Comments by "Nikkishears" (@nikkishears6402) on "Face the Nation"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@douglasjcox , Hundreds of pages of never-released memos and documents - many from inside the American team helping Burisma to stave off its legal troubles - conflict with Biden's narrative.
And they raise the troubling prospect that U.S. officials may have painted a false picture in Ukraine that helped ease Burisma's legal troubles and stop prosecutors' plans to interview Hunter Biden during the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
For instance, Burisma's American legal representatives met with Ukrainian officials just days after Biden forced the firing of the country's chief prosecutor and offered "an apology for dissemination of false information by U.S. representatives and public figures" about the Ukrainian prosecutors, according to the Ukrainian government's official memo of the meeting. The effort to secure that meeting began the same day the prosecutor's firing was announced.
In addition, Burisma's American team offered to introduce Ukrainian prosecutors to Obama administration officials to make amends, according to that memo and the American legal team's internal emails.
The memos raise troubling questions:
1.) If the Ukraine prosecutor's firing involved only his alleged corruption and ineptitude, why did Burisma's American legal team refer to those allegations as "false information?"
2.) If the firing had nothing to do with the Burisma case, as Biden has adamantly claimed, why would Burisma's American lawyers contact the replacement prosecutor within hours of the termination and urgently seek a meeting in Ukraine to discuss the case?
Ukrainian prosecutors say they have tried to get this information to the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) since the summer of 2018, fearing it might be evidence of possible violations of U.S. ethics laws. First, they hired a former federal prosecutor to bring the information to the U.S. attorney in New York, who, they say, showed no interest. Then, the Ukrainians reached out to President Trump's personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani.
Ukraine's new president, Volodymyr Zelensky, told Trump in July that he plans to launch his own wide-ranging investigation into what happened with the Bidens and Burisma.
"I'm knowledgeable about the situation," Zelensky told Trump, asking the American president to forward any evidence he might know about. "The issue of the investigation of the case is actually the issue of making sure to restore the honesty so we will take care of that and will work on the investigation of the case."
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/463307-solomon-these-once-secret-memos-cast-doubt-on-joe-bidens-ukraine-story%3Famp&ved=2ahUKEwiqrvWV6oflAhUP2FkKHSmgDAoQFjAAegQIBBAB&usg=AOvVaw0oX1OSvwWdoTvtphH0Cy0D&cf=1
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@NestaAstern , abuse of power? Where's your evidence? You can't use your whistle blower, because it's hearsay, inadmissable in a court of law, dear hypocrite.
Obstruction? Where? Are you back to "Russia, Russia, Russia!!"? That was debunked by the Mueller report. Not a single person charged with a crime by Mueller was convicted of collusion or obstruction.
Here's a hint, dear(this should be obvious to anyone with half a brain), if no one was charged with obstruction by Mueller there WASN'T ENOUGH EVIDENCE!🤣🤣🤣
Seriously, you're high right now, aren't you, dear hypocritical liar? 😂😂😂
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@NestaAstern ,remember when I said, Warren will be the nominee? 😂😂😂
I'm assuming you watched the Democrat debate last night. Who's the front runner now, dear? 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Everything I said is turning out to be 100% true. Warren will be your nominee, Dems will lose on impeachment, Dems will lose the House, and Trump will annihiate Warren.
A new analysis predicts Trump will win 2020, but they aren't just predicting a win. They're predicting that Trump will win in a landslide, collecting 400 electoral votes. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣IE: "you're handing him re-election on a silver platter"
https://thefederalist-gary.blogspot.com/2019/10/new-trump-might-get-400-electoral-votes.html
If I was right about Biden and Warren, which I was, perhaps you should reconsider your floundering candidates. Just saying. 🤣🤣🤣😘
1
-
1
-
1
-
@NestaAstern , no dear. Allow me to educate you, once again, dearest hypocrite.
If Impeachment passes the house, which they won't vote on because Nancy no longer has the votes, impeachment goes to the Republican controlled Senate. The Senate majority leader, McConnell, has the right to run the Senate court anyway he wants. Just like Democrats are doing in the House, denying rights to the accused, and denying Republicans subpoena power to call witnesses or give a defense.
Mitch has vowed to vote immediately to dismiss impeachment. In order to dismiss impeachment, there doesn't need to be a trial. There doesn't need to be a 2/3 majority. To dismiss impeachment, Republicans only need a simple majority vote. So impeachment is dead, before it even gets to the Senate. Your Democrat leadership knows this, so does the media. The only ones who don't know it are the stupid Democrat voters being gaslighted by liberal news.
How Mitch McConnell could give impeachment the Merrick .
https://www.politico.com/news/2019/09/28/mitch-mcconnell-trump-impeachment-007689
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@NestaAstern , are you really this stupid? Name the last president who remained in political offices after his term as president was over? Did Carter? Did Reagan? Did either Bush? Did Bill Clinton? Did Obama? No dear. Once you're done being the president, you're political aspirations are over. You don't go from being the president to becoming a senator. So, what does anyone care about your useless fantasy factoids? He's gonna be a two term president. Everyone knows it, except the stupid Democrat voters, like you.
Impeachment may pass the House, but I doubt it. Nancy won't vote, cause she doesn't have the numbers. The Senate will dismiss the case with a simple majority. Your impeachment wet dream is a broken fantasy. Way to double down on stupid, dearest hypocrite. I can see you, like all liberals, have no intention of learning from your mistakes. Well done. 🤣🤣🤣
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
, I told you Biden wouldn't be the nominee. I told you it would be Warren. You said I was wrong.
Well, I'm assuming you watched the debate last night. Who's the front runner now, dear? 😂😂😂
Everything I said is turning out to be 100% true. Warren will be your candidate, Democrats will lose on impeachment, Dems will lose the House, and Trump will annihiate Warren.
A new analysis predicts that Trump will win 2020, but they're not just saying he'll win. They're predicting a landslide, with Trump receiving 400 electoral votes. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
https://thefederalist-gary.blogspot.com/2019/10/new-trump-might-get-400-electoral-votes.html
If I was right about Biden and Warren, which I was, maybe you should reconsider your floundering candidates. Just saying. 😘
1