting how your answer is that without paying attention to what it provides. Facts. The key point here is that The guy has information found in Gaza about the inside operation of Palestinian militants who participated in the October 7 attack. So if you are atleast educated or you want to be, this is the type of information that outlets are missing. Furthermore, what I discovered is that you only share things that you want others to read, or you think that googling the questions and choosing a part of the paragraph from a secondary source is the logical way to answer, when it is not. For example, one of your source, dust and tribe, title, the attack on the Israeli music festival... IS NOT a factual statement. It is a written opinion that questions why the event was relocated without providing adequate evidence of how it was relocated...walking in circles, Keyword, "unknown reasons." it was written on oct 16. So what is the point of writing that report if it is only going to be based on observation? You see... You can't consider it as a credible source when there isn't any evidence or factual information that can solidify that report.
1
@arturferrao7353 It's interesting how your answer is that without paying attention to what it provides. Facts. The key point here is that The guy has information found in Gaza about the inside operation of Palestinian militants who participated in the October 7 attack. So if you are atleast educated or you want to be, this is the type of information that outlets are missing. Furthermore, what I discovered is that you only share things that you want others to read, or you think that googling the questions and choosing a part of the paragraph from a secondary source is the logical way to answer, when it is not. For example, one of your source, dust and tribe, title, the attack on the Israeli music festival... IS NOT a factual statement. It is a written opinion that questions why the event was relocated without providing adequate evidence of how it was relocated...walking in circles, Keyword, unknown reasons. It was written on oct 16. What happened to the updates? LoL... So what is the point of writing that report if it is only going to be based on observation? You can't consider it as a credible source when there isn't any evidence or factual information that can solidify that report.
1
@arturferrao7353 It's interesting how your answer is that without paying attention to what it provides. Facts. The key point here is that The guy has information found in Gaza about the inside operation of Palestinian militants who participated in October 7. So if you are atleast educated or you want to be, this is the type of information that outlets are missing. Furthermore, what I discovered is that you only share things that you want others to read, or you think that googling the questions and choosing a part of the paragraph from a secondary source is the logical way to answer, when it is not. For example, one of your source, dust and tribe, title, the attack on the Israeli music festival... IS NOT a factual statement. It is a written opinion that questions why the event was relocated without providing adequate evidence of how it was relocated...walking in circles, Keyword, unknown reasons. It was written on oct 16. What happened to the updates? LoL... So what is the point of writing that report if it is only going to be based on observation? You can't consider it as a credible source when there isn't any evidence or factual information that can solidify that report.
1
@arturferrao7353 It's interesting how your answer is that without paying attention to what it provides. Facts. The key point here is that The guy has information found in Gaza about the inside operation of Palestinian militants who participated. So if you are atleast educated or you want to be, this is the type of information that outlets are missing. Furthermore, what I discovered is that you only share things that you want others to read, or you think that googling the questions and choosing a part of the paragraph from a secondary source is the logical way to answer, when it is not. For example, one of your source, dust and tribe, title, the attack on the Israeli music festival... IS NOT a factual statement. It is a written opinion that questions why the event was relocated without providing adequate evidence of how it was relocated...walking in circles, Keyword, unknown reasons. It was written on oct 16. What happened to the updates? LoL... So what is the point of writing that report if it is only going to be based on observation? You can't consider it as a credible source when there isn't any evidence or factual information that can solidify that report.
1
@arturferrao7353 It's interesting how your answer is that without paying attention to what it provides. Facts. The key point here is that The guy has information found in Gaza about the inside operation of Palestinian militants who participated. So if you are atleast educated or you want to be, this is the type of information that outlets are missing.
1
@arturferrao7353 Furthermore, what I discovered is that you only share things that you want others to read, or you think that googling the questions and choosing a part of the paragraph from a secondary source is the logical way to answer, when it is not. For example, one of your source, dust and tribe, title, the attack on the Israeli music festival... IS NOT a factual statement. It is a written opinion that questions why the event was relocated without providing adequate evidence of how it was relocated...walking in circles, Keyword, unknown reasons. It was written on oct 16. What happened to the updates? LoL... So what is the point of writing that report if it is only going to be based on observation? You can't consider it as a credible source when there isn't any evidence or factual information that can solidify that report.
1
@arturferrao7353 what actual point? Lol. Theres none. All of the sources that you shared including that one are based on an written opinion or observation, by an observer. there no facts, evidence or factual statements whatsoever. At this point, It is practically worthless to read your sources.
1
@arturferrao7353 again. It clearly doesn't prove anything. What does it prove? Can you explain? Oh wait, you can't.
1
@arturferrao7353 Even, IF Noval festival was changed just three days earlier, it means nothing more than a conspiracy when there is no factual information TO PROVE WHY it was changed three days early, AND HOW it relates to October 7th...So far, You have literally proof nothing but relying on subjective statements. For example, the dust and tribe, article clearly said, for unknown reason. ... Meh Meh. That right there, is a written opinion by the author. You have no evidence other than written opinions from secondary sources. In fact, your sources are based on pure observation, which is considered as observers. Do you know what it means?
1
@arturferrao7353 Again, this proves nothing. but a conspiracy... you said, shows that hamas had no intentions of attacking the festival but the military base of... while the video clearly shows who really attacked the civilians... It's complete nonsense. Honestly, it's the most pseudo comment I've ever read on the Internet. You clearly lack common sense... yes, there are several videos that clearly show who the attackers were. They were Palestinian militants... among many, you see them breaking bones and taking a German girl hostage. In fact, In case you ignored my first source, it explains what type of vehicles these Palestinian militants were going to use and their goal to annex and take people hostage on the first hour. During the nova festival mass genocide, it happened on the first hour, and you can see, and identify that those types of vehicles in the videos were palestenian militants attacking civilians on the nova festival. Hamas had no intentions of attacking the festival but the military base. You must be really stupid to say that because for one thing, they DID go for the festival, and killed hundreds of people. Secondly, you are justifying their actions or covering it by saying that their goal was the military base no the festival. It doesn't change the fact that they went after civilians. Your sources are secondary sources following a written opinions. You should educate yourself first, before you start having a grownmen conversation.
1
@arturferrao7353 Again, you proven nothing, but an opinion, a conspiracy. you said, SHOWS that hamas HAD NO INTENTIONS of attacking the festival but the military base of... WHILE the video clearly shows who really attacked the civilians... I find it complete nonsense. Honestly, it's the most pseudo comment I've ever read on the Internet. You clearly lack common sense and it shows some signs of cognitive dissonance. Yes, tthere are several videos that clearly show who the attackers were. They were Palestinian militants... and among many hostages, you see them taking a German girl on their pickup truck. So what happened to her? Did the Israelis took her to Gaza? Show me the evidence arturito lol... Do you realize that my first source that you ignored explains what kind of vehicles these Palestinian militants used and the goal to take people during first hour of the operation? During the Nova festival mass genocide, it happened in the first hour, you can see and identify what kind of vehicles in the videos the Palestinian militants used to get to the Nova festival. But okay, you said, let me guesss... you're going to keep pretending that was hamas right that attacked civilians and not israeli rights? In response, Based on what event? Because you haven't had any evidence to prove it other than secondary sources by observers.
1
@arturferrao7353 Again, you proven nothing, but an opinion, a conspiracy. you said, SHOWS that hamas HAD NO INTENTIONS of attacking the festival but the military base of... WHILE the video clearly shows who really attacked the civilians... I find it complete nonsense. Honestly, it's the most pseudo comment I've ever read on the Internet. Yes, there are several videos that clearly show who the aggressor were. They were Palestinian militants... and among many hostaged, you see them take a german girl. Yet, what happened to her? Did the Israelis took her to Gaza? Show me the evidence arturito.
1
@arturferrao7353 Do you realize that my first source that you ignored explains what Palestinian militants used as well as, a goal to take people during the first hour of the operation..? During the Nova festival mass genocide, it happened in the first hour, you can see and identify in the videos what the Palestinian militants used to get to the Nova festival as they many people including, most noteably a german woman. But akright let's ignore that real piece of information and continue with your nonsense, you said,, Let me guesss... you're going to keep pretending that was hamas right that attacked civilians and not israeli rights? In response, Based on what event? Because you haven't had any evidence to prove it, other than secondary sources written by observers.
1
@arturferrao7353 What I also noticed is that you contradicted yourself. You might be wondering, but how? Your earlier comment said, Care to explain how something that doesn't exist can be false? Cough Yet, now you are saying,, This proves that hamas had no intentions of attacking the festival but the military base of kibbutz re im. Ah, if that is not a sign of Cognitive Dissonance, then I don't know what it Is. Anyway, whether they had an intention or not, it doesn't changed the fact that they attacked civilians who were at the Nova Festival. So you can't continue to ignore that issue and say otherwise when the facts speak for themselves.
1
@arturferrao7353 your response to the events is irrelevant to the current situation that in conclusion shows that you are baseless, illiterate and uneducated.
1
 @AgatBluvsky-ow9gp reported for spamming.
1
Ok malcolm X. Weirdo.
1