Youtube comments of Larre Valentine (@internetuser881).
-
34
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
16
-
16
-
@DarkVVitcher Do you know where these presidents, judges, and congressmen get their information? They get it from people who are very good at what they do. We don't need a scientist to represent the entire population when we know that society can be cruel, society will diminish their reputation. That's why we need scientists to be scientists and inform public officials. In addition, Presidents, judges, congressmen, people who govern, judge or legislate, have qualified personnel in their team or administration to inform state and national issues. For example, if things go wrong, the only people who will receive backlash will be those in public positions in the government.
In terms of the military aspect, although we have chains of command, at the end of the day, presidents are responsible for what happens both at home and abroad... Another thing I would like to clarify is that many of the candidates running Public office have to some extent experience within their type of field, so to say they have little or no knowledge is an understatement.
15
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@prodigiii712 As a matter of fact the EU Human Rights Council have voted with a majority of the nations In-Favor on the suspension against Russia. With such data it forms an equivalent amount of support in voting for Ukraine EU Membership. It all comes down towards which countries have voted to reject the suspension on Russia; Algeria, Belarus, Bolivia, Burundi, Central Afro Rep, China, Cuba, Dem PR of Korea, Erithea, Ethiopia, Gabon, Iran(Islamic Rep) Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Lao Pdr, Mali, Nicaragua, Russian Fed, Syrian Arab Rep, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@prosl11 Yes, that is why many people leave to prosper in what u consider other countries that u do not like as "savage and colonialist", despite, knowing that the levels of institutions in ur country lack the necessary tools that people need to grow in life. Maybe what I'm seeing is more of a you problem, because there are many countries that you don't like that can give you opportunities and options that you would like, that others or your country can't or simply choose not to offer.
As far as I'm concerned, the colonialist countries you keep talking about, were once colonized countries that are now starting to become more diverse in society and through politics... We also know that many of them are currently recovering from the past and are facing a series of leftover problems that want to expand and draw attention once again, such as racism, hatred, greed and violence. These components are what we often see throughout history, decisions which many people took for their own personal gain or because they thought it was right.
By the way, I think it is only natural that the curiosity of humans leads them to travel the world, we understand it's history and how we became who we are today. We know that our brains have not yet fully developed... regardless of that, we can build modern technology and make the worst case scenario happen at the same time... This is what our species is currently going through, as it has only been over seven generations ago when tribes began compromising with other tribes. Before that, they saw what we saw, a total savagery, genocide and colonialism.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
I think the war has gone on too long and gone too far, too many things have happened, that the people around are feeling the conflict or backlash and are drastically changing the way they think about all, the real world problems... So I have a theory that may seem reasonable, if you connect with those who are closely related to the conflict. There is a small possibility that this tragedy that occurred in moscow was the fault of the russian regime... The question one might ask is, but how? Well, figuratively speaking, they are the reason the gates of hell opened… what does that mean? is that in terrible times of war, a real event happened, the answer is, the russians used conscripts... and so the question of this theory starts with, if the Russian prisoners were conscripted, then that means that there is a small possibility of the bending over the law motto, that among those prisons there were foreigners who were ordered to fight for the russians... I believe there was a time when they said that if they could last more than 6 months, then they could return home and have russian stuff and freedom. Because, how did they manage to move with that specific type of machines before, despite great warnings and conflicts?
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
I think the failure to give Palestinians the right to know their decisions of October 7 was terrible which fell into the hands of Hamas. You may be wondering, but how? Considering what Israel is doing, it definitely points out the lack of empathy towards Gaza, as well as Hamas for Gaza. Why? Because Hamas's negligence in representing these people without helping them or giving them the opportunity to evacuate before October 7th out of Gaza caused their many lives...
So yes, in a way, after October 12th, according to the population from areas like hospitals and schools, and the number of reports of people who were unable to evacuate showed that underneath these areas that are now occupied by Israel gave an idea of what was going on at the time, between the Palestinian people and hamas... and to be honest, it should be logical to diplomatically let the people who know as a body of government what they're going to do. Based of that, I think hamas could have done it deliberately, in one way or another, since it was their responsibility to prevent the numbers from increasing. Furthermore, what is even worse is that they brought hostages to Gaza, among them they were not Israelis, which further gave Israel the opportunity to act, but as many did not expect they were violent, which led to the Palestinians being stranded with hamas. in a place where the tolls described that most of them were innocent people. In addition to this, the real problem here is that we are witnessing the power differential between hamas and Israel. However, the problem here is that hamas continues to hide hostages, putting Palestinians at risk, which it considers a form of human protection.
So yes, hamas is terrible for their decision that put thousands in danger, while also pointing a question about... how israel is going to rescue the hostages without losing casualties in areas they might not have had the chance to go through? If that scenario had occurred, I think to a large extent, it's another way to protect hamas by shielding them.
@Just.in.case77
4
-
4
-
4
-
@Birdbussa On March 2019, During the Robert Mueller Report, He released a complete statement, "After the Investigation, If we've had confidence that the President clearly Did Not commit a crime, then We've had said so.
We did not however, made a Determination as to Whether the President did commit a crime, The Introduction to the Volumne 2 of our Report explains THAT decision. It explains, that under-long standing Department's Policy; A president Cannot be Charged with Federal Crime while Is In office, That Is unconstitutional, even If, the charges are kept under seal, and hidden from public, that too, Is prohibited.
The Special Counsel Office Is part of the DOJ, and by regulation It was Bound by That Department's Policy. Charging with a crime, Therefore was NOT an Option that we could consider. The Departmet's Written Opinion explaining the policy, makes several Important Points that further Informed our handling of the Obstruction Investigation. Those points summarized In our reports and I will describe two of them for you; First, The Opinion explicitly Permits the Investigation of a sitting-President, Because It Is Important to Preserve Evidence while memories are fresh, and Documents Available.
Among other things, That evidence could be use, If there were Co-conspirators who could be Charged now, and Second the Opinion says; The Consitutions requires a process, OTHER than Criminal Justice System to formally accuse a sitting president of wrongdoing, and beyond Department's Policy, We were guided by principles of fairness. It would be unfair to potentially accuse somebody of a crime, when there can be no court resolution of the Actual Charge. So that was Justice Department's Policy and Principles under which we operated and from them, We CONCLUDED that we would not reach a Determination one way or other about the president committed a crime. That Is the offices final position, and we will not comment on any other conclusions or hypothethicals about the president...."
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
You are missing a lot of common sense, for starters, this happened inside a movie set. Secondly, in this video it describes the specific case against the person who was responsible and legitimately licensed and obligated to follow safety regulations and standard procedures... which means she was indeed supposed to know what is going on with her prop department. On the other hand, the actor's job does not require any of that, he was not responsible for the prop gun nor did he knew what was going to happen. What do I mean by responsible? The actor's job does not require him to test or create props materials, his job is to act and follow the director's orders. now If you believe the actor's actions were intentional, then you are making serious accusations that require evidence...evidence that would have been helpful in court, and yet where were you? So just because you are looking at it from an audience perspective doesn't mean that what you are saying is the complete true of what actually happened. Fyi, the film armorer was found guilty while another individual was charged for tampering evidence but was not found guilty*
Update; For an example, do I believe tampering evidence is crucial to the investigation? Yes, but do I need to say that the system is rigged because the defendant was not found guilty? No. I know I am not qualified enough, nor do I have the ability to provide an expert opinion, or factual statements as to whether or not, Guitierrez Reed should be a free person. I have the common sense to know that I need sufficient amount of proof in order to be able to reach a proper conclusion. To know what is right, and to know what actually happened are two seperate aspects, and it looks like you are taking it based on faith and morality rather than logically, which I comprehend that both are two types of common sense. However, under the rule of law one of them is realistically taking upon consideration. In this matter, you should learn about innocent until proven guilty, since this is the common sense you should be using. @JinNani224
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@BobBilly506 As a general rule of thumb, from pretty much any guided missile, a third of the missile's weight is in guidance and flight control, a third is in the warhead, and a third of the weight is in fuel. Sometimes on interceptors, that number is even lower. That number could be as low as like 10 to 20% in the warhead, because you need to pack that missile with as much fuel as possible to get it up to speed.
So this isn't a hard and fast rule, but it's a good rule of thumb. It's a good way to estimate because you can't really cheat physics. So if an Iron Dome rocket is 90 kilos, then a rough estimate of the warhead is about 30 kilos or roughly 66 pounds.
In all honesty, Israel doesn't really give out the specifications of its weapons. But I would say that the Iron Dome warhead is probably more like ten percent so we might be dealing with a nine kilo warhead on that rocket because again these iron dome interceptors are actually maneuvering it's one of the few
interceptors that can actually maneuver and you need to pack that thing with as much fuel as possible so they can maneuver in midair Now, let's talk about this warhead. The Iron Dome has a proximity warhead. We know that. That means as it gets closer to its target, it explodes in a bunch of shrapnel so that it can hit that incoming warhead. It has a better chance of hitting that incoming warhead like a shotgun hitting a sporting clay. You don't pack a lot of high explosive into an interceptor with a proximity warhead, at least not enough to make a gigantic explosion.
You need enough to kind of push that shrapnel out to create a cloud of shrapnel that the incoming warhead can hit. And then there's the other issue of self-destruction. Surface-to-air missiles self-destruct when they lose track. And they do this to avoid exactly what people think happened,
to avoid this missile from coming down in a populated area and hurting people that it's supposed to protect. Now, there is a non-zero chance that self-destruct wouldn't work. As far as I know, there's only one video I've seen where this has happened.
And in a case like this, where self-destruct doesn't work, the biggest issue is fuel, not warhead. Remember, packing this interceptor with as much fuel as possible, it's probably going to be the fuel that detonates, not the actual proximity warhead because the proximity warhead is made up of
shrapnel and you just need enough explosive to push the shrapnel out. Still, the Iron Dome has fired thousands of missiles over its lifetime of service, and I've seen one video, one video of an interceptor failing to self-destruct. I think that's a pretty reliable system. So we have a missile that's not designed to explode with explosive force,
and a missile with a good track record of self-destructing if it does go off course. That being said, if I use ICD-203, which is a standard in the intelligence community for determining probability, I would say that it is unlikely that this is the impact of an Iron Dome missile.
3
-
If they couldn't properly govern Gaza, why should they deserve to own more land?
Gaza has received billions of dollars from nations around the world over the years, and yet, all it's government cared about was a way to retaliate like a bunch of animals that they are, rather than to diplomatically rebuild its socioeconomic status like Taiwan, NK and SK. These are the three countries that own a smaller amount of land, Taiwan, which is under geopolitical and economical imminent threat from China, remains fundamentally prosperous, while on the other hand, we have NK and SK, which have been at war for quite some time who decided to cool things down between eachother from potentially going through another catatrosphic war. NK, isolated from the world by sanctions, remains slightly functional, meanwhile SK has diplomatically been working with countries that were once enemies.
Gaza should've learn over the years, but no, It Is just another lawless place where it's own journalists cannot even tell the truth for fear of being attack by hamas and this shows why they shouldn't expand.
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@alexandrareuter327 IF, you have watch the COMEDY netflix special of Dave Chappelle "The Closer," then you would know that he said, "they cancelled her because she said, In an Interview, and THIS IS NOT EXACTLY WHAT SHE SAID, but effectually said, Gender was a fact." Would you like to imply certain quotes from Rowling's tweets, writing, and sayings, since you claim to re-search about it than Dave. I am not interest it to check out a video, but rather your own statements since you claim to say David was wrong. One last thing I would to implement into this conversation since you're not from the United States. In the U.S, we all practice the Constitutional rights of the first ammendment which is Freedom of Speech.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@AlfredoDr.Z Jews, Arabs, and Christians lived together In mostly peaceful coexistence In Palestine for hundreds of years under the rule of the Ottoman Turks Empire since 1516.
When War World l broke out In 1914, the Turks were on Germany's side, Britain decided to open up a Southern Front by capturing the Cyani Penninsula and taking Palestine from the Turks. So Britain recruited Arab Leaders to their side to fight against the Turks by promising them Palestine when they won. Britain also recruited several Local Battalions made up of local jews living In Palestine with the promise that if they helped defeat the Turks, the jews would get their own Homeland. This was appealing to a Jewish Movement called Zionism which basically advocated for a Jewish Homeland, So Britain essentially promised the same piece of land to the Arabs and Jews. Which raised the troops that Britain needed to open up the Southern Front against Turkey.
In 1920, Britain eventually received a mandate from the League of Nations to administer Palestine.
In 1947 The United Nations proposed a Partition Plan for Palestine which recommended the establishment of seperate Jewish and Arab States with Jerulem under International Administration, this plan was accepted by Jewish leadership but it was rejected by the Arab States and Palestinian Arab Leaders. The Partition Plan was never fully implemented. Israel DECLARED Independence In May of 1948. Neighboring Arab States INVADED Israel Inmmediately leading to the 1948 Arab-Israeli War.
Israel calls it the War of Independence, the Arabs call it Naka. While Israel were poorly equipped and trained they somehow won against five nations, Egypt, Iraq, Syria, Jordan and Lebanon. The Jewish militias THEN EXPELLED over 700,000 Palestinians from their homes, the State of Israel grew beyond the original borders set by the United Nations and many Palestinians ended up in a thin Strip land called Gaza, or landlocked area called The West Bank, or Lebanon.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Mark Warner Is a reality that many of these families go through, which many enables the physcological impacts of the kids' behaviour to act ruthlessly or without remorse. Instead, of living these Type of Reactive Synchronization within the bond of families; The parents' Responsibilities are to support and prevent from situations to escalate. One of the examples are; Pay close attention towards the child or children and learn how to Articulate with them with a proper education at Home. The child or children are born and raised under the arms of a biological or adopted parent for most of their lives, and whatever happens in the real world, will become a cause and effect and it would also include;The friends and those who they dont know, are going to be part of an Influence in their life time. Everyday a son or daughter will go home and the responsibility of a parent is to make sure what is going on. In this case, the adult parents are Irresponsible and ignorant enough to not be able to find a possibility that would of have prevented this tragic event from happening. In other hand, their unbelieveable stupidity were able to purchased and handled a gun as a gift to their FIFTEEN year old son AND Enabled his son's behaviour from, I quote "getting caught at class with ammunitions to ignoring school's meet up about their son's drawings." Furthermore, In accordings to the information, the parents fleed away BEFORE the problem for their safety; Considering they were the ones who bought the gun in the first place. Whether the son might of have threaten their parents or not, the parents are at fault the entire time as their involvement continues to show. This could of have been prevented many ways such as; Therapy support, Authority support, school board's proper standards and decisions in how to manage this kind of situations from students by assisting aid, Parent's support or whatnot. The parents are negligence due to giving or not been able to properly secured the gun from their son that is under their Names.
2
-
2
-
2
-
Mark Warner Whether they know about it or not, The parents have an advantage through year experiences. I have a questions for you such as; Why are the "kids able to hide things?" ¿What reason does it give for a kid to hide from their parents? And Why would YOU hide it from your parents? Genuinenly asking. From what I have read from your comment, I have never mentioned about finding comfort for myself... Rather I had to find a possibility AFTER my experienced and in order to reach to a preventable situation, I needed to reach towards my parent's attention and I learned how to manage alternative methods In how to help my siblings who were going through the same phases like me and that is where i said, "I had to give a different perspective towards my parents in order to pursue a more comfortable way for my sibling to express themselves." Now, your answer to your question, They're many porpotions that includes the physcological behaviour of a youth son or daughter which is commonly known as Bi-polar disorder. Not many kids often grow through it, but an Adult parent who is giving birth and raising a child; NO MATTER WHAT, the kid never ever, smiles at the table when eating... you're saying, every time when the kid appears infront of their parents, they're going to hide it and that is not the case, the kids often ignore them... there is always tensions within the bonds of families that results into fights during breakfast, dinner, when getting picked up from school or getting home from work and looking at your children playing outside, or staying inside their homes(room) upon physical behaviours or when they're outside with friends for long and without a text response or a reactive emotional replies (dodging their parent's awarenesses.) Parents cannot take control over their kids' live or be there the whole time, but knowing what they're doing at their presence...Making sure what they're doing, is a step fowards of CARING. For a teenager kid, they feel like they're getting controlled by their parents, but that isn't the case; Considering these kids barely know how to wipe their ass....I am not saying they're not capable of living... what I am saying, these kids are still under development and the only ones who are able to assist them at the time and space, are their parents. When there is a miss-connection, then it becomes another main layer of problem which in this case, the parent as well as the kids are very unaware of their own problems and act Subconsciously that resulted to fatal deaths.
2
-
No one else can tell what is going on with their child, the police aren't their parents, the teachers are not their parents, strangers are not their parents... therefore when it came down to the accuser having a mental breakdown; The teachers were able to notice and without any knowledge to why, He was sent to the offices and the parents were called for a conference TO EXPLAIN WHAT IS GOING ON WITH THEIR CHILD. In assumptions, the parents could claim they were not aware to which i have obviously mentioned during my replies. The kid literally had drawings... as for many people, I have also mentioned that many have taken differeng routes which means not all of us are going through the same shit, we are all different and majority of the teenagers make choices to escape their problems such as; Music, drawings, gaming, hangout with friends, drugs, or to a point of suicide or violent events. Nonetheless, it's parenting at it's main stage that was needed. The parents who are grown ass people should of have taken their time to search Aids through medical, authorities, or other agencies in order to minimize their kid's problem and if that isn't the case then it's just fucken bad parenting. For god sakes, its between a child and it's parents.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
KiselinaSRB Yup, I think it happened between 2015 and 2016. I remember hearing the news about Sacramento and France in 2015. One in Sacramento, and three in France, one in a crowded cafe and near restaurants, a stadium and a theater less than a kilometer away one from another. Then, two months later, in 2016, Germany was attacked twice, at a train station and at a concert thirty to an hour away from each other. Around June or July of the same year, a gay bar was hit in Florida by the same group of people claiming Scramento, France, and Germany.
Edit; Not Sacramento. It was San Bernardino.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@LAJiini As a general rule of thumb, from pretty much any guided missile, a third of the missile's weight is in guidance and flight control, a third is in the warhead, and a third of the weight is in fuel. Sometimes on interceptors, that number is even lower. That number could be as low as like 10 to 20% in the warhead, because you need to pack that missile with as much fuel as possible to get it up to speed.
So this isn't a hard and fast rule, but it's a good rule of thumb. It's a good way to estimate because you can't really cheat physics. So if an Iron Dome rocket is 90 kilos, then a rough estimate of the warhead is about 30 kilos or roughly 66 pounds.
In all honesty, Israel doesn't really give out the specifications of its weapons. But I would say that the Iron Dome warhead is probably more like ten percent so we might be dealing with a nine kilo warhead on that rocket because again these iron dome interceptors are actually maneuvering it's one of the few
interceptors that can actually maneuver and you need to pack that thing with as much fuel as possible so they can maneuver in midair Now, let's talk about this warhead. The Iron Dome has a proximity warhead. We know that. That means as it gets closer to its target, it explodes in a bunch of shrapnel so that it can hit that incoming warhead. It has a better chance of hitting that incoming warhead like a shotgun hitting a sporting clay. You don't pack a lot of high explosive into an interceptor with a proximity warhead, at least not enough to make a gigantic explosion.
You need enough to kind of push that shrapnel out to create a cloud of shrapnel that the incoming warhead can hit. And then there's the other issue of self-destruction. Surface-to-air missiles self-destruct when they lose track. And they do this to avoid exactly what people think happened,
to avoid this missile from coming down in a populated area and hurting people that it's supposed to protect. Now, there is a non-zero chance that self-destruct wouldn't work. As far as I know, there's only one video I've seen where this has happened.
And in a case like this, where self-destruct doesn't work, the biggest issue is fuel, not warhead. Remember, packing this interceptor with as much fuel as possible, it's probably going to be the fuel that detonates, not the actual proximity warhead because the proximity warhead is made up of
shrapnel and you just need enough explosive to push the shrapnel out. Still, the Iron Dome has fired thousands of missiles over its lifetime of service, and I've seen one video, one video of an interceptor failing to self-destruct. I think that's a pretty reliable system. So we have a missile that's not designed to explode with explosive force,
and a missile with a good track record of self-destructing if it does go off course. That being said, if I use ICD-203, which is a standard in the intelligence community for determining probability, I would say that it is unlikely that this is the impact of an Iron Dome missile.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@rexbanner1560 The Last Supper of 1991 shut down the military industrial complex of the 1940s-1960s. In 2002, the military budget increased in total by less than 5%, yet it does not compare to what the corporations in the USA received and generated. They earned more than 5 times more than the military industry. In other words, Amazon, Walmart and Target, Macys, Pharmaceuticals, Wallstreet, Guns and Arms, received 20 times more profit for their products and stocks than the security of a nation in one year.
As a result, it is extremely necessary now more than ever to be able to obtain a construction of a well organized army under the constitutional rights of the second amendment of the United States of America.
I understand that everyone has the opportunity to decide what they want to do with their life because it is a freedom, however, when it comes to essential needs like the rising prices of gas, oil, and goods caused by a war from Russia... citizens are not going to buy Guccis, Pradas, Louis, or a damn item from Target. What America should do is not ignore these kinds of emergencies because we are witnessing where this is all headed.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@karwashblark7499 We learn that the mutiny began on 24 June, 2023 against the Russian MOD, which as a result confused the Russian population and divided them between supporting the Russian federation or Wagner. Being prosecuted by the Russian Federation, and targeted by Ukraine, I think Wagner's chances of dying in Africa are slim compared to Belarus, or Russia due to geopolitics, as we continue to witness how people in Africa support them.
As we know, NATO considers Wagner a terrorist organization and at any time any member can use their military power against them.
What I am going to hint next is a theory; the CIA may have wanted to get at Prigozhin as leverage to obtain vulnerable information about Russia, and Any country covertly involved In Ukraine... and of course, in exchange for Wagner and Prigozhin's freedom; The kind of freedom that hides them under the rocks of Africa.
So who knows whether or not, there was a possibility that Prigozhin was compromised by a mole who might have overheard the leader, or someone speaking within Prigozhin's small circle about his true intentions for the Africa operation, and informed Putin, or someone from the Defense Ministry, and saw Prigozhin as a potential future threat?
If, Prigozhin's death is 100% confirmed, then I think, In theory it would have been better for Prigozhin to get involved in Africa, because probably He, or anyone knew that he wasn't the biggest threat, since African governments don't have nuclear weapons. It would have led NATO wanted to make a deal so it could take the advantage against those who do.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@5StarHeneral As a general rule of thumb, from pretty much any guided missile, a third of the missile's weight is in guidance and flight control, a third is in the warhead, and a third of the weight is in fuel. Sometimes on interceptors, that number is even lower. That number could be as low as like 10 to 20% in the warhead, because you need to pack that missile with as much fuel as possible to get it up to speed.
So this isn't a hard and fast rule, but it's a good rule of thumb. It's a good way to estimate because you can't really cheat physics. So if an Iron Dome rocket is 90 kilos, then a rough estimate of the warhead is about 30 kilos or roughly 66 pounds.
In all honesty, Israel doesn't really give out the specifications of its weapons. But I would say that the Iron Dome warhead is probably more like ten percent so we might be dealing with a nine kilo warhead on that rocket because again these iron dome interceptors are actually maneuvering it's one of the few
interceptors that can actually maneuver and you need to pack that thing with as much fuel as possible so they can maneuver in midair Now, let's talk about this warhead. The Iron Dome has a proximity warhead. We know that. That means as it gets closer to its target, it explodes in a bunch of shrapnel so that it can hit that incoming warhead. It has a better chance of hitting that incoming warhead like a shotgun hitting a sporting clay. You don't pack a lot of high explosive into an interceptor with a proximity warhead, at least not enough to make a gigantic explosion.
You need enough to kind of push that shrapnel out to create a cloud of shrapnel that the incoming warhead can hit. And then there's the other issue of self-destruction. Surface-to-air missiles self-destruct when they lose track. And they do this to avoid exactly what people think happened,
to avoid this missile from coming down in a populated area and hurting people that it's supposed to protect. Now, there is a non-zero chance that self-destruct wouldn't work. As far as I know, there's only one video I've seen where this has happened.
And in a case like this, where self-destruct doesn't work, the biggest issue is fuel, not warhead. Remember, packing this interceptor with as much fuel as possible, it's probably going to be the fuel that detonates, not the actual proximity warhead because the proximity warhead is made up of
shrapnel and you just need enough explosive to push the shrapnel out. Still, the Iron Dome has fired thousands of missiles over its lifetime of service, and I've seen one video, one video of an interceptor failing to self-destruct. I think that's a pretty reliable system. So we have a missile that's not designed to explode with explosive force,
and a missile with a good track record of self-destructing if it does go off course. That being said, if I use ICD-203, which is a standard in the intelligence community for determining probability, I would say that it is unlikely that this is the impact of an Iron Dome missile.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ararson4710 As a general rule of thumb, from pretty much any guided missile, a third of the missile's weight is in guidance and flight control, a third is in the warhead, and a third of the weight is in fuel. Sometimes on interceptors, that number is even lower. That number could be as low as like 10 to 20% in the warhead, because you need to pack that missile with as much fuel as possible to get it up to speed.
So this isn't a hard and fast rule, but it's a good rule of thumb. It's a good way to estimate because you can't really cheat physics. So if an Iron Dome rocket is 90 kilos, then a rough estimate of the warhead is about 30 kilos or roughly 66 pounds.
In all honesty, Israel doesn't really give out the specifications of its weapons. But I would say that the Iron Dome warhead is probably more like ten percent so we might be dealing with a nine kilo warhead on that rocket because again these iron dome interceptors are actually maneuvering it's one of the few
interceptors that can actually maneuver and you need to pack that thing with as much fuel as possible so they can maneuver in midair Now, let's talk about this warhead. The Iron Dome has a proximity warhead. We know that. That means as it gets closer to its target, it explodes in a bunch of shrapnel so that it can hit that incoming warhead. It has a better chance of hitting that incoming warhead like a shotgun hitting a sporting clay. You don't pack a lot of high explosive into an interceptor with a proximity warhead, at least not enough to make a gigantic explosion.
You need enough to kind of push that shrapnel out to create a cloud of shrapnel that the incoming warhead can hit. And then there's the other issue of self-destruction. Surface-to-air missiles self-destruct when they lose track. And they do this to avoid exactly what people think happened,
to avoid this missile from coming down in a populated area and hurting people that it's supposed to protect. Now, there is a non-zero chance that self-destruct wouldn't work. As far as I know, there's only one video I've seen where this has happened.
And in a case like this, where self-destruct doesn't work, the biggest issue is fuel, not warhead. Remember, packing this interceptor with as much fuel as possible, it's probably going to be the fuel that detonates, not the actual proximity warhead because the proximity warhead is made up of
shrapnel and you just need enough explosive to push the shrapnel out. Still, the Iron Dome has fired thousands of missiles over its lifetime of service, and I've seen one video, one video of an interceptor failing to self-destruct. I think that's a pretty reliable system. So we have a missile that's not designed to explode with explosive force,
and a missile with a good track record of self-destructing if it does go off course. That being said, if I use ICD-203, which is a standard in the intelligence community for determining probability, I would say that it is unlikely that this is the impact of an Iron Dome missile.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@truthisdifferent5965 Anyways, sadly you are being perceived through what observers would like you to believe and do. Most people are aware of America's relationships and conflicts abroad, many of us have agreed or disagreed with certain decisions on issues that the body of government has made throughout the years.
In order to have a proper educational discussion on these topics, you must understand that we should not deflect arguments with whataboutism...which is exactly what you are doing and what bots like to do. It creates a void and division between societies.
For example, I do not agree with the US decision on Afghanistan and Iraq during the 2000s, and I also do not agree with the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022. However, you do not see me going through chinese or russian channels related to the attacks on russian oil refineries speaking of, didn't Russia do the same or worse in the Middle East or elsewhere? No. Logically, I am conscious enough to know how absurd and robust it sounds...Some may argue that brainstorming would find ways to prevent future conflicts from happening, however, I disagree, I believe things are constantly and drastically changing as time goes by. Instead, I prefer to discuss it on a Ukrainian channel pointing out certain details ABOUT WHETHER or NOT, it's decisions were strategically correct in the long term through forms of credible data gathering, atleast this way you get to a conclusion.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
daryabrownbear I think the war has gone on too long and gone too far, too many things have happened, that the people around are feeling the conflict or backlash and are drastically changing the way they think about all, the real world problems... So I have a theory that may seem reasonable, if you connect with those who are closely related to the conflict. There is a small possibility that this tragedy that occurred in moscow was the fault of the russian regime... The question one might ask is, but how? Well, figuratively speaking, they are the reason the gates of hell opened… what does that mean? is that in terrible times of war, a real event happened, the answer is, the russians used conscripts... and so the question of this theory starts with, if the Russian prisoners were conscripted, then that means that there is a small possibility of the bending over the law motto, that among those prisons there were foreigners who were ordered to fight for the russians... I believe there was a time when they said that if they could last more than 6 months, then they could return home and have russian stuff and freedom. Because, how did they manage to move with that specific type of machines before, despite great warnings and conflicts?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@dr.burtgummerfan439 It Involves HOW the NRA distributes it's goods and the RELATIONS It may potential have In terms of automatic-Rifles and attachments that may otherwise continue to be misscarry, illegally sold or whatnot, by a handful of people.
Many people seemed to Ignore the physcological factor of motive behind these individuals' ill intent, or politically/religious irrationalities that are often shown through a *RED FLAG*.
During these passed three decades there's been horrific events from people who were considered normal from the eyes of the public to that moment.
A margin of these people who committed mass shootings have mainly bought their guns from legal states that laws and policies are less strictier because of lobbyism particularly by the NRA who find ways to decept the concept of the Second Ammendment Rights.
At a time and place where a new sources of methods are created-- the black market still provides clients who have offers from illegal States giving them a much more difficult task for the local law enforcement to be able to trace it.
I do believe every citizen has the rights to defend themselves with a weapon from an invasion, thusavoid prosecution by foreigners, Since it's in our constitution to protect our Free State.
But The problem we are facing is the lack of exercise, training as well as stricter background checks-- because these are the three pieces that results whether or not somebody is stable enough to continue to buy particularly an autorifle and prevent an attack from happening.
How??
I suggest that a citizen who wants to armed themselves will have to go through a Process and Procedures which it makes sure people follow through a multiple test and exercise of safety standards.
What this means is that as a result there will be a score that can determine your tier level. Some may fail and that's because of a reason... this doesn't mean they will be stripped off their rights and guns taken away, No. It just means he no longer fits on the following future records from gettinf the new manufactured materials, and they can try again until they have physically rehab themselves and score a tier level.
Tier level equals to a Radius perimeter that allows a certain type of guns to be use at a certain area by a certain person.
For an example;
at your home or private properties, any citizen who score tier level 1-3 will be able to buy level 1[pistols] to level 3[auto-rifles].
However only tier level 3 will be able to carry level 3 guns as a form of vigilantes on certain broader areas -- as the highest possibilities are that we can evaluate the amount of people who may be intellectual trained would prevent to minimize the amounts per death.
Meanwhile, the carry of pistols will reach tier level 1 [small radius in short terms; size of a car].
Tier 2 level would equals to the size of a neighborhood block or a ranch that a specify weapon can only be held by tier 2 citizens and so forth.
The reason why I blueprint it this way because there were several instances that auto-rifles and shotguns have been uses on unvernable public areas or roads by the wrong physically i'll people.
Guns level 1(pistols) 2(shotguns, attachments) 3(auto-rifles etc).
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Mark Warner In according to the parent's accuser; There is a high probability they're going to try to minimize their federal sentences and in order to do that, the lawyers who represent them will strategically twist their statements that isn't based of the entire truth. If, they're going to claim "The parents weren't aware of their son's behaviour," giving a reason why, then there might be a slight chance, however the amount of records between the accuser and the parents involved are transparent by the minute as the agencies are able to obtain evidences. Now, when talking about our life experiences as a youth; Mostly everybody have different routes and many of the kids have taken their decisions such as, smoking weed, drinking, staying alone, hanging out with friends or what not, in order to avoid their problems as well as their families. But I do think, when a child isn't able to open up about their problems with their parents it increases their anxiety and depression which is unfortune state of mind at such age, therefore the Adults(parents) Are suppose to find POSSIBILITIES that could help the child to speak up. Many of the parents have inherited bad habits that are used to force on their child and it would be considered a (Bad education, or limit thoughts.)So, It's negligence and Ignorance and they're at fault. There is one thing that is inevitable and that would be Genetics and developments; They're many types of mental illness that are impossible to detect and without care it could continue to get worse, therefore, the parents are responsible to help their child with medical Aids and spiritual support, but many results into lack of parenting. Whether someone is poor or not, it's how you are able manage to thrive during worst times.
1
-
Mark Warner well I mean, I did mentioned, what are many of the reasons that causes a child to disengage their emotions and speak upon their situations. A child is literally living under the parents guard and roof majority of their life time, and friends, families and those who they dont know become partly an influenced in their lives. When a youth tries to commits suicide, is definitely the parent's responsibility to prevent it. For an example, I have also been through these life experiences at my youth times; Where at an early stage, I didn't confront my parents about what I was going through. I chose to ignore my parents because i felt they didn't really care much of what was going on with me, and when I did, they often compare me with other kids to show a comparison of how badly their situations are from mine Instead of finding a possibility that could lure me to speak with them in order to minimize or resolve my problems. As time went by, meanwhile I chose weed and friends to avoid it. After I kept getting older, at age 17, I had a realization of how I became who I was and How I ended up with suicidal thoughts...It's a journey of mine that I have picked up and throughout my travels, those around become a cause and effect and I was the one who was In control on where I should go... luckily, I was the one who found a possibility to express what I was going through with my parents, and not been the only one in the family; I found more chances and I did my best to give my parent's a different perspective that could help them reach one of my siblings in a different matter that i know could make them comfortable to talk about it. When times of drama happened, I'd make sure my parents never pressure one of my siblings with anger, but to articulate with a proper education, considering that it would accelerate their thoughts to subconciously committ an act of suicide or any of that matter. I think, Parents should always know how to confront it, because a child must be their first priority and if they fail to do so, then it becomes lack of parenting. It's terrible of how there is a reality in where a parent has been in the lives of their child for 15 years since birth, could potential inflict their son or daughter physcologically or/and physically; It may be domestic violence, verbal threats, or really ignorant Influencial thoughts specifically, Physcological behaviours, and political aspects.... these are fundementally huge that leads the kid where they are today. In this case, the mother of the accuser enabled his son's physcological behaviour about how he should "be more careful to not get caught with ammunition in school." It proves how poorly they know about how to exercise the second ammendment of the constitution, and how ignorant and un-educated they are about these kind of situations. These parents have failed their child AND their influenced towards their child have caused many innocent lives.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@maxsmith695 It's bigger than you think.
We could say, arms dealers are the "third parties/anarchists" who get their hands dirty.
Additionally, there has been multiple evidence in the past of people in the military, agencies or levels of government illegally selling classified security and intelligence information from other foreign nations as well as their own.
These illegal contracts between traitors and anarchists are basically Intels that provide military logistics. giving anarchists the ability to bypass or circumvent military forces to transport illegal weapons.
we are talking about a business of almost a trillion dollars that implies the destruction of other economies. while those who profit are the Contributors, Distributors, Anarchists, Traitors and terrorist Organizations.
So yes, you can blame the whole government, but know that It can be a very impossible task to keep everyone in check because there are so many good guys and bad guys who are smart enough to stay hidden.
In a world where life and death are In everyone's minds, these group of bad people are playing games putting other people's lives at risk, because it would seem easier for them to destroy than to build or re-build.
1
-
@theancientsancients1769 They can, however we have seen so many countries like the governments of Afghanistan and Iraq give away their military-funded arsenals because they were unable to stabilize their personnel so that most of them would become traitors or refugees to their, or others nations that as a result, Afghanistan fell apart In a matter of 20 days.
On the other hand, I think as the Navy Seal mentioned in the video, the Somali forces have fought well In compared to Afghanistan and Iraq.
If your question is about funding, then you know why... Ukraine is in a major international war against multiple factions that have been engaged with Russia since its invasion. In addition, also their territorial lands have been occupied and sabotaged that consist of a high percentage of the economic contribution among other nations that are now burned or stopped working, such as, Gas, Oil, or Agricultural Fields... these are elements of survival been erase from what other countries need which makes the price affordable due to foreign relations and trade.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@kraevinmoorehed1776 "The only way to stop it is get the kid what ever he wants... which leads to stuff like this" Is a reality that many of these families go through, which many enables the physcological impacts of the kids' behaviour to act ruthlessly or without remorse. Instead, of living these Type of Reactive Synchronization within the bond of families; The parents' Responsibilities are to support and prevent from situations to escalate. One of the examples are; Pay close attention towards the child or children and learn how to Articulate with them with a proper education at Home. The child or children are born and raised under the arms of a biological or adopted parent for most of their lives, and whatever happens in the real world, will become a cause and effect and it would also include;The friends and those who they dont know, are going to be part of an Influence in their life time. Everyday a son or daughter will go home and the responsibility of a parent is to make sure what is going on. In this case, the adult parents are Irresponsible and ignorant enough to not be able to find a possibility that would of have prevented this tragic event from happening. In other hand, their unbelieveable stupidity were able to purchased and handled a gun as a gift to their FIFTEEN year old son AND Enabled his son's behaviour from, I quote "getting caught at class with ammunitions to ignoring school's meet up about their son's drawings." Furthermore, In accordings to the information, the parents fleed away BEFORE the problem for their safety; Considering they were the ones who bought the gun in the first place. Whether the son might of have threaten their parents or not, the parents are at fault the entire time as their involvement continues to show. This could of have been prevented many ways such as; Therapy support, Authority support, school board's proper standards and decisions in how to manage this kind of situations from students by assisting aid, Parent's support or whatnot. The parents are negligence due to giving or not been able to properly secured the gun from their son that is under their Names.
1
-
Proper Safety Measurements, Strong Safety background check-records(health, and Criminal) and A Course of Training Exercise to whether confirm you're eligible to receive an Approval and License to obtain a Rifle Weapon. Have Rifle weapons Inside public/Private Inventory, where it can only be Store and use within the practice range perimeters, and overwatch logs...Meanwhile I do think, Secondary weapons should also have the same strong Instructions where clients are ONLY ELIGIBLE TO BUY A Type of second weapon based of their Overall Results. The only difference Is; You are able to use it as one of many Bear arms for protection within your properties... which Technically, these rethorical changes would not affect the second ammendment right of the U.S consitution, which in terms means, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed".
1
-
Rethorically, I'd say the word "Radius" could pratically have a meaning on a structural form of protections and security for a free state and It's people; Radius can be measure in a form of a Distance, and the Overall Results from the Course of Exercise Training and Safety Measurements Tests of a client decides what Type of Secondary Weapons you are eligible to use In a General Level. In circumstances like properties such as a home It will become part of the effect, which means; You're able to use the required Secondary Weapons from the distributors and agencies in accordings to their approval to ONLY when necessary to protect your home, and to Re-Store and Confirm the occurences in Data, and the amount of Shells used which could be check and balance the background Identification of amount In ammunitions bought from a specific client... or you can Use the required weapons on practice range areas. When it's Public Areas, then they're going to be a Less Percentage of People who are going to be eligible to carry the specific types of required Secondary Weapons On a Radius of Public Environment. It means, The security of the people and the type of weapon to use will only be Necessary during a domestic-threat level. The small fraction of well-Experienced Citizens are the ones who would carry and would require a stricter Practical and Safety Courses. In the long, who In the moment could proactively decide in times of needs. Meanwhile In the other hand, There has been criminal cases In the past like, "The shooting death of Ahmaud Arbery," where Three residents chased an Individual on a truck through a road with a shotgun, Who assumed he was a burglar; The Result of the Verdict was a "Hate Crime, guilty where Two of them received a Life Sentence possible without Parole, and the third, Life Sentence allows probability of parole After thirty years." These people were NOT capable as well as Ineligible to obtain such shotgun weapon in a radius of a Public Environment. In simplistic words; The radius gets smaller on a much higher level like public areas. While the lower level defines owned properties where the Radius doesn't have much an effect..The Radius Effect would Define the Type of Weapons Required to use, and the type of weapons eligible are based of the test results from a client... Criminals cannot buy a gun, but In Record, Those who distribute it as a client or company are going to handle them over whether It's by Intentions or negligences, which can be trace. The only official company who have majority control of it's distributions In the market, are the NRA who consist of living an old traditional greed; Where profits are on the amount of weapons rather than the advancement Into a Proper Structure of Security and Protection for the people and a free state that would financially effect the NRA, but would Minimize and save lives. The Second Ammendent of the U.S constitution is the foundation of human rights to legal protection of the security of a free state under a well-controlled militia. But however, by having cracks in the system; Who doesnt allow strategic laws to take place It makes it difficult to improve. Unfortunely, they're many people who Ironically opposes to Ideas that could effect them and not the entire population. It seems to me, We are not moving anywhere but staying dumb.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@thepixelw4rrior644 super creepy even after the fact about how the amount of people who tried to overthrown a government and the democracy that millions of people live by; These people have consistently shown what they're against and for, to which at this point it doesn't have a difference from what certain Russian people specifically elders, and bots have been about it. In reality, it's a universal mental problem of individuals who wants to see the world burn and we can tell who they are. They're some cases of established organizations that would like to enforce racism, hatred and violence, because they all simply share the Idea of hate against Neo-Nazis, Communists, Facists, or whatnot which is Ironic. Today, the problem we face is how we interact with Information without the Identification whether It Is a primary source. Now, we see an enormous growth of people who either agree or disagree with what the news are publicly showing. But In truth, it's sickening to read what's on many people's mind and we can tell, Those who disagree, are skeptical, but when asked about whether a War was necessary, they deflect(manipulators)...I think, An Invasion"Special military Operation" against a "Neutral" seperate country, shouldn't be a taken as discussion. But these people who are in favor of the war would rather find A Way to attack others meanwhile They're others who have gone offrails, they would like to see people suffer. Now, We can see which countries rejected the suspension of Russia on been In the human rights Council, and it proves what they're about... So, I'd say; Time changes people and some people will decides to change through time. If they are historical events to where and when anyone have become a victim of, then just to let you know, they were and are some fed officials who voted against a War or operations, but unfortunely they weren't able to gain the right amount of votes to deny certain bills.
1
-
1
-
@highpriestofgavinalmightyh1304 What you wrote It's basically a different subject related to the over spectrum of "Illegal Immigration." I understand, there has been an Increased of "Refugees" who have come from other countries to receive asylum for these passed few centuries. Whether it were Natural Disasters, Dictarorships, Coup'd et, Economical Crisis, Pandemics or what not. When it happens, People are going to travel In Migration and some will eventually risk it and trespass into other nations due to circumstances of the foreign countries' Laws and Policies. In general; Any US administratrion will Investigate and follow certain procedures to figure the situation out, and what actions are going to be required during these cases, specially when an Individual does not have any identification to proof Itself. Legally, they're going to be charged based of what kind of actions the Individual committ it, or made ever since step in foot on a foreign land before a Civil Trial, however not many who have been arrested are labeled as "Terrotists etc...". Currently, there is a majority of Ukraine refugees who within most have relatives in the U.S while other don't. Many of these refugees aren't able identify themselves so its difficult to seek asylum without any evidence of Birth certf, passports or whatnot to the Borders And Protection Services in order to temporarily received authorization to Visit the US, So It often gets deny, and when it comes to immigration cases; Some States laws have an Immense Impact on courts that operates within the border systems. So you need to think about in details before thinking it's an "Invasion". Meanwhile thesr Refugees RAN away from a dictator who actually used Military Armed Forces to ambush and Invade Another country and furthermore theaten the entire world to not Interfere or else Nuclear weapons will be Use which concludes a potential worldwide war crime caught on video tape.... ill go off topic here but, I have noticed from your first comment, you are not even from the US or Mexico, how the fuck are you suppose to know. What source do you use to get info ?
1
-
1
-
1
-
@highpriestofgavinalmightyh1304 Location has a significant role with how informations are distribute it and whether they are reliable; When you're living In Canada, Mexico, U.S, or Nicaragua, Technology could continue to evolve; Where as a whole society have access to certain regions within the Internet. As time goes by virtually it has taken effect on all of us as it construct itself into a living Machine to where it works quite differently than Radios, or Broadcoast Stations. When you're using any devices with sim cards, or services you're connected torwards your closest towers and It detects, sends and receive these frequencies and transmitts to those near your closest cities or areas. One of the examples would be, the Journalists to who you have mentioned. So You might of have been suggested by someone close to you, your neighborhood or the people who are suscribe to the same phone company's towers. So the Internet appears to works on a Algoritim. Another structural form of transmit information with communication outlets could be through Televisions, or radios which are either own by the same or different group of bodies who highily manage what to publish or broadcoast at your disposal. So my point is, Realistically, you might live either close or a thousand miles away from the U.S Southern Border, therefore you absorb what's surrounds you that leads you to create an idea and write, or say your point of view. Which is totally different than In compare to someone who actually lives near the area. You by saying "These refugees are invading is thought of mockery... so elaborate with a case in the U.S in where an individual or multiple groups are labeled status; as Invaders? Then i might just shut up and acknowledge otherwise, Location matters when it comes to Information. Another example, Technology plays a huge role in how voters shape their thoughts when it comes to upcoming bills, so it doesn't matter where you're from as long as we as a whole population still doesn't know how to absorb and tell the difference between what's real or not, will continue to get stuck playing the machine's game. By you not been at the U.S Southern Border, you're not able to see it from a different aspect. Let's say; It's easy to talk about it, but it's a whole different ball game once you're there.
1
-
1
-
1
-
The Individual was clearly sworned In which is atleast something to slightly consider, If the the topic gets investigate it by his published testimony explaining his time in the service, then It would only mean that these non-human "biologics" exist to this day and are operational with these UAPs.
I wonder How Long and how many languages they would learn from all of us to be able to Interact, move before, and after an event, or "do specific disturbing things." In my opinion,
With, for humans, or humans themselves.
If, Nonhuman Entities can enter a UAP, and sustain travel as described and I quote, "up to 80,000 feet AGL, that's considered space to us", and can rapidly descend to 12-30,000 feet AGL in a matter of seconds, then I would believe they are cheating life, as time travelers.😂
for an example; A different perspective of life for austronauts on the ISS Is, unlike Earth looking up at the skies, because from their view It's like watching the world on the ISS spin faster as the forces pull it, between space, and the planet moving towards all the nations of the world in a matter of hours.
If you can move like the UAPs, you'll be there In seconds.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@sandybennett_itsme Trump did not bring troops home or end endless wars, but rather added fuel to the fire by adding more troops, deepening dependence on private contractors, and expanding air warfare. In fact, he revoked a rule that would summarize statistics on deaths from drone strikes in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Somalia. He extended the conflicts by seeing an increase in the Pentagon's annual budget. To date, results have shown that under the Trump administration, it carried out eight times as many drone strikes in Afghanistan between 2015 and 2019, with an increase in civilian casualties. In Yemen, he repeatedly used veto power to override bipartisan congressional majorities that sought to stop U.S. military involvement and block the flow of weapons to the conflict.
Trump gutted the intermediate range nuclear forces treaty, withdrew from the open skies treaty that guaranteed transparency between the US, Europe and Russia, and failed to extend the critical New Start treaty with Russia. this guy sold weapons to dictators, tried to launch a new war in Kenya, sparked a cold war with China, and assassinated a militant Iranian general, putting troops and Americans at greater risk. The guy used the government to blackmail other countries through sanctions so they could do his dirty bidding abroad and in the US. trump nearly led the US into a nuclear war against NK and a civil war against eachother. While also passing bills that were controversial among many others, children detention centers, the disruption of the education system, and the weaponization of executive agencies against low income communities. In principle, geopolitics is fundamental to the lives of all people and therefore to understand why this is happening now, we must look closer and analyze the past decisions that led to where things are today.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
There has been many new methods of been able to craft or get a hold of guns, but there isn't a proper way of fixing the problems with How It should be distribute. Some people think It's a choice to blame between Gun Reform or mental Illness, when In reality we are facing both. Whether gun reform Increases the security process; At some point In time, they're going to be people who will Intent to harm innocent lives, by becoming a bridge of source for those Individuals, and families who might not be financially capable of been able to receive the correct Health Treatments... Considering, Mental Illness becomes a huge discussion for politicians to take action In the near future, It's a question of where the money will go. Rethorically; By Having an Organization or Private Sector take ownership of the Arsenal and Mental Health Facilities In the U.S, It would mean...A potential feed of violence, due to the overall connection between third parties. It takes the entire population out of propotion, Since they're ones who would eventually Fund It...
I wouldn't want to bring this up, but it Is figurately kind of like; How we all buy gas that's distributed from a certain percentage of Russian Oil Companies who they're the ones who funds their war, means of transportation.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Emilio-sq6gb The Evidences can be shown through Physical Data, Scientific Examinations & Forensics Investigations to which are lead by Selected Professionals Who Analyze and obtain Bio/Geo Informations of the aftermath within the Effected Perimeters and casualties. The evidence's details are Elements of materials that were used against civilians such as; Type of Weapons, missiles, shells, ammos, tanks, vehicles, drones, medical poisons... Intels whether it may be radios, or frequencies, Logistics... Evidences... It Is everything that has been left damaged, Materials containing DNAs around hot areas like, "Interrogation/execution rooms", and the victims who have been mentally/physically harm... The Ukraine government have already been informed about every situation that happened across their country since feb 24th, but the only sources that has been published throughout the world on mostly every outlets were; Intels, Audios, Images, & videos footages. The separatists are the ones who helped russian military forces Invade Ukraine In order to claim their Independence. The separatists racists/Nazis who are pro-russia, coordinated into the destruction of holocausts memorials.... so it's a pretty obvious data that can easily be comprehend it, but From your replies, it further proves you're not mentally and morally capable of human capabilities to comprehend reality. As an example, I wouldn't say; You're not free to do with your life, however your continuous negligence causes consequences to which affects everyone who surrounds you. Which is called, "Naive". By every sentence you write is pretty naive.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@سروشرهیده According to the hamas run Health Ministry, that is the estimated amount. Considering that they are the ones who stated that you have to understand the reality, the lack of defense and the neglect that hamas had towards the Palestinians in Gaza, which led to their projected number being accumulated. Don't get me wrong, Israel is to blame, but you also have to hold hamas responsible for October 7th because the question still remains...
why so many people? Well, as we know for decades, these two regions have always been in conflict over who owns what and what to do with power and religion, we know from evidence about who and what led to October 7 in Israel that caused Israel to retaliate by putting Many others in Gaza at risk.
The real piece of evidence was that hamas felt that annexing certain parts of Israel would greatly affect the movement in the West Bank, as well as the houthis and Iran in hopes of unbalancing the odds and motivating people to do follow the same steps. However, Instead, what happened was that they attacked Israel and took away people who weren't even Israelis because hamas knew they didn't have the ability to defend themselves by land, sea and air... So they used years and years of taxpayer funds from Palestinian residents and corrupt international organizations to build tunnels, or whatnot, and all that while hiding among the Palestinian people. Many examples in which consist show the bargain of hostages and post bases. Again, why were these people a hit by the Israeli army? Because humans tend to hold grudges that I believe were intentional from the beginning after October 7th. In conclusion, Both sides needs to be investigated, trial and prosecuted for their actions.
Side Note, While many people would like to blame the US, sometimes you have to look closely at the world and see how things would change without them sending their most powerful ship during the first phase of the war in order to protect their units stationed around the Middle East, and we are talking about countries who have diplomatic relationships with the US. Another thing, I would like to note that it is also to economically protect assets that would, otherwise affect many populations around the world that depend on diplomatic solutions or foreign economic relations. We are not just talking about the US, but many others who uses the same logistics. It is a very complex topic that requires a tremendous amount of time, attention, patience and knowledge.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@wedoalittletrolling The Iranians reported that not 300, but 3 drones were shot down by their defense systems near the city of Isfahan, an Iranian Air Force base located near a nuclear facility. So keep in mind that the OP said it was good for Iran not to escalate, to which I then responded that maybe the reason they haven't done so yet is because their nuclear facilities were almost demolished?
To put it into real perspective, what are the chances now after what happened, that not just three drones could bypass Iran's aerospace space? What would happen if 300 drones or a ballistic missile were used? you see what I mean, I had implied that THEY WERE ALMOST DEMOLISHED.
The point of this issue is that this raises many concerns for Iran, since it showed that Israel is capable of large scale attacks on Iran's most valuable assets. As for now we can make a statement that Iran's recent attacks demonstrated that Israel and it's faction overcomes Iran's faction through power and alliance.
And this is where it is becoming a global problem. Iran, like hamas, knows that it is really stupid of them to continue putting millions of people at risk for some pride or loyal individuals who possibly cooperated or committed such evil acts, one way or another. Iran, the Houthis, Hezbollah, all of them Knew that the odds are not in their favor, and yet, why do they continue to risk other peoples lives?
I would like to give a future reference, we understand that Ukraine had internal conflicts, because we saw it many times throughout the Years since 2014 and prior to the war. But now, Unlike The Ukraine of Today, I think the difference in this comparison lies in the influence and behavior of both events. After Feb 22, and Oct 7th. On the one hand, russia declared a special military operation against Ukraine, which soon after turned into a full scale invasion, leaving Ukraine to decide whether or not to fight for it's country and the freedom to live there despite risking lives. As time went by, we saw the support of countries to Ukraine... While on the other hand, Gaza provoked it by attacking 1,200 civilians and taking foreigners and Israelis hostage Into Gaza. In addition, reports of information were stated that Iran had indirectly helped hamas and others help build to become the aggressor since oct 7th.
I know that many people keep talking about past events between Gaza and Israel, however, the important truth is that none of them reached this level of magnitude between the parties that it is now.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@eby2257 what does your comments have to do towards the topic of the video, or in other words; The controversy, between a comedian, a group of communities, and what is at stake? Many people forget the point, It Is to show Empathy comes both ways, It Is Bi-sexual. An example would be; If, you have a brother or sister who are going through the same experience, or you have already met someone then most likely, they're always going to be someone in your family or around who haven't experienced the new changes, or what not, and some will comfortably show empathy no matter who you or others may be, and Dave showed it with Daphne Dorman. The problem Dave has is against white people, because throughout the years, decades and even centuries The principle behind their evil intentions in how to break humanity have changed and influenced people lives as well as businesses industries. Particularly, System design to obstruct society, mainly minority communities. When dave said, "I have been fighting my entire career, Just when I had them by the ropes, they change the routes." He even layer down a Joke about it with the "Black Clifford" children book story.
1
-
@eby2257 what you have wrote is exactly what Dave mentioned. An ordinary person with a conscious would express their mind and makes sure it's logical to say or write. Therefore I could assume, you haven't watch the comedy special, yet... Daphne Dorman was a close friend of Dave Chappelle, who personally admired him. After "Stick and Stones," Dave Chappelle received backlash by the LGBTQ, specially trans community, and dragged him all over twitter. Daphne Dorman wrote in a twitter August 29, 2019 "Punching down requires you to consider yourself superior to another group. Dave Chappelle, doesn't consider himself better than me in any way. He isn't punching up or punching down. He's punching lines. That's his job and he's a master of his craft." Daphne was attacked by her own community for days, killed herself from jumping out of a building with a note on October 11, 2019. We do not know what is going through her life, but the attacks did not help Daphne at all.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Countries who opposed Against the suspension of russia on the Human Rights Council after war crimes on Donbas; Algebria, Belarus, Bolivia, Burundi, Central Afro Republic, China, Cuba, Dem PR of korea, Eritrea, Ethiopa, Gabon, Iran, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Lao PDR, Mali, Nicaragua, russia fed, Syrian Arab Republic, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Zimbabwe.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I really need to say this, everyone are starting to see through your motive as much as those who promoted. We know that hamas are connected to Iran. We know that these protests around the world, more inclusively to western nations are connected to hamas and others muslims and liberal organizations involved who are in for various reasons, specially on the internet with some unhinged stuff. We know that Yemen are intentionally for Gaza, and ecommerce, but at the same time, they have an interested doing it. So, We might possibly know that someone is paying them to do it... and no one wants to talk about it. So i think the whole point is that the more this keeps going the more chaos it will happen. So if people think this is a good idea to encourage evil people who manipulate these protestors by saying free palestine, as a form of deception, then they are wrong towards this particular issue. What we need to do is unite people from both sides who suffered the most, and help nursure them during times of need, and communicate with eachother rather than lying or ignoring.
1
-
1
-
@kcsnipes supposedly, yes ofc lol, there is a lot of ifs, because for now, we are still getting information about how it potentially happened. The main key element is that the shooter's claims were previously reported and investigated.
So many of us are wondering Why did it happen? I believe, It may vary for several reasons, such as the shooter's social environment with students, faculty, and staff,
and/or a community that may have gangs, friends or families of friends that could have physically and mentally influenced the shooter. Third, as time goes by, it is highly likely that the Internet influenced a kid shooter, in a negative way
Therefore, only a conjunction or theories that include alternative scenarios can be assumed or written, since the answers are still unknown whether the kid shooter obtained the guns from his parents, friends or a third party.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Jeremynano By top military officials, I mean active members who are at the top of the chain of command. So we are talking about people who works for the government. They have access to the most advanced capabilities and are required by the government to use it to protect hundreds and hundreds of millions of Americans from harm, whether at home or abroad. They also have the duty to protect military personnel deployed in partner countries.
So In other words, on a daily basis, these are the people who know what's really going on in the world and what tomorrow will be like because they're the ones providing real time information to Congress and the president about what the heck is going on. in fact they have advisors who gives ideas how they should address this situation. Eventhough I don't personally know what their decisions are, in a glampse, I can tell where this is heading.
On the one hand, I understand that the students' opinion is to stop and cease fire because innocent people should not die, and that Israel must approach this differently, while also preventing innocent people from dying and terror from expanding. On the other hand, I don't think we can or should dictate what a country can or cannot, when it considers innocent people in Israel and their livelihoods to be at risk from proxies.
1
-
@Jeremynano I think I must have written it wrong... you asked two questions, one, who are these senior officials protecting? They protect hundreds and hundreds of millions of Americans from harm, whether at home or abroad. They also have a duty to protect their military personnel deployed in partner countries.
Second question, and who exactly do these senior military officers work for? Answer, they work for the US government using advanced technologies to provide real time information to Congress and the President about what is happening around the world, including Gaza, Israel, South Africa, Ukraine, Europe, etc. The US military have advisors who give ideas or options on how the president or Congress should approach or approve a bill related to this situation.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I think the failure to give Palestinians the right to know their decisions of October 7 was terrible which fell into the hands of Hamas. You may be wondering, but how? Considering what Israel is doing, it definitely points out the lack of empathy towards Gaza, as well as Hamas for Gaza. Why? Because Hamas's negligence in representing these people without helping them or giving them the opportunity to evacuate before October 7th out of Gaza caused their many lives...
So yes, in a way, after October 12th, according to the population from areas like hospitals and schools, and the number of reports of people who were unable to evacuate showed that underneath these areas that are now occupied by Israel gave an idea of what was going on at the time, between the Palestinian people and hamas... and to be honest, it should be logical to diplomatically let the people who represent a government know what they're going to do. Instead, I think hamas could have done it deliberately, in one way or another, since it was their responsibility to prevent the numbers from increasing. Furthermore, what is even worse is that they brought hostages to Gaza, among them they were not Israelis, which further gave Israel the opportunity to act, but as many did not expect they were violent, which led to the Palestinians being stranded with hamas. in a place where the tolls described that most of them were innocent people. In addition to this, the real problem here is that we are witnessing the power differential between hamas and Israel. However, the problem here is that hamas continues to hide hostages, putting Palestinians at risk, which it considers a form of human protection.
So yes, hamas is terrible for their decision that put thousands in danger, while also pointing a question about... how israel is going to rescue the hostages without losing casualties in areas they might not have had the chance to go through? If that scenario had occurred, I think to a large extent, it's another way to protect hamas by shielding them.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@arturferrao7353 It's interesting how your answer is that without paying attention to what it provides. Facts. The key point here is that The guy has information found in Gaza about the inside operation of Palestinian militants who participated in the October 7 attack. So if you are atleast educated or you want to be, this is the type of information that outlets are missing.
Furthermore, what I discovered is that you only share things that you want others to read, or you think that googling the questions and choosing a part of the paragraph from a secondary source is the logical way to answer, when it is not. For example, one of your source, dust and tribe, title, the attack on the Israeli music festival... IS NOT a factual statement. It is a written opinion that questions why the event was relocated without providing adequate evidence of how it was relocated...walking in circles, Keyword, "unknown reasons." it was written on oct 16. So what is the point of writing that report if it is only going to be based on observation? You see... You can't consider it as a credible source when there isn't any evidence or factual information that can solidify that report.
1
-
@arturferrao7353 It's interesting how your answer is that without paying attention to what it provides. Facts. The key point here is that The guy has information found in Gaza about the inside operation of Palestinian militants who participated in the October 7 attack. So if you are atleast educated or you want to be, this is the type of information that outlets are missing.
Furthermore, what I discovered is that you only share things that you want others to read, or you think that googling the questions and choosing a part of the paragraph from a secondary source is the logical way to answer, when it is not. For example, one of your source, dust and tribe, title, the attack on the Israeli music festival... IS NOT a factual statement. It is a written opinion that questions why the event was relocated without providing adequate evidence of how it was relocated...walking in circles, Keyword, unknown reasons. It was written on oct 16. What happened to the updates? LoL... So what is the point of writing that report if it is only going to be based on observation? You can't consider it as a credible source when there isn't any evidence or factual information that can solidify that report.
1
-
@arturferrao7353 It's interesting how your answer is that without paying attention to what it provides. Facts. The key point here is that The guy has information found in Gaza about the inside operation of Palestinian militants who participated in October 7. So if you are atleast educated or you want to be, this is the type of information that outlets are missing.
Furthermore, what I discovered is that you only share things that you want others to read, or you think that googling the questions and choosing a part of the paragraph from a secondary source is the logical way to answer, when it is not. For example, one of your source, dust and tribe, title, the attack on the Israeli music festival... IS NOT a factual statement. It is a written opinion that questions why the event was relocated without providing adequate evidence of how it was relocated...walking in circles, Keyword, unknown reasons. It was written on oct 16. What happened to the updates? LoL... So what is the point of writing that report if it is only going to be based on observation? You can't consider it as a credible source when there isn't any evidence or factual information that can solidify that report.
1
-
@arturferrao7353 It's interesting how your answer is that without paying attention to what it provides. Facts. The key point here is that The guy has information found in Gaza about the inside operation of Palestinian militants who participated. So if you are atleast educated or you want to be, this is the type of information that outlets are missing.
Furthermore, what I discovered is that you only share things that you want others to read, or you think that googling the questions and choosing a part of the paragraph from a secondary source is the logical way to answer, when it is not. For example, one of your source, dust and tribe, title, the attack on the Israeli music festival... IS NOT a factual statement. It is a written opinion that questions why the event was relocated without providing adequate evidence of how it was relocated...walking in circles, Keyword, unknown reasons. It was written on oct 16. What happened to the updates? LoL... So what is the point of writing that report if it is only going to be based on observation? You can't consider it as a credible source when there isn't any evidence or factual information that can solidify that report.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@arturferrao7353 Even, IF Noval festival was changed just three days earlier, it means nothing more than a conspiracy when there is no factual information TO PROVE WHY it was changed three days early, AND HOW it relates to October 7th...So far, You have literally proof nothing but relying on subjective statements. For example, the dust and tribe, article clearly said, for unknown reason. ... Meh Meh. That right there, is a written opinion by the author.
You have no evidence other than written opinions from secondary sources. In fact, your sources are based on pure observation, which is considered as observers. Do you know what it means?
1
-
@arturferrao7353 Again, this proves nothing. but a conspiracy... you said, shows that hamas had no intentions of attacking the festival but the military base of... while the video clearly shows who really attacked the civilians...
It's complete nonsense. Honestly, it's the most pseudo comment I've ever read on the Internet. You clearly lack common sense... yes, there are several videos that clearly show who the attackers were. They were Palestinian militants... among many, you see them breaking bones and taking a German girl hostage. In fact, In case you ignored my first source, it explains what type of vehicles these Palestinian militants were going to use and their goal to annex and take people hostage on the first hour.
During the nova festival mass genocide, it happened on the first hour, and you can see, and identify that those types of vehicles in the videos were palestenian militants attacking civilians on the nova festival. Hamas had no intentions of attacking the festival but the military base.
You must be really stupid to say that because for one thing, they DID go for the festival, and killed hundreds of people. Secondly, you are justifying their actions or covering it by saying that their goal was the military base no the festival. It doesn't change the fact that they went after civilians. Your sources are secondary sources following a written opinions. You should educate yourself first, before you start having a grownmen conversation.
1
-
@arturferrao7353 Again, you proven nothing, but an opinion, a conspiracy. you said, SHOWS that hamas HAD NO INTENTIONS of attacking the festival but the military base of... WHILE the video clearly shows who really attacked the civilians... I find it complete nonsense. Honestly, it's the most pseudo comment I've ever read on the Internet. You clearly lack common sense and it shows some signs of cognitive dissonance.
Yes, tthere are several videos that clearly show who the attackers were. They were Palestinian militants... and among many hostages, you see them taking a German girl on their pickup truck. So what happened to her? Did the Israelis took her to Gaza? Show me the evidence arturito lol...
Do you realize that my first source that you ignored explains what kind of vehicles these Palestinian militants used and the goal to take people during first hour of the operation? During the Nova festival mass genocide, it happened in the first hour, you can see and identify what kind of vehicles in the videos the Palestinian militants used to get to the Nova festival.
But okay, you said, let me guesss... you're going to keep pretending that was hamas right that attacked civilians and not israeli rights? In response, Based on what event? Because you haven't had any evidence to prove it other than secondary sources by observers.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@nikkidixon-fox1907 It is so obvious how much they are putting civilian population at risk with H routing maneuvers and Hstgs... And how much money they have used over the years from others to prepare a war against Israel. Examples such as, Yemen, Lebanon, Egypt, Jordan, Iraq, Iran, Russia, Africa, Turkey, Chechenya, Belarus, Georgia, NK, China, Afghanistan etc are all involved. We can find
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
A few days ago, the Wagner's boss made some statements about this situation and behavior, describing the motives of the Russian federation.
Now, we all know who are among the handful of people who transfer military Intel from the "grounds to the desk of the Russian president." A reminder that these people have given Putin the green light to speak publicly about the use of nuclear missiles against formidable nations.
It's was a wild statement for the Wagner boss to make in my opinion, however, whether the intentions are true or not; It explains what the Wagner's boss stated, "These people would like to see others suffer with their use of military power in action before they fall into the coffin."
Considering that power is the key to success, I highly doubt they want their legacy/reputation to be tarnished by being overall prohibited to teach people and learn about them all over the world.
Therefore, by declaring it an operation and a belief to denazify a country and return it to the motherland is an alternative statement to not only relieve its citizens, but to free itself from the ban on history books or whatnot In the near future.
This will only make sense after 25 or 35 years have passed when future generations find out what happened in Ukraine... All nations, including Russia, citizens will decide and act towards it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Did you forget that many Americans, among others, from other countries were taken to Gaza? Because, if I'm not mistaken, the recent bills passed by Congress to fund Israel were explicitly stated, for security and defense purposes, against labeled OTs. Now, if they were used in any way by Israel, it should not be our sole responsibility, since none of us know what is being talked about behind closed doors. For an example, If you are in a country where you know what could happen in terms of power and the status of its people, and you have to decide, wouldn't you think you would explain to Israel why they approved the funds... behind closed doors?
What does that mean? By making some deductive points, it means that BEFORE the bill was proposed by the House of Intelligence and passed by congress; After October 7, the US had deployed one of its strongest ships to the Black Sea, due to the potential large scale movement of TOs in, near, and around Israel... So, I don't know if you forgot or decided to ignore what happened to three US servicemen and many others who were injured by a kamizame in Jordan, I think that was their decision to solidified it. Why? Because the lives of US servicemen are priceless, and the cost of operating those ships is very high...Knowing that Israel is somewhat capable of supporting itself, the fundsI think the funds was the option they took. Did they expect them to go like that? probably yes and probably not. Either ways, we know that if we hypothetically see it from a further distance, a massive scale would disrupt the economy that could put everyone else around the world at risk.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@@AnnTaylor-em3cgThey are certainly events, such as, The "Asian"Japanese-Pacific Incarcernation Camps-- Through the Executive Order 9066 by President Franklin D. Roosevelt after the attack on Pearl Harbor.
From 1942 to 1945, it was the policy of the U.S. government that people of Japanese descent, including U.S. citizens, would be incarcerated In Isolated camps-- that today the education system have longly been teaching students the good and the ugly of American History.
Until now, some Federal officials like DeSantis' believes Elementary, Middle and High School students shouldn't learn about the development pieces of American History In which completes the overall view of reality.
The Important pieces that explains How influencial from all parties became that made life for what it is today... A question that students will eventually ask Why are people like this... my question for you is... who do you think is more suitable to answer? SUBJECTIVE OR OBJECTIVE? Teacher or parent?.
Side mote; In other words; DeSantis would rather have students learn a limited-portion off the good american side of history like; Presidents Roosevelt, and ripped chapters off the history book about the 100th battalion Infrantry Division and accomplishment that shaped the ww2 era eventhough their families were Incarcerated by their own government.
Which I believe it is problematic to put kids inside a bubble knowing full-well how the world works, and how people are.
In Cities and towns of districts from public schools and communities we know they are different level of class-Income.
At this point, I see the removal of a context In education and not a single piece of adjustment that can help solve the "Problem" they are discussing.
It rather seems DeSantis, and Company wants to take advantage of the general public through Social Behavior and Economics-- Because these two combinations creates a new wave of generations that are going to break-easily and blindfolded to the truth of others. The new generation are going to soon walk into the real world; Whether at a job, or public areas without a conscious of thought to how to financially or physically react to these changes of legislations, Personal or Social discrimination because In this rethoretical aspect-- History repeats itself.
They are basically putting the new generations to an uncertain situation where opportunities within a system and their expectations will highly unmatch.
Unfortunely, I believe the system is been adjust it as we write-- to help high profiles within the Government and Third party associations in order to maintain their power, and make profit out of the future generations awaits to come.
Out of context;These Federal Officials have in the past advocate against higher education of College free-tuition for students who are struggling with debts or whatnot. Which is quite strange because these students typically come from low income-communities... where he now wants certain books to ban from teaching.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@infinity let' say the rumours about osama controls nuclear weapons is true, will the country get hit with sanctions? As far as we are concern, Osama was not a diplomatic entity, or rather a president of a country, but an individual with a militant army considered as a "Terrorist Groups" who were inhabited within the lands of Pakistan as well as Afghanistan as a station ground to use as battle field, which means they were difficult to search for, just like the rest of leader militant groups across the world. When it came down to a whole corrupted government the biggest relieve was, they didn't held Nuclear weapons. Possibly the decision that were made at the time are wrong that now we are looking at different strategies against people who have tremendous power over an army... in this case, it's far greater than just numbers of people and materials. Putin has a ground funded-establishment programs like scientists and programmers who are professionally able to create and expand their operations such as Bio, nuclear weapons and whatnot . Sanctions are one of the proper strategies to minimize the momentum specially against one of the biggest and power house militaries in the world. What aboutism is the use to say, "well the U.S is also a powerhouse and attacked a foreign and small country like Ukraine". In your head would sound like it make sense but, overall they're millions of details that seperates these events from eachother. Using what aboutism is just, another blantant code to waste everybody's time, including mine. But I choose to respond for the purpose to bring awareness to those who are reading. The "What aboutism" is now an algorithim In the digital world that affects the mind's of the people, started from the BOTs and now some individuals are responding based of that.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ThurgoodJenkinz Fyi, the Last Supper of 1991 destroyed the military industrial complex of the 1940s-1950s.
In 2002, the military budget increased in total by less than 5%, yet it does not compare to what the corporations in the USA received and generated. They earned more than 5 times more than the military industry.
In other words, Amazon, Walmart and Target, Macys, Pharmaceuticals, Wallstreet, Guns and Arms, received 20 times more profit for their products and stocks than the security of a nation in one year.
As a result, it is extremely necessary now more than ever to be able to obtain a construction of a well organized army under the constitutional rights of the second amendment of the United States of America.
I understand that everyone has the opportunity to decide what they want to do with their life because it is a freedom, however, when it comes to essential needs like the rising prices of gas, oil, and goods caused by a war from Russia... citizens are not going to buy Guccis, Pradas, Louis, or a damn item from Target. What America should do is not ignore these kinds of emergencies because we are witnessing where this is all headed. Stop Disinformation and missinformation.
1
-
@ThurgoodJenkinz Fyi, the Last Supper of 1991 destroyed the military industrial complex of the 1940s-1950s.
In 2002, the military budget increased in total by less than 5%, yet it does not compare to what the corporations in the USA received and generated. They earned more than 5 times more than the military industry.
In other words, Amazon, Walmart and Target, Macys, Pharmaceuticals, Wallstreet, Guns and Arms, received 20 times more profit for their products and stocks than the security of a nation in one year.
As a result, it is extremely necessary now more than ever to be able to obtain a construction of a well organized army under the constitutional rights of the second amendment of the United States of America.
I understand that everyone has the opportunity to decide what they want to do with their life because it is a freedom, however, when it comes to essential needs like the rising prices of gas, oil, and goods caused by a war from Russia... citizens are not going to buy Guccis, Pradas, Louis, or a damn item from Target. What America should do is not ignore these kinds of emergencies because we are witnessing where this is all headed. Stop Disinformation and missinformation.
Thirdly, I believe you should think about how Ukraine can provide Combat Information and Analysis among others.
1
-
@ThurgoodJenkinz The Last Supper of 1991 shut down the military industrial complex of the 1940s-1960s. In 2002, the military budget increased in total by less than 5%, yet it does not compare to what the corporations in the USA received and generated. They earned more than 5 times more than the military industry. In other words, Amazon, Walmart and Target, Macys, Pharmaceuticals, Wallstreet, Guns and Arms, received 20 times more profit for their products and stocks than the security of a nation in one year.
As a result, it is extremely necessary now more than ever to be able to obtain a construction of a well organized army under the constitutional rights of the second amendment of the United States of America.
I understand that everyone has the opportunity to decide what they want to do with their life because it is a freedom, however, when it comes to essential needs like the rising prices of gas, oil, and goods caused by a war from Russia... citizens are not going to buy Guccis, Pradas, Louis, or a damn item from Target. What America should do is not ignore these kinds of emergencies because we are witnessing where this is all headed.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@marcussmith3969 We, as human beings, have not yet fully developed, therefore, we must understand that there is a lot to learn about ourselves and what surrounds us. We create chaos, destruction and violence... We can also show love, compassion and unity all at the same time. On one hand, we cannot underestimate our species because time, opportunities and experiences have been a large part of our core, we can light a fire, speak multiple languages and expand its technologies, and also, feel the sound of the frequencies that travel through everyone's bodies that involves everything that exists. Now, I don't want to criticize your religious thoughts, on the other hand, I would like to discuss about what happens in the video. As we know, based on our current process, I want to say that most of the people around the world contributed to modern technologies, in one way or another... We should know better and trust our conscience, for example, what we have in Our disposition is valuable because we can predict the weather. So if people really care about changing the world according to their religious rights of freedom, why can't they save their families without risking their lives knowing the days are becoming hotter than ever?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1