Youtube comments of Nikkishears (@nikkishears6402).

  1. 2100
  2. 597
  3. 463
  4. 434
  5. 412
  6. 398
  7. 387
  8. 375
  9. 353
  10. 315
  11. 293
  12. 288
  13. 276
  14. 271
  15. 267
  16. 247
  17. 227
  18. 219
  19. 218
  20. 208
  21. 191
  22. 189
  23. 181
  24. 169
  25. 165
  26. 162
  27. She's a trained lawyer, judge, and DA. Her supposed "open position" is nothing more than an act, a mummer's farce. She's pissed that anyone would dare question her behavior. She's unhinged and loose with her temper, her contempt, her arrogance, her lies, and her clearly bigoted views. **Edit** @Ednalowery9 has blocked me from speaking, because she's a YouTube content moderator, desperately trying to influence public opinion by pushing lies and propaganda. She can't stand Truth, and so I've been blocked from commenting for 42 hours. I'm forced to answer "her" here, in previously written comments. @Ednalowery9, Told you reverse psychology would work on you. "you are just astounding at your ability to know truth from a lie. It's truly remarkable!" This is called a "non sequitur". It's another logical fallacy of debate. An officer of the court would know that. Nathan Wade literally lied on his interrogatory statements of fact in his divorce. He then filed interrogatory statements of fact for this hearing, also about his divorce, which Fani signed off on as proof of their innocence. Mr Wade went back into the court filings, and changed his answers. He was asked if during his divorce he had ever been in any romantic relationships with anyone other than his wife during the course of the marriage, through the separation, and up to the present. He said "none". Then when Fani had to admit to their romantic relationship, he went back into the filings and altered his answers. In place of his answer that he never cheated on his wife, he pled the fifth. As a fake officer of the court, do you even know what the "pleading the 5th" means? I highly doubt it. When a defendant pleads the 5th, it means they are refusing to answer the question, based on the fact that the answer may incriminate them in a crime. "To be frank, you don't know what you are talking about, in spite of you arrogant self-assurance. You also have little experience in life, as your presumptions make clear. That's called projection and hypocrisy. Psychology 101. You're a textbook case. You literally just made nothing but presumptions about me, dear totally lacking self awareness. "I don't have 10k in my home safe, but I have a little under 8. I don't reveal that to others. That okay with you?" You've foolishly revealed you keep 8k in a safe in your home, Edna Lowery. Are you really this obtuse? Or is this just the desperate act of a YouTube content moderator pretending to be an officer of the court? I'm inclined to believe the latter. "Also, just FYI, I am an officer of the court" If you're an officer of the court, then I'm a Supreme Court Justice. "Your assertions are foolish, and although you are clearly literate, you do yourself and your intelligence no favors to pontificate where you have no experience." Are you talking to yourself in the mirror? Cause this is also projection and hypocrisy. Not to mention, it's yet another argument from authority, another ad hominem, and another non sequitur. Are you capable of acting else? Highly doubtful. Again, your parochial arguments are called "logical fallacies of debate". An officer of the courts should know that. "I hope you NEVER need a lawyer." I'm in my 40s. I've needed lawyers many times for various legal proceedings in regards to my personally owned business. I have a lawyer on retainer. Do you know what "retainer" means? 🤣🤣🤣🤣 "Leaving this forum now. I didn't expect to see mtg on Reddit, so I'm out! Cheers!" Another ad hominem, wrapped in a non sequitur, and covered in an argument from authority. All you have is logical fallacies of debate. You can't argue law, because you have no idea what the law is. You're clearly not a lawyer or a judge, because you know nothing about the authority of the law. Are you pretending you're a court reporter? Is that the kind of officer of the court you imagine you are?🤣🤣🤣🤣 You're not fooling anyone. You're leaving, because you can't defend your position. You're so desperate to win that you've decided to lie. That's the act of someone who has no idea what it feels like to win a debate.
    154
  28. 151
  29. 149
  30. 149
  31. 148
  32. 146
  33. 144
  34. 140
  35. 139
  36. 122
  37. 122
  38. 120
  39. 109
  40. 108
  41. 107
  42. 103
  43. 103
  44. 103
  45. 95
  46. 84
  47. 84
  48. 81
  49. 81
  50. 79
  51. 77
  52. 77
  53. 77
  54. 75
  55. 75
  56. 69
  57. 69
  58. 67
  59. 66
  60. 63
  61. 63
  62. 60
  63. 58
  64. 55
  65. 53
  66. 52
  67. 52
  68. 51
  69. 50
  70. 48
  71. 48
  72. 46
  73. 46
  74. 46
  75. 44
  76. 43
  77. 42
  78. 41
  79. 41
  80. 39
  81. 39
  82. 39
  83. 39
  84. 39
  85. 38
  86. 38
  87. 38
  88. 36
  89. 36
  90. 36
  91. 36
  92. 35
  93. 35
  94. 35
  95. 35
  96. 35
  97. 35
  98. 34
  99. 34
  100. 32
  101. 31
  102. 30
  103. 30
  104. 30
  105. 30
  106. 29
  107. 29
  108. 29
  109. 28
  110. 26
  111. 26
  112. 25
  113. 25
  114. 23
  115. 23
  116. 23
  117. 23
  118. 22
  119. 22
  120. 22
  121. 22
  122. 22
  123. 22
  124. 21
  125. 21
  126. 20
  127. 20
  128. 19
  129. 19
  130. 19
  131. 19
  132. 19
  133. 18
  134. 18
  135. 17
  136. 17
  137. 17
  138. 17
  139. 17
  140. 17
  141. 17
  142. 16
  143. 16
  144. 16
  145. 16
  146. 16
  147. 16
  148. 16
  149. 16
  150. 15
  151. 15
  152. 15
  153. 15
  154. 15
  155. 15
  156. 15
  157. 15
  158. 15
  159. 14
  160. 14
  161. 14
  162. 14
  163. 14
  164. 14
  165. 14
  166. 14
  167. 14
  168. 14
  169. 13
  170. 13
  171. 13
  172. 13
  173. 13
  174. 13
  175. 13
  176. 13
  177. 13
  178. 13
  179. 13
  180. 13
  181. 13
  182. 13
  183. 13
  184. 13
  185. 13
  186. 13
  187. 12
  188. 12
  189. 12
  190. 12
  191. 12
  192. 12
  193. 12
  194. 12
  195. 12
  196. 12
  197. 12
  198. 12
  199. 12
  200. 12
  201. 12
  202. 11
  203. 11
  204. 11
  205. 11
  206. 11
  207. 11
  208. 11
  209. 11
  210. 11
  211. 11
  212. 11
  213. 11
  214. 11
  215. 11
  216. 11
  217. 10
  218. 10
  219. 10
  220. 10
  221. 10
  222. 10
  223. 10
  224. 10
  225. 10
  226. 10
  227. 10
  228. 10
  229. 10
  230. 10
  231. 10
  232. 10
  233. 10
  234. 9
  235. 9
  236. 9
  237. 9
  238. 9
  239. 9
  240. 9
  241. 9
  242. 9
  243. 9
  244. 9
  245. 9
  246. 9
  247. 9
  248. 9
  249. 9
  250. 9
  251. 9
  252. 9
  253. 8
  254. 8
  255. 8
  256. 8
  257. 8
  258. 8
  259. 8
  260. 8
  261. 8
  262. 8
  263. 8
  264. 8
  265. 8
  266. 8
  267. 8
  268. 8
  269. 8
  270. 8
  271. 8
  272. 8
  273. 8
  274. 8
  275. 8
  276. 8
  277. 8
  278. 8
  279. 8
  280. 8
  281. 8
  282. 7
  283. 7
  284. 7
  285. 7
  286. 7
  287. 7
  288. 7
  289. 7
  290. 7
  291. 7
  292. 7
  293. 7
  294. 7
  295. 7
  296. 7
  297. 7
  298. 7
  299. 7
  300. 7
  301. 7
  302.  @jcraw6332  , What Democrats fail to realize is this is designed to take out Biden, and make a path for Elizabeth Warren. Biden did what the media is accusing Trump of. Biden is on tape admitting withholding funds until the prosecutor looking into his son was fired. There is far more evidence for a Biden investigation than a Trump Impeachment. Biden's currently leading in the polls by a large margin among Democrat candidate. However the radical left base running the Democrat party don't want another racist, old, white man as their nominee. As the party of identity politics, they need a victim candidate, like a woman victim, or a black woman victim, or a trans or gay woman victim as their candidate. When the message of your campaign is nothing but grievances, you need a victim to be the voice of said grievance. Warren will be the nominee. She's the only woman candidate with any political following, polling at 13%. Warren will be your candidate, Democrats will fail to convict Trump on hearsay (inadmissable in a court of law), Democrats will lose the House, and Trump will annihilate Warren. Impeachment is political suicide for Democrats. Let's be perfectly clear, Biden was NEVER gonna be the nominee. He's a gaff machine. The Democrat party was NEVER gonna run a candidate that says things like, "poor kids are just as smart as white kids". Apparently Biden thinks only people of color can be poor, and only white people are smart. Seriously, maybe it's senility, but this guy doesn't even know where he is half the time. As if he was gonna be the democrat presidential candidate.😂😂😂
    7
  303. 7
  304. 7
  305. 7
  306. 7
  307. 7
  308. 7
  309. 7
  310. 7
  311. 7
  312. Never live in a big city. This is an orchestrated culling. Anyone telling you differently is selling something. This is the flu. According to the WHO: "If you got a flu shot and take a Covid test, you will recieve a false positive." "It's easier to fool the people, than convince them they've been fooled." Look how quickly freedom evaporated in the name of safety. 56,000 Americans die on average every year from the flu. That never bothered you before. It certainly didn't scare you. You never wanted GOVERNMENT checkpoints for travel during flu season. You never wanted to close all "non essential businesses" for your health. There's over 300 strains of flu and we have vaccines for 4 of those strains. The same four vaccines every year. Yet 900,000 have died worldwide from Coronavirus, and you've allowed your freedom to be stolen, because you don't have a government vaccine?! Perspective is needed. "Those willing to relinquish freedom for security deserve neither." Where does our freedom come from? If government tells you it's not safe to leave your home, and that directive is implemented by force, how can you claim you're a free American? How can you claim this is a constitutional republic? If you believe your freedom comes from the government, then your are no more than a slave, taking only what has been given by your Masters. You are resigned to live on your knees in preaceful slavery. "Give me liberty or give me death." These are not mere flowery words. They are the heart and soul of every person who ever died, because they would not live under the rule of tyranny. Those words are the measure of a person's conviction, and the key to breaking the heavy chains of slavery. They are the lifeblood of every person who can't breathe, unless they live free. Freedom is a very dangerous idea that terrifies our Masters, because it gives the individual the right to govern oneself. It negates the need for a government slave Master. It becomes the individual's responsibility to control their own life, to protect their own life. Freedom is abstract in theory, invisible to the naked eye, but it's absence is more than palpable. It's loss is crippling and overbearing. Those who live without it are broken in body and spirit. It's a strangling so harrowing and devestating that one might never recover. But despite the danger of freedom, billions were willing to die for this abstract idea throughout history, because it's value is beyond any currency. Our Masters know the value of our freedom, and they hate us for it. Freedom is never given. It has to be seized; stolen from the powers that would like nothing more than to keep us subservient and obedient. How can this be a government "for, of, and by the people", if the people have no right to object to the tyranny of a government which rules by fear and manipulation? When will you stand up and object to being ruled over by your Masters? When will you realize that your life has no value, if you cannot live free? Let me assure you, to wait would be a grave mistake. The loss of freedom is far more deadly than any virus or disease could ever be.
    7
  313. 7
  314. 7
  315. 7
  316. 7
  317. 7
  318. 7
  319. 7
  320. 7
  321. 7
  322. 7
  323. 6
  324. 6
  325. 6
  326. 6
  327. 6
  328. 6
  329. 6
  330. 6
  331. 6
  332. 6
  333. 6
  334. 6
  335. 6
  336. 6
  337. 6
  338. 6
  339. 6
  340. 6
  341. 6
  342. 6
  343. 6
  344. 6
  345. 6
  346. 6
  347. 6
  348. 6
  349. 6
  350. 6
  351. 6
  352. 6
  353. 6
  354. 6
  355. 6
  356. 6
  357. 6
  358. 6
  359. 6
  360. 6
  361. 5
  362. 5
  363. 5
  364. 5
  365. 5
  366. 5
  367. 5
  368. 5
  369. 5
  370. 5
  371. 5
  372. 5
  373. 5
  374. 5
  375. 5
  376. 5
  377. 5
  378. 5
  379. 5
  380. 5
  381. 5
  382. 5
  383. 5
  384. 5
  385. 5
  386. 5
  387. 5
  388. 5
  389. 5
  390. 5
  391. 5
  392. 5
  393. 5
  394. 5
  395. 5
  396. 5
  397. 5
  398. 5
  399. 5
  400. 5
  401. 5
  402. 5
  403. 5
  404. 5
  405. 5
  406. 5
  407. 5
  408. 5
  409. 5
  410. 5
  411. 5
  412. 5
  413. 5
  414. 5
  415. 5
  416. 5
  417. 5
  418. 5
  419. 5
  420. 5
  421. 5
  422. 5
  423. 5
  424. 5
  425. 5
  426. 5
  427. 5
  428. 5
  429. 5
  430. 5
  431. 5
  432. 5
  433. 5
  434. 5
  435. 5
  436. 5
  437. 5
  438. 5
  439. 5
  440. 4
  441. 4
  442.  popasmuerf  , I wonder if you've ever read this quote from Malcolm X. "The white liberal is the worst enemy to America, and the worst enemy to the black man. Let me explain what I mean by the white liberal. In America there is no such thing as Democrat or Republican anymore. In America you have liberals and conservatives. The only people living in the past who think in terms of I’m a Democrat or Republican, is the American Negro. He’s the one that runs around bragging about party affiliation. He’s the one that sticks to the Democrat or sticks to the Republican. But white people are divided into two groups, liberals and conservative. The Democrats who are conservative, vote with the Republicans liberals. The Democrats who are liberal vote with the Republicans that are liberal. The white liberal aren’t white people who are for independence, who are moral and ethical in their thinking. They are just a faction of white people that are jockeying for power. The same as the white conservative is a faction of white people that are jockeying for power. They are fighting each other for power and prestige, and the one that is the football in the game is the Negro, 20 million black people. A political football, a political pawn, an economic football, and economic pawn. A social football, a social pawn. The liberal elements of whites are those who have perfected the art of selling themselves to the Negro as a friend of the Negro. Getting sympathy of the Negro, getting the allegiance of the Negro, and getting the mind of the Negro. Then the Negro sides with the white liberal, and the white liberal use the Negro against the white conservative. So that anything that the Negro does is never for his own good, never for his own advancement, never for his own progress, he’s only a pawn in the hands of the white liberal. The worst enemy that the Negro have is this white man that runs around here drooling at the mouth professing to love Negros, and calling himself a liberal, and it is following these white liberals that has perpetuated problems that Negros have. If the Negro wasn’t taken, tricked, or deceived by the white liberal then Negros would get together and solve our own problems. I only cite these things to show you that in America the history of the white liberal has been nothing but a series of trickery designed to make Negros think that the white liberal was going to solve our problems. Our problems will never be solved by the white man. The only way that our problem will be solved is when the black man wakes up, clean himself up, stand on his own feet and stop begging the white man, and take immediate steps to do for ourselves the things that we have been waiting on the white man to do for us. Once we do for self then we will be able to solve our own problems." https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/8869214-the-white-liberal-is-the-worst-enemy-to-america-and
    4
  443. 4
  444. 4
  445. 4
  446. 4
  447. 4
  448. 4
  449. 4
  450. 4
  451. 4
  452. 4
  453. 4
  454. 4
  455. 4
  456. 4
  457. 4
  458. 4
  459. 4
  460. 4
  461. 4
  462. 4
  463. 4
  464. 4
  465. 4
  466. 4
  467. 4
  468. 4
  469. 4
  470. 4
  471. 4
  472.  @Chewy_GarageBandDad  , “We’ll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.” William Casey, CIA Director 1981-1987 The very fact that nearly everyone believes that Epstein is dead should be a red flag to anyone with eyes to see. If you agree with the majority opinion, you're falling for their lies. The fact that people like you and me will be called "crazy" for telling the truth, speaks volumes about the mass indoctrination solidified by the drive-by news networks. The brainwashing is almost absolute, imbedded in us from birth. Each generation passes the indoctrination to the next. Calling someone crazy for an opinion or belief is dismissive and insulting. "I don't understand you, therefore you're crazy". They wouldn't call us crazy, if the things we said didn't scare the hell out of them. They're terrified, because if we're right (which we are), everything they believe is a lie. It makes them feel good to believe Epstein was murdered. They can sleep at night as long as he's dead. Their fear keeps them insulated and submissive to their controllers. It's also self preservation for them to remain deluded. It's fight or flight. They chose delusional flight. The irony is: according to EVERY intelligence source: despite calling us "conspiracy theorist"(a term coined by our own CIA), you and I are a huge threat to their game plan. We are the holdout to this disinformation campaign being completed. They've been coming for us for a long time, and in the last 4 years, they have amped up their pursuit of "the fringe" who remember how to think critically. They are in control, but we(the conspiracy theorist) have the power, which is why it's so critical for them to die on the alter of discrediting us.
    4
  473. 4
  474. 4
  475. 4
  476. 4
  477. 4
  478. 4
  479. 4
  480. 4
  481. 4
  482. 4
  483. 4
  484. 4
  485. 4
  486. 4
  487. 4
  488. 4
  489. 4
  490. 4
  491. 4
  492. 4
  493. 4
  494. 4
  495. 4
  496. 4
  497. 4
  498. 4
  499. 4
  500. 4
  501. 4
  502. 4
  503. 4
  504. 4
  505. 4
  506. 4
  507. 4
  508. 4
  509. 4
  510. 4
  511. 4
  512. 4
  513. 4
  514. 4
  515. 4
  516. 4
  517. 4
  518. 4
  519. 4
  520. 4
  521. 4
  522. 4
  523. 4
  524. 4
  525. 4
  526. 4
  527. 4
  528. 4
  529. 4
  530. 4
  531. 4
  532. 4
  533. 4
  534. 4
  535. 4
  536. 4
  537. 4
  538. 4
  539. 4
  540. 4
  541. 4
  542. 4
  543. 4
  544. 4
  545. 4
  546. 4
  547. 4
  548. 4
  549. 4
  550. 4
  551. 4
  552. 4
  553. 4
  554. 4
  555. 4
  556. 4
  557. 4
  558. 4
  559. 4
  560. 4
  561. 4
  562. 4
  563. 4
  564. 4
  565. 4
  566. 4
  567. 4
  568. 4
  569. 4
  570. 4
  571. 4
  572. 4
  573. 4
  574. 4
  575. 4
  576. 4
  577. 4
  578. 4
  579. 4
  580. 4
  581. 4
  582. 4
  583. 4
  584. 4
  585. 4
  586. 4
  587. 4
  588. 4
  589. 4
  590. 4
  591. 4
  592. 4
  593. 4
  594. 4
  595. 4
  596. 4
  597. 4
  598. 4
  599. 4
  600. 4
  601. 4
  602. 4
  603. 4
  604. 4
  605. 4
  606. 4
  607. 4
  608. 4
  609. 4
  610. 4
  611. 4
  612. 4
  613. 4
  614. 3
  615. 3
  616. 3
  617. 3
  618. 3
  619. 3
  620. 3
  621. 3
  622. 3
  623. 3
  624. 3
  625. 3
  626. 3
  627. 3
  628. 3
  629. 3
  630. 3
  631. 3
  632. 3
  633. 3
  634. 3
  635. 3
  636. 3
  637. 3
  638. 3
  639. 3
  640. 3
  641. 3
  642. 3
  643. 3
  644. 3
  645. 3
  646. 3
  647. 3
  648. 3
  649. 3
  650. 3
  651. 3
  652. 3
  653. 3
  654. 3
  655. 3
  656. 3
  657. 3
  658. 3
  659. 3
  660. 3
  661. 3
  662. 3
  663. 3
  664. 3
  665. 3
  666. 3
  667. 3
  668. 3
  669. 3
  670. 3
  671. 3
  672. 3
  673. 3
  674. 3
  675. 3
  676. 3
  677. 3
  678. 3
  679. 3
  680. 3
  681. 3
  682. 3
  683. 3
  684. 3
  685. 3
  686. 3
  687. 3
  688. 3
  689. 3
  690. 3
  691. 3
  692. 3
  693. 3
  694. 3
  695.  @lachlanbell8390  , you had no idea he IS intelligence. You can lie all you want, but we see through you, dear gaslighting fucktard. "Why do we know he's still alive?" In order to kill Epstein, one would need permission from the higher ups. Who do you think killed him? The Clinton's? They don't have the power. No one in our government has enough authority to take him out. They couldn't even keep him in jail while he was supposed to be there. He was walking out of jail 16 hours a day with permission from a federal judge who gave Epstein that sweetheart plea deal without informing his victims. Totally illegal. Now add to this fact that as an agent of Mossad, Epstein has been part of many psyop operations, used to manipulate the public. In other words, he's an exceptional liar, a consummate actor, capable of faking his death. Were you also aware that since the days of Hitler, our government world leaders are all using body doubles? Epstein has several body doubles. Finally, your favorite news channels are owned by your government and are full time state propaganda networks. They are used to reinforce psyop operations. Nothing the media says it's true. Literally nothing. Whatever the TV tells you, the opposite is true. So if they are pushing that he's dead and anyone who disagrees is "crazy", that's a confession indicating a psyop. He's alive and those "crazy people" are on to them. Hence the total rejection of the premise that he is actually alive. You think that repeating your moral and intellectual superiors on TV in the alphabet news makes you informed. It doesn't, dear delusional. It makes you a parrot.😘 PS: If you think we can't tell you're a Google shill, pushing propaganda on YouTube, you couldn't be more wrong. Tell us, Who ordered Epstein's death, since you're so well informed. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
    3
  696. 3
  697. 3
  698. 3
  699. 3
  700. 3
  701. 3
  702. 3
  703. 3
  704. 3
  705. 3
  706. 3
  707. 3
  708. 3
  709. 3
  710. 3
  711. 3
  712. Biden said the impeachment of Bill Clinton was a lynching. Biden apologizes for saying in 1998 Clinton impeachment was a lynching... https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/biden-lynching-impeachment-apologizes-for-saying-clinton-impeachment-could-be-seen-as-partisan-lynching-in-1998/&ved=2ahUKEwiDserChbTlAhWFUt8KHRXTDYUQFjAIegQIAhAB&usg=AOvVaw0iXziyfeFqqgtimlWlMaJP&ampcf=1 lynch verb gerund or present participle: lynching; noun: lynching (of a mob) kill (someone), especially by hanging, for an alleged offense with or without a legal trial. Hmmm. Not a single mention of black people. Interesting. Lynching actually dates back to the revolutionary war. But afterwards, Lynching became so widespread that the years 1882 to 1930 have been termed the “lynching era.” The origin of the word “lynching” has several explanations. The most common account has it derived from Charles Lynch, a justice of the peace in Virginia, who excessively punished Loyalists during the Revolutionary War. Reference: www.scencyclopedia.org/sce/entries/lynchin… After the civil war and up through civil rights, when lynching was normalized, white Republicans made up 30% of people lynched in America. https://www.montgomeryadvertiser.com/story/opinion/2017/09/25/many-whites-were-lynched-fighting-racism-opinion/700690001/ The largest group to ever be lynched at one time in America was Italian. The most infamous lynching of Italians occurred on March 14, 1891 in New Orleans. This event claimed eleven victims and was one of the largest multiple lynching in American history. The catalyst for this tragedy was the unsolved murder of popular city police superintendent David Hennessy. Lynching of Italians | Italian Ameri… www.iaovc.org/lynching-of-italians/ Lynching did not begin as torture for black people. It began as white Americans killing other white Americans who were loyal to the king of England. The truth is that though lynching doesn't belong to black people, it does belong to Democrats. For it was Democrats who lynched blacks during the civil war and the civil Rights movement. It was also Democrats who lynched white Republicans, Italians, and Irishmen. So if anyone wants to own the word lynching, let it be Dems. Let's brand them with their sins. They are responsible for EVERY lynching of black people.
    3
  713. 3
  714. 3
  715. 3
  716. 3
  717. 3
  718. 3
  719. 3
  720. 3
  721. 3
  722. 3
  723. 3
  724. 3
  725. 3
  726. 3
  727. 3
  728. 3
  729. 3
  730. 3
  731. 3
  732. 3
  733. 3
  734. 3
  735. 3
  736. 3
  737. 3
  738. 3
  739. 3
  740. 3
  741. 3
  742. 3
  743. 3
  744. 3
  745. 3
  746. 3
  747. 3
  748. 3
  749. 3
  750. 3
  751. 3
  752. 3
  753. 3
  754. 3
  755. 3
  756. 3
  757. 3
  758. 3
  759. 3
  760. 3
  761. 3
  762. 3
  763. 3
  764. 3
  765. 3
  766. 3
  767. 3
  768. 3
  769. 3
  770. 3
  771. 3
  772. 3
  773. 3
  774. 3
  775. 3
  776. 3
  777. 3
  778. 3
  779. 3
  780. 3
  781. 3
  782. 3
  783. 3
  784. 3
  785. 3
  786. 3
  787. 3
  788. 3
  789. 3
  790. 3
  791. 3
  792. 3
  793. 3
  794. 3
  795. 3
  796. 3
  797. 3
  798. 3
  799. 3
  800. 3
  801. 3
  802. 3
  803. 3
  804. 3
  805. 3
  806. 3
  807. 3
  808. 3
  809. 3
  810. 3
  811. 3
  812. I wonder if you've ever read this quote from Malcolm X. "The white liberal is the worst enemy to America, and the worst enemy to the black man. Let me explain what I mean by the white liberal. In America there is no such thing as Democrat or Republican anymore. In America you have liberals and conservatives. The only people living in the past who think in terms of I’m a Democrat or Republican, is the American Negro. He’s the one that runs around bragging about party affiliation. He’s the one that sticks to the Democrat or sticks to the Republican. But white people are divided into two groups, liberals and conservative. The Democrats who are conservative, vote with the Republicans liberals. The Democrats who are liberal vote with the Republicans that are liberal. The white liberal aren’t white people who are for independence, who are moral and ethical in their thinking. They are just a faction of white people that are jockeying for power. The same as the white conservative is a faction of white people that are jockeying for power. They are fighting each other for power and prestige, and the one that is the football in the game is the Negro, 20 million black people. A political football, a political pawn, an economic football, and economic pawn. A social football, a social pawn. The liberal elements of whites are those who have perfected the art of selling themselves to the Negro as a friend of the Negro. Getting sympathy of the Negro, getting the allegiance of the Negro, and getting the mind of the Negro. Then the Negro sides with the white liberal, and the white liberal use the Negro against the white conservative. So that anything that the Negro does is never for his own good, never for his own advancement, never for his own progress, he’s only a pawn in the hands of the white liberal. The worst enemy that the Negro have is this white man that runs around here drooling at the mouth professing to love Negros, and calling himself a liberal, and it is following these white liberals that has perpetuated problems that Negros have. If the Negro wasn’t taken, tricked, or deceived by the white liberal then Negros would get together and solve our own problems. I only cite these things to show you that in America the history of the white liberal has been nothing but a series of trickery designed to make Negros think that the white liberal was going to solve our problems. Our problems will never be solved by the white man. The only way that our problem will be solved is when the black man wakes up, clean himself up, stand on his own feet and stop begging the white man, and take immediate steps to do for ourselves the things that we have been waiting on the white man to do for us. Once we do for self then we will be able to solve our own problems." https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/8869214-the-white-liberal-is-the-worst-enemy-to-america-and
    3
  813. 3
  814. 3
  815. 3
  816. 3
  817. 3
  818. 3
  819. 3
  820. 3
  821. 3
  822. 3
  823. 3
  824. 3
  825. 3
  826. 3
  827. 3
  828. 3
  829. 3
  830. 3
  831. 3
  832. 3
  833. 3
  834. 3
  835. 3
  836. 3
  837. 3
  838. 3
  839. 3
  840. 3
  841. 3
  842. 3
  843. 3
  844. 3
  845. 3
  846. 3
  847. 3
  848. 3
  849. 3
  850. 3
  851. 3
  852. 3
  853. 3
  854. 3
  855. 3
  856. 3
  857. 3
  858. 3
  859. 3
  860. 3
  861. 3
  862. 3
  863. 3
  864. 3
  865. 3
  866. 3
  867. 3
  868. 3
  869. 3
  870. 3
  871. 3
  872. 3
  873. 3
  874. 3
  875. 3
  876. 3
  877. 3
  878. 3
  879. 3
  880. 3
  881. 3
  882. 3
  883. 3
  884. 3
  885. 3
  886. 3
  887. 3
  888. 3
  889. Never live in a big city. This is an orchestrated culling. Anyone telling you differently is selling something. This is the flu. According to the WHO: "If you got a flu shot and take a Covid test, you will recieve a false positive." "It's easier to fool the people, than convince them they've been fooled." Look how quickly freedom evaporated in the name of safety. 56,000 Americans die on average every year from the flu. That never bothered you before. It certainly didn't scare you. You never wanted GOVERNMENT checkpoints for travel during flu season. You never wanted to close all "non essential businesses" for your health. There's over 300 strains of flu and we have vaccines for 4 of those strains. The same four vaccines every year. Yet 900,000 have died worldwide from Coronavirus, and you've allowed your freedom to be stolen, because you don't have a government vaccine?! Perspective is needed. "Those willing to relinquish freedom for security deserve neither." Where does our freedom come from? If government tells you it's not safe to leave your home, and that directive is implemented by force, how can you claim you're a free American? How can you claim this is a constitutional republic? If you believe your freedom comes from the government, then your are no more than a slave, taking only what has been given by your Masters. You are resigned to live on your knees in preaceful slavery. "Give me liberty or give me death." These are not mere flowery words. They are the heart and soul of every person who ever died, because they would not live under the rule of tyranny. Those words are the measure of a person's conviction, and the key to breaking the heavy chains of slavery. They are the lifeblood of every person who can't breathe, unless they live free. Freedom is a very dangerous idea that terrifies our Masters, because it gives the individual the right to govern oneself. It negates the need for a government slave Master. It becomes the individual's responsibility to control their own life, to protect their own life. Freedom is abstract in theory, invisible to the naked eye, but it's absence is more than palpable. It's loss is crippling and overbearing. Those who live without it are broken in body and spirit. It's a strangling so harrowing and devestating that one might never recover. But despite the danger of freedom, billions were willing to die for this abstract idea throughout history, because it's value is beyond any currency. Our Masters know the value of our freedom, and they hate us for it. Freedom is never given. It has to be seized; stolen from the powers that would like nothing more than to keep us subservient and obedient. How can this be a government "for, of, and by the people", if the people have no right to object to the tyranny of a government which rules by fear and manipulation? When will you stand up and object to being ruled over by your Masters? When will you realize that your life has no value, if you cannot live free? Let me assure you, to wait would be a grave mistake. The loss of freedom is far more deadly than any virus or disease could ever be.
    3
  890. 3
  891. 3
  892. 3
  893. 3
  894.  @MurderousLamb  , the Coronavirus is a protein molecule covered in lipid. I'm an SRN. I know what a virus is. You don't, dear Google GESTAPO, YouTube Nazi paid shill. By the way, my facts on autism linked to MMR, they come from the NIH. The very same NIH your trust for your CV19 lockdown. At least I'm consistent, dear HYPOCRITE. "The virus is not a living organism, but a protein molecule (DNA) covered by a protective layer of lipid (fat), which, when absorbed by the cells of the ocular, nasal or buccal mucosa, changes their genetic code.  (mutation) and convert them into aggressor and multiplier cells. * Since the virus is not a living organism but a protein molecule, it is not killed, but decays on its own.  The disintegration time depends on the temperature, humidity and type of material where it lies. * The virus is very fragile;  the only thing that protects it is a thin outer layer of fat.  That is why any soap or detergent is the best remedy, because the foam CUTS the FAT (that is why you have to rub so much: for 20 seconds or more, to make a lot of foam).   By dissolving the fat layer, the protein molecule disperses and breaks down on its own. * HEAT melts fat;  this is why it is so good to use water above 25 degrees Celsius for washing hands, clothes and everything.  In addition, hot water makes more foam and that makes it even more useful. * Alcohol or any mixture with alcohol over 65% DISSOLVES ANY FAT, especially the external lipid layer of the virus. * Any mix with 1 part bleach and 5 parts water directly dissolves the protein, breaks it down from the inside. * Oxygenated water helps long after soap, alcohol and chlorine, because peroxide dissolves the virus protein, but you have to use it pure and it hurts your skin. * NO BACTERICIDE OR ANTIBIOTIC SERVES.  The virus is not a living organism like bacteria;  antibodies cannot kill what is not alive.  * NEVER shake used or unused clothing, sheets or cloth.  While it is glued to a porous surface, it is very inert and disintegrates only  -between 3 hours (fabric and porous),  -4 hours (copper and wood) -24 hours (cardboard),  - 42 hours (metal) and  -72 hours (plastic).   But if you shake it or use a feather duster, the virus molecules float in the air for up to 3 hours, and can lodge in your nose. * The virus molecules remain very stable in external cold, or artificial as air conditioners in houses and cars.   They also need moisture to stay stable, and especially darkness.  Therefore, dehumidified, dry, warm and bright environments will degrade it faster. * UV LIGHT on any object that may contain it breaks down the virus protein.  For example, to disinfect and reuse a mask is perfect.  Be careful, it also breaks down collagen (which is protein) in the skin. * The virus CANNOT go through healthy skin. * Vinegar is NOT useful because it does not break down the protective layer of fat. * NO SPIRITS, NOR VODKA, serve.  The strongest vodka is 40% alcohol, and you need 65%. * LISTERINE IF IT SERVES!  It is 65% alcohol. * The more confined the space, the more concentration of the virus there can be.  The more open or naturally ventilated, the less. * You have to wash your hands before and after touching mucosa, food, locks, knobs, switches, remote control, cell phone, watches, computers, desks, TV, etc.  And when using the bathroom. * You have to HUMIDIFY HANDS DRY from so much washing them, because the molecules can hide in the micro cracks.  The thicker the moisturizer, the better.   * Also keep your NAILS SHORT so that the virus does not hide there." -JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL   Do you know more than medicine? Are you smarter than Johns Hopkins?🤣🤣🤣🤣 you don't know what Nazis are, dear PROJECTION. Psychology 101. You're a textbook case. Funny how Bill Gates said we can't open the world until a vaccine is provided. I showed you the US patent for Coronavirus, and the WO patent for the Coronavirus vaccine. They're lying to you, I've proven it, and you still believe them. That's called willfully blind and woefully ignorant. Nazis forbid you to leave your home. Nazis forbid you to work. Nazis steel your freedom and force compliance. That's exactly what's happening. Tell me, how does threatening people with jail protect them?
    3
  895. 3
  896. 3
  897. Never live in a big city. This is an orchestrated culling. Anyone telling you differently is selling something. This is the flu. According to the WHO: "If you got a flu shot and take a Covid test, you will recieve a false positive." "It's easier to fool the people, than convince them they've been fooled." Look how quickly freedom evaporated in the name of safety. 56,000 Americans die on average every year from the flu. That never bothered you before. It certainly didn't scare you. You never wanted GOVERNMENT checkpoints for travel during flu season. You never wanted to close all "non essential businesses" for your health. There's over 300 strains of flu and we have vaccines for 4 of those strains. The same four vaccines every year. Yet 900,000 have died worldwide from Coronavirus, and you've allowed your freedom to be stolen, because you don't have a government vaccine?! Perspective is needed. "Those willing to relinquish freedom for security deserve neither." Where does our freedom come from? If government tells you it's not safe to leave your home, and that directive is implemented by force, how can you claim you're a free American? How can you claim this is a constitutional republic? If you believe your freedom comes from the government, then your are no more than a slave, taking only what has been given by your Masters. You are resigned to live on your knees in preaceful slavery. "Give me liberty or give me death." These are not mere flowery words. They are the heart and soul of every person who ever died, because they would not live under the rule of tyranny. Those words are the measure of a person's conviction, and the key to breaking the heavy chains of slavery. They are the lifeblood of every person who can't breathe, unless they live free. Freedom is a very dangerous idea that terrifies our Masters, because it gives the individual the right to govern oneself. It negates the need for a government slave Master. It becomes the individual's responsibility to control their own life, to protect their own life. Freedom is abstract in theory, invisible to the naked eye, but it's absence is more than palpable. It's loss is crippling and overbearing. Those who live without it are broken in body and spirit. It's a strangling so harrowing and devestating that one might never recover. But despite the danger of freedom, billions were willing to die for this abstract idea throughout history, because it's value is beyond any currency. Our Masters know the value of our freedom, and they hate us for it. Freedom is never given. It has to be seized; stolen from the powers that would like nothing more than to keep us subservient and obedient. How can this be a government "for, of, and by the people", if the people have no right to object to the tyranny of a government which rules by fear and manipulation? When will you stand up and object to being ruled over by your Masters? When will you realize that your life has no value, if you cannot live free? Let me assure you, to wait would be a grave mistake. The loss of freedom is far more deadly than any virus or disease could ever be.
    3
  898. 3
  899. 3
  900. 3
  901. 3
  902. 3
  903. 3
  904. 3
  905. 3
  906. 3
  907. 3
  908. 3
  909. 3
  910. 3
  911. 3
  912. 3
  913. 3
  914. 3
  915. 3
  916. 3
  917. @justaguylearningmusic , "fear is not from God". Anytime you feel fear, that is the enemy working in your life. You're afraid if you do one thing wrong, you'll go to hell. Is that right? Here's the thing, the Bible tells us that our sins separate us from our Creator. The more sinful your life is, the less you are connected to God. The problem is, we're all sinners. The human nature of man is sinful. Even someone who has fully embraced faith in Jesus, they're still going to sin. No one is, or will ever be perfect, only Jesus. What did God do for sinners? He gave His only Son; sinless, perfect, Jesus. When Jesus was nailed to the cross, he lifted his eyes to heaven and said, "it is finished". What was finished? Answer:Your salvation. In that moment, Jesus gave his life to pay for every sin ever committed, and every single sin that will be committed in the future. You are offered a free gift of salvation, all you have to do is believe in the one who saved you. Think of it this way: You commit a crime and you end up in court. God is the judge. God says, "you've lied, you've cheated, you've stolen, you've had sexual relations outside of marriage, you use drugs, and you've taken my name in vain. You're guiltily and deserve the ultimate punishment, but today, you're free to go." "Why?" You ask. God says, "because Jesus payed your fine and suffered your punishment for you." No other FAITH offers you salvation. No other FAITH promises everlasting life for simply believing. All others are religion and require you to save yourself through works of kindness and good deeds. But salvation is a gift to an undeserving person who has the humility to say, "Jesus, I'm worthless and I can't save myself. Forgive me, and take control of my life."
    3
  918. 3
  919. 3
  920. 3
  921. 3
  922. 3
  923. 3
  924. 3
  925. 3
  926. 3
  927. 3
  928. 3
  929. 3
  930. 3
  931. 3
  932. 3
  933. 3
  934. 3
  935. 3
  936. 3
  937. 3
  938. 3
  939. 3
  940. 3
  941. 3
  942. 3
  943. 3
  944. 3
  945. 3
  946. 3
  947. 3
  948. 3
  949. 3
  950. 3
  951. 3
  952. 3
  953. 3
  954. 3
  955. 3
  956. 3
  957. 3
  958. 3
  959. 3
  960. 3
  961. 3
  962. 3
  963. 3
  964. 3
  965. 3
  966. 3
  967. 3
  968. 3
  969. 3
  970. 3
  971. 3
  972. 3
  973. 3
  974. 3
  975. 3
  976. 3
  977. 3
  978. 3
  979. 3
  980. 3
  981. 3
  982. 3
  983. 3
  984. 3
  985. 3
  986. 3
  987. 3
  988. 3
  989. 3
  990. 3
  991. 3
  992. 3
  993. 3
  994. 3
  995. 3
  996. 3
  997. 3
  998. 3
  999. 3
  1000. 3
  1001. 3
  1002. 3
  1003. 3
  1004. 3
  1005. 3
  1006. 3
  1007. 3
  1008. 3
  1009. 3
  1010. 3
  1011. 3
  1012. 3
  1013. 3
  1014. 3
  1015. 3
  1016. 3
  1017. 3
  1018. 3
  1019. 3
  1020. 3
  1021. 3
  1022. 3
  1023. 3
  1024. 3
  1025. 3
  1026.  @salvatorebullock9367  , he was Not a war hero. He was a war criminal. Bombing a light-bulb factory, a civilian target, is a war crime. McCain, obviously, didn’t select the target, he was just following orders, but that doesn’t exonerate him any more than any other soldier who follows an illegal order. According to Amnesty International this particular violation of the Geneva Convention (bombing civilian targets) is actually official U.S. military doctrine: “Military advantage may involve a variety of considerations, including the security of the attacking force. … Economic targets of the enemy that indirectly but effectively support and sustain the enemy’s war-fighting capability may also be attacked.” “War is a clash of opposing wills. … While physical factors are crucial in war, the national will and the leadership’s will are also critical components of war. The will to prosecute or the will to resist can be decisive elements. … Strategic attack objectives often include producing effects to demoralize the enemy’s leadership, military forces, and population, thus affecting the adversary’s capability to continue the conflict.” Both of these statements, taken from different U.S. military manuals and documents, represent direct violations of the Geneva Convention (and, it should be noted, well before the advent of George W. Bush). But McCain didn’t just carry out such illegal orders himself, he willingly voiced support for them, specifically during the 1999 war against Yugoslavia when “water systems, power and heating plants, hospitals, universities, schools, apartment complexes, senior citizens’ homes, bridges, factories, trains, buses, radio and TV stations, the telephone system, oil refineries, embassies, marketplaces and more were deliberately destroyed by U.S./NATO planes in a ruthless 10-week bombing campaign.” For reference, here is Article 54 of the Geneva convention: “It is prohibited to attack, destroy, remove, or render useless objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population, such as foodstuffs, crops, livestock, drinking water installations and supplies, and irrigation works, for the specific purpose of denying them for their sustenance value to the civilian population or to the adverse Party, whatever the motive, whether in order to starve out civilians, to cause them to move away, or for any other motive.” McCain, and the entire U.S. political and military establishment, also supported the wholesale bombing of Iraq’s water purification plants during the first Gulf War. And this was no ordinary war crime, it was a planned genocide. Documents released in 2000 revealed that the U.S. had studied in detail all aspects of Iraq’s water system, had planned a strategy for preventing Iraq from reconstructing that system (via sanctions), and knew in advance that “this could lead to increased incidences, if not epidemics of disease.” Indeed it did, with more than half a million Iraqi children dead as a result, one of the greatest war crimes in history, carried out by the next generation of U.S. pilots who followed John McCain, and with John McCain’s full-throated support. John McCain—war criminal then, war criminal now, war criminal forever. To be clear, he is far from the only one currently, or previously, serving in the U.S. government or U.S. military. But, at the moment, he is the only one for whom the entire ruling class, with the lone exception of Donald Trump, is rushing to assure the American public that he was a war hero, before the truth gets more closely examined.
    3
  1027. 3
  1028. 3
  1029. 3
  1030. 3
  1031. 3
  1032. 3
  1033. 3
  1034. 3
  1035. 3
  1036. 3
  1037. 3
  1038. 3
  1039. 3
  1040. 3
  1041. 3
  1042. 3
  1043. 3
  1044. 3
  1045. 3
  1046. 3
  1047. 3
  1048. 3
  1049. 3
  1050. 3
  1051. 3
  1052. 3
  1053. 3
  1054. 3
  1055. 3
  1056. 3
  1057. 3
  1058. 3
  1059. 3
  1060. 3
  1061. 3
  1062. 3
  1063. 3
  1064. 3
  1065. 3
  1066. 3
  1067. 3
  1068. 3
  1069. 3
  1070. 3
  1071. 3
  1072. 3
  1073. 3
  1074. 3
  1075. 3
  1076. 3
  1077. 3
  1078. 3
  1079. 3
  1080. 3
  1081. 3
  1082. 3
  1083. 3
  1084. 3
  1085. 3
  1086. 3
  1087. 3
  1088. 3
  1089. 3
  1090. 3
  1091. 3
  1092. 3
  1093. 3
  1094. 3
  1095. 2
  1096. 2
  1097. 2
  1098. The house has the sole power to investigate impeachment. The Senate has the sole power to try the case. The Senate doesn't investigate. They simply hear the case and pass judgement. Senate Republicans get to make their own rules for the trial, just like Democrats got to make their own rules in the house. They are guided by 200 years of legal precedent. Mitch has said this will be like Clinton's trial. No new witnesses were allowed by Democrats during Bill's trial. They refused Republican requests for witnesses, citing "the Senate doesn't investigate. Why should it be different with Trump? By the way, there is no legal precedent for Nancy holding onto impeachment indefinitely. If anyone has thrown the rules out, it's Nancy. The fact that Democrats are refusing to pass articles to the Senate, until they get a guarantee to have their own way is totally hypocrisy. Hmmm... Can you say quid pro quo? Democrats asking for new witnesses in the Senate is an indication of how weak their case is against Trump. If Nancy believed her case was solid, she would have handed over the articles and set a trial date. When Clinton was impeached, articles were passed to the Senate the very same day. Clinton was later convicted of lying to Congress, and was stripped of his law license. A fair trial applies to the accused, not the prosecution. Every defendant is innocent at the beginning of their trial. Presumption of innocence is the Hallmark of our Justice system. Every juror must view the defendant as innocent until evidence says otherwise. If they can't, then they are dismissed from participating in the jury process.
    2
  1099. 2
  1100. 2
  1101. 2
  1102. 2
  1103. 2
  1104. 2
  1105. 2
  1106. 2
  1107. 2
  1108. 2
  1109. 2
  1110. 2
  1111. 2
  1112. 2
  1113. 2
  1114. 2
  1115. 2
  1116. 2
  1117. 2
  1118. 2
  1119. 2
  1120. 2
  1121. 2
  1122. 2
  1123. 2
  1124. 2
  1125. 2
  1126. 2
  1127. 2
  1128. 2
  1129. 2
  1130. 2
  1131. 2
  1132. 2
  1133. 2
  1134. 2
  1135. 2
  1136. 2
  1137. 2
  1138. 2
  1139. 2
  1140. 2
  1141. 2
  1142. 2
  1143. 2
  1144. 2
  1145. 2
  1146. 2
  1147. 2
  1148. 2
  1149. 2
  1150. 2
  1151. 2
  1152. 2
  1153. 2
  1154. 2
  1155. 2
  1156. 2
  1157. 2
  1158. 2
  1159. 2
  1160. 2
  1161. 2
  1162. 2
  1163. 2
  1164. 2
  1165. 2
  1166. 2
  1167. 2
  1168. 2
  1169. 2
  1170. 2
  1171. 2
  1172. 2
  1173. 2
  1174. 2
  1175. 2
  1176. 2
  1177. 2
  1178. 2
  1179. 2
  1180. 2
  1181. 2
  1182. 2
  1183. 2
  1184. 2
  1185. 2
  1186. 2
  1187. 2
  1188. 2
  1189. 2
  1190. 2
  1191. 2
  1192. 2
  1193. 2
  1194. 2
  1195. 2
  1196. 2
  1197. 2
  1198. 2
  1199. 2
  1200. 2
  1201. 2
  1202. 2
  1203. 2
  1204. 2
  1205. 2
  1206. 2
  1207. 2
  1208. 2
  1209. 2
  1210. 2
  1211. 2
  1212. 2
  1213. 2
  1214. 2
  1215. 2
  1216. 2
  1217. 2
  1218. 2
  1219. 2
  1220. 2
  1221. 2
  1222. 2
  1223. 2
  1224. 2
  1225. 2
  1226. 2
  1227. 2
  1228. 2
  1229. 2
  1230. 2
  1231. 2
  1232. 2
  1233. 2
  1234. 2
  1235. 2
  1236. 2
  1237. 2
  1238. 2
  1239. 2
  1240. 2
  1241. 2
  1242. 2
  1243. 2
  1244. 2
  1245. 2
  1246. 2
  1247. 2
  1248.  @snoglydox  , ****"EDIT***** I've been blocked from commenting by @Political Wonk, and @Snoglydox, who happen to be 2 fake accounts with the same brainless incompetent running them. He blocked me simply because I tell the truth. Only truth requires such a cowardly rebuttal as censorship. I'll just answer him here: "You really don't understand engineering, do you" That's not an argument. Let's play "who knows more about engineering", shall we? Slightly rusted rebar has better bond to concrete than uncorroded rebar. If the concrete is 'good' further corrosion will be minor as the concrete should be sufficiently alkaline to prevent rusting, and dense enough not to permit enough 'water or air to reach rebar to cause corrosion. Steel corrodes because it is not a naturally occurring material. Rather, iron ore is smelted and refined to produce steel. The production steps that transform iron ore into steel add energy to the metal. Steel, like most metals except gold and platinum, is thermodynamically unstable under normal atmospheric conditions and will release energy and revert back to its natural state—iron oxide, or rust. This process is called corrosion. For corrosion to occur, these elements must be present: There must be at least two metals (or two locations on a single metal) at different energy levels an electrolyte a metallic connection corrosion_67217_th In reinforced concrete, the rebar may have many separate areas at different energy levels. Concrete acts as the electrolyte, and the metallic connection is provided by wire ties, chair supports, or the rebar itself. Corrosion is an electrochemical process involving the flow of charges (electrons and ions). At active sites on the bar, called anodes, iron atoms lose electrons and move into the surrounding concrete as ferrous ions. This process is called a half-cell oxidation reaction, or the anodic reaction, and is represented as: 2Fe → 2Fe2+ + 4e- The electrons remain in the bar and flow to sites called cathodes, where they combine with water and oxygen in the concrete. The reaction at the cathode is called a reduction reaction. A common reduction reaction is: 2H2O + O2 + 4e- → 4OH- To maintain electrical neutrality, the ferrous ions migrate through the concrete pore water to these cathodic sites where they combine to form iron hydroxides, or rust: 2Fe2+ + 4OH- → 2Fe(OH) This initial precipitated hydroxide tends to react further with oxygen to form higher oxides. The increases in volume as the reaction products react further with dissolved oxygen leads to internal stress within the concrete that may be sufficient to cause cracking and spalling of the concrete cover. With me so far? *****End of Edit***** I'm supposed to believe that you're an engineer, but you don't know it's called the "Dunning Kruger effect", not the "dun and Krueger effect", dear incompetent, used and bloody tampon, and ENRAGED and OBSESSED PSYCHO stalker.
    2
  1249. 2
  1250. 2
  1251. 2
  1252. 2
  1253. 2
  1254. 2
  1255. 2
  1256. 2
  1257. 2
  1258. 2
  1259. 2
  1260. 2
  1261. 2
  1262. 2
  1263. 2
  1264. 2
  1265. 2
  1266. 2
  1267. 2
  1268. 2
  1269. 2
  1270. 2
  1271. 2
  1272. 2
  1273. 2
  1274. 2
  1275. 2
  1276. 2
  1277. 2
  1278. 2
  1279. 2
  1280. 2
  1281. 2
  1282. 2
  1283. 2
  1284. 2
  1285. 2
  1286. 2
  1287. 2
  1288. 2
  1289. 2
  1290. 2
  1291. 2
  1292. 2
  1293. 2
  1294. 2
  1295. 2
  1296. 2
  1297. 2
  1298. 2
  1299. 2
  1300. 2
  1301. 2
  1302. 2
  1303. 2
  1304. 2
  1305. 2
  1306. 2
  1307. 2
  1308. 2
  1309. 2
  1310. 2
  1311. 2
  1312. 2
  1313. 2
  1314. 2
  1315. 2
  1316. 2
  1317. 2
  1318. 2
  1319. 2
  1320. 2
  1321. 2
  1322. 2
  1323. 2
  1324. 2
  1325. 2
  1326. 2
  1327. 2
  1328. 2
  1329. 2
  1330. 2
  1331. 2
  1332. 2
  1333. 2
  1334. 2
  1335. 2
  1336. 2
  1337. 2
  1338. 2
  1339. 2
  1340. 2
  1341. 2
  1342. 2
  1343. 2
  1344. 2
  1345. 2
  1346. 2
  1347. 2
  1348. 2
  1349. 2
  1350. 2
  1351. 2
  1352. 2
  1353. 2
  1354. 2
  1355. 2
  1356. 2
  1357. 2
  1358. 2
  1359. 2
  1360.  @Kolazola  , If this were true, there'd be thousands of examples of buildings all along the coast collapsing due to saltwater and heat. This clearly wasn't corrosion. The probability that all the steel beams inside the concrete were equally corroded, and gave way at the same time without explosives is statistically impossible. Also, there's no way that natural corrosion would cause the building to be collapsed into tiny pieces of rubble. If this were natural, there would be huge pieces of the building still in tact, even after collapse. There's none of that. The debris of the fallen building is literally dust. Could have been DEW, either way, this didn't occur naturally. People need to wake up. You can see the flashes(explosions) right before the reinforced steel concrete slabs were cut with dynamite or a DEW. @Prairie Pucker said, "personally, I think you're an idiot. But there's gonna be an investigation. If there's wires and thermite, they're gonna find it" Well, personally I think you're as useless as a used an bloody tampon, because they demoed the rest of the building 10 days later. They're going to find wires and thermite, but how can they find the cause of the collapse, when they destroyed the evidence? That's called a cover-up. John Macafee had a residence in the building. This is your government. Wake up. I posted the video of the collapse. You can clearly see it was a controlled demolition. You can view the dynamite explosions throughout the building just prior to collapse. Good try though, dear PROPAGANDA pusher. I'm not the one unfamiliar with physics, dear PROJECTION and HYPOCRISY. This was a free fall collapse which can't happen if the building fell the way you suggest.
    2
  1361. 2
  1362. 2
  1363. 2
  1364. 2
  1365. 2
  1366. 2
  1367. 2
  1368. 2
  1369. 2
  1370. 2
  1371. 2
  1372. 2
  1373. 2
  1374. 2
  1375. 2
  1376. 2
  1377. 2
  1378. 2
  1379. 2
  1380. 2
  1381. 2
  1382. 2
  1383. 2
  1384. 2
  1385. 2
  1386. 2
  1387. 2
  1388. 2
  1389. 2
  1390. 2
  1391. 2
  1392. 2
  1393. 2
  1394. 2
  1395. 2
  1396. 2
  1397. 2
  1398. 2
  1399. 2
  1400. 2
  1401. 2
  1402. 2
  1403. 2
  1404. 2
  1405. 2
  1406. 2
  1407. 2
  1408. 2
  1409. 2
  1410. 2
  1411. 2
  1412. 2
  1413. 2
  1414. 2
  1415. Gillian Persaid 10 hours ago "@Nikkisheers you actually ARE soul transplanted Zero, if you can't understand how closet Reps masquerade as Dems." This is called hypocrisy and projection. Psychology 101. Justin Truedue , Joy Bayher, Sarah Silverman, Jimmy Kimmell, Ralf Northum are all democrats who have been caught in blackface, and apologized. They are ALL Democrats. Clearly you don't know your history. The democrats instituted slavery. Democrats instituted Jim Crow and segregation. Democrats founded the KKK. The democrat party has always been the party of racism. Republicans freed the slaves. Republicans ended Jim Crow and Segregation. Republicans gave black people the right to vote. You have only yourselves to thank for racism, dear demoralized Dem. "Didn't Trump (The Rout by Underwear Models from Playboy) teach you that Reps try to buy anti-Dem political attackers AS IN UKRAINE?" First of all, dear, I'm not a republican. I don't vote for presidents. I'm a conscientious objector, an anarchist. A president is nothing more than a slave owner. All you're doing is choosing your new master every 4 years. I prefer actual freedom. As far as Ukraine goes, the Ukrainian president is the one who said Democrats were doing corrupt deals in Ukraine. It was the Ukrainian President who no longer wanted Yovanovich as an ambassador. Not Republicans. " Who was that in blackface? Was it YOU?" Yes, It was. I'm BLACK, dear racist hypocrite. " You seem to know more about it than anyone else. " A rock knows more than you, dear ignorant and inept. "Don't waste my time. ' More projection from you. You're wasting everyone's time with your biased non facts, and ill informed opinion. "I have dignity, honor, more important occupations AND I deal only with Truth and Fact(both are alien to you.)" Yeah, It's really dignified and honorable to name call, because you disagree with someone. You haven't dealt in either fact or truth. The only thing you've done is state your opinion. Opinions aren't facts, dear dolt. Do we need to define the 2? Cause you seem genuinely confused. I'm a surgical RN, dear projecting hypocrite. On your best day, you couldn't compete with my intelligence, which is why you've failed so miserably here. " Enjoy the False Prophet's cult tRump Koolaid- that he stirred with his dick- I sense it gurgling where your brain, soul and heart were. 😋😋😋😅😅😅😝😝" Once again, I'm not a Trump voter, dear liar. And once again you display your "dignity and honor" with ad hominem attacks and graphic depictions of your opposition. Neither is dignified or honorable, dear delusional. "You can also copy my Emojis as you did in your reply- " Are you really this obtuse? Did you invent emoji's? I'm pretty sure EVERYONE uses emojis, dear dumbass. The only reason someone would copy you, would be if they were trying to appear brain dead.🤣🤣🤣💩💩💩 "I know it's hard to think of your own, while you're full of Kool Aid." Once again, dear hypocrite, you didn't invent emojis. No one would copy your sanctimonious, self righteous, dumbass. "You Reps bow to a corrupted blond man as God because you refuse the Truth but you want God's power." I'm not a Republican. How many times can I say it? Are you really laboring under the delusion that Democrats are good, and republicans are evil? How convenient that your party is so virtuous. Give me a break, dear projecting hypocrite. Both parties are full of liars, thieves, and psychotic murderers. You know that Jeffrey Epstein was a democrat, right? And you know the super majority that flew to pedophile island were democrats, right? Trump was a democrat his whole life. He donated to Clinton and Obama. So was trump evil when he was a democrat? Or just when he became a republican? " As the Bible says "all the world wandered after the Beast"- the world being those sold out to Satan. " You mean like the liberals who support abortion? You do know that abortion is described as a curse from God in the bible, right? "Remember your sad destiny in God's wrath. " No dear, ignorant and inept. I'm saved. Born again. I suggest you do the same, dear hypocrite.The bible tells us anyone who condemns another, will find themselves condemned. You just damned yourself to hell. Well done, dearest sinner. Praying for you. Matt.7. [1] Judge not, that ye be not judged. [2] For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again. [3] And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
    2
  1416.  @gillianpersaid7794  can you read, dear ignorant and inept?!🤣🤣🤣 No one would ever copy you, unless they were trying to appear braindead. Gillian Persaid 10 hours ago "@Nikkisheers you actually ARE soul transplanted Zero, if you can't understand how closet Reps masquerade as Dems." This is called hypocrisy and projection. Psychology 101. Justin Truedue , Joy Bayher, Sarah Silverman, Jimmy Kimmell, Ralf Northum are all democrats who have been caught in blackface, and apologized. They are ALL Democrats. Clearly you don't know your history. The democrats instituted slavery. Democrats instituted Jim Crow and segregation. Democrats founded the KKK. The democrat party has always been the party of racism. Republicans freed the slaves. Republicans ended Jim Crow and Segregation. Republicans gave black people the right to vote. You have only yourselves to thank for racism, dear demoralized Dem. "Didn't Trump (The Rout by Underwear Models from Playboy) teach you that Reps try to buy anti-Dem political attackers AS IN UKRAINE?" First of all, dear, I'm not a republican. I don't vote for presidents. I'm a conscientious objector, an anarchist. A president is nothing more than a slave owner. All you're doing is choosing your new master every 4 years. I prefer actual freedom. As far as Ukraine goes, the Ukrainian president is the one who said Democrats were doing corrupt deals in Ukraine. It was the Ukrainian President who no longer wanted Yovanovich as an ambassador. Not Republicans. " Who was that in blackface? Was it YOU?" Yes, It was. I'm BLACK, dear racist hypocrite. " You seem to know more about it than anyone else. " A rock knows more than you, dear ignorant and inept. "Don't waste my time. ' More projection from you. You're wasting everyone's time with your biased non facts, and ill informed opinion. "I have dignity, honor, more important occupations AND I deal only with Truth and Fact(both are alien to you.)" Yeah, It's really dignified and honorable to name call, because you disagree with someone. You haven't dealt in either fact or truth. The only thing you've done is state your opinion. Opinions aren't facts, dear dolt. Do we need to define the 2? Cause you seem genuinely confused. I'm a surgical RN, dear projecting hypocrite. On your best day, you couldn't compete with my intelligence, which is why you've failed so miserably here. " Enjoy the False Prophet's cult tRump Koolaid- that he stirred with his dick- I sense it gurgling where your brain, soul and heart were. 😋😋😋😅😅😅😝😝" Once again, I'm not a Trump voter, dear liar. And once again you display your "dignity and honor" with ad hominem attacks and graphic depictions of your opposition. Neither is dignified or honorable, dear delusional. "You can also copy my Emojis as you did in your reply- " Are you really this obtuse? Did you invent emoji's? I'm pretty sure EVERYONE uses emojis, dear dumbass. The only reason someone would copy you, would be if they were trying to appear brain dead.🤣🤣🤣💩💩💩 "I know it's hard to think of your own, while you're full of Kool Aid." Once again, dear hypocrite, you didn't invent emojis. No one would copy your sanctimonious, self righteous, dumbass. "You Reps bow to a corrupted blond man as God because you refuse the Truth but you want God's power." I'm not a Republican. How many times can I say it? Are you really laboring under the delusion that Democrats are good, and republicans are evil? How convenient that your party is so virtuous. Give me a break, dear projecting hypocrite. Both parties are full of liars, thieves, and psychotic murderers. You know that Jeffrey Epstein was a democrat, right? And you know the super majority that flew to pedophile island were democrats, right? Trump was a democrat his whole life. He donated to Clinton and Obama. So was trump evil when he was a democrat? Or just when he became a republican? " As the Bible says "all the world wandered after the Beast"- the world being those sold out to Satan. " You mean like the liberals who support abortion? You do know that abortion is described as a curse from God in the bible, right? "Remember your sad destiny in God's wrath. " No dear, ignorant and inept. I'm saved. Born again. I suggest you do the same, dear hypocrite.The bible tells us anyone who condemns another, will find themselves condemned. You just damned yourself to hell. Well done, dearest sinner. Praying for you. Matt.7. [1] Judge not, that ye be not judged. [2] For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again. [3] And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
    2
  1417. 2
  1418. 2
  1419.  @gillianpersaid7794  , from the above article, which is from Politico, the gold standard of Liberal Democrat news reporting. This is written by your own side. Read it and weep, dear ignorant Hypocrite. 🤣🤣🤣🤣 "Donald Trump wasn’t the only presidential candidate whose campaign was boosted by officials of a former Soviet bloc country. Ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning his fitness for office. They also disseminated documents implicating a top Trump aide in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter, only to back away after the election. And they helped Clinton’s allies research damaging information on Trump and his advisers, a Politico investigation found. A Ukrainian-American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia, according to people with direct knowledge of the situation. The Ukrainian efforts had an impact in the race, helping to force Manafort’s resignation and advancing the narrative that Trump’s campaign was deeply connected to Ukraine’s foe to the east, Russia. But they were far less concerted or centrally directed than Russia’s alleged hacking and dissemination of Democratic emails. Russia’s effort was personally directed by Russian President Vladimir Putin, involved the country’s military and foreign intelligence services, according to U.S. intelligence officials. They reportedly briefed Trump last week on the possibility that Russian operatives might have compromising information on the president-elect. And at a Senate hearing last week on the hacking, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper said “I don't think we've ever encountered a more aggressive or direct campaign to interfere in our election process than we've seen in this case.” There’s little evidence of such a top-down effort by Ukraine. Longtime observers suggest that the rampant corruption, factionalism and economic struggles plaguing the country — not to mention its ongoing strife with Russia — would render it unable to pull off an ambitious covert interference campaign in another country’s election. And President Petro Poroshenko’s administration, along with the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington, insists that Ukraine stayed neutral. Yet Politico’s investigation found evidence of Ukrainian government involvement in the race that appears to strain diplomatic protocol dictating that governments refrain from engaging in one another’s elections. Russia’s meddling has sparked outrage from the American body politic. The U.S. intelligence community undertook the rare move of publicizing its findings on the matter, and President Barack Obama took several steps to officially retaliate, while members of Congress continue pushing for more investigations into the hacking and a harder line against Russia, which was already viewed in Washington as America’s leading foreign adversary. Ukraine, on the other hand, has traditionally enjoyed strong relations with U.S. administrations. Its officials worry that could change under Trump, whose team has privately expressed sentiments ranging from ambivalence to deep skepticism about Poroshenko’s regime, while sounding unusually friendly notes about Putin’s regime. Poroshenko is scrambling to alter that dynamic, recently signing a $50,000-a-month contract with a well-connected GOP-linked Washington lobbying firm to set up meetings with U.S. government officials “to strengthen U.S.-Ukrainian relations.”
    2
  1420. 2
  1421. 2
  1422. 2
  1423. 2
  1424. 2
  1425. 2
  1426. 2
  1427. 2
  1428. 2
  1429. 2
  1430. 2
  1431. 2
  1432. 2
  1433. 2
  1434. 2
  1435. 2
  1436. 2
  1437. 2
  1438. 2
  1439. 2
  1440. 2
  1441. 2
  1442. 2
  1443. 2
  1444. 2
  1445. 2
  1446. 2
  1447. 2
  1448. 2
  1449. 2
  1450. 2
  1451. 2
  1452. 2
  1453. 2
  1454. 2
  1455. 2
  1456. 2
  1457. 2
  1458. 2
  1459. 2
  1460. 2
  1461. 2
  1462. 2
  1463. 2
  1464. 2
  1465. 2
  1466. 2
  1467. 2
  1468. 2
  1469. 2
  1470. 2
  1471. 2
  1472. MysticMech MysticMech 15 minutes ago "@Nikkisheers What "you"prefer" is to be triggered." This is called hypocrisy, dear. You were the one triggered by my comments. "Writing a bunch of nonsense, for what reason, i have no idea." You mean like this bullshit that you wrote? yeah, I don"t get why you typed up a response that has zero facts. " Telling people, what they believe and what they think, is a no no." Who did that, dear liar. It wasn't me. "Your opinion on what "Trump" thinks and who was actually at the ballgame is nothing more than projection." No dear, you're projecting. This was the world series. Average Americans can't afford $2000 for a nosebleed ticket. This was also DC, the home of liberal democrats. Are you really this inept, dear? DC hates trump. No one was surorised by their boos. " Of course, you think you have all of the facts, and know it all. " More projection and hypocrisy from you. "You don't. You are no better than the next guy, who thinks, he's better than the next... " You mean like you, dear hypocrite? Everything you say about me only applies to you. "You say freedom? What are you not free to do today, that you couldn't do 4 to 8 years ago? Huh... " Who a said that? I've never voted for a president. Can you read, poor dolt? "I'm a conscientious objector" Oh, is that what you are?" Yes. I know it's a foreign concept to the mass indoctrinated, but i never cared what the misinformed think of me. " If a president is nothing more than a slave owner...and Trump is the president, doesn't that make you a slave too?" No, cause i don't vote for presidents. I'm not a slave to the left/right paradigm that you worship. " Or are you, just so above the rest of the American people, that you can't be part of your own "branding"? " Never said I was above America, but clearly I'm above you in intelligence. Thanks for proving it though by providing us with your sanctimonious and self righteous comments. "Branding"? Who did i brand incorrectly? ARE you not a hypocrite, because your comments suggest you are. "Yeah... i got your hypocrite, right here... " I know. I'm the one who called you a hypocrite. Do keep up, dear.
    2
  1473. 2
  1474. 2
  1475. 2
  1476. 2
  1477. 2
  1478. 2
  1479. 2
  1480. 2
  1481. 2
  1482. 2
  1483. 2
  1484. 2
  1485. 2
  1486. 2
  1487. 2
  1488. 2
  1489. 2
  1490. 2
  1491. 2
  1492. 2
  1493. 2
  1494. 2
  1495. 2
  1496. 2
  1497. 2
  1498. 2
  1499. 2
  1500. Youtube is censoring ALL decenting voices on all subjects. Yesterday I was shadow banned for pointing out that there's a video of anfarta changing into Trump gear at the capital riot. When I posted the YouTube video, it was immediately deleted. Today, I got an email from YouTube, because people are complaining about my truthful comments. Please read said email: "Nikkishears, The YouTube Community Outreach Team regularly reaches out to users who may not otherwise get an opportunity to share their thoughts with us.We’re reaching out to you because members of the community were concerned about some of the comments you’ve posted on YouTube. We’d like to hear about your experience – please take a moment to complete our survey and share your thoughts. We’re here to listen." I love how youtube pretends that they, themselves, have no complaints about my comments, when they're the ones censoring, shadow banning, and deleting my comments daily. Yet, all of the sudden they care about my thoughts? 😏 Ironically, I don't give a flying f*** about what "they wanna know". This is why I'm on bitchute. No censorship. Youtube, Twitter, and the rest of social media are purposely destroying free speech. And the New York Times is telling us to "stop employing critical thinking". Seriously?! What world are we living in? To add insult to injury, Youtube had the nerve to ask for my thoughts about their censorship of me. Allow me to say this: "F*** you, YouTube Nazis, and F*** the Google GESTAPO. The only reason one needs to censor my speech is because they fear the Truth. If I was lying they could easily prove me wrong, but since I'm telling the truth, they HAVE to silence me.
    2
  1501. 2
  1502. 2
  1503. 2
  1504. 2
  1505. 2
  1506. 2
  1507. 2
  1508. 2
  1509. 2
  1510. 2
  1511. 2
  1512. 2
  1513. 2
  1514. 2
  1515. 2
  1516. 2
  1517. 2
  1518. 2
  1519. 2
  1520. 2
  1521. 2
  1522. 2
  1523. 2
  1524. 2
  1525. 2
  1526. 2
  1527. 2
  1528. 2
  1529. 2
  1530. 2
  1531. 2
  1532. 2
  1533. 2
  1534. 2
  1535. 2
  1536. 2
  1537. 2
  1538. 2
  1539. 2
  1540. 2
  1541. 2
  1542. 2
  1543. 2
  1544. 2
  1545. 2
  1546. 2
  1547. 2
  1548. 2
  1549. 2
  1550. 2
  1551. 2
  1552. 2
  1553. 2
  1554. 2
  1555. 2
  1556. 2
  1557. 2
  1558. 2
  1559. 2
  1560. 2
  1561. 2
  1562. 2
  1563. 2
  1564. 2
  1565. 2
  1566. 2
  1567. 2
  1568. 2
  1569. 2
  1570. 2
  1571. 2
  1572. 2
  1573. 2
  1574. 2
  1575. 2
  1576. 2
  1577. 2
  1578. 2
  1579. 2
  1580. 2
  1581. 2
  1582. 2
  1583. 2
  1584. 2
  1585. 2
  1586. 2
  1587. 2
  1588. 2
  1589. 2
  1590. 2
  1591. 2
  1592. 2
  1593. 2
  1594. 2
  1595. 2
  1596. 2
  1597. 2
  1598. 2
  1599. 2
  1600. 2
  1601. 2
  1602. 2
  1603. 2
  1604. 2
  1605. 2
  1606. 2
  1607. 2
  1608. 2
  1609. 2
  1610. 2
  1611. 2
  1612. 2
  1613. 2
  1614. 2
  1615. Highlighted reply Rhys Rautjoki 47 minutes ago "@Nikkisheers Thanks for listening to me and continuing to post crazy stuff." This is called projection and hypocrisy. You're talking to me. You approached me on two threads, not the other way around, dear lying hypocrite. "Me a liberal? lol You just had me ROFL. " You're a hypocrite liberal democrat who votes the party line. You're a slave to your party and you know it. Sad. "And I'm glad how you love I don't answer any of your questions." I love your cowardice, get it right. " Because then you'll love to hear how I don't answer to or suffer fools." You won't suffer fools. I know. Clearly I'm not a fool, if you're still trying and failing to win the argument, dear hypocritical bigot. If i was a foolish as you say, logic says you'd walk away. You're still here. I also have 149 IQ. Technically, I'm a genius, What's your IQ, dear cowardly hypocrite? Oh right, you're too cowardly to answer. "But please keep posting. It's Friday afternoon here so I need the weekend entertainment." Sad that you have no life to speak of, but understandable since you're an insufferable hypocrite, bigot, and moron. I'm more than happy to continue this conversation, but you continue to talk with a dick in your mouth. Not only is this uncouth, but no one can understand a hypocritical word you're saying. Best remove the dick from your mouth, before you speak. Also, I have to replace a mitral valve on Monday. Do you think you could finish being useless by then?
    2
  1616. 2
  1617. 2
  1618. 2
  1619. 2
  1620. 2
  1621. 2
  1622. 2
  1623. 2
  1624. 2
  1625. 2
  1626. 2
  1627. 2
  1628. 2
  1629. 2
  1630. 2
  1631. 2
  1632. 2
  1633. 2
  1634. 2
  1635. 2
  1636. 2
  1637. 2
  1638. 2
  1639. 2
  1640. 2
  1641. 2
  1642. 2
  1643. 2
  1644. 2
  1645. 2
  1646. 2
  1647. 2
  1648.  @garrettlivingston8577  here it is again, dear blind hypocrite. Let's read together, shall we? new report for The Hill by award-winning investigative reporter John Solomon presents details from “hundreds of pages of never-released memos and documents,” many from inside the American team helping the company at the center of the Biden-Ukraine controversy, that “conflict” with Joe Biden’s claim that he pressured Ukraine to remove its top prosecutor because he was failing to weed out corruption, rather than the prosecutor’s investigation into the company paying Hunter Biden some $600,000 a year. While Biden maintains that he only strong-armed Ukraine to replace its chief prosecutor, Viktor Shokin, because of allegations of his corruption and mishandling of his job — not because of Shokin’s investigation into Burisma Holdings, which hired Biden’s son just weeks after President Obama appointed Biden to oversee U.S.-Ukraine relations — Solomon found that previously undisclosed documents “conflict with Biden’s narrative.” “Hundreds of pages of never-released memos and documents — many from inside the American team helping Burisma to stave off its legal troubles — conflict with Biden’s narrative,” Solomon reported Thursday. “And they raise the troubling prospect that U.S. officials may have painted a false picture in Ukraine that helped ease Burisma’s legal troubles and stop prosecutors’ plans to interview Hunter Biden during the 2016 U.S. presidential election.” Solomon reports: For instance, Burisma’s American legal representatives met with Ukrainian officials just days after Biden forced the firing of the country’s chief prosecutor and offered ‘an apology for dissemination of false information by U.S. representatives and public figures’ about the Ukrainian prosecutors, according to the Ukrainian government’s official memo of the meeting. The effort to secure that meeting began the same day the prosecutor’s firing was announced. In addition, Burisma’s American team offered to introduce Ukrainian prosecutors to Obama administration officials to make amends, according to that memo and the American legal team’s internal emails. “If the Ukraine prosecutor’s firing involved only his alleged corruption and ineptitude, why did Burisma’s American legal team refer to those allegations as ‘false information?'” Solomon asks. “If the firing had nothing to do with the Burisma case, as Biden has adamantly claimed, why would Burisma’s American lawyers contact the replacement prosecutor within hours of the termination and urgently seek a meeting in Ukraine to discuss the case?” According to Solomon, Ukrainian prosecutors say they have tried to get this information to the Department of Justice since the summer of 2018 because they believe it “might be evidence of possible violations of U.S. ethics laws,” but the DOJ “showed no interest.” In response, the prosecutors contacted Trump’s personal lawyer and former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani. In their famous July 25 call, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky told Trump that he is “knowledgeable” about the Burisma-Biden situation and that investigating the case is important in “making sure to restore the honesty” between the countries, Solomon notes. Solomon also highlights a “newly sworn affidavit prepared for a European court,” in which Shokin testified that he was informed when he was fired in March 2016 that it was because of his investigation into Burisma. “The truth is that I was forced out because I was leading a wide-ranging corruption probe into Burisma Holdings, a natural gas firm active in Ukraine and Joe Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, was a member of the Board of Directors,” said Shokin. “On several occasions President Poroshenko asked me to have a look at the case against Burisma and consider the possibility of winding down the investigative actions in respect of this company but I refused to close this investigation.” Solomon stresses that Shokin “certainly would have reason to hold a grudge over his firing,” but the newly revealed documents seem to align with his account. Solomon goes on to summarize the history of the Burisma-Biden controversy, starting with The New York Times‘ initial report on the suspicious decision by the company to hire Hunter Biden weeks after his father was tasked with overseeing relations with Ukraine. “Documents I obtained this year detail an effort to change the narrative after the Times story about Hunter Biden, with the help of the Obama State Department,” Solomon writes. (Read Solomon’s full report here.)
    2
  1649. 2
  1650. 2
  1651. 2
  1652. 2
  1653. 2
  1654. 2
  1655. 2
  1656. 2
  1657. 2
  1658. 2
  1659. 2
  1660. 2
  1661. 2
  1662. 2
  1663. 2
  1664.  @douglasjcox  , isn't it amazing that the people calling to impeach have no clue as to what happened in Ukraine with Biden and his son? Not only do they not know, but thy have no desire to know. Yet they insist they are OBJECTIVE. If the shoe were on the other foot, I can't imagine a single democrat would be ok with a scenario in which a drug addict son of the president was dishonorably discharged from the military for cocaine, and his very next job is sitting on the board of a foreign energy company with American influence, making $50-$80 thousand a month. Was Barisma holding interviews to find a coke head to sit on their board of directors? Somehow, Hunter Biden hardly seems like the right candidate for the job. And if they did need drug addicts on their board, who knew nothing about Ukraine or energy, why the Vice President's son? I'm sure there are plenty of stupid, poor drug addicts who could have used this job making $50-$80 thousand a month. So, you'd be ok if Trump did what Biden did? No, you wouldn't. This is called hypocrisy, dear. Stop calling others gullible. You're the one who believes the alphabet news. This is the same news that told you Hillary would be president. 100% chance she would beat Trump. How'd that work out for Democrats? Cause I remember a lot of crying and bitching in safe spaces, and rioting in the streets. This is the same media who told you Trump colluded with Russia. 3 years of investigating, and the Mueller report said no COLLUSION. Not a single American was charged with collusion or obstruction. This is the same media that said Kavanaugh was a gang rapist. Not only was there no evidence for this claim, but the accuser retracted her allegations, admitting she was never gang raped, and knew nothing about it. This is the same media who told you Jussie Smollet was the latest victim of a Trump inspired hate crime. Just one problem, Jussie hired two black men to attack him and stage the event. This is the same media that told you, "Trump's an idiot. He's NEVER gonna be president." Now that is obvious he was legitimately elected, the media is telling you he's colluding with Ukraine, China, and Australia, getting away with election interference right in front of your eyes, on live TV. How is it possible that this "stupid man" is getting away with collusion? How is one so dumb effectively making fools of our intelligence agencies? They must be more inept than the idiot in office, if they can't stop Trump from "election interference"? So which is it? Is Trump an idiot? Or an evil genius, who's bested all our intelligence agencies? You can't have it both ways, dear. This is called hypocrisy. Looks like you're the only one who's gullible enough to believe the drive-by media. Maybe you should look in the mirror before you call others gullible.
    2
  1665. 2
  1666. 2
  1667. 2
  1668. 2
  1669. 2
  1670. 2
  1671. 2
  1672. 2
  1673. 2
  1674. 2
  1675. 2
  1676. 2
  1677. 2
  1678. 2
  1679. 2
  1680. 2
  1681. 2
  1682. 2
  1683. 2
  1684. 2
  1685. 2
  1686. 2
  1687. 2
  1688. 2
  1689. 2
  1690. 2
  1691. 2
  1692. 2
  1693. 2
  1694. 2
  1695. 2
  1696. 2
  1697. 2
  1698. 2
  1699. 2
  1700. 2
  1701. 2
  1702. 2
  1703. 2
  1704. 2
  1705. 2
  1706. 2
  1707. 2
  1708. 2
  1709. 2
  1710. 2
  1711. 2
  1712. 2
  1713. 2
  1714. 2
  1715. 2
  1716. 2
  1717. 2
  1718. 2
  1719. 2
  1720. 2
  1721. 2
  1722.  @demetriusdion286  , dear willfully blind. I'm not a Trump voter, and this isn't impeachment. Nice try though. I'm a conscientious objector, an anarchist. I never vote for Presidents. A president is nothing more than a slave owner. All you're doing is picking your new Master every four years. I prefer actual freedom. "This will go on his permeant record as Impeachment." What is this, high school? No, dear dumbass, it won't. Not unless they vote to Impeach, which Nancy said she hasn't decided to do. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.speaker.gov/newsroom/111419-2&ved=2ahUKEwjqwrDppuzlAhXpRd8KHejuAnsQFjAKegQIBBAC&usg=AOvVaw30SiZK-0u-yNr68hxWPHuv The following is from the link above, and on Pelosi's official webpage. It's the transcript of her press conference yesterday. Can you read, dear inept hypocrite? Q:  Will you be looking at article of impeachment? Speaker Pelosi.  "I don’t know that.  We haven't made a decision to impeach.  That's what the inquiry is about, and when the committees decide that, and they will decide what the articles are. " You, dear ignorant and inept, have no idea what you're talking about. You're simply repeating your moral and intellectual superiors at CNN. That doesn't make you informed, dear projecting hypocrite. It makes you a parrot. Once again: Two things happen before impeachment begins. 1) articles of impeachment are drafted. 2) the house votes on the articles of impeachment. Neither of these standards have occurred. You'd think this would be obvious to anyone with half a brain: If neither of the protocols for impeachment have been implemented, then this isn't Impeachment, dear dumbass. THIS ISN'T IMPEACHMENT. ASK PELOSI. It won't be, until Nancy calls for a vote. As far as removal from office, that is a collective wet dream of Democrats. It's a fantasy. You don't even have an IMPEACHABLE charge, dear simpleton. I'll say this slowly for the mentally impaired: IN WHAT WORLD DO YOU IMAGINE A REPUBLICAN MAJORITY SENATE WILL VOTE TO REMOVE A REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT, ON HEARSAY EVIDENCE, AND NO CRIME? ARE YOU HIGH?!🤣🤣🤣 If you were smart, you'd be trying to convince your opposition with facts, instead of virtue signaling your supposed superiority. But you can't do that can you? You have no facts. Just like Democrats in Congress, all you have is your ill informed, biased opinion. Do we need to define facts and opinions? Cause you seem genuinely confused. Here's a clue: Facts don't care about your opinions, dear simpleton.
    2
  1723. 2
  1724. 2
  1725. 2
  1726. 2
  1727. 2
  1728. 2
  1729. 2
  1730. 2
  1731. 2
  1732. 2
  1733. 2
  1734. 2
  1735. 2
  1736. 2
  1737. 2
  1738. 2
  1739. 2
  1740. 2
  1741. 2
  1742. 2
  1743. 2
  1744. 2
  1745. 2
  1746. 2
  1747. 2
  1748. 2
  1749. 2
  1750. 2
  1751. 2
  1752. 2
  1753. 2
  1754. 2
  1755. 2
  1756. 2
  1757. 2
  1758. 2
  1759. 2
  1760. 2
  1761. 2
  1762. 2
  1763. 2
  1764. 2
  1765. 2
  1766. 2
  1767. 2
  1768. 2
  1769. 2
  1770. 2
  1771. 2
  1772. 2
  1773. 2
  1774. 2
  1775. 2
  1776. 2
  1777. 2
  1778. 2
  1779. 2
  1780. 2
  1781. 2
  1782. 2
  1783. 2
  1784. 2
  1785. 2
  1786. 2
  1787. 2
  1788. 2
  1789. 2
  1790. 2
  1791. 2
  1792. 2
  1793. 2
  1794. 2
  1795. 2
  1796. 2
  1797. 2
  1798. 2
  1799. 2
  1800. 2
  1801. 2
  1802. 2
  1803. 2
  1804. 2
  1805. 2
  1806. 2
  1807. 2
  1808. 2
  1809. 2
  1810. 2
  1811. 2
  1812. 2
  1813. 2
  1814. Let me begin with this: Everyone shot by Kyle Rittenhouse was a white man and a convicted criminal. There is no racial element to these crimes. None whatsoever. Rosenbaum was a 5 time convicted kiddy diddler just released from the mental hospital and carrying a thick metal chain as a weapon. He showed up at the riot immediately after being released. He's on camera calling Kyle the N word, and telling him, "I'm going to kill you if I get you alone." He chased Kyle, because Kyle had the nerve to put out a fire in a dumpster that the mob was pushing towards a gas station. Hueber was a 2 time convicted kidnapper and woman abuser. He was wielding a skateboard as a weapon, and hit Kyle in the head with it twice, knocking him to the ground, making it possible for an unknown man to stomp on Kyle's face. Then this fool tried to grab Kyle's gun. Grosscruetz was involved in an armed robbery, and had his gun rights taken away. Yet that night, he was concealing an illegal pistol. He admitted to aiming it at Kyle, as Kyle lay on the ground bleeding. He admitted pretending to lower his weapon to fool Kyle into thinking he wasn't a threat. Then he finally admitted that he aimed his gun a second time at Kyle. ONLY then did Kyle shoot. These were all criminals, and yet none of their crimes were revealed during the trial. Why? Cause these crimes are prejudicial to a jury. Imagine if the media had done it's job, and the world had heard these details before the trial. Kyle NEVER would have been charged. Rosenbaum died the way he lived, trying to forcibly touch a minor against his will. Huber held a knife to his pregnant girlfriend's belly, and threatened to cut it out of her. Is it a surprise that he tried to beat Kyle's head in with a skateboard? Grosscruetz is antifa, and currently suing the state for 10 million, because they failed to protect him that night. Meanwhile, he failed to tell them he was carrying an illegal gun. Kyle's gun was not illegal. The law in Wisconsin is such that an 18 year old can carry. However, there are exceptions. A 16 or 17 year old can carry a rifle, but not a hand gun. That's the law. His gun was legal. The shootings were justified.
    2
  1815. 2
  1816. 2
  1817. 2
  1818. 2
  1819. 2
  1820. 2
  1821. 2
  1822. 2
  1823. 2
  1824. 2
  1825. 2
  1826. 2
  1827. 2
  1828. 2
  1829. 2
  1830. 2
  1831. 2
  1832. 2
  1833. 2
  1834. 2
  1835. 2
  1836. 2
  1837. 2
  1838. 2
  1839. 2
  1840. 2
  1841. 2
  1842. 2
  1843. 2
  1844. 2
  1845. 2
  1846. 2
  1847. 2
  1848. 2
  1849. 2
  1850. 2
  1851. 2
  1852. 2
  1853. 2
  1854. 2
  1855. 2
  1856. 2
  1857. 2
  1858. 2
  1859. 2
  1860. 2
  1861. 2
  1862. 2
  1863. 2
  1864. 2
  1865. 2
  1866. 2
  1867. 2
  1868. 2
  1869. 2
  1870. 2
  1871. 2
  1872. 2
  1873. 2
  1874. 2
  1875. 2
  1876. 2
  1877. 2
  1878. 2
  1879. 2
  1880. 2
  1881. 2
  1882. 2
  1883. 2
  1884. 2
  1885. 2
  1886. 2
  1887. 2
  1888. 2
  1889. 2
  1890. 2
  1891. 2
  1892. 2
  1893. 2
  1894. 2
  1895. 2
  1896. 2
  1897. 2
  1898. 2
  1899. 2
  1900. 2
  1901. 2
  1902. 2
  1903. 2
  1904. 2
  1905. 2
  1906. 2
  1907. 2
  1908. 2
  1909. 2
  1910. 2
  1911. 2
  1912. 2
  1913. 2
  1914. 2
  1915. 2
  1916. 2
  1917. 2
  1918. 2
  1919. 2
  1920. 2
  1921. 2
  1922. 2
  1923. 2
  1924. 2
  1925. 2
  1926. 2
  1927. 2
  1928. 2
  1929. 2
  1930. 2
  1931. 2
  1932. 2
  1933. 2
  1934. 2
  1935. 2
  1936. 2
  1937. 2
  1938. 2
  1939. 2
  1940. 2
  1941. 2
  1942. 2
  1943. 2
  1944. 2
  1945. 2
  1946. 2
  1947. 2
  1948. 2
  1949. 2
  1950. 2
  1951. 2
  1952. 2
  1953. 2
  1954. 2
  1955. 2
  1956. 2
  1957. 2
  1958. 2
  1959. 2
  1960. 2
  1961. 2
  1962. 2
  1963. 2
  1964. 2
  1965. 2
  1966. 2
  1967. 2
  1968. 2
  1969. 2
  1970. 2
  1971. 2
  1972. 2
  1973. 2
  1974. 2
  1975. 2
  1976. 2
  1977. 2
  1978. 2
  1979. 2
  1980. 2
  1981. 2
  1982.  @jcraw6332  Here's the report, AGAIN: Hundreds of pages of never-released memos and documents - many from inside the American team helping Burisma to stave off its legal troubles - conflict with Biden's narrative. And they raise the troubling prospect that U.S. officials may have painted a false picture in Ukraine that helped ease Burisma's legal troubles and stop prosecutors' plans to interview Hunter Biden during the 2016 U.S. presidential election. For instance, Burisma's American legal representatives met with Ukrainian officials just days after Biden forced the firing of the country's chief prosecutor and offered "an apology for dissemination of false information by U.S. representatives and public figures" about the Ukrainian prosecutors, according to the Ukrainian government's official memo of the meeting. The effort to secure that meeting began the same day the prosecutor's firing was announced. In addition, Burisma's American team offered to introduce Ukrainian prosecutors to Obama administration officials to make amends, according to that memo and the American legal team's internal emails. The memos raise troubling questions: 1.)   If the Ukraine prosecutor's firing involved only his alleged corruption and ineptitude, why did Burisma's American legal team refer to those allegations as "false information?" 2.)   If the firing had nothing to do with the Burisma case, as Biden has adamantly claimed, why would Burisma's American lawyers contact the replacement prosecutor within hours of the termination and urgently seek a meeting in Ukraine to discuss the case? Ukrainian prosecutors say they have tried to get this information to the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) since the summer of 2018, fearing it might be evidence of possible violations of U.S. ethics laws. First, they hired a former federal prosecutor to bring the information to the U.S. attorney in New York, who, they say, showed no interest. Then, the Ukrainians reached out to President Trump's personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani. Ukraine's new president, Volodymyr Zelensky, told Trump in July that he plans to launch his own wide-ranging investigation into what happened with the Bidens and Burisma. "I'm knowledgeable about the situation," Zelensky told Trump, asking the American president to forward any evidence he might know about. "The issue of the investigation of the case is actually the issue of making sure to restore the honesty so we will take care of that and will work on the investigation of the case." Biden has faced scrutiny since December 2015, when the New York Times published a story noting that Burisma hired Hunter Biden just weeks after the vice president was asked by President Obama to oversee U.S.-Ukraine relations. That story also alerted Biden's office that Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin had an active investigation of Burisma and its founder. Documents I obtained this year detail an effort to change the narrative after the Times story about Hunter Biden, with the help of the Obama State Department. Hunter Biden's American business partner in Burisma, Devon Archer, texted a colleague two days after the Times story about a strategy to counter the "new wave of scrutiny" and stated that he and Hunter Biden had just met at the State Department. The text suggested there was about to be a new "USAID project the embassy is announcing with us" and that it was "perfect for us to move forward now with momentum." I have sued the State Department for any records related to that meeting. The reason is simple: There is both a public interest and an ethics question to knowing if Hunter Biden and his team sought State's assistance while his father was vice president. The controversy ignited anew earlier this year when I disclosed that Joe Biden admitted during a 2018 videotaped speech that, as vice president in March 2016, he threatened to cancel $1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees, to pressure Ukraine's then-President Petro Poroshenko to fire Shokin. At the time, Shokin's office was investigating Burisma. Shokin told me he was making plans to question Hunter Biden about $3 million in fees that Biden and his partner, Archer, collected from Burisma through their American firm. Documents seized by the FBI in an unrelated case confirm the payments, which in many months totaled more than $166,000.   Some media outlets have reported that, at the time Joe Biden forced the firing in March 2016, there were no open investigations. Those reports are wrong. A British-based investigation of Burisma's owner was closed down in early 2015 on a technicality when a deadline for documents was not met. But the Ukraine Prosecutor General's office still had two open inquiries in March 2016, according to the official case file provided me. One of those cases involved taxes; the other, allegations of corruption. Burisma announced the cases against it were not closed and settled until January 2017.  After I first reported it in a column, the New York Times and ABC News published similar stories confirming my reporting. Joe Biden has since responded that he forced Shokin's firing over concerns about corruption and ineptitude, which he claims were widely shared by Western allies, and that it had nothing to do with the Burisma investigation. Some of the new documents I obtained call that claim into question. In a newly sworn affidavit prepared for a European court, Shokin testified that when he was fired in March 2016, he was told the reason was that Biden was unhappy about the Burisma investigation. "The truth is that I was forced out because I was leading a wide-ranging corruption probe into Burisma Holdings, a natural gas firm active in Ukraine and Joe Biden's son, Hunter Biden, was a member of the Board of Directors," Shokin testified. "On several occasions President Poroshenko asked me to have a look at the case against Burisma and consider the possibility of winding down the investigative actions in respect of this company but I refused to close this investigation," Shokin added. Shokin certainly would have reason to hold a grudge over his firing. But his account is supported by documents from Burisma's legal team in America, which appeared to be moving into Ukraine with intensity as Biden's effort to fire Shokin picked up steam. Burisma's own accounting records show that it paid tens of thousands of dollars while Hunter Biden served on the board of an American lobbying and public relations firm, Blue Star Strategies, run by Sally Painter and Karen Tramontano, who both served in President Bill Clinton's administration. Just days before Biden forced Shokin's firing, Painter met with the No. 2 official at the Ukrainian embassy in Washington and asked to meet officials in Kiev around the same time that Joe Biden visited there. Ukrainian embassy employee Oksana Shulyar emailed Painter afterward: "With regards to the meetings in Kiev, I suggest that you wait until the next week when there is an expected vote of the government's reshuffle." Ukraine's Washington embassy confirmed the conversations between Shulyar and Painter but said the reference to a shakeup in Ukrainian government was not specifically referring to Shokin's firing or anything to do with Burisma. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/463307-solomon-these-once-secret-memos-cast-doubt-on-joe-bidens-ukraine-story%3Famp&ved=2ahUKEwilhfHdxvzkAhUQd98KHWI7DF4QFjAAegQIAhAB&usg=AOvVaw0oX1OSvwWdoTvtphH0Cy0D&cf=1
    2
  1983. 2
  1984. 2
  1985. 2
  1986. 2
  1987. 2
  1988. 2
  1989. 2
  1990. 2
  1991. 2
  1992. 2
  1993. 2
  1994. 2
  1995. 2
  1996. 2
  1997. 2
  1998. 2
  1999. 2
  2000. 2
  2001. 2
  2002. 2
  2003. 2
  2004. 2
  2005. 2
  2006. 2
  2007. 2
  2008. 2
  2009. 2
  2010. 2
  2011. 2
  2012. 2
  2013. 2
  2014. 2
  2015. 2
  2016. 2
  2017. 2
  2018. 2
  2019.  @agnosticatheist7529  , unfortunately, dear, you're completely wrong. Here's the New York Post outlining Obama and his administration's roll in crimes and cover-up. Just cause they were never charged, doesn't mean they didn't commit crimes. Look at Hillary. Comey came out and said, "she sent and received classified emails on her hidden server". He said she broke the law, but that "no prosecutor would ever charge her, because she had no intent". What was Hillary's intent behind smashing electronic devices with hammers so that they couldn't be examined? Hmmm...Is that how it works? So if you're speeding, but you didn't mean to, you don't get a ticket? No, dear simpleton. Ignorance or "lack of intent" does not make you innocent. Please name the last republican that the FBI director said was guilty of committing crimes, but there would be no charges, because we can't find intent? Here's a clue, the FBI doesn't charge people. That's not their job. Their job is to examine evidence. Period. DOJ decides who is prosecuted. So how could Comey clear Hillary? Only Eric holder could have done that. It' was his job to charge and prosecute. Not Comey. If liberals are so smart, how come they can't tell the truth? Why do they feel the need to lie in order to win the argument? If you don't know that every politician is a liar, then you're a moron. If you don't know that every politician is a criminal, then you're willfully blind. If you don't know that a President is nothing more than a slave owner, and all you're doing is picking you're new Master every four years, then you're a slave to the left/right paradigm. Read up, dear. Ignorance can be remedied, hypocrisy not so much. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://nypost.com/2016/05/21/the-scandal-in-washington-no-one-is-talking-about/amp/&ved=2ahUKEwjaoJbYosnlAhUDc98KHUs7DUUQFjALegQIBhAB&usg=AOvVaw1tVtLR5mqzGcjtEIhQTvhm&ampcf=1
    2
  2020. 2
  2021. 2
  2022. 2
  2023. 2
  2024. 2
  2025. 2
  2026. 2
  2027. 2
  2028. 2
  2029. 2
  2030. 2
  2031. 2
  2032. 2
  2033. 2
  2034. 2
  2035. 2
  2036. 2
  2037. 2
  2038. 2
  2039. 2
  2040. 2
  2041. 2
  2042. 2
  2043. 2
  2044. 2
  2045. 2
  2046. 2
  2047. 2
  2048. 2
  2049. 2
  2050. 2
  2051. 2
  2052. 2
  2053. 2
  2054. 2
  2055. 2
  2056. 2
  2057. 2
  2058. 2
  2059. 2
  2060. 2
  2061. 2
  2062. 2
  2063. 2
  2064. 2
  2065. 2
  2066. 2
  2067. 2
  2068. 2
  2069. 2
  2070. 2
  2071.  Lemar Sullivan "The first casualty of War is Truth" You have no proof that what this actor is saying is true. Where are the dead bodies? How do you know what he's actually saying, or if he's speaking Italian? If Coronavirus is as infectious and deadly as they say, why would GOVERNMENT leave dead bodies in homes, so that the virus can spread even more? This is the same government you all trust so much?! 🤣🤣🤣🤣 You willfully blind masses believe the Propaganda without evidence, and spurn the truth, despite facts. Coronavirus-like particles morphologically similar to normal virions are assembled when genes encoding the viral membrane proteins M and E are coexpressed in eukaryotic cells. Using this envelope assembly assay, we have studied the primary sequence requirements for particle formation of the mouse hepatitis virus (MHV) M protein, the major protein of the coronavirion membrane. Our results show that each of the different domains of the protein is important. Mutations (deletions, insertions, point mutations) in the luminal domain, the transmembrane domains, the amphiphilic domain, or the carboxy-terminal domain had effects on the assembly of M into enveloped particles. Strikingly, the extreme carboxy-terminal residue is crucial. Deletion of this single residue abolished particle assembly almost completely; most substitutions were strongly inhibitory. Site-directed mutations in the carboxy terminus of M were also incorporated into the MHV genome by targeted recombination. The results supported a critical role for this domain of M in viral assembly, although the M carboxy terminus was more tolerant of alteration in the complete virion than in virus-like particles, likely because of the stabilization of virions by additional intermolecular interactions. Interestingly, glycosylation of M appeared not essential for assembly. Mutations in the luminal domain that abolished the normal O glycosylation of the protein or created an N-glycosylated form had no effect. Mutant M proteins unable to form virus-like particles were found to inhibit the budding of assembly-competent M in a concentration-dependent manner. However, assembly-competent M was able to rescue assembly-incompetent M when the latter was present in low amounts. These observations support the existence of interactions between M molecules that are thought to be the driving force in coronavirus envelope assembly. Enveloped viruses acquire their lipid envelopes by budding through cellular membranes. The viral envelope contains integral membrane proteins that play important roles in envelope formation and virus entry. Three models have been proposed for the budding of enveloped viruses. Two of these are based on nucleocapsid-dependent assembly. In retroviruses the nucleocapsid is all that is required, since the Gag core particle can direct its envelopment without the need for viral envelope proteins (9, 23,31). In contrast, both core and spike proteins are essential for the formation of togaviruses (26, 71), envelopment being driven by direct interactions between the viral envelope proteins and the nucleocapsid (42, 78). In the case of rhabdoviruses, optimal budding efficiency and virus production are achieved by a concerted action of spike and internal virus proteins (48). In the third model, budding is nucleocapsid independent. Coexpression of flavivirus prM and E results in the formation of subviral particles resembling capsidless viral envelopes (1, 44). The hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface proteins can be independently secreted from cells as subviral particles, which, however, are morphologically quite distinct from HBV virions (58, 67). Recently we demonstrated that coronavirus envelope proteins have the capacity to assemble uniform envelopes, which have the same appearance and dimensions as virus particles, independently of nucleocapsid proteins (73). Coronaviruses are positive-stranded RNA viruses with 30-kb genomes packaged in helical nucleocapsids. The nucleocapsid is incorporated into a viral particle by budding into the intermediate compartment between the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and the Golgi complex (33,35, 72). The coronavirus membrane contains three or four viral proteins. The membrane (M) glycoprotein is the most abundant structural protein; it spans the membrane bilayer three times, leaving a short NH2-terminal domain outside the virus (or exposed luminally in intracellular membranes) and a long COOH terminus (cytoplasmic domain) inside the virion (reviewed by Rottier [62]). The spike protein (S) is a type I membrane glycoprotein that constitutes the peplomers. The small envelope protein (E) has been detected as a minor structural component in avian infectious bronchitis virus (IBV), transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV), and mouse hepatitis virus (MHV) particles (reviewed by Siddell [66]), but it has not been extensively characterized. Some coronaviruses also contain a hemagglutinin-esterase protein (HE) (reviewed by Brian et al. [7]). Molecular interactions between the envelope proteins are thought to determine the formation and composition of the coronaviral membrane. M plays a predominant role in the intracellular formation of virus particles, for which S appears not to be required. Growth of coronaviruses in the presence of tunicamycin gave rise to the production of spikeless, noninfectious virions (27, 51, 63,69). These particles were devoid of S but contained M. Independently synthesized MHV M protein accumulates in the Golgi complex (33, 34, 65) in homomultimeric complexes (36). Heterotypic interactions between the M and S proteins have been identified by coimmunoprecipitation and sedimentation analyses (55). The S protein, on its own, is transported to the cell surface, but when it is associated with the M protein, it is retained in the Golgi complex. Upon coexpression of M, S, and E by using the vaccinia virus T7 system (20), virus-like particles (VLPs) containing these three viral membrane proteins were assembled in and released from cells. However, only M and E were required for particle formation. The S protein was dispensable but was incorporated when present (6, 73). The envelope particles produced by this system were shown to form a homogeneous population of spherical particles indistinguishable from authentic virions in size and shape (73). One of our main interests is to understand the process of coronavirus assembly. We are particularly interested in the interactions and the mechanisms that drive the formation of the viral particles. With the VLP assembly system, we have developed an ideal tool for the study of coronavirus envelope formation and for the analysis of the interactions between the viral membrane proteins in molecular detail. In the present study, we have used the VLP assembly system to investigate the primary structure requirements of the M protein in envelope formation. Site-directed mutations in the carboxy terminus of M were also incorporated into the MHV genome by targeted recombination. The results demonstrate that particle assembly is critically sensitive to changes in all domains of the M molecule. If you wanna cause cancer in rats, you expose them to 2.4GHz of radio waves. It's a scientific fact. 5G operates at 60GHZ, and GOVERNMENT is telling you you're safe. How stupid do you have to be to believe them. And autism, CDC admitted that there's a link between MMR vaccine and autism, and that it disproportionately effects black males more than any other race. You're a Google GESTAPO, YouTube Nazi paid to lie and shill on social media in an effort to influence public opinion. Too bad you're so obviouly pushing government propaganda. You're not fooling anyone, dear ignorant and DELUSIONAL.
    2
  2072. 2
  2073.  @MurderousLamb  , more proof you're stupid. ResearchGate › publication › 27363... Web results (PDF) Effects of 2.4 GHz radiofrequency radiation emitted from Wi-Fi equipment ... Fein the article: The study was carried out on sixteen Wistar Albino adult male rats by dividing them into two groups such as sham (n: 8) and exposure (n: 8). Rats in the exposure group were exposed to 2.4 GHz radiofrequency (RF) radiation for 24 hours a day for twelve months (one year). The same procedure was applied to the rats in the sham group except the Wi-Fi system was turned off. Immediately after the last exposure, rats were sacrificed and their brains were removed. miR-9-5p, miR-29a-3p, miR-106b-5p, miR-107, miR-125a-3p in brain were investigated in detail. The results revealed that long term exposure of 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi radiation can alter expression of some of the miRNAs such as miR-106b-5p (adjP(*) = 0,010) and miR-107 (adjP(*) = 0,005). We observed that mir 107 expression is 3.3 times and miR-106b-5p expression is 3.65 times lower in the exposure group than in the control group. However, miR-9-5p, miR-29a-3p and miR-125a-3p levels in brain were not altered. Long term exposure of 2.4 GHz RF may lead to adverse effects such as neurodegenerative diseases originated from the alteration of some miRNAs expression and more studies should be devoted to the effects of RF radiation on miRNAs expression levels. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6015645/&ved=2ahUKEwi9-7P-gdzoAhXwRt8KHewtBd0QFjAAegQIBRAC&usg=AOvVaw247aAjcbp4fS4NpRL83-gf https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273637962_Effects_of_24_GHz_radiofrequency_radiation_emitted_from_Wi-Fi_equipment_on_microRNA_expression_in_brain_tissue&ved=2ahUKEwi9-7P-gdzoAhXwRt8KHewtBd0QFjAKegQIARAB&usg=AOvVaw3YzHrnE9657ybBpDk4pwRq
    2
  2074.  @rusticpath2244  , Coronavirus-like particles morphologically similar to normal virions are assembled when genes encoding the viral membrane proteins M and E are coexpressed in eukaryotic cells. Using this envelope assembly assay, we have studied the primary sequence requirements for particle formation of the mouse hepatitis virus (MHV) M protein, the major protein of the coronavirion membrane. Our results show that each of the different domains of the protein is important. Mutations (deletions, insertions, point mutations) in the luminal domain, the transmembrane domains, the amphiphilic domain, or the carboxy-terminal domain had effects on the assembly of M into enveloped particles. Strikingly, the extreme carboxy-terminal residue is crucial. Deletion of this single residue abolished particle assembly almost completely; most substitutions were strongly inhibitory. Site-directed mutations in the carboxy terminus of M were also incorporated into the MHV genome by targeted recombination. The results supported a critical role for this domain of M in viral assembly, although the M carboxy terminus was more tolerant of alteration in the complete virion than in virus-like particles, likely because of the stabilization of virions by additional intermolecular interactions. Interestingly, glycosylation of M appeared not essential for assembly. Mutations in the luminal domain that abolished the normal O glycosylation of the protein or created an N-glycosylated form had no effect. Mutant M proteins unable to form virus-like particles were found to inhibit the budding of assembly-competent M in a concentration-dependent manner. However, assembly-competent M was able to rescue assembly-incompetent M when the latter was present in low amounts. These observations support the existence of interactions between M molecules that are thought to be the driving force in coronavirus envelope assembly. Enveloped viruses acquire their lipid envelopes by budding through cellular membranes. The viral envelope contains integral membrane proteins that play important roles in envelope formation and virus entry. Three models have been proposed for the budding of enveloped viruses. Two of these are based on nucleocapsid-dependent assembly. In retroviruses the nucleocapsid is all that is required, since the Gag core particle can direct its envelopment without the need for viral envelope proteins (9, 23,31). In contrast, both core and spike proteins are essential for the formation of togaviruses (26, 71), envelopment being driven by direct interactions between the viral envelope proteins and the nucleocapsid (42, 78). In the case of rhabdoviruses, optimal budding efficiency and virus production are achieved by a concerted action of spike and internal virus proteins (48). In the third model, budding is nucleocapsid independent. Coexpression of flavivirus prM and E results in the formation of subviral particles resembling capsidless viral envelopes (1, 44). The hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface proteins can be independently secreted from cells as subviral particles, which, however, are morphologically quite distinct from HBV virions (58, 67). Recently we demonstrated that coronavirus envelope proteins have the capacity to assemble uniform envelopes, which have the same appearance and dimensions as virus particles, independently of nucleocapsid proteins (73). Coronaviruses are positive-stranded RNA viruses with 30-kb genomes packaged in helical nucleocapsids. The nucleocapsid is incorporated into a viral particle by budding into the intermediate compartment between the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and the Golgi complex (33,35, 72). The coronavirus membrane contains three or four viral proteins. The membrane (M) glycoprotein is the most abundant structural protein; it spans the membrane bilayer three times, leaving a short NH2-terminal domain outside the virus (or exposed luminally in intracellular membranes) and a long COOH terminus (cytoplasmic domain) inside the virion (reviewed by Rottier [62]). The spike protein (S) is a type I membrane glycoprotein that constitutes the peplomers. The small envelope protein (E) has been detected as a minor structural component in avian infectious bronchitis virus (IBV), transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV), and mouse hepatitis virus (MHV) particles (reviewed by Siddell [66]), but it has not been extensively characterized. Some coronaviruses also contain a hemagglutinin-esterase protein (HE) (reviewed by Brian et al. [7]). Molecular interactions between the envelope proteins are thought to determine the formation and composition of the coronaviral membrane. M plays a predominant role in the intracellular formation of virus particles, for which S appears not to be required. Growth of coronaviruses in the presence of tunicamycin gave rise to the production of spikeless, noninfectious virions (27, 51, 63,69). These particles were devoid of S but contained M. Independently synthesized MHV M protein accumulates in the Golgi complex (33, 34, 65) in homomultimeric complexes (36). Heterotypic interactions between the M and S proteins have been identified by coimmunoprecipitation and sedimentation analyses (55). The S protein, on its own, is transported to the cell surface, but when it is associated with the M protein, it is retained in the Golgi complex. Upon coexpression of M, S, and E by using the vaccinia virus T7 system (20), virus-like particles (VLPs) containing these three viral membrane proteins were assembled in and released from cells. However, only M and E were required for particle formation. The S protein was dispensable but was incorporated when present (6, 73). The envelope particles produced by this system were shown to form a homogeneous population of spherical particles indistinguishable from authentic virions in size and shape (73). One of our main interests is to understand the process of coronavirus assembly. We are particularly interested in the interactions and the mechanisms that drive the formation of the viral particles. With the VLP assembly system, we have developed an ideal tool for the study of coronavirus envelope formation and for the analysis of the interactions between the viral membrane proteins in molecular detail. In the present study, we have used the VLP assembly system to investigate the primary structure requirements of the M protein in envelope formation. Site-directed mutations in the carboxy terminus of M were also incorporated into the MHV genome by targeted recombination. The results demonstrate that particle assembly is critically sensitive to changes in all domains of the M molecule. Oh, I read it. You didn't. Here's a clue: if you have to lie to win the argument, you have no chance of winning, dear Google GESTAPO, YouTube Nazi, paid shill.
    2
  2075. 2
  2076.  @MurderousLamb  , why don't you copy and paste the counter argument? And while you do, please allow me to show you that a virus is a protein molecule covered in a layer of fat (lipid). Proof you're a moron who has no idea what you're talking about: "The virus is not a living organism, but a protein molecule (DNA) covered by a protective layer of lipid (fat), which, when absorbed by the cells of the ocular, nasal or buccal mucosa, changes their genetic code.  (mutation) and convert them into aggressor and multiplier cells. * Since the virus is not a living organism but a protein molecule, it is not killed, but decays on its own.  The disintegration time depends on the temperature, humidity and type of material where it lies. * The virus is very fragile;  the only thing that protects it is a thin outer layer of fat.  That is why any soap or detergent is the best remedy, because the foam CUTS the FAT (that is why you have to rub so much: for 20 seconds or more, to make a lot of foam).   By dissolving the fat layer, the protein molecule disperses and breaks down on its own. * HEAT melts fat;  this is why it is so good to use water above 25 degrees Celsius for washing hands, clothes and everything.  In addition, hot water makes more foam and that makes it even more useful. * Alcohol or any mixture with alcohol over 65% DISSOLVES ANY FAT, especially the external lipid layer of the virus. * Any mix with 1 part bleach and 5 parts water directly dissolves the protein, breaks it down from the inside. * Oxygenated water helps long after soap, alcohol and chlorine, because peroxide dissolves the virus protein, but you have to use it pure and it hurts your skin. * NO BACTERICIDE OR ANTIBIOTIC SERVES.  The virus is not a living organism like bacteria;  antibodies cannot kill what is not alive.  * NEVER shake used or unused clothing, sheets or cloth.  While it is glued to a porous surface, it is very inert and disintegrates only  -between 3 hours (fabric and porous),  -4 hours (copper and wood) -24 hours (cardboard),  - 42 hours (metal) and  -72 hours (plastic).   But if you shake it or use a feather duster, the virus molecules float in the air for up to 3 hours, and can lodge in your nose. * The virus molecules remain very stable in external cold, or artificial as air conditioners in houses and cars.   They also need moisture to stay stable, and especially darkness.  Therefore, dehumidified, dry, warm and bright environments will degrade it faster. * UV LIGHT on any object that may contain it breaks down the virus protein.  For example, to disinfect and reuse a mask is perfect.  Be careful, it also breaks down collagen (which is protein) in the skin. * The virus CANNOT go through healthy skin. * Vinegar is NOT useful because it does not break down the protective layer of fat. * NO SPIRITS, NOR VODKA, serve.  The strongest vodka is 40% alcohol, and you need 65%. * LISTERINE IF IT SERVES!  It is 65% alcohol. * The more confined the space, the more concentration of the virus there can be.  The more open or naturally ventilated, the less. * You have to wash your hands before and after touching mucosa, food, locks, knobs, switches, remote control, cell phone, watches, computers, desks, TV, etc.  And when using the bathroom. * You have to HUMIDIFY HANDS DRY from so much washing them, because the molecules can hide in the micro cracks.  The thicker the moisturizer, the better.   * Also keep your NAILS SHORT so that the virus does not hide there." -JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL The virus is not a living organism, but a protein molecule (DNA) covered by a protective layer of lipid (fat), which, when absorbed by the cells of the ocular, nasal or buccal mucosa, changes their genetic code.  (mutation) and convert them into aggressor and multiplier cells. * Since the virus is not a living organism but a protein molecule, it is not killed, but decays on its own.  The disintegration time depends on the temperature, humidity and type of material where it lies. * The virus is very fragile;  the only thing that protects it is a thin outer layer of fat.  That is why any soap or detergent is the best remedy, because the foam CUTS the FAT (that is why you have to rub so much: for 20 seconds or more, to make a lot of foam).   By dissolving the fat layer, the protein molecule disperses and breaks down on its own. * HEAT melts fat;  this is why it is so good to use water above 25 degrees Celsius for washing hands, clothes and everything.  In addition, hot water makes more foam and that makes it even more useful. * Alcohol or any mixture with alcohol over 65% DISSOLVES ANY FAT, especially the external lipid layer of the virus. * Any mix with 1 part bleach and 5 parts water directly dissolves the protein, breaks it down from the inside. * Oxygenated water helps long after soap, alcohol and chlorine, because peroxide dissolves the virus protein, but you have to use it pure and it hurts your skin. * NO BACTERICIDE OR ANTIBIOTIC SERVES.  The virus is not a living organism like bacteria;  antibodies cannot kill what is not alive.  * NEVER shake used or unused clothing, sheets or cloth.  While it is glued to a porous surface, it is very inert and disintegrates only  -between 3 hours (fabric and porous),  -4 hours (copper and wood) -24 hours (cardboard),  - 42 hours (metal) and  -72 hours (plastic).   But if you shake it or use a feather duster, the virus molecules float in the air for up to 3 hours, and can lodge in your nose. * The virus molecules remain very stable in external cold, or artificial as air conditioners in houses and cars.   They also need moisture to stay stable, and especially darkness.  Therefore, dehumidified, dry, warm and bright environments will degrade it faster. * UV LIGHT on any object that may contain it breaks down the virus protein.  For example, to disinfect and reuse a mask is perfect.  Be careful, it also breaks down collagen (which is protein) in the skin. * The virus CANNOT go through healthy skin. * Vinegar is NOT useful because it does not break down the protective layer of fat. * NO SPIRITS, NOR VODKA, serve.  The strongest vodka is 40% alcohol, and you need 65%. * LISTERINE IF IT SERVES!  It is 65% alcohol. * The more confined the space, the more concentration of the virus there can be.  The more open or naturally ventilated, the less. * You have to wash your hands before and after touching mucosa, food, locks, knobs, switches, remote control, cell phone, watches, computers, desks, TV, etc.  And when using the bathroom. * You have to HUMIDIFY HANDS DRY from so much washing them, because the molecules can hide in the micro cracks.  The thicker the moisturizer, the better.   * Also keep your NAILS SHORT so that the virus does not hide there. -JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL   Do you know more than medicine? Are you smarter than Johns Hopkins?🤣🤣🤣🤣 you don't know what Nazis are, dear PROJECTION. Psychology 101. You're a textbook case. Funny how Bill Gates said we can't open the world until a vaccine is provided. I showed you the US patent for Coronavirus, and the WO patent for the Coronavirus vaccine. They're lying to you, I've proven it, and you still believe them. That's called willfully blind and woefully ignorant. Nazis forbid you to leave your home. Nazis forbid you to work. Nazis steel your freedom and force compliance. That's exactly what's happening. Tell me, how does threatening people with jail protect them?
    2
  2077.  @rusticpath2244  , Coronavirus-like particles morphologically similar to normal virions are assembled when genes encoding the viral membrane proteins M and E are coexpressed in eukaryotic cells. Using this envelope assembly assay, we have studied the primary sequence requirements for particle formation of the mouse hepatitis virus (MHV) M protein, the major protein of the coronavirion membrane. Our results show that each of the different domains of the protein is important. Mutations (deletions, insertions, point mutations) in the luminal domain, the transmembrane domains, the amphiphilic domain, or the carboxy-terminal domain had effects on the assembly of M into enveloped particles. Strikingly, the extreme carboxy-terminal residue is crucial. Deletion of this single residue abolished particle assembly almost completely; most substitutions were strongly inhibitory. Site-directed mutations in the carboxy terminus of M were also incorporated into the MHV genome by targeted recombination. The results supported a critical role for this domain of M in viral assembly, although the M carboxy terminus was more tolerant of alteration in the complete virion than in virus-like particles, likely because of the stabilization of virions by additional intermolecular interactions. Interestingly, glycosylation of M appeared not essential for assembly. Mutations in the luminal domain that abolished the normal O glycosylation of the protein or created an N-glycosylated form had no effect. Mutant M proteins unable to form virus-like particles were found to inhibit the budding of assembly-competent M in a concentration-dependent manner. However, assembly-competent M was able to rescue assembly-incompetent M when the latter was present in low amounts. These observations support the existence of interactions between M molecules that are thought to be the driving force in coronavirus envelope assembly. Enveloped viruses acquire their lipid envelopes by budding through cellular membranes. The viral envelope contains integral membrane proteins that play important roles in envelope formation and virus entry. Three models have been proposed for the budding of enveloped viruses. Two of these are based on nucleocapsid-dependent assembly. In retroviruses the nucleocapsid is all that is required, since the Gag core particle can direct its envelopment without the need for viral envelope proteins (9, 23,31). In contrast, both core and spike proteins are essential for the formation of togaviruses (26, 71), envelopment being driven by direct interactions between the viral envelope proteins and the nucleocapsid (42, 78). In the case of rhabdoviruses, optimal budding efficiency and virus production are achieved by a concerted action of spike and internal virus proteins (48). In the third model, budding is nucleocapsid independent. Coexpression of flavivirus prM and E results in the formation of subviral particles resembling capsidless viral envelopes (1, 44). The hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface proteins can be independently secreted from cells as subviral particles, which, however, are morphologically quite distinct from HBV virions (58, 67). Recently we demonstrated that coronavirus envelope proteins have the capacity to assemble uniform envelopes, which have the same appearance and dimensions as virus particles, independently of nucleocapsid proteins (73). Coronaviruses are positive-stranded RNA viruses with 30-kb genomes packaged in helical nucleocapsids. The nucleocapsid is incorporated into a viral particle by budding into the intermediate compartment between the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and the Golgi complex (33,35, 72). The coronavirus membrane contains three or four viral proteins. The membrane (M) glycoprotein is the most abundant structural protein; it spans the membrane bilayer three times, leaving a short NH2-terminal domain outside the virus (or exposed luminally in intracellular membranes) and a long COOH terminus (cytoplasmic domain) inside the virion (reviewed by Rottier [62]). The spike protein (S) is a type I membrane glycoprotein that constitutes the peplomers. The small envelope protein (E) has been detected as a minor structural component in avian infectious bronchitis virus (IBV), transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV), and mouse hepatitis virus (MHV) particles (reviewed by Siddell [66]), but it has not been extensively characterized. Some coronaviruses also contain a hemagglutinin-esterase protein (HE) (reviewed by Brian et al. [7]). Molecular interactions between the envelope proteins are thought to determine the formation and composition of the coronaviral membrane. M plays a predominant role in the intracellular formation of virus particles, for which S appears not to be required. Growth of coronaviruses in the presence of tunicamycin gave rise to the production of spikeless, noninfectious virions (27, 51, 63,69). These particles were devoid of S but contained M. Independently synthesized MHV M protein accumulates in the Golgi complex (33, 34, 65) in homomultimeric complexes (36). Heterotypic interactions between the M and S proteins have been identified by coimmunoprecipitation and sedimentation analyses (55). The S protein, on its own, is transported to the cell surface, but when it is associated with the M protein, it is retained in the Golgi complex. Upon coexpression of M, S, and E by using the vaccinia virus T7 system (20), virus-like particles (VLPs) containing these three viral membrane proteins were assembled in and released from cells. However, only M and E were required for particle formation. The S protein was dispensable but was incorporated when present (6, 73). The envelope particles produced by this system were shown to form a homogeneous population of spherical particles indistinguishable from authentic virions in size and shape (73). One of our main interests is to understand the process of coronavirus assembly. We are particularly interested in the interactions and the mechanisms that drive the formation of the viral particles. With the VLP assembly system, we have developed an ideal tool for the study of coronavirus envelope formation and for the analysis of the interactions between the viral membrane proteins in molecular detail. In the present study, we have used the VLP assembly system to investigate the primary structure requirements of the M protein in envelope formation. Site-directed mutations in the carboxy terminus of M were also incorporated into the MHV genome by targeted recombination. The results demonstrate that particle assembly is critically sensitive to changes in all domains of the M molecule. Untrue. The results have been replicated again and again. Just cause you don't research doesn't mean the studies aren't there, dear Google GESTAPO.
    2
  2078. 2
  2079.  @rusticpath2244  , if it's not that big a deal, and I'm just stupid, why are you so concerned? Why do you feel the need to silence me? Coronavirus-like particles morphologically similar to normal virions are assembled when genes encoding the viral membrane proteins M and E are coexpressed in eukaryotic cells. Using this envelope assembly assay, we have studied the primary sequence requirements for particle formation of the mouse hepatitis virus (MHV) M protein, the major protein of the coronavirion membrane. Our results show that each of the different domains of the protein is important. Mutations (deletions, insertions, point mutations) in the luminal domain, the transmembrane domains, the amphiphilic domain, or the carboxy-terminal domain had effects on the assembly of M into enveloped particles. Strikingly, the extreme carboxy-terminal residue is crucial. Deletion of this single residue abolished particle assembly almost completely; most substitutions were strongly inhibitory. Site-directed mutations in the carboxy terminus of M were also incorporated into the MHV genome by targeted recombination. The results supported a critical role for this domain of M in viral assembly, although the M carboxy terminus was more tolerant of alteration in the complete virion than in virus-like particles, likely because of the stabilization of virions by additional intermolecular interactions. Interestingly, glycosylation of M appeared not essential for assembly. Mutations in the luminal domain that abolished the normal O glycosylation of the protein or created an N-glycosylated form had no effect. Mutant M proteins unable to form virus-like particles were found to inhibit the budding of assembly-competent M in a concentration-dependent manner. However, assembly-competent M was able to rescue assembly-incompetent M when the latter was present in low amounts. These observations support the existence of interactions between M molecules that are thought to be the driving force in coronavirus envelope assembly. Enveloped viruses acquire their lipid envelopes by budding through cellular membranes. The viral envelope contains integral membrane proteins that play important roles in envelope formation and virus entry. Three models have been proposed for the budding of enveloped viruses. Two of these are based on nucleocapsid-dependent assembly. In retroviruses the nucleocapsid is all that is required, since the Gag core particle can direct its envelopment without the need for viral envelope proteins (9, 23,31). In contrast, both core and spike proteins are essential for the formation of togaviruses (26, 71), envelopment being driven by direct interactions between the viral envelope proteins and the nucleocapsid (42, 78). In the case of rhabdoviruses, optimal budding efficiency and virus production are achieved by a concerted action of spike and internal virus proteins (48). In the third model, budding is nucleocapsid independent. Coexpression of flavivirus prM and E results in the formation of subviral particles resembling capsidless viral envelopes (1, 44). The hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface proteins can be independently secreted from cells as subviral particles, which, however, are morphologically quite distinct from HBV virions (58, 67). Recently we demonstrated that coronavirus envelope proteins have the capacity to assemble uniform envelopes, which have the same appearance and dimensions as virus particles, independently of nucleocapsid proteins (73). Coronaviruses are positive-stranded RNA viruses with 30-kb genomes packaged in helical nucleocapsids. The nucleocapsid is incorporated into a viral particle by budding into the intermediate compartment between the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and the Golgi complex (33,35, 72). The coronavirus membrane contains three or four viral proteins. The membrane (M) glycoprotein is the most abundant structural protein; it spans the membrane bilayer three times, leaving a short NH2-terminal domain outside the virus (or exposed luminally in intracellular membranes) and a long COOH terminus (cytoplasmic domain) inside the virion (reviewed by Rottier [62]). The spike protein (S) is a type I membrane glycoprotein that constitutes the peplomers. The small envelope protein (E) has been detected as a minor structural component in avian infectious bronchitis virus (IBV), transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV), and mouse hepatitis virus (MHV) particles (reviewed by Siddell [66]), but it has not been extensively characterized. Some coronaviruses also contain a hemagglutinin-esterase protein (HE) (reviewed by Brian et al. [7]). Molecular interactions between the envelope proteins are thought to determine the formation and composition of the coronaviral membrane. M plays a predominant role in the intracellular formation of virus particles, for which S appears not to be required. Growth of coronaviruses in the presence of tunicamycin gave rise to the production of spikeless, noninfectious virions (27, 51, 63,69). These particles were devoid of S but contained M. Independently synthesized MHV M protein accumulates in the Golgi complex (33, 34, 65) in homomultimeric complexes (36). Heterotypic interactions between the M and S proteins have been identified by coimmunoprecipitation and sedimentation analyses (55). The S protein, on its own, is transported to the cell surface, but when it is associated with the M protein, it is retained in the Golgi complex. Upon coexpression of M, S, and E by using the vaccinia virus T7 system (20), virus-like particles (VLPs) containing these three viral membrane proteins were assembled in and released from cells. However, only M and E were required for particle formation. The S protein was dispensable but was incorporated when present (6, 73). The envelope particles produced by this system were shown to form a homogeneous population of spherical particles indistinguishable from authentic virions in size and shape (73). One of our main interests is to understand the process of coronavirus assembly. We are particularly interested in the interactions and the mechanisms that drive the formation of the viral particles. With the VLP assembly system, we have developed an ideal tool for the study of coronavirus envelope formation and for the analysis of the interactions between the viral membrane proteins in molecular detail. In the present study, we have used the VLP assembly system to investigate the primary structure requirements of the M protein in envelope formation. Site-directed mutations in the carboxy terminus of M were also incorporated into the MHV genome by targeted recombination. The results demonstrate that particle assembly is critically sensitive to changes in all domains of the M molecule.
    2
  2080. 2
  2081. 2
  2082. 2
  2083. 2
  2084. 2
  2085. 2
  2086. 2
  2087. 2
  2088. 2
  2089. 2
  2090. 2
  2091. 2
  2092. 2
  2093. 2
  2094. 2
  2095. 2
  2096. 2
  2097. 2
  2098. 2
  2099.  @rusticpath2244  , we are indeed in relationship, and the relationship is called adversarial debate. You've been engaging in it for hours, dear willfully blind and woefully ignorant. You're a classic narcissist, and the following is your script/tactical plan. Again, you're still TEXTBOOK Psychology 101. Narcissists distort the truth through disinformation, oversimplifying, ridiculing and sowing doubt. Narcissists can be incredibly skilled at using classic elements of thought-control and brainwashing. To get free of narcissistic thought control it is essential to spot the distortions narcissists deliberately and instinctively practice. Applying critical thinking skills can inoculate you against their campaigns. Here are 14 thought-control tactics narcissists frequently use: 1) Emotional Appeals:  Attempting to play on emotions such as fear, guilt and loyalty rather than using logic and reasoning. Narcissists use emotional appeals to disguise false or outrageous claims. Since many narcissists tend to be Drama Kings or Queens, using over-the-top emotionality to control others comes naturally for them. Example:  “How dare you question me! After all I’ve done for you.” 2) Bandwagon:  An attempt to pressure another to go along because “everybody is doing it.” Narcissists know the power of numbers. They slavishly follow their “likes” on social media and other measures of attention. Having lots of followers reassures them of their worth. They use the power of group-think and peer pressure to play on others’ fears of missing out, being ostracized or being in the wrong. Example:  “All your friends agree with me.” 3) Black-and-white / Either-or:  Pretending there are only two choices when there are several. Narcissists view the world in either-or terms. Nuance is lost on them. They derive a feeling of power from this divide-and-conquer approach. Example:  “You’re either with me or against me.”  4) Burden of Proof:  Asserting that the speaker does not need to prove his points but, rather, that the burden is on the listener to disprove them. Such an entitled stance comes easily for narcissists. Narcissists love to take credit but have little interest in acknowledging their faults. They hate to be wrong, so putting the burden on others the prove them wrong is a stonewalling strategy that makes it time-consuming and tedious to disprove them. And even if you do point out their error, they are likely to dismiss it or distract and change the subject. Example:  “I know I am right. What I say stands until you can prove otherwise.” 5) False Flattery:  Buttering others up to make them more receptive to their arguments. Narcissists rarely meet a compliment they don’t like. They think others are as susceptible to flattery as they are. They ply listeners with pseudo-compliments, hoping to get things in return. Example:  “I couldn’t possibly be manipulating you, you’re way too smart for that.” 6) Incredulity:  Acting as though what someone said is unbelievable. Narcissists often use this tactic when they don’t understand what another person is saying. Rather than admit they are confused, they pretend that what the other person is saying is beyond belief. This is an attempt to dismiss valid concerns. Example:  “You seriously think there are other husbands who are better than me? You really think other wives get anywhere near what I have given you? You are not living in the real world.” 7) Labeling:  Applying a negative phrase or attributing negative characteristics to a person or position. Narcissists love labels. Having a single word to invalidate or humiliate another feels like an ultimate power for narcissists. Example:  “You’re too needy. You’re a loser.” 8) False Compromise:  Offering to meet half way on matters in which there is clearly a fair and unfair choice. If a narcissist has a choice to treat another person fairly or unfairly, a “compromise” that still treats the other unfairly is no compromise – it’s still wrong. Example:  “Okay, you win, I’ll pay you back $50 of the $100 you gave me and we’ll call it even. Hey, it’s better than nothing.”  9) Empty Promises:  Promising to give you what you want without any plan or intention of fulfilling the promise. Example:  “You’ll get your turn. I promise.” 10) Quoting out of Context:  Repeating only part of what another person said or using another’s words completely out of context. Narcissists do this to discredit others and put them on the defensive. Example:  “You always said people have to take responsibility for themselves so I didn’t think you needed my help when you had to go to the ER.” 11) Ridicule:  Mocking or humiliating another person or their requests or feelings. Narcissists devalue others through dismissive remarks, sarcasm, or hostile humor instead of taking the other person seriously. Example:  “That’s the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard. You’re just embarrassing yourself.” 12) Slippery Slope:  An appeal to fear which takes a small problem and predicts that it will lead to an escalating series of worst-case scenarios. The goal is to use an extreme hypothetical to distract from a reasonable complaint or argument. Example:  “If I do this for you, you will think you can get whatever you want from me. I’ll become your slave and have no life.” 13) Dehumanizing:  Classifying others as inferior, dangerous or evil to justify oppressing or eliminating them. This ends-justifies-the-means tactic is second nature for narcissists, who view most other people as inferior. Example:  “They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists.” 14) Slogans:  A simplistic phrase that is a catch-all designed to shut down dissent
    2
  2100. 2
  2101. 2
  2102. 2
  2103. 2
  2104. 2
  2105. 2
  2106. 2
  2107. 2
  2108. 2
  2109. 2
  2110. 2
  2111. 2
  2112. 2
  2113. 2
  2114. 2
  2115. 2
  2116. 2
  2117. 2
  2118. 2
  2119. 2
  2120. 2
  2121. 2
  2122. 2
  2123. 2
  2124. 2
  2125. 2
  2126. 2
  2127. 2
  2128. 2
  2129. 2
  2130. 2
  2131. 2
  2132. 2
  2133. 2
  2134. 2
  2135. 2
  2136. 2
  2137. 2
  2138. 2
  2139. 2
  2140. 2
  2141. 2
  2142. 2
  2143. 2
  2144. 2
  2145. 2
  2146. 2
  2147. 2
  2148. 2
  2149. 2
  2150. 2
  2151. 2
  2152. 2
  2153. 2
  2154. 2
  2155. 2
  2156. 2
  2157. 2
  2158. 2
  2159. 2
  2160. 2
  2161. 2
  2162. 2
  2163. 2
  2164. 2
  2165. 2
  2166. 2
  2167. 2
  2168. 2
  2169. The following comment had been shadow banned by Tim four times. Why is Tim so afraid of my freedom of speech? **Offending comment** Never live in a big city. This is an orchestrated culling. Anyone telling you differently is selling something. This is the flu. According to the WHO: "If you got a flu shot and take a Covid test, you will recieve a false positive." "It's easier to fool the people, than convince them they've been fooled." Look how quickly freedom evaporated in the name of safety. 56,000 Americans die on average every year from the flu. That never bothered you before. It certainly didn't scare you. You never wanted GOVERNMENT checkpoints for travel during flu season. You never wanted to close all "non essential businesses" for your health. There's over 300 strains of flu and we have vaccines for 4 of those strains. The same four vaccines every year. Yet 900,000 have died worldwide from Coronavirus, and you've allowed your freedom to be stolen, because you don't have a government vaccine?! Perspective is needed. "Those willing to relinquish freedom for security deserve neither." Where does our freedom come from? If government tells you it's not safe to leave your home, and that directive is implemented by force, how can you claim you're a free American? How can you claim this is a constitutional republic? If you believe your freedom comes from the government, then your are no more than a slave, taking only what has been given by your Masters. You are resigned to live on your knees in preaceful slavery. "Give me liberty or give me death." These are not mere flowery words. They are the heart and soul of every person who ever died, because they would not live under the rule of tyranny. Those words are the measure of a person's conviction, and the key to breaking the heavy chains of slavery. They are the lifeblood of every person who can't breathe, unless they live free. Freedom is a very dangerous idea that terrifies our Masters, because it gives the individual the right to govern oneself. It negates the need for a government slave Master. It becomes the individual's responsibility to control their own life, to protect their own life. Freedom is abstract in theory, invisible to the naked eye, but it's absence is more than palpable. It's loss is crippling and overbearing. Those who live without it are broken in body and spirit. It's a strangling so harrowing and devestating that one might never recover. But despite the danger of freedom, billions were willing to die for this abstract idea throughout history, because it's value is beyond any currency. Our Masters know the value of our freedom, and they hate us for it. Freedom is never given. It has to be seized; stolen from the powers that would like nothing more than to keep us subservient and obedient. How can this be a government "for, of, and by the people", if the people have no right to object to the tyranny of a government which rules by fear and manipulation? When will you stand up and object to being ruled over by your Masters? When will you realize that your life has no value, if you cannot live free? Let me assure you, to wait would be a grave mistake. The loss of freedom is far more deadly than any virus or disease could ever be.
    2
  2170. 2
  2171. 2
  2172. 2
  2173. 2
  2174. 2
  2175. 2
  2176. 2
  2177. 2
  2178. 2
  2179. 2
  2180. 2
  2181. 2
  2182. 2
  2183. 2
  2184. 2
  2185. 2
  2186. 2
  2187. 2
  2188. 2
  2189. 2
  2190. 2
  2191. 2
  2192. 2
  2193. 2
  2194. 2
  2195. 2
  2196. 2
  2197. 2
  2198. 2
  2199. 2
  2200. 2
  2201. 2
  2202. 2
  2203. 2
  2204. 2
  2205. 2
  2206. 2
  2207. 2
  2208. 2
  2209. 2
  2210. 2
  2211. 2
  2212. 2
  2213. 2
  2214. 2
  2215. 2
  2216. 2
  2217. 2
  2218. 2
  2219. 2
  2220. 2
  2221. 2
  2222. 2
  2223. 2
  2224. 2
  2225. 2
  2226. 2
  2227. 2
  2228. 2
  2229. 2
  2230. 2
  2231. 2
  2232. 2
  2233. 2
  2234. 2
  2235. 2
  2236. 2
  2237. 2
  2238. 2
  2239. 2
  2240. 2
  2241. 2
  2242. 2
  2243. 2
  2244. 2
  2245.  @crlotero  , you forgot the laundry list of "violations", which is another word for broken law. Here's a more full characterization direct from Comey: "Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information. For example, seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation. In addition to this highly sensitive information, we also found information that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligence Community at the time it was discussed on e-mail (that is, excluding the later “up-classified” e-mails). None of these e-mails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these e-mails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like those found at Departments and Agencies of the U.S. Government—or even with a commercial service like Gmail. Separately, it is important to say something about the marking of classified information. Only a very small number of the e-mails containing classified information bore markings indicating the presence of classified information. But even if information is not marked “classified” in an e-mail, participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it. While not the focus of our investigation, we also developed evidence that the security culture of the State Department in general, and with respect to use of unclassified e-mail systems in particular, was generally lacking in the kind of care for classified information found elsewhere in the government. With respect to potential computer intrusion by hostile actors, we did not find direct evidence that Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail domain, in its various configurations since 2009, was successfully hacked. But, given the nature of the system and of the actors potentially involved, we assess that we would be unlikely to see such direct evidence. We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private commercial e-mail accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her personal account. We also assess that Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent. She also used her personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related e-mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account. So that’s what we found. Finally, with respect to our recommendation to the Department of Justice: In our system, the prosecutors make the decisions about whether charges are appropriate based on evidence the FBI has helped collect. Although we don’t normally make public our recommendations to the prosecutors, we frequently make recommendations and engage in productive conversations with prosecutors about what resolution may be appropriate, given the evidence. In this case, given the importance of the matter, I think unusual transparency is in order. Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. Prosecutors necessarily weigh a number of factors before bringing charges. There are obvious considerations, like the strength of the evidence, especially regarding intent. Responsible decisions also consider the context of a person’s actions, and how similar situations have been handled in the past." Violations are broken laws, dear dumbass. 😉
    2
  2246. 2
  2247.  Trumptards are stupid. Reply to me if you agree.  , Hunter was being investigated. He was about to be interviewed by the prosector his dad got fired. Proof you have no idea what you're talking about. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/463307-solomon-these-once-secret-memos-cast-doubt-on-joe-bidens-ukraine-story%3Famp&ved=2ahUKEwj-r42tyo7nAhWBrFkKHWVHAygQFjAAegQIBxAC&usg=AOvVaw0oX1OSvwWdoTvtphH0Cy0D&ampcf=1 From the article: Ukraine's new president, Volodymyr Zelensky, told Trump in July that he plans to launch his own wide-ranging investigation into what happened with the Bidens and Burisma. "I'm knowledgeable about the situation," Zelensky told Trump, asking the American president to forward any evidence he might know about. "The issue of the investigation of the case is actually the issue of making sure to restore the honesty so we will take care of that and will work on the investigation of the case." Biden has faced scrutiny since December 2015, when the New York Times published a story noting that Burisma hired Hunter Biden just weeks after the vice president was asked by President Obama to oversee U.S.-Ukraine relations. That story also alerted Biden's office that Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin had an active investigation of Burisma and its founder. Documents I obtained this year detail an effort to change the narrative after the Times story about Hunter Biden, with the help of the Obama State Department. Hunter Biden's American business partner in Burisma, Devon Archer, texted a colleague two days after the Times story about a strategy to counter the "new wave of scrutiny" and stated that he and Hunter Biden had just met at the State Department. The text suggested there was about to be a new "USAID project the embassy is announcing with us" and that it was "perfect for us to move forward now with momentum." I have sued the State Department for any records related to that meeting. The reason is simple: There is both a public interest and an ethics question to knowing if Hunter Biden and his team sought State's assistance while his father was vice president. The controversy ignited anew earlier this year when I disclosed that Joe Biden admitted during a 2018 videotaped speech that, as vice president in March 2016, he threatened to cancel $1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees, to pressure Ukraine's then-President Petro Poroshenko to fire Shokin. At the time, Shokin's office was investigating Burisma. Shokin told me he was making plans to question Hunter Biden about $3 million in fees that Biden and his partner, Archer, collected from Burisma through their American firm. Documents seized by the FBI in an unrelated case confirm the payments, which in many months totaled more than $166,000.   Some media outlets have reported that, at the time Joe Biden forced the firing in March 2016, there were no open investigations. Those reports are wrong. A British-based investigation of Burisma's owner was closed down in early 2015 on a technicality when a deadline for documents was not met. But the Ukraine Prosecutor General's office still had two open inquiries in March 2016, according to the official case file provided me. One of those cases involved taxes; the other, allegations of corruption. Burisma announced the cases against it were not closed and settled until January 2017.  After I first reported it in a column, the New York Times and ABC News published similar stories confirming my reporting. Joe Biden has since responded that he forced Shokin's firing over concerns about corruption and ineptitude, which he claims were widely shared by Western allies, and that it had nothing to do with the Burisma investigation. Some of the new documents I obtained call that claim into question. In a newly sworn affidavit prepared for a European court, Shokin testified that when he was fired in March 2016, he was told the reason was that Biden was unhappy about the Burisma investigation. "The truth is that I was forced out because I was leading a wide-ranging corruption probe into Burisma Holdings, a natural gas firm active in Ukraine and Joe Biden's son, Hunter Biden, was a member of the Board of Directors," Shokin testified. "On several occasions President Poroshenko asked me to have a look at the case against Burisma and consider the possibility of winding down the investigative actions in respect of this company but I refused to close this investigation," Shokin added. Shokin certainly would have reason to hold a grudge over his firing. But his account is supported by documents from Burisma's legal team in America, which appeared to be moving into Ukraine with intensity as Biden's effort to fire Shokin picked up steam.
    2
  2248. 2
  2249. 2
  2250. 2
  2251. 2
  2252. 2
  2253. 2
  2254. 2
  2255. 2
  2256. 2
  2257.  @darncat422  , Obama investigated it, according to Fiona Hill. She said they had several meetings specifically dealing with Hunter. When it was clear that the investigation would lead to Joe Biden, Obama shut it down. Hunter was about to be questioned by prosecutor Shokin, when Joe Biden threatened to withhold a billion dollar loan guarantee if Shokin wasn't fired. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/463307-solomon-these-once-secret-memos-cast-doubt-on-joe-bidens-ukraine-story%3Famp&ved=2ahUKEwjD6Kbl35DnAhVnqlkKHU98At4QFjAAegQIBhAB&usg=AOvVaw0oX1OSvwWdoTvtphH0Cy0D&ampcf=1 From the article: "{Ukraine's new president, Volodymyr Zelensky, told Trump in July that he plans to launch his own wide-ranging investigation into what happened with the Bidens and Burisma. "I'm knowledgeable about the situation," Zelensky told Trump, asking the American president to forward any evidence he might know about. "The issue of the investigation of the case is actually the issue of making sure to restore the honesty so we will take care of that and will work on the investigation of the case." Biden has faced scrutiny since December 2015, when the New York Times published a story noting that Burisma hired Hunter Biden just weeks after the vice president was asked by President Obama to oversee U.S.-Ukraine relations. That story also alerted Biden's office that Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin had an active investigation of Burisma and its founder. Documents I obtained this year detail an effort to change the narrative after the Times story about Hunter Biden, with the help of the Obama State Department. Hunter Biden's American business partner in Burisma, Devon Archer, texted a colleague two days after the Times story about a strategy to counter the "new wave of scrutiny" and stated that he and Hunter Biden had just met at the State Department. The text suggested there was about to be a new "USAID project the embassy is announcing with us" and that it was "perfect for us to move forward now with momentum." I have sued the State Department for any records related to that meeting. The reason is simple: There is both a public interest and an ethics question to knowing if Hunter Biden and his team sought State's assistance while his father was vice president. The controversy ignited anew earlier this year when I disclosed that Joe Biden admitted during a 2018 videotaped speech that, as vice president in March 2016, he threatened to cancel $1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees, to pressure Ukraine's then-President Petro Poroshenko to fire Shokin. At the time, Shokin's office was investigating Burisma. Shokin told me he was making plans to question Hunter Biden about $3 million in fees that Biden and his partner, Archer, collected from Burisma through their American firm. Documents seized by the FBI in an unrelated case confirm the payments, which in many months totaled more than $166,000.   Some media outlets have reported that, at the time Joe Biden forced the firing in March 2016, there were no open investigations. Those reports are wrong. A British-based investigation of Burisma's owner was closed down in early 2015 on a technicality when a deadline for documents was not met. But the Ukraine Prosecutor General's office still had two open inquiries in March 2016, according to the official case file provided me. One of those cases involved taxes; the other, allegations of corruption. Burisma announced the cases against it were not closed and settled until January 2017.  After I first reported it in a column, the New York Times and ABC News published similar stories confirming my reporting. Joe Biden has since responded that he forced Shokin's firing over concerns about corruption and ineptitude, which he claims were widely shared by Western allies, and that it had nothing to do with the Burisma investigation. Some of the new documents I obtained call that claim into question. In a newly sworn affidavit prepared for a European court, Shokin testified that when he was fired in March 2016, he was told the reason was that Biden was unhappy about the Burisma investigation. "The truth is that I was forced out because I was leading a wide-ranging corruption probe into Burisma Holdings, a natural gas firm active in Ukraine and Joe Biden's son, Hunter Biden, was a member of the Board of Directors," Shokin testified. "On several occasions President Poroshenko asked me to have a look at the case against Burisma and consider the possibility of winding down the investigative actions in respect of this company but I refused to close this investigation," Shokin added. Shokin certainly would have reason to hold a grudge over his firing. But his account is supported by documents from Burisma's legal team in America, which appeared to be moving into Ukraine with intensity as Biden's effort to fire Shokin picked up steam.}"
    2
  2258. 2
  2259. 2
  2260. 2
  2261. 2
  2262. 2
  2263. 2
  2264. 2
  2265. 2
  2266. 2
  2267. 2
  2268. 2
  2269. 2
  2270. 2
  2271. 2
  2272. 2
  2273. 2
  2274. 2
  2275. 2
  2276. 2
  2277. 2
  2278. 2
  2279. 2
  2280. 2
  2281. 2
  2282. 2
  2283. 2
  2284. 2
  2285. 2
  2286. 2
  2287. 2
  2288. 2
  2289. 2
  2290. 2
  2291. 2
  2292. 2
  2293. 2
  2294. 2
  2295. 2
  2296. 2
  2297. 2
  2298. 2
  2299. 2
  2300. 2
  2301. 2
  2302. 2
  2303. 2
  2304. 2
  2305. 2
  2306. 2
  2307. 2
  2308. 2
  2309. 2
  2310. 2
  2311. 2
  2312. 2
  2313. 2
  2314. 2
  2315. 2
  2316. 2
  2317. 2
  2318. 2
  2319. 2
  2320. 2
  2321. 2
  2322. 2
  2323. 2
  2324. 2
  2325. 2
  2326. 2
  2327. 2
  2328. 2
  2329. 2
  2330. 2
  2331. 2
  2332. 2
  2333. 2
  2334. 2
  2335. 2
  2336. 2
  2337. 2
  2338. 2
  2339. 2
  2340. 2
  2341. 2
  2342. 2
  2343. 2
  2344. 2
  2345. 2
  2346. 2
  2347. 2
  2348. 2
  2349.  @thornyturtleranch4u  , Trump didn't kill any kids or Kurds, dear ignorant. Obama set up the prison cages for kids at the border. Not Trump. Did you want Obama impeached for that? If not, you're a hypocrite. https://www.googleadservices.com/pagead/aclk?sa=L&ai=DChcSEwjYgf6Tl9LmAhWmg1oFHct4CnEYABAAGgJ2dQ&ae=1&ohost=www.google.com&cid=CAESQeD2koET_Thj9ln1_-hoeFo49FXZPe50fsd933cCKdlPmJXBpHF2gKgT9v6xGmY84rN7opGjl5BheFDB0BgfMBcL&sig=AOD64_069d5N0BETLLWMPcKl8dX5Y-NQCg&q&adurl=https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/apr/9/donald-trump-says-obama-put-children-cages-wont-re/?utm_source%3DGOOGLE%26utm_medium%3Dcpc%26utm_id%3Dchacka%26utm_campaign%3DTWT%2B-%2BDSA%26gclid%3DCj0KCQiArozwBRDOARIsAHo2s7uT0MasXSwqSrZGt9RpIhKS_WSQuSFL2BWIC8jT0gTNA00jJTmQjvUaAu2REALw_wcB&ved=2ahUKEwi94fWTl9LmAhUR2FkKHegDDBkQ0Qx6BAgOEAE Trump pulling 30 troops out of the strip was a brilliant plan to make Bahagdadi feel safe enough to come out of hiding. It worked. They killed him, and not a single Kurd was killed. They are still enjoying the cease fire that Trump orchestrated. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.defenseone.com/threats/2019/10/trump-pullout-had-no-impact-baghdadi-raid-timing-says-general/160986/&ved=2ahUKEwinx8TUl9LmAhVEu1kKHSVrCCoQFjAEegQIARAB&usg=AOvVaw3AhGXJSh2A6HAHS4c5xcea And let's talk about Ukraine. Obama forced Ukraine to disarm their military, promising to protect them if Russia attacked. Guess what happened? Russia took a third of Ukraine when they annexed Crimea. And what did Obama do? Nothing. He gave no weapons, no troops, no money. He let Russia walk in and kill hundreds of Ukrainians, while stealing their country, and he did nothing. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.vox.com/platform/amp/2014/9/3/6102001/obama-abandons-ukraine&ved=2ahUKEwjd_-GAmNLmAhUr11kKHT1JBCkQFjADegQIARAB&usg=AOvVaw3SZrDJy_4vNnRg9BKyUX4N&ampcf=1 You need to educate yourself. You clearly think you can watch the alphabet news and know what's going on. You can't. You have to do your own research. You're repeating a script provided by your moral and intellectual superiors on tv. This doesn't make you informed, dear. It makes you a parrot.
    2
  2350. 2
  2351. 2
  2352. 2
  2353. 2
  2354. 2
  2355. 2
  2356. 2
  2357. 2
  2358. 2
  2359. 2
  2360. 2
  2361. 2
  2362. 2
  2363. 2
  2364. 2
  2365. 2
  2366. 2
  2367. 2
  2368. 2
  2369. 2
  2370. 2
  2371. 2
  2372. 2
  2373. 2
  2374. 2
  2375. 2
  2376. 2
  2377. 2
  2378. 2
  2379. 2
  2380. 2
  2381. 2
  2382. 2
  2383. 2
  2384. 2
  2385. 2
  2386. 2
  2387. 2
  2388. 2
  2389. 2
  2390. 2
  2391. 2
  2392. 2
  2393. 2
  2394. 2
  2395. 2
  2396. 2
  2397. 2
  2398. 2
  2399. 2
  2400. 2
  2401. 2
  2402. 2
  2403. 2
  2404. 2
  2405. 2
  2406. 2
  2407. 2
  2408. 2
  2409. 2
  2410. 2
  2411. 2
  2412. 2
  2413. 2
  2414. 2
  2415. 2
  2416. 2
  2417. 2
  2418. 2
  2419. 2
  2420. 2
  2421. 2
  2422. 2
  2423. 2
  2424. 2
  2425. 2
  2426. 2
  2427. 2
  2428. 2
  2429. 2
  2430. 2
  2431. 2
  2432. 2
  2433. 2
  2434. 2
  2435. 2
  2436. 2
  2437. 2
  2438. 2
  2439. 2
  2440. 2
  2441. 2
  2442. 2
  2443. 2
  2444. 2
  2445. 2
  2446. 2
  2447. 2
  2448. 2
  2449. 2
  2450. 2
  2451. 2
  2452. 2
  2453. 2
  2454. 2
  2455. 2
  2456. 2
  2457. 2
  2458. 2
  2459. 2
  2460. 2
  2461. 2
  2462. 2
  2463. 2
  2464. 2
  2465. 2
  2466. 2
  2467. 2
  2468. 2
  2469. 2
  2470. 2
  2471. 2
  2472. 2
  2473. 2
  2474. 2
  2475. 2
  2476. 2
  2477. 2
  2478. 2
  2479. 2
  2480. 2
  2481. 2
  2482. 2
  2483. 2
  2484. 2
  2485. 2
  2486. 2
  2487. 2
  2488. 331Grabber 3 hours ago "@Nikkisheers Just asking a person on the internet to prove something to you identifies you as an intellectual failure to thrive." This is called projection, dear hypocrite. Psychology 101. Just because you can't prove your lies with sources (because there are none that support your claims), you project your own failures and inadequacies onto your betters. You're copying your intellectual superiors in the drive-by media. You don't have an original thought in your useless brain. This makes you a parrot. You have zero facts, no sources, just opinions that you heard on tv, and repeat like a broken record. You've provided nothing but your ill informed opinions. Do we need to define facts and opinions? Cause you seem genuinely confused. Here's a clue: Facts don't care about your opinions or your feelings. " You misquoted the findings of Mueller report." You're a LIAR. I directly copied and pasted from the articles provided by your favorite alphabet news sources: CNN and NBC. You clearly can't read. Prove I got it wrong. Provide the quote, liar. "None of the silly shit you're saying after that fail is changing your mistake. " This is more projection from you , dear hypocritical liar. Your existence is a mistake. None of the asinine comments you're making are rooted in facts. You're spouting conspiracy theories without evidence. Are you trying to be useless? It's working. If you want to be helpful for a change, why not wander into a mass shooting? Promise, no one will miss you. "You're either smart enough to know you made a mistake. Or too stupid to look it up yourself." Again, this is you, dear projecting hypocrite. You have zero proof of your claims, and zero proof I'm wrong. You can't provide one source to back your stupid lies. If you can't provide sources, you're nothing but an ignorant and inept liar. "Either way your failure here is your own fault." Spare me your sanctimonious and self righteous virtue signaling. If it weren't for lies, projection, and hypocrisy, you'd have nothing to say. YOU'RE the failure, dear hypocrite, evident by you inability to answer a single question, or provide a single source for your claims. Ignorant, yet arrogant, not a good combo. Try to educate yourself, dear simpleton. Ignorance can be remedied, hypocrisy not so much.
    2
  2489. 331Grabber 331Grabber 2 hours ago (edited) "@Nikkisheers Triggered yourself lol." This is called projection, dear hypocrite. I destroyed you and your non argument 2 days ago. I must have hit a nerve, since here we are 2 days later, and you're still unhinged. For 2 days you've been boiling, stewing, and seething over your utter and abject humiliation. Your ego was so bruised and provoked that you sneakily came back in the hopes of redeeming yourself, only to be further humiliated. This is called desperate and pathetic, dear delusional. You lost, because you're a liar. Get over it. You're becoming a psycho stalker, dear liar. And why are you responding to yourself in the hopes I won't see your asinine and inept comments? This is called cowardice, dear psycho stalker. "You're the one who can't articulate your own point. " Really? I can't articulate my own point? Then why are you so angry 2 days later?🤣🤣🤣Pretty sure that was you, dear projecting, hypocritical liar, who failed to provide proof of your claims, because you're a liar. Where's your proof I'm wrong? I provided sources for all my claims. You've provided nothing but opinions, conspiracy theories, hyperbolic conjecture, and ad hominem attacks. None of which are evidence to support your lies. "You stupidly misquoted the Mueller report probably thinking no one would call you on your bullshit." YOU ARE A LIAR. I copied and pasted directly from CNN and NBC sources. Are you so mentally impaired that you don't know how copy and paste works? Clearly, you never read the Mueller report. I didn't misquote anything. I asked you to provide the quote that (you say) i "misquoted". You failed to do so, because you know you lied, and providing the quote would prove I'm 100% correct, as usual. You have no proof of your claims and no facts to bolster your argument. Provide the quote, dear liar. You can't, and so you keep spewing the same bullshit lie over, and over again. I quoted Mueller accurately and correctly. If you can't prove that I misquoted Mueller with actual fact sources, then you prove yourself a liar. So, thank you for being so accommodating, dear liar. All you had to do was provide the quote. I've been waiting for days, and you've yet to do so. If I'm so obviously wrong, it should be easy for anyone to prove. Unless one is a liar, like you. What exactly did I misquote? What is the correct quote? I'm still waiting, dear liar. By the way, nothing about me is stupid. My IQ was tested to be 149. Technically, I'm a genius. I'm so far out of your plebian league that you can't even come to the games, dear DELUSION PSYCHO. "I called you on it and the internet is forever." Yes, your lie is forever captured on the internet, unless you delete it, like the coward you are. Well done, dear simpleton. Do you imagine you're winning the argument, dear delusional? 🤣🤣🤣 Do you think no one else is going to see your lies, or how arrogantly stupid and clueless you are? No one has come to your rescue. No one is agreeing with you. Everyone sees your ineptitude, your projection, your hypocrisy, and your unhinged ignorance and malice. You poor, ignorant fool. Sad to be as despicable and duplicitous as you. Here's a clue: If you have to lie to win the argument, then you're incapable of winning. A fact, I'm sure, you're well aware of, as winning is sensation of feeling you've never experienced. "Fuck you. " Is this the best you got, useless, bloody cuntrag? How unimaginative and generic of you. Is this failure due to the fact that you're now further hindered by a dick in your ass, as well as your mouth? I told you, we can discuss facts, or we can hurl insults. Either way, you're gonna lose, mindless fucktard. If I was as intellectually starving as you are, I'd limit my comments to zero. Haven't you found that mass shooting yet? Here's a clue: look for a gun free zone.🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'm not going anywhere, psycho stalking, projecting, hypocritical LIAR. You're never gonna get the last word, dear coward. You can wait days, weeks, or even months to respond to yourself. I'm still gonna see it, moron. I'm making it my agenda to check this comment daily to see your cowardly comments. You've got nothing but lies, projection, and HYPOCRISY, as well as a dick in your mouth, and one in your ass. This is why you're trying to sneak in your inane, impaired, and inept replies. Pretty pathetic, dear cowardly cuntrag.🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣DYING LAUGHING AT YOU, LIAR!!!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
    2
  2490. 2
  2491. 2
  2492. 2
  2493. 2
  2494. 2
  2495. 2
  2496. 2
  2497. 2
  2498. 2
  2499. 2
  2500. 2
  2501. 2
  2502. 2
  2503. 2
  2504. 2
  2505. 2
  2506. 2
  2507. 2
  2508. 2
  2509. 2
  2510. 2
  2511. 2
  2512. 2
  2513. 2
  2514. 2
  2515. 2
  2516. 2
  2517. Tim Ryan 14 minutes ago @Nikkisheers i was wrong. Obama said Russia was a small economy and the Putin was a regional nuisance. That's what we learned from video at the time. I can easily find the presser. He said this wasn't the cold war, and Russia isn't our enemy. I provided the proof. Tim Ryan Tim Ryan 12 minutes ago @Nikkisheers never finish a thought while on a call. Obama is a kitchen appliance and the sink was president. 🙄 This is called projection, dear. Psychology 101. Tim Ryan Tim Ryan 11 minutes ago @Nikkisheers our tax dollars on oir elections are used to buy foreign dirt. Why do you care? Why don't you care? You're so worried about integrity. So no one can interfere in our elections, but we can interfeer in other countries' elections. Nice arrogance and hypocrisy, dear Tim Ryan Tim Ryan 7 minutes ago @Nikkisheers ahh.... Now i see your problem. I'm not a democrat. I am an American that would support Pence in 2020 as Trump has left the nation of laws he's supposed to uphold. Later. Don't cut them too much. Dont want to be replaced with a Better Than Us robot surgeon. (Russian TV show) You may not be a democrat(highly doubtful), but you're definitely a liberal. What laws did trump break. Name the crime? He can't be guilty without a crime. You still can't name one. I never cut too much, Just enough to see the playing field. I always follow the rules. I'm an excellent RN. Sleep well, and continue to dream of a Trump impeachment, but don't go crazy when he gets a second term, because of indoctrinated sheep like you. You have only yourself to thank for a Trump presidency.
    2
  2518. 2
  2519. 2
  2520. 2
  2521. 2
  2522. 2
  2523. 2
  2524. 2
  2525. 2
  2526. 2
  2527. 2
  2528. Mayan Ruins Mayan Ruins 13 minutes ago "Nikkisheers telling your staff to defy lawful subpoenas is obstruction of justice and any private citizen who decided to not comply with a subpoena would swiftly be arrested." No dear ignorant and inept. that's completely untrue. It's only a crime when the disagreement has been taken to court. Only a judge can demand that Trump forgo executive privilege. The following is an overview of congressional requests for executive branch information and executive privilege assertions in response; it does not cover, for example, requests by Special Counsel Robert Mueller, the law and dynamics of which are quite different. Lawfare has published a number of articles that address the issue of executive privilege generally. In June of 2017, John Bies offered a primer on the subject. David Kris has written about disclosures to Congress in the context of the special counsel investigation. My colleague Susan Hennessey discussed the nature of congressional investigative authority as well as investigative tools and their enforcement. In addition, the National Constitution Center offers a concise history of presidents’ use of executive privilege. Finally, Mark Rozell’s book entitled, “Executive Privilege” offers a deep dive that is nonetheless easy to read. In the landmark case of United States v. Nixon, the Supreme Court ruled that it had authority to resolve the conflict between President Richard Nixon and Special Prosecutor Archibald Cox, who had been appointed to investigate the Watergate affair, over the issue of executive privilege. Cox had obtained a grand jury subpoena requiring Nixon to deliver to the district court tape recordings of various meetings with assistants. The Supreme Court acknowledged, for the first time, that an executive privilege exists under the Constitution, but it qualified the scope of the privilege by subjecting it to a balancing of the competing interests and legitimate needs of the executive and judicial branches. Courts have applied this general approach in the context of enforcement of congressional subpoenas as well, but there haven’t been very many such decisions—and the ones that do exist are narrowly drawn to the particular facts of the cases at hand. In addition, as articulated in United States v. AT&T, courts will only decide such a case if the executive and legislative branches have tried, in good faith, but failed to reach an accommodation. "Got another defense?" I don't need one. I'm telling the truth. You're lying. "I’ll shred that one too dumb fuck." This is called projection, dear hypocrite. Did you ever learn proper sentence structure? "Stop talking as if trumps above the law and can do whatever he wants because thats literally why America is in this mess." This is called a run-on sentence, dear simpleton, not to mention poor spelling. "We have a lawless president with a lawless administration." No we have a lawless congress who is trying to make going to the Court a crime. " Also you cant just claim executive privilege over anything and everything like trump is, doesn’t work like that." Another lie. He's claimed privilege over his conversations with his executive administration, as is the law. " Also trump saying that phone call was about corruption is laughable because not once does he ever mention the words corruption." Not one time did a single witness mention bribery, except in regards to Joe Biden, yet Schiff is claiming bribery occured. Where's the evidence? "Also Instead of talking about corruption in ukraine in general he made it a point to talk about joe biden and his son and burisma." No, dear liar, Zelensky brought up Burisma and Joe and Hunter Biden. Trump brought up Crowd Strike. If you have to lie to win the argument, then you're incapable of winning. "As if thats the only corrupt company in ukraine. " It's the only one that paid the cokehead son of the VP $83,000 a month for influence in his father's office. "You cannot defend the indefensible yet republicans continue to try😂😂😂 " I'm not a republican, dear hypocrite, and I just destroyed your lies. I don't vote for presidents. I'm a conscientious objector, an anarchist. A president is nothing more than a slave owner. All you're doing is choosing your new master every 4 years. I prefer actual freedom.
    2
  2529. Mayan Ruins Mayan Ruins 13 minutes ago "Nikkisheers telling your staff to defy lawful subpoenas is obstruction of justice and any private citizen who decided to not comply with a subpoena would swiftly be arrested." No dear ignorant and inept. that's completely untrue. It's only a crime when the disagreement has been taken to court. Only a judge can demand that Trump forgo executive privilege. The following is an overview of congressional requests for executive branch information and executive privilege assertions in response; it does not cover, for example, requests by Special Counsel Robert Mueller, the law and dynamics of which are quite different. Lawfare has published a number of articles that address the issue of executive privilege generally. In June of 2017, John Bies offered a primer on the subject. David Kris has written about disclosures to Congress in the context of the special counsel investigation. My colleague Susan Hennessey discussed the nature of congressional investigative authority as well as investigative tools and their enforcement. In addition, the National Constitution Center offers a concise history of presidents’ use of executive privilege. Finally, Mark Rozell’s book entitled, “Executive Privilege” offers a deep dive that is nonetheless easy to read. In the landmark case of United States v. Nixon, the Supreme Court ruled that it had authority to resolve the conflict between President Richard Nixon and Special Prosecutor Archibald Cox, who had been appointed to investigate the Watergate affair, over the issue of executive privilege. Cox had obtained a grand jury subpoena requiring Nixon to deliver to the district court tape recordings of various meetings with assistants. The Supreme Court acknowledged, for the first time, that an executive privilege exists under the Constitution, but it qualified the scope of the privilege by subjecting it to a balancing of the competing interests and legitimate needs of the executive and judicial branches. Courts have applied this general approach in the context of enforcement of congressional subpoenas as well, but there haven’t been very many such decisions—and the ones that do exist are narrowly drawn to the particular facts of the cases at hand. In addition, as articulated in United States v. AT&T, courts will only decide such a case if the executive and legislative branches have tried, in good faith, but failed to reach an accommodation. "Got another defense?" I don't need one. I'm telling the truth. You're lying. "I’ll shred that one too dumb fuck." This is called projection, dear hypocrite. Did you ever learn proper sentence structure? "Stop talking as if trumps above the law and can do whatever he wants because thats literally why America is in this mess." This is called a run-on sentence, dear simpleton, not to mention poor spelling. "We have a lawless president with a lawless administration." No we have a lawless congress who is trying to make going to the Court a crime. " Also you cant just claim executive privilege over anything and everything like trump is, doesn’t work like that." Another lie. He's claimed privilege over his conversations with his executive administration, as is the law. " Also trump saying that phone call was about corruption is laughable because not once does he ever mention the words corruption." Not one time did a single witness mention bribery, except in regards to Joe Biden, yet Schiff is claiming bribery occured. Where's the evidence? "Also Instead of talking about corruption in ukraine in general he made it a point to talk about joe biden and his son and burisma." No, dear liar, Zelensky brought up Burisma and Joe and Hunter Biden. Trump brought up Crowd Strike. If you have to lie to win the argument, then you're incapable of winning. "As if thats the only corrupt company in ukraine. " It's the only one that paid the cokehead son of the VP $83,000 a month for influence in his father's office. "You cannot defend the indefensible yet republicans continue to try😂😂😂 " I'm not a republican, dear hypocrite, and I just destroyed your lies. I don't vote for presidents. I'm a conscientious objector, an anarchist. A president is nothing more than a slave owner. All you're doing is choosing your new master every 4 years. I prefer actual freedom.
    2
  2530. Mayan Ruins 10 minutes ago "Nikkisheers so a congressional subpoena holds less weight in your eyes than some random judge?" Do you know how government works, dear imbecile? Three branches of equal power. When the president and congress disagree, a judge determines the outcome. That's our system, dear dumbass. " Wtf do you think a congressional subpoena is?" I've already defined this for you. See previous comment. "Are you stupid or what, the president isn’t above the law so no he cant just tell people to defy lawful subpoenas." My IQ is 149. Technically, I'm a genius, dear dolt. Don't you think it would behoove you to use proper sentence structure, spelling, and punctuation, if you're going to call others stupid? Again, more projection and hypocrisy from you. " Thats called obstruction of justice." Only if Trump defies a judge's order, not congress. " Innocent people dont obstruct justice at every turn and refuse to sit under oath and refuse to provide proper documentation and refuse to cooperate in any way shape or form. " More nonsensical run-on sentences from you. Trump hasn't obstructed anything. Nothing. Innocent people often refuse to talk to authorities, as is their right. "Trumps obviously guilty and his behavior and his tweets make that blatantly obvious." You're obviously in high school, because you have the literacy of a 12 year old. You're stating an opinion, dear hypocrite. You have zero facts, just hatred for trump. Hatred isn't worthy of impeachment. Name the crime.It's not obstruction, quid pro quo, bribery, or extortion.
    2
  2531. Mayan Ruins 8 minutes ago "Nikkisheers wtf are u talking about? " What are you talking about, dear hypocrite? You're wasting your time. Trump's already won re-election. "Their have only ever been what 2 or 3 presidents impeached and no the next president wont be impeached unless he or she does something that warrants impeachment." Another run-on sentence. Also, it's "there", not "their". Impeachment happened 3 times in the first 200 years of our natio, twice with Presidents, one with a judge. Nixon was impeached, 20 years later, Bill was impeached, 30 years later temp is impeached. And there is proof that Democrats have tried to impeach every single republican since Nixon. "Your grasping at straws and using fear tactics to scare people about impeachment. " This is more projection and hypocrisy from you. "Your" shows possession. "You're" is the contraction you are. Facts are in my side, dear. All you have is your self righteous opinion. If it weren't for projection and hypocrisy you'd have nothing to say. You should be scared, dear, Nancy and Schiff are committing political suicide. "If we allow trump to get away with what hes done then i guess the next president can be a full blown dictator right cuz thats what your saying." You'r so amazingly impaired and delusional. Obama signed more executive orders than any other president. That's a dictator. The truth is you don't care about dictators, as long as they agree with your opinion. "Republicans are trying to tell us that a president is above the law and can do whatever he or she wants which is not true. " Once again, not everyone who thinks you're an idiot is a republican. I don't vote for slave owners, dear hypocrite. No one said Trump was above the law. We simply asked: Exactly what law did he break. Name the crime, dear hypocrite.
    2
  2532. 2
  2533. 2
  2534. 2
  2535. 2
  2536. 2
  2537. 2
  2538. 2
  2539. 2
  2540. 2
  2541. 2
  2542. 2
  2543. 2
  2544. 2
  2545. 2
  2546. 2
  2547. 2
  2548. 2
  2549. 2
  2550. 2
  2551. 2
  2552. 2
  2553. 2
  2554. 2
  2555. 2
  2556. 2
  2557. 2
  2558. 2
  2559. 2
  2560. 2
  2561. 2
  2562. 2
  2563. 2
  2564. 2
  2565. 2
  2566. 2
  2567. 2
  2568. 2
  2569. 2
  2570. 2
  2571. 2
  2572. 2
  2573. 2
  2574. 2
  2575. 2
  2576. 2
  2577. 2
  2578. 2
  2579. 2
  2580. 2
  2581. 2
  2582. 2
  2583. 2
  2584. 2
  2585. 2
  2586. 2
  2587. 2
  2588. 2
  2589. 2
  2590. 2
  2591. 2
  2592. 2
  2593. 2
  2594. 2
  2595. 2
  2596. 2
  2597. 2
  2598. 2
  2599. 2
  2600. 2
  2601. 2
  2602. 2
  2603. 2
  2604. 2
  2605. 2
  2606. 2
  2607. 2
  2608. 2
  2609. 2
  2610. 2
  2611. 2
  2612. 2
  2613. 2
  2614. 2
  2615. 2
  2616. 2
  2617. 2
  2618. 2
  2619. 2
  2620. 2
  2621. 2
  2622. 2
  2623. 2
  2624. 2
  2625.  @richardwebb2348  , how very sad it must be to be the person who tries so desperately in vain to steal faith from others. Also terribly heartbreaking for you to be that insecure in your own beliefs that you feel the need to criticise anyone who believes differently. I feel so sorry for you. You are the definition of a tragedy. It must be miserable to be as feckless, and as cowardly as you are. As a Christian, I would never wish death on anyone, and neither does God. If you knew anything about God, you'd know that disease isn't His gift or punishment to us. It's the result of " the fall". God originally made man to be immortal. Man decided he knew better than God what was good for him. We chose to live in a world of disease and violence. Rush would never blame God for his illness, but he would always credit God for any healing. Rush will be healed, if that's God's will. There's no way on Earth that you have the slightest clue as to what God's will is, dear ignorant yet arrogant. God doesn't give us diseases, dear faithless. God gives us eternal life. Praying for you. May The Holy Spirit convict you, and may you abandon your ignorant arrogance in favor of the humility of a child of God. He loves you. It's not too late to let Him in. By the way, if any man deserves God's grace and mercy, it's Rush. He is none of the ridiculous things you espoused. You've clearly never listened to a single word he's said, dear lying hypocrite. You're simply repeating your moral and intellectual superiors on TV in the drive-by media. This doesn't make you informed. It makes you a parrot.😉
    2
  2626. 2
  2627. 2
  2628. 2
  2629. 2
  2630. 2
  2631. 2
  2632. 2
  2633. 2
  2634. 2
  2635.  @jacquelinemilton5933  , no, she can't hold the articles for a year. And why would she? I thought this was a matter of national security? How does Nancy sitting on her hands help your "emergency" scenario? It can't be that urgent if she doesn't want a trial. She gets one Congressional cycle to bring articles to the Senate. If she doesn't, the articles die and can't be brought back up. Mitch can dismiss the case. He could actually dismiss it now. He only has to call a vote. He won't, though. When Bill Clinton was impeached, the articles were passed to the Senate on the same day. With Trump, House Democrats refused to go to court for witnesses, saying there wasn't time, because "our national security was at risk". If they need more witnesses, it's because their case is weak. They have no grounds to demand new witnesses in the Senate, when they effectively cut out the third branch of government by refusing to go to court. The case is investigated solely by the House. If they wanted these witnesses to testify, they should have gone to court, and gotten the ruling of a judge. The case is tried solely by the Senate. Democrats get no authority in the republican Senate. Much like Republicans had no authority in the Democrat House. These same Democrats demanding new witnesses, denied new witnesses to Republicans during Clinton's impeachment. I think Nancy is saving Trump from impeachment, and saving her own party from ruin. Historically, the party that brings up impeachment loses the election.
    2
  2636. 2
  2637. 2
  2638. 2
  2639. 2
  2640. 2
  2641. 2
  2642. 2
  2643. 2
  2644. 2
  2645. 2
  2646. 2
  2647. 2
  2648. 2
  2649. 2
  2650. 2
  2651. 2
  2652. 2
  2653. 2
  2654. 2
  2655. 2
  2656. 2
  2657. 2
  2658. 2
  2659. 2
  2660. 2
  2661. 2
  2662. 2
  2663. 2
  2664. 2
  2665. 2
  2666. 2
  2667. 2
  2668. 2
  2669. 2
  2670. 1
  2671. 1
  2672. 1
  2673. 1
  2674. 1
  2675. 1
  2676. 1
  2677. 1
  2678. 1
  2679. 1
  2680. 1
  2681. 1
  2682. 1
  2683. 1
  2684. 1
  2685. 1
  2686. 1
  2687. 1
  2688. 1
  2689. 1
  2690. 1
  2691. 1
  2692. 1
  2693. 1
  2694. 1
  2695. 1
  2696. 1
  2697. 1
  2698. 1
  2699. 1
  2700. 1
  2701. 1
  2702. 1
  2703. 1
  2704. 1
  2705. 1
  2706. 1
  2707. 1
  2708. 1
  2709. 1
  2710. 1
  2711. 1
  2712. 1
  2713. 1
  2714. 1
  2715. 1
  2716. 1
  2717. 1
  2718. 1
  2719. 1
  2720. 1
  2721. 1
  2722. 1
  2723. 1
  2724. 1
  2725. 1
  2726. 1
  2727. 1
  2728. 1
  2729. 1
  2730. 1
  2731. 1
  2732. 1
  2733. 1
  2734. 1
  2735. 1
  2736. 1
  2737. 1
  2738. 1
  2739. 1
  2740. 1
  2741. 1
  2742. 1
  2743. 1
  2744. 1
  2745. 1
  2746. 1
  2747. 1
  2748. 1
  2749. 1
  2750. 1
  2751. 1
  2752. 1
  2753. 1
  2754. 1
  2755. 1
  2756. 1
  2757. 1
  2758. 1
  2759. 1
  2760. 1
  2761. 1
  2762. 1
  2763. 1
  2764. 1
  2765. 1
  2766. 1
  2767. 1
  2768. 1
  2769. 1
  2770. 1
  2771. 1
  2772. 1
  2773. 1
  2774. 1
  2775. 1
  2776. 1
  2777. 1
  2778. 1
  2779. 1
  2780. 1
  2781. 1
  2782. 1
  2783. 1
  2784. 1
  2785. 1
  2786. 1
  2787. 1
  2788. 1
  2789. 1
  2790. 1
  2791. 1
  2792. 1
  2793. 1
  2794. 1
  2795. 1
  2796. 1
  2797. 1
  2798. 1
  2799. 1
  2800. 1
  2801. 1
  2802. 1
  2803. 1
  2804. 1
  2805. 1
  2806. 1
  2807. 1
  2808. 1
  2809. 1
  2810. 1
  2811. 1
  2812. 1
  2813. 1
  2814. 1
  2815. 1
  2816. 1
  2817. 1
  2818. 1
  2819. 1
  2820. 1
  2821. 1
  2822. 1
  2823. 1
  2824. 1
  2825. 1
  2826. 1
  2827. 1
  2828. 1
  2829. 1
  2830. 1
  2831. 1
  2832. 1
  2833. 1
  2834. 1
  2835. 1
  2836. 1
  2837. 1
  2838. 1
  2839. 1
  2840. 1
  2841. 1
  2842. 1
  2843. 1
  2844. 1
  2845. 1
  2846. 1
  2847. 1
  2848. 1
  2849. 1
  2850. 1
  2851. 1
  2852. 1
  2853. 1
  2854. 1
  2855. 1
  2856. 1
  2857. 1
  2858. 1
  2859. 1
  2860. 1
  2861. 1
  2862. 1
  2863. 1
  2864. 1
  2865. 1
  2866. 1
  2867. 1
  2868. 1
  2869. 1
  2870. 1
  2871. 1
  2872. 1
  2873. 1
  2874. 1
  2875. 1
  2876. 1
  2877. 1
  2878. 1
  2879. 1
  2880. 1
  2881. 1
  2882. 1
  2883. 1
  2884. 1
  2885. 1
  2886. 1
  2887. 1
  2888. 1
  2889. 1
  2890. 1
  2891. 1
  2892. 1
  2893. 1
  2894. 1
  2895. 1
  2896. 1
  2897. 1
  2898. 1
  2899. 1
  2900. 1
  2901. 1
  2902. 1
  2903. 1
  2904. 1
  2905. 1
  2906. 1
  2907. 1
  2908. 1
  2909. 1
  2910. 1
  2911. 1
  2912. 1
  2913. 1
  2914. 1
  2915. 1
  2916. 1
  2917. 1
  2918. 1
  2919. 1
  2920. 1
  2921. 1
  2922. 1
  2923. 1
  2924. 1
  2925. 1
  2926. 1
  2927. 1
  2928. 1
  2929. 1
  2930. 1
  2931. 1
  2932. 1
  2933. 1
  2934. 1
  2935. 1
  2936. 1
  2937. 1
  2938. 1
  2939. 1
  2940. 1
  2941. 1
  2942. 1
  2943. 1
  2944. 1
  2945. 1
  2946. 1
  2947. 1
  2948. 1
  2949. 1
  2950. 1
  2951. 1
  2952. 1
  2953. 1
  2954. 1
  2955. 1
  2956. 1
  2957. 1
  2958. 1
  2959. 1
  2960. 1
  2961. 1
  2962. 1
  2963. 1
  2964. 1
  2965. 1
  2966. 1
  2967. 1
  2968. 1
  2969. 1
  2970. 1
  2971. 1
  2972. 1
  2973. 1
  2974. 1
  2975. 1
  2976. 1
  2977. 1
  2978. 1
  2979. 1
  2980. 1
  2981. 1
  2982. 1
  2983. 1
  2984. 1
  2985.  @gillianpersaid7794  , I didn't say blacks wear Blackface, liar. I said, I'm in Blackface, cause my face is black. It's a play on words, dearest dolt. You don't get to tell me what I mean, racist bigot. I wonder if you've ever seen this quote from Malcolm X. He said white liberals are the worst thing to happen to black people. I have to agree. "The white liberal is the worst enemy to America, and the worst enemy to the black man. Let me explain what I mean by the white liberal. In America there is no such thing as Democrat or Republican anymore. In America you have liberals and conservatives. The only people living in the past who think in terms of I’m a Democrat or Republican, is the American Negro. He’s the one that runs around bragging about party affiliation. He’s the one that sticks to the Democrat or sticks to the Republican. But white people are divided into two groups, liberals and conservative. The Democrats who are conservative, vote with the Republicans who are conservative. The Democrats who are liberal vote with the Republicans that are liberal. The white liberal aren’t white people who are for independence, who are moral and ethical in their thinking. They are just a faction of white people that are jockeying for power. The same as the white conservative is a faction of white people that are jockeying for power. They are fighting each other for power and prestige, and the one that is the football in the game is the Negro, 20 million black people. A political football, a political pawn, an economic football, and economic pawn. A social football, a social pawn. The liberal elements of whites are those who have perfected the art of selling themselves to the Negro as a friend of the Negro. Getting sympathy of the Negro, getting the allegiance of the Negro, and getting the mind of the Negro. Then the Negro sides with the white liberal, and the white liberal use the Negro against the white conservative. So that anything that the Negro does is never for his own good, never for his own advancement, never for his own progress, he’s only a pawn in the hands of the white liberal. The worst enemy that the Negro have is this white man that runs around here drooling at the mouth professing to love Negros, and calling himself a liberal, and it is following these white liberals that has perpetuated problems that Negros have. If the Negro wasn’t taken, tricked, or deceived by the white liberal then Negros would get together and solve our own problems. I only cite these things to show you that in America the history of the white liberal has been nothing but a series of trickery designed to make Negros think that the white liberal was going to solve our problems. Our problems will never be solved by the white man. The only way that our problem will be solved is when the black man wakes up, clean himself up, stand on his own feet and stop begging the white man, and take immediate steps to do for ourselves the things that we have been waiting on the white man to do for us. Once we do for self then we will be able to solve our own problems"
    1
  2986. 1
  2987. 1
  2988. 1
  2989. 1
  2990. 1
  2991. 1
  2992. 1
  2993. 1
  2994. 1
  2995. 1
  2996. 1
  2997. 1
  2998. 1
  2999. 1
  3000. 1
  3001. 1
  3002. 1
  3003. 1
  3004. 1
  3005. 1
  3006. 1
  3007. 1
  3008. 1
  3009. 1
  3010. 1
  3011. 1
  3012. 1
  3013. 1
  3014. 1
  3015. 1
  3016. 1
  3017. 1
  3018. 1
  3019. 1
  3020. 1
  3021. 1
  3022. 1
  3023. 1
  3024. 1
  3025. 1
  3026. 1
  3027. 1
  3028. 1
  3029. 1
  3030. 1
  3031. 1
  3032. 1
  3033. 1
  3034. 1
  3035. 1
  3036. 1
  3037. 1
  3038. 1
  3039. 1
  3040. 1
  3041. 1
  3042. 1
  3043. 1
  3044. 1
  3045. 1
  3046. 1
  3047. 1
  3048. 1
  3049. 1
  3050. 1
  3051. 1
  3052. 1
  3053. 1
  3054. 1
  3055. 1
  3056. 1
  3057. 1
  3058. 1
  3059. 1
  3060. 1
  3061. 1
  3062. 1
  3063. 1
  3064. 1
  3065. 1
  3066. 1
  3067. 1
  3068. 1
  3069. 1
  3070. 1
  3071. 1
  3072. 1
  3073. 1
  3074. 1
  3075. 1
  3076. 1
  3077. 1
  3078. 1
  3079. 1
  3080. 1
  3081. 1
  3082. 1
  3083. 1
  3084. 1
  3085. 1
  3086. 1
  3087. 1
  3088. 1
  3089. 1
  3090. 1
  3091. 1
  3092. 1
  3093. 1
  3094. 1
  3095. 1
  3096. 1
  3097. 1
  3098. 1
  3099. 1
  3100. 1
  3101. 1
  3102. 1
  3103. 1
  3104. 1
  3105. 1
  3106. 1
  3107. 1
  3108. 1
  3109. 1
  3110. 1
  3111. 1
  3112. 1
  3113. 1
  3114. 1
  3115. 1
  3116. 1
  3117. 1
  3118. 1
  3119. 1
  3120. 1
  3121. 1
  3122. 1
  3123. 1
  3124. 1
  3125. 1
  3126. 1
  3127. 1
  3128. 1
  3129. 1
  3130. 1
  3131. 1
  3132. 1
  3133. 1
  3134. 1
  3135. 1
  3136. 1
  3137. 1
  3138. 1
  3139. 1
  3140. 1
  3141. 1
  3142. 1
  3143. 1
  3144. 1
  3145. 1
  3146. 1
  3147. 1
  3148. 1
  3149. 1
  3150. 1
  3151. 1
  3152. 1
  3153. 1
  3154. 1
  3155. 1
  3156. 1
  3157. 1
  3158. 1
  3159. 1
  3160. 1
  3161. 1
  3162. 1
  3163. 1
  3164. 1
  3165. 1
  3166. 1
  3167. 1
  3168. 1
  3169. 1
  3170. 1
  3171. 1
  3172. 1
  3173. 1
  3174. 1
  3175. 1
  3176. 1
  3177. 1
  3178. 1
  3179. 1
  3180. 1
  3181. 1
  3182. 1
  3183. 1
  3184. 1
  3185. 1
  3186. 1
  3187. 1
  3188. 1
  3189. 1
  3190. 1
  3191. 1
  3192. 1
  3193. 1
  3194. 1
  3195. 1
  3196. 1
  3197. 1
  3198. 1
  3199. 1
  3200. 1
  3201. 1
  3202. 1
  3203. 1
  3204. 1
  3205. 1
  3206. 1
  3207. 1
  3208. 1
  3209. 1
  3210. 1
  3211. 1
  3212. 1
  3213. 1
  3214. 1
  3215. 1
  3216. 1
  3217. 1
  3218. 1
  3219. 1
  3220. 1
  3221. 1
  3222. 1
  3223. 1
  3224. 1
  3225. 1
  3226. 1
  3227. 1
  3228. 1
  3229. 1
  3230. 1
  3231. 1
  3232. 1
  3233. 1
  3234. 1
  3235. 1
  3236. 1
  3237. 1
  3238. 1
  3239. 1
  3240. 1
  3241. 1
  3242. 1
  3243. 1
  3244. 1
  3245. 1
  3246. 1
  3247. 1
  3248. 1
  3249. 1
  3250. 1
  3251. 1
  3252. 1
  3253. 1
  3254. 1
  3255. 1
  3256. 1
  3257. 1
  3258. 1
  3259. 1
  3260. 1
  3261. 1
  3262. 1
  3263. 1
  3264. 1
  3265. 1
  3266. 1
  3267. 1
  3268. 1
  3269. 1
  3270. 1
  3271. 1
  3272.  @mothersgauri4137  , "trolling the comments section"? How can I troll my own comment? You felt the need to berate me by calling me a troll for expressing actual facts. All you have is feelings. Facts don't care about your feelings, dear. I clearly know more than you. I saw the entire hearing, and read EVERYTHING from every source on this topic. I didn't turn to CNN and never leave that channel, as you did. Ford lied. She said she had a second door installed in her house, because she's afraid of confined space. Lie. The second door is to the rental property attached to her house. She said she is afraid to fly. She flew over 500 times last year. Her ex boyfriend presented evidence that she took his credit card and spent more than $600 dollars without his knowledge or permission, after they broke up. He also said they flew in prop planes, several times. Ramirez doesn't remember who exposed himself to her. She never said it was Brett. No evidence. No corroboration. Julie Sweatnik lied and said she saw him standing near a punch bowl, possibly he spiked it, but she doesn't know. She also mentioned gang rapes that she never witnessed, but heard about, maybe. This story: there isn't even a victim. Some third party said they saw him expose himself and get pushed into a girl. The girl says she can't remember any such thing ever happening. Furthermore, if he was "pushed", that makes Brett a victim. Still can't admit your a liberal lunatic?! That's ok, everyone already knows. "I hope you are at least interested in doing something positive for your country and other people with your time other than this foolishness." Can you say "hypocrite"? You keep proving me right with every comment you write. Just for your 411, I'm a labor and delivery nurse. I bring life into the world. What's your job, besides being a liberal dumbass? Prostitution, perhaps? You're the one who needs to feel self important by "trolling" YouTube. Get a job, prostitute. And get an STD test. I can smell your disease from here. Dear lying hypocrite, what you don't know about this case we could just about fit into the grand canyon. Try again, useless liberal. You're drowning in hypocrisy, and becoming an expert at losing the argument.😂😂😂😂
    1
  3273. 1
  3274. 1
  3275. 1
  3276. 1
  3277. 1
  3278. 1
  3279. 1
  3280. 1
  3281. 1
  3282. 1
  3283. 1
  3284. 1
  3285. 1
  3286. 1
  3287. 1
  3288. 1
  3289. 1
  3290. 1
  3291. 1
  3292. 1
  3293. 1
  3294. 1
  3295. 1
  3296. 1
  3297. 1
  3298. 1
  3299. 1
  3300. 1
  3301. 1
  3302. 1
  3303. 1
  3304. 1
  3305. 1
  3306. 1
  3307. 1
  3308. 1
  3309. 1
  3310. 1
  3311. 1
  3312. 1
  3313. 1
  3314. 1
  3315. 1
  3316. 1
  3317. 1
  3318. 1
  3319. 1
  3320. 1
  3321. 1
  3322. 1
  3323. 1
  3324. 1
  3325. 1
  3326. 1
  3327. 1
  3328. 1
  3329. 1
  3330. 1
  3331. 1
  3332. 1
  3333. 1
  3334. 1
  3335. 1
  3336. 1
  3337. 1
  3338. 1
  3339. 1
  3340. 1
  3341. 1
  3342. 1
  3343. 1
  3344. 1
  3345. 1
  3346. 1
  3347. 1
  3348. 1
  3349. 1
  3350. 1
  3351. 1
  3352. 1
  3353. 1
  3354. 1
  3355. 1
  3356. 1
  3357. 1
  3358. 1
  3359. 1
  3360. 1
  3361. 1
  3362. 1
  3363. 1
  3364. 1
  3365. 1
  3366. 1
  3367. 1
  3368. 1
  3369. 1
  3370. 1
  3371. 1
  3372. 1
  3373. 1
  3374. 1
  3375. 1
  3376. 1
  3377. 1
  3378. 1
  3379. 1
  3380. 1
  3381. 1
  3382. 1
  3383. 1
  3384. 1
  3385. 1
  3386. 1
  3387. 1
  3388. 1
  3389. 1
  3390. 1
  3391. 1
  3392. 1
  3393. 1
  3394. 1
  3395. 1
  3396. 1
  3397. 1
  3398. 1
  3399. 1
  3400. 1
  3401. 1
  3402. 1
  3403. 1
  3404. 1
  3405. 1
  3406. 1
  3407. 1
  3408. 1
  3409. 1
  3410. 1
  3411. 1
  3412. 1
  3413.  @douglasjcox  , Hundreds of pages of never-released memos and documents - many from inside the American team helping Burisma to stave off its legal troubles - conflict with Biden's narrative. And they raise the troubling prospect that U.S. officials may have painted a false picture in Ukraine that helped ease Burisma's legal troubles and stop prosecutors' plans to interview Hunter Biden during the 2016 U.S. presidential election. For instance, Burisma's American legal representatives met with Ukrainian officials just days after Biden forced the firing of the country's chief prosecutor and offered "an apology for dissemination of false information by U.S. representatives and public figures" about the Ukrainian prosecutors, according to the Ukrainian government's official memo of the meeting. The effort to secure that meeting began the same day the prosecutor's firing was announced. In addition, Burisma's American team offered to introduce Ukrainian prosecutors to Obama administration officials to make amends, according to that memo and the American legal team's internal emails. The memos raise troubling questions: 1.)   If the Ukraine prosecutor's firing involved only his alleged corruption and ineptitude, why did Burisma's American legal team refer to those allegations as "false information?" 2.)   If the firing had nothing to do with the Burisma case, as Biden has adamantly claimed, why would Burisma's American lawyers contact the replacement prosecutor within hours of the termination and urgently seek a meeting in Ukraine to discuss the case? Ukrainian prosecutors say they have tried to get this information to the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) since the summer of 2018, fearing it might be evidence of possible violations of U.S. ethics laws. First, they hired a former federal prosecutor to bring the information to the U.S. attorney in New York, who, they say, showed no interest. Then, the Ukrainians reached out to President Trump's personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani. Ukraine's new president, Volodymyr Zelensky, told Trump in July that he plans to launch his own wide-ranging investigation into what happened with the Bidens and Burisma. "I'm knowledgeable about the situation," Zelensky told Trump, asking the American president to forward any evidence he might know about. "The issue of the investigation of the case is actually the issue of making sure to restore the honesty so we will take care of that and will work on the investigation of the case." https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/463307-solomon-these-once-secret-memos-cast-doubt-on-joe-bidens-ukraine-story%3Famp&ved=2ahUKEwiqrvWV6oflAhUP2FkKHSmgDAoQFjAAegQIBBAB&usg=AOvVaw0oX1OSvwWdoTvtphH0Cy0D&cf=1
    1
  3414. 1
  3415. 1
  3416. 1
  3417. 1
  3418. 1
  3419. 1
  3420. 1
  3421. 1
  3422. 1
  3423. 1
  3424. 1
  3425. 1
  3426. 1
  3427. 1
  3428. 1
  3429. 1
  3430. 1
  3431. 1
  3432. 1
  3433. 1
  3434. 1
  3435. 1
  3436. 1
  3437. 1
  3438. 1
  3439. 1
  3440. 1
  3441. 1
  3442. 1
  3443. 1
  3444. 1
  3445. 1
  3446. 1
  3447. 1
  3448. 1
  3449. 1
  3450. 1
  3451. 1
  3452. 1
  3453. 1
  3454. 1
  3455. 1
  3456. 1
  3457. 1
  3458. 1
  3459. 1
  3460. 1
  3461. 1
  3462. 1
  3463. 1
  3464. 1
  3465. 1
  3466. 1
  3467. 1
  3468. 1
  3469. 1
  3470. 1
  3471. 1
  3472. 1
  3473. 1
  3474. 1
  3475. 1
  3476. 1
  3477. 1
  3478. 1
  3479. 1
  3480. 1
  3481. 1
  3482. 1
  3483. 1
  3484. 1
  3485. 1
  3486. 1
  3487. 1
  3488. 1
  3489. 1
  3490. 1
  3491. 1
  3492. 1
  3493. 1
  3494. 1
  3495. 1
  3496. 1
  3497. 1
  3498. 1
  3499. 1
  3500. 1
  3501. 1
  3502. 1
  3503. 1
  3504. 1
  3505. 1
  3506. 1
  3507. 1
  3508. 1
  3509. 1
  3510. 1
  3511. 1
  3512. 1
  3513. 1
  3514. 1
  3515. 1
  3516. 1
  3517. 1
  3518. 1
  3519. 1
  3520. 1
  3521. 1
  3522. 1
  3523. 1
  3524. 1
  3525. 1
  3526. 1
  3527. 1
  3528. 1
  3529. 1
  3530. 1
  3531. 1
  3532. 1
  3533. 1
  3534. 1
  3535. 1
  3536. 1
  3537. 1
  3538. 1
  3539. 1
  3540. 1
  3541. 1
  3542. 1
  3543. 1
  3544. 1
  3545. 1
  3546. 1
  3547. 1
  3548. 1
  3549. 1
  3550. 1
  3551. 1
  3552. 1
  3553. 1
  3554. 1
  3555. 1
  3556. 1
  3557. 1
  3558. 1
  3559. 1
  3560. 1
  3561. 1
  3562. 1
  3563. 1
  3564. 1
  3565. 1
  3566. 1
  3567. 1
  3568. 1
  3569. 1
  3570. 1
  3571. 1
  3572. 1
  3573. 1
  3574. 1
  3575. 1
  3576. 1
  3577. 1
  3578. 1
  3579. 1
  3580. 1
  3581. 1
  3582. 1
  3583. 1
  3584. 1
  3585. 1
  3586. 1
  3587. 1
  3588. 1
  3589. 1
  3590. 1
  3591. 1
  3592. 1
  3593. 1
  3594. 1
  3595. 1
  3596. 1
  3597. 1
  3598. 1
  3599. 1
  3600. 1
  3601. 1
  3602. 1
  3603. 1
  3604. 1
  3605. 1
  3606. 1
  3607. 1
  3608. 1
  3609. 1
  3610. 1
  3611. 1
  3612. 1
  3613. 1
  3614. 1
  3615. 1
  3616. 1
  3617. 1
  3618. 1
  3619. 1
  3620. 1
  3621. 1
  3622. 1
  3623. 1
  3624. 1
  3625. 1
  3626. 1
  3627. 1
  3628. 1
  3629. 1
  3630. 1
  3631. 1
  3632. 1
  3633. 1
  3634. 1
  3635. 1
  3636. 1
  3637. 1
  3638. 1
  3639. 1
  3640. 1
  3641. 1
  3642. 1
  3643. 1
  3644. 1
  3645. 1
  3646. 1
  3647. 1
  3648. 1
  3649. 1
  3650. 1
  3651. 1
  3652. 1
  3653. 1
  3654. 1
  3655. 1
  3656. 1
  3657. 1
  3658. 1
  3659. 1
  3660. 1
  3661. 1
  3662. 1
  3663. 1
  3664. 1
  3665. 1
  3666. 1
  3667. 1
  3668. 1
  3669. 1
  3670. 1
  3671. 1
  3672. 1
  3673. 1
  3674. 1
  3675. 1
  3676. 1
  3677. 1
  3678. 1
  3679. 1
  3680. 1
  3681. 1
  3682. 1
  3683. 1
  3684. 1
  3685. 1
  3686. 1
  3687. 1
  3688. 1
  3689. 1
  3690. 1
  3691. 1
  3692. 1
  3693. 1
  3694. 1
  3695. 1
  3696. 1
  3697. 1
  3698. 1
  3699. 1
  3700. 1
  3701. 1
  3702. 1
  3703. 1
  3704. 1
  3705. 1
  3706. 1
  3707. 1
  3708. 1
  3709. 1
  3710. 1
  3711. 1
  3712. 1
  3713. 1
  3714. 1
  3715. 1
  3716. 1
  3717. 1
  3718. 1
  3719. 1
  3720. 1
  3721. 1
  3722. 1
  3723. 1
  3724. 1
  3725. 1
  3726. 1
  3727. 1
  3728. 1
  3729. 1
  3730. 1
  3731. 1
  3732. 1
  3733. 1
  3734. 1
  3735. 1
  3736. 1
  3737. 1
  3738. 1
  3739. 1
  3740. 1
  3741. 1
  3742. 1
  3743. 1
  3744. 1
  3745. 1
  3746. 1
  3747. 1
  3748. 1
  3749. 1
  3750. 1
  3751. 1
  3752. 1
  3753. 1
  3754. 1
  3755. 1
  3756. 1
  3757. 1
  3758. 1
  3759. 1
  3760. 1
  3761. 1
  3762. 1
  3763. 1
  3764. 1
  3765. 1
  3766. 1
  3767. 1
  3768. 1
  3769.  @bettythomas8660  , I wonder if you ever read this quote from Malcolm X, famed civil rights activist. He calls white liberals the worst enemy of the black man. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/8869214-the-white-liberal-is-the-worst-enemy-to-america-and&ved=2ahUKEwir16nHvaHmAhUNpFkKHZu7B_EQFjAAegQIBhAB&usg=AOvVaw3OpsKR-mkEavd2Sy4TcMH7 The white liberal is the worst enemy to America, and the worst enemy to the black man. Let me explain what I mean by the white liberal. In America there is no such thing as Democrat or Republican anymore. In America you have liberals and conservatives. The only people living in the past who think in terms of I’m a Democrat or Republican, is the American Negro. He’s the one that runs around bragging about party affiliation. He’s the one that sticks to the Democrat or sticks to the Republican. But white people are divided into two groups, liberals and conservative. The Democrats who are conservative, vote with the Republicans who are conservative. The Democrats who are liberal vote with the Republicans that are liberal. The white liberal aren’t white people who are for independence, who are moral and ethical in their thinking. They are just a faction of white people that are jockeying for power. The same as the white conservative is a faction of white people that are jockeying for power. They are fighting each other for power and prestige, and the one that is the football in the game is the Negro, 20 million black people. A political football, a political pawn, an economic football, and economic pawn. A social football, a social pawn. The liberal elements of whites are those who have perfected the art of selling themselves to the Negro as a friend of the Negro. Getting sympathy of the Negro, getting the allegiance of the Negro, and getting the mind of the Negro. Then the Negro sides with the white liberal, and the white liberal use the Negro against the white conservative. So that anything that the Negro does is never for his own good, never for his own advancement, never for his own progress, he’s only a pawn in the hands of the white liberal. The worst enemy that the Negro have is this white man that runs around here drooling at the mouth professing to love Negros, and calling himself a liberal, and it is following these white liberals that has perpetuated problems that Negros have. If the Negro wasn’t taken, tricked, or deceived by the white liberal then Negros would get together and solve our own problems. I only cite these things to show you that in America the history of the white liberal has been nothing but a series of trickery designed to make Negros think that the white liberal was going to solve our problems. Our problems will never be solved by the white man. The only way that our problem will be solved is when the black man wakes up, clean himself up, stand on his own feet and stop begging the white man, and take immediate steps to do for ourselves the things that we have been waiting on the white man to do for us. Once we do for self then we will be able to solve our own problems’ "The white conservatives aren't friends of the Negro either, but they at least don't try to hide it. They are like wolves; they show their teeth in a snarl that keeps the Negro always aware of where he stands with them. But the white liberals are foxes, who also show their teeth to the Negro but pretend that they are smiling. The white liberals are more dangerous than the conservatives; they lure the Negro, and as the Negro runs from the growling wolf, he flees into the open jaws of the "smiling" fox. One is the wolf, the other is a fox. No matter what, they’ll both eat you. Argue with Malcom X, dear hypocrite.
    1
  3770.  @mizzgeek99  , I wonder if you ever read this quote from Malcolm X, famed civil rights activist. He calls white liberals the worst enemy of the black man. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/8869214-the-white-liberal-is-the-worst-enemy-to-america-and&ved=2ahUKEwir16nHvaHmAhUNpFkKHZu7B_EQFjAAegQIBhAB&usg=AOvVaw3OpsKR-mkEavd2Sy4TcMH7 The white liberal is the worst enemy to America, and the worst enemy to the black man. Let me explain what I mean by the white liberal. In America there is no such thing as Democrat or Republican anymore. In America you have liberals and conservatives. The only people living in the past who think in terms of I’m a Democrat or Republican, is the American Negro. He’s the one that runs around bragging about party affiliation. He’s the one that sticks to the Democrat or sticks to the Republican. But white people are divided into two groups, liberals and conservative. The Democrats who are conservative, vote with the Republicans who are conservative. The Democrats who are liberal vote with the Republicans that are liberal. The white liberal aren’t white people who are for independence, who are moral and ethical in their thinking. They are just a faction of white people that are jockeying for power. The same as the white conservative is a faction of white people that are jockeying for power. They are fighting each other for power and prestige, and the one that is the football in the game is the Negro, 20 million black people. A political football, a political pawn, an economic football, and economic pawn. A social football, a social pawn. The liberal elements of whites are those who have perfected the art of selling themselves to the Negro as a friend of the Negro. Getting sympathy of the Negro, getting the allegiance of the Negro, and getting the mind of the Negro. Then the Negro sides with the white liberal, and the white liberal use the Negro against the white conservative. So that anything that the Negro does is never for his own good, never for his own advancement, never for his own progress, he’s only a pawn in the hands of the white liberal. The worst enemy that the Negro have is this white man that runs around here drooling at the mouth professing to love Negros, and calling himself a liberal, and it is following these white liberals that has perpetuated problems that Negros have. If the Negro wasn’t taken, tricked, or deceived by the white liberal then Negros would get together and solve our own problems. I only cite these things to show you that in America the history of the white liberal has been nothing but a series of trickery designed to make Negros think that the white liberal was going to solve our problems. Our problems will never be solved by the white man. The only way that our problem will be solved is when the black man wakes up, clean himself up, stand on his own feet and stop begging the white man, and take immediate steps to do for ourselves the things that we have been waiting on the white man to do for us. Once we do for self then we will be able to solve our own problems’ "The white conservatives aren't friends of the Negro either, but they at least don't try to hide it. They are like wolves; they show their teeth in a snarl that keeps the Negro always aware of where he stands with them. But the white liberals are foxes, who also show their teeth to the Negro but pretend that they are smiling. The white liberals are more dangerous than the conservatives; they lure the Negro, and as the Negro runs from the growling wolf, he flees into the open jaws of the "smiling" fox. One is the wolf, the other is a fox. No matter what, they’ll both eat you. Argue with Malcom X, dear hypocrite.
    1
  3771. 1
  3772. 1
  3773. 1
  3774. 1
  3775. 1
  3776. 1
  3777. 1
  3778. 1
  3779. 1
  3780. 1
  3781. 1
  3782. 1
  3783. 1
  3784. 1
  3785. 1
  3786. 1
  3787. 1
  3788. 1
  3789.  Robert Aldridge  , Never live in a big city. This is an orchestrated culling. Anyone telling you differently is selling something. This is the flu. According to the WHO: "If you got a flu shot and take a Covid test, you will recieve a false positive." "It's easier to fool the people, than convince them they've been fooled." Look how quickly freedom evaporated in the name of safety. 56,000 Americans die on average every year from the flu. That never bothered you before. It certainly didn't scare you. You never wanted GOVERNMENT checkpoints for travel during flu season. You never wanted to close all "non essential businesses" for your health. There's over 300 strains of flu and we have vaccines for 4 of those strains. The same four vaccines every year. Yet 900,000 have died worldwide from Coronavirus, and you've allowed your freedom to be stolen, because you don't have a government vaccine?! Perspective is needed. "Those willing to relinquish freedom for security deserve neither." Where does our freedom come from? If government tells you it's not safe to leave your home, and that directive is implemented by force, how can you claim you're a free American? How can you claim this is a constitutional republic? If you believe your freedom comes from the government, then your are no more than a slave, taking only what has been given by your Masters. You are resigned to live on your knees in preaceful slavery. "Give me liberty or give me death." These are not mere flowery words. They are the heart and soul of every person who ever died, because they would not live under the rule of tyranny. Those words are the measure of a person's conviction, and the key to breaking the heavy chains of slavery. They are the lifeblood of every person who can't breathe, unless they live free. Freedom is a very dangerous idea that terrifies our Masters, because it gives the individual the right to govern oneself. It negates the need for a government slave Master. It becomes the individual's responsibility to control their own life, to protect their own life. Freedom is abstract in theory, invisible to the naked eye, but it's absence is more than palpable. It's loss is crippling and overbearing. Those who live without it are broken in body and spirit. It's a strangling so harrowing and devestating that one might never recover. But despite the danger of freedom, billions were willing to die for this abstract idea throughout history, because it's value is beyond any currency. Our Masters know the value of our freedom, and they hate us for it. Freedom is never given. It has to be seized; stolen from the powers that would like nothing more than to keep us subservient and obedient. How can this be a government "for, of, and by the people", if the people have no right to object to the tyranny of a government which rules by fear and manipulation? When will you stand up and object to being ruled over by your Masters? When will you realize that your life has no value, if you cannot live free? Let me assure you, to wait would be a grave mistake. The loss of freedom is far more deadly than any virus or disease could ever be.
    1
  3790. 1
  3791. 1
  3792.  Robert Aldridge  , no dear moron. It's classified as an HCID(high consequence infectious diseases). No, the new coronavirus is not the plague. But let’s read on to actually learn about the difference between the coronavirus and the plague to be sure. What does plague mean? The terms the plague or just plague (without the or a) refer to an infectious disease caused by a bacterium spread from rats to humans by means of flea bites. This plague is what is meant by the Black Death, which was a form of bubonic plague that spread over Europe in the 1300s and killed about a quarter of the population. Bacterium, bubonic? Let’s drill down some more. Most of us encounter the word bacterium in its Latin-based plural form, bacteria. But when referring to one type of bacteria, scientists use the singular bacterium. In the case of the plague, the scientific name for the bacterium is Yersinia pestis. There are three forms of plague. The most familiar to you is probably bubonic plague. One of the most noticeable symptoms of this form is the development of buboes (swollen lymph nodes) in the armpits and groin. The other forms are pneumonic plague, which ravages the lungs, and septicemic plague, a particularly nasty kind that attacks the bloodstream. Other major symptoms of the plague include fever, chills, and prostration—basically like being completely taken out. The plague causes serious, and often fatal, infections. It is responsible for some of the deadliest epidemics in history, such as the Black Death noted above. Thanks to modern medicine, however, the plague is now extremely rare and not a great risk to many people anymore. So, what do the coronavirus and the plague have in common? They both are infectious diseases that spread to humans from certain animals (that’s called zoonotic). However, COVID-19 is caused by a virus—essentially a tiny bit of nucleic acid and protein that needs a living host—whereas the plague is caused by bacteria, which are single-celled organisms. Further, while antibiotics work on bacteria, they do not work on viruses. What makes a plague a plague? We don’t use the word plague only to refer to the infectious disease specifically caused by bacterium Yersinia pestis. Plague can also mean “an epidemic disease that causes high mortality” or “pestilence.” More figuratively, plague can mean “any widespread, calamity, or evil,” especially one considered a direct punishment by God. These senses of plague probably bring to mind biblical plagues, such as the plagues of Egypt, which were ten disasters God inflicted on Egypt, including swarms of locusts, hordes of frogs, a scourge of boils, pestilence of livestock, and the death of firstborn sons. Pestilence is defined as “a deadly or virulent epidemic disease,” especially the bubonic plague. It’s not clear, though, exactly what type of disease was meant in the Bible. OK, etymology break: pestilence is ultimately from the Latin pestis, “contagious, disease, plague.” Pestis is also the source of the English pest, which originally denoted the bubonic plague. You may recognize this Latin pestis from above in the name for that plague-causing bacterium, Yersinia pestis. Plague is from the Latin plāga, “stripe, wound,” which became extended to mean “affliction,” including disease. Now, comparison time. Like a plague, the coronavirus is an epidemic disease—and more, it is considered, now, a pandemic because it has spread worldwide. Also like a plague, the coronavirus is also causing widespread affliction, if we consider all the pain, loss, and distress from the virus. So, can we liken the coronavirus to a plague? Well, a word like plague generally connotes a massive scale of death that we’re thankfully not witnessing so far with the coronavirus—and we don’t say this to downplay the cost COVID-19 has wreaked on people’s lives and livelihoods. When the coronavirus is under control across the world and society begins to recover, you may hear people likening the coronavirus to a metaphorical plague due to its consequences. But no, COVID-19 absolutely is not “the plague plague.” https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.dictionary.com/e/is-the-coronavirus-a-plague/&ved=2ahUKEwjl2P-dodDoAhVWmXIEHXNKA78QFjAEegQIAhAB&usg=AOvVaw10nE-UdcAMFQPuRR9K7-5H
    1
  3793. 1
  3794. 1
  3795. 1
  3796. 1
  3797. 1
  3798. 1
  3799. 1
  3800. 1
  3801. 1
  3802. 1
  3803. 1
  3804. 1
  3805. 1
  3806. 1
  3807. 1
  3808. 1
  3809. 1
  3810. 1
  3811. 1
  3812. 1
  3813. 1
  3814. 1
  3815. 1
  3816. 1
  3817. 1
  3818. 1
  3819. 1
  3820. 1
  3821. 1
  3822. 1
  3823. 1
  3824. 1
  3825. 1
  3826. 1
  3827. 1
  3828. 1
  3829. 1
  3830. 1
  3831. 1
  3832. 1
  3833. 1
  3834. 1
  3835. 1
  3836. 1
  3837. 1
  3838. 1
  3839. 1
  3840. 1
  3841. 1
  3842. 1
  3843. 1
  3844. 1
  3845. 1
  3846. 1
  3847. 1
  3848. 1
  3849. 1
  3850. 1
  3851. 1
  3852. 1
  3853. 1
  3854. 1
  3855. 1
  3856. 1
  3857. 1
  3858. 1
  3859. 1
  3860. 1
  3861. 1
  3862. 1
  3863. 1
  3864. 1
  3865. 1
  3866. 1
  3867. 1
  3868. 1
  3869. 1
  3870. 1
  3871. 1
  3872. 1
  3873. 1
  3874. 1
  3875. 1
  3876. 1
  3877. 1
  3878. 1
  3879. 1
  3880. 1
  3881. 1
  3882. 1
  3883. 1
  3884. 1
  3885. 1
  3886. 1
  3887. 1
  3888. 1
  3889. 1
  3890. 1
  3891. 1
  3892. 1
  3893. 1
  3894. 1
  3895. 1
  3896. 1
  3897. 1
  3898. 1
  3899. 1
  3900. 1
  3901. 1
  3902. 1
  3903. 1
  3904. 1
  3905. 1
  3906. 1
  3907. 1
  3908. 1
  3909. 1
  3910. 1
  3911. 1
  3912. 1
  3913. 1
  3914. 1
  3915. 1
  3916. 1
  3917. 1
  3918. 1
  3919. 1
  3920. 1
  3921. 1
  3922. 1
  3923. 1
  3924. 1
  3925. 1
  3926. 1
  3927. 1
  3928. 1
  3929. 1
  3930. 1
  3931. 1
  3932. 1
  3933. 1
  3934. 1
  3935. 1
  3936. 1
  3937. 1
  3938. 1
  3939. 1
  3940. 1
  3941. 1
  3942. 1
  3943. 1
  3944. 1
  3945. 1
  3946. 1
  3947. 1
  3948. 1
  3949. 1
  3950. 1
  3951. 1
  3952. 1
  3953. 1
  3954. 1
  3955. 1
  3956. 1
  3957. 1
  3958. 1
  3959. 1
  3960. 1
  3961. 1
  3962. 1
  3963. 1
  3964. 1
  3965. 1
  3966. 1
  3967. 1
  3968. 1
  3969. 1
  3970. 1
  3971. 1
  3972. 1
  3973. 1
  3974. 1
  3975. 1
  3976. 1
  3977. 1
  3978. 1
  3979. 1
  3980. 1
  3981. 1
  3982. 1
  3983. 1
  3984. 1
  3985. 1
  3986. 1
  3987. 1
  3988. 1
  3989. 1
  3990. 1
  3991. 1
  3992. 1
  3993. 1
  3994. 1
  3995. 1
  3996. 1
  3997. 1
  3998. 1
  3999. 1
  4000. 1
  4001. 1
  4002. 1
  4003. 1
  4004. 1
  4005. 1
  4006. 1
  4007. 1
  4008. 1
  4009. 1
  4010. 1
  4011. 1
  4012. 1
  4013. 1
  4014. 1
  4015. 1
  4016. 1
  4017. 1
  4018. 1
  4019. 1
  4020. 1
  4021. 1
  4022. 1
  4023. 1
  4024. 1
  4025. 1
  4026. 1
  4027. 1
  4028. 1
  4029. 1
  4030. 1
  4031. 1
  4032. 1
  4033. 1
  4034. 1
  4035. 1
  4036. 1
  4037. 1
  4038. 1
  4039. 1
  4040. 1
  4041. 1
  4042. 1
  4043. 1
  4044. 1
  4045. 1
  4046. 1
  4047. 1
  4048. 1
  4049. 1
  4050. 1
  4051. 1
  4052. 1
  4053. 1
  4054. 1
  4055. 1
  4056. 1
  4057. 1
  4058. 1
  4059. 1
  4060. 1
  4061. 1
  4062. 1
  4063. 1
  4064. 1
  4065. 1
  4066. 1
  4067. 1
  4068. 1
  4069. 1
  4070. 1
  4071. 1
  4072. 1
  4073. 1
  4074. 1
  4075. 1
  4076. 1
  4077. 1
  4078. 1
  4079. 1
  4080. 1
  4081. 1
  4082. 1
  4083. 1
  4084. 1
  4085. 1
  4086. 1
  4087. 1
  4088. 1
  4089. 1
  4090. 1
  4091. 1
  4092. 1
  4093. 1
  4094. 1
  4095. 1
  4096. 1
  4097. 1
  4098. 1
  4099. 1
  4100. 1
  4101. 1
  4102. 1
  4103. 1
  4104. 1
  4105. 1
  4106. 1
  4107. 1
  4108. 1
  4109. 1
  4110. 1
  4111. 1
  4112. 1
  4113. 1
  4114. 1
  4115. 1
  4116. 1
  4117. 1
  4118. 1
  4119. 1
  4120. 1
  4121. 1
  4122. 1
  4123. 1
  4124. 1
  4125. 1
  4126. 1
  4127. 1
  4128. 1
  4129. 1
  4130. 1
  4131. 1
  4132. 1
  4133. 1
  4134. 1
  4135. 1
  4136. 1
  4137. 1
  4138.  Adam Brady  Adam Brady Adam Brady 3 minutes ago "@Nikkisheers You really are sad if you want to ask what the Orange Clown has done to be impeached, It means that even if a truck hit you and you were in the wrong by walking in front of oncoming traffic and I believe you are stupid enough to do that." This is called projection, dear. You can't name the crime. How can it be quid pro quo, when Zelensky never did what Trump asked, but he got the money anyway? How can it be quid pro quo, when the president of Ukraine said they didn't even know aide was delayed, until a month after it arrived? How can it be a quid pro quo, when the person being bribed has no idea? Please, explain, dear hypocrite. Ad hominem attacks are the hallmark of those with no argument. "Later when talking to the police someone like you would probably say is it alright if mister officer you say that I didn't walk in front of oncoming traffic like and idiot but rather the truck driver didn't look properly when turning onto the road and hitting my dumbass." In what world is this anything like an actual sentence? Ever heard of a coma? Or a run-on sentence? This is called projection, dear hypocrite. You can't even use proper grammar or sentence structure, but I'm stupid?🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😘 " Then adding after I get my insurance I will give a donation to the police fund because you were so helpful. QUID PRO QUO" That's not what happened here, dear. This was about election interference in 2016. We have the transcript. 2020 was never mentioned. President Zelensky said there was no quid pro quo. He never did what Trump asked, and didn't know aide was withheld until a month after it had already arrived. It CAN'T be quid pro quo if the person being bribed has no idea. " now please go away because talking to you is annoying and you are probably not even and American.!!! " If talking to me is so annoying, then stop, poor fool. Why can't you stop, dear deranged psychopath? This is more hypocrisy from you. You're afraid to answer my questions, which is why you make up wild, hyperbolic scenarios, full of conjecture and OPINIONS. Did you learn that from Adam Schiff? It sounds eerily similar to when he stood before congress and lied about the transcript, telling everyone the president "Asked Ukraine 8 times to make up dirt on Biden". That's not in the transcript once. When called out for his lies, he said, "I was doing a parody of the transcript". Yeah, because the House of Representatives is usually where you go to see a Saturday Night Live Skit. This is called lying. Something that doesn't bother you when democrats do it.Hypocrisy is your bread and butter. I'm Italian American, born and raised in the United States. In what world do you imagine you can tell me what to do? I'm American, that means I'm free to say whatever I want. Why are you acting like a fascist dictator, dear hypocrite? I thought you hated that. " This was and example of quid pro quo and not what the President actually has done, I thought I better add that because there is a big chance you will say something like. HE DID NOT DO THAT YOU ARE SO DUM!!😂 " What you've done here, is called hypocrisy. You can't even spell the word "DUMB", but you THINK that I am.🤦‍♀️😂😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 You still can't answer what your job is? Why is that? Oh right! You're a coward and a hypocrite. I'll wait for you to summon your courage. I do have to work on Monday, so if you could summon your courage before then, I'd really appreciate it, dear lying hypocrite.
    1
  4139. 1
  4140. 1
  4141.  Adam Brady  Adam Brady Adam Brady 4 hours ago "@Nikkisheers Your just sad and I haven't even been reading or getting all your comments," This shows you're uneducated. "Your" shows possession. "You're" is the contraction "you are". You're starting at stupid, but watch. You'll go from stupid to moronic, and from moronic to braindead, in less than two minutes. " I just had a look and to honest I am not reading this one," To "BE " honest, You aren't reading or spelling. "I just discovered you do not even vote and say its because you do not believe in slavery and are a conscientious objector, that just screams Idiot." Really?I've said it to you at least 10 times. So you're admitting you can't read or write a proper sentence. The hypocrisy of the uneducated Uber driver telling his moral and intellectual superiors they're stupid.🤣🤣🤣🤣 " You just basically said you are a brainless idiot and explaining why to you is useless" This is called a nonsequitur, a conclusion or statement that does not logically follow from the previous argument or statement. Which is why you can't explain yourself. " . I would rather people read what you said and laugh.' No one laughed. They all got mad, just like you, psycho stalker. I told everyone I don't vote, so i find it incredible that you're so illiterate you never saw it. " I do not thing you have been hitting the right button to reply directly to me, not a shock" Again you can't spell. You "do not thing"? Do you mean to say you don't "think"? We know that already. You're hitting the wrong keys and copying me. I told you, "love how you reply to yourself hoping I won't see it." ".But since you do not vote everybody that is wanting to die of idiocy should and can read your replies" Another nonsequitur. Do you always jump to the illogical conclusion, or are you just mentally impaired? "and as I have now realised you either are aspergers or just stupid " Do you know what a punctuation mark is? Aspergers is an autistic disorder most notable for the often great discrepancy between the intellectual and social abilities of those who have it. Asperger's patients are some of the smartest people you will ever meet, but they have poor social skills. Albert Einstein had aspergers. You just called me a genius. " I leave you with this. Whatever you say Nikki of course " We both know you can't walk away, cause you're a deranged psycopath. You're gonna post another asanine comment, and everyone knows it. "and yes santa is real but you already know that," An Uber driver who believes in Santa. Why do you insist on proving you're as limp and useless as the sock you jerk off into 16 times a day. " take your medication and relax" Take your own advice, and learn what a coma is. " because as you know we have to be continuous objecters and not vote at the election" As opposed to your herd mentality where you vote for whoever CNN tells you. " and have no say even though it's obviously important to you that we stop slavery and free all the slaves" You're a slave to the left/right paradigm. As if it's possible for 300 million people to all fall into two categories: Democrat or Republican. The fact that you wanna box everyone into a neat little category... Makes you a bigot and a fascist. " even if it has already happened !!! " Physical slaves were freed. You're a braindead, mind controlled, mental slave to your government. What's sad is that you chose to be enslaved, and you think emailed makes you enlightened. In reality, you're loving on your knees in peaceful slavery. "GOOD NIGHT I have to get some sleep but thanks this has been hilarious, I will direct all my friends to read your crazy comments thanks.😘 " Yeah, you must be tired from waiting til the middle of the night to sneak your comment in. This is called cowardice. Why are you acting like you're leaving? You're about to write another nonsensical and asinine comment. Please, stop pretending you have friends. The passengers you drive around are strangers, not your friends. Yes, they all feel sorry for you because you're poorly educated and driving people around for a living. But just cause they're sympathetic, doesn't mean they're actually friends.
    1
  4142. 1
  4143. 1
  4144. 1
  4145. 1
  4146. 1
  4147. 1
  4148. 1
  4149. 1
  4150. 1
  4151. 1
  4152. 1
  4153. 1
  4154. 1
  4155. 1
  4156. 1
  4157. 1
  4158. 1
  4159. 1
  4160. 1
  4161. 1
  4162. 1
  4163. 1
  4164. 1
  4165. 1
  4166. 1
  4167. 1
  4168. 1
  4169. 1
  4170. 1
  4171. 1
  4172. 1
  4173. 1
  4174. 1
  4175. 1
  4176. 1
  4177. 1
  4178. 1
  4179. 1
  4180. 1
  4181. 1
  4182. 1
  4183. 1
  4184. 1
  4185. 1
  4186. 1
  4187. 1
  4188. 1
  4189. 1
  4190. 1
  4191. 1
  4192. 1
  4193. 1
  4194. 1
  4195. 1
  4196. 1
  4197. 1
  4198. 1
  4199. 1
  4200. 1
  4201. 1
  4202. 1
  4203. 1
  4204. 1
  4205. 1
  4206. 1
  4207. 1
  4208. 1
  4209. 1
  4210. 1
  4211. 1
  4212. 1
  4213. 1
  4214. 1
  4215. 1
  4216. 1
  4217. 1
  4218. 1
  4219. 1
  4220. 1
  4221. 1
  4222. 1
  4223. 1
  4224. 1
  4225. 1
  4226. 1
  4227. 1
  4228. 1
  4229. 1
  4230. 1
  4231. 1
  4232. 1
  4233. 1
  4234. 1
  4235. 1
  4236. 1
  4237. 1
  4238. 1
  4239. 1
  4240. 1
  4241.  @rusticpath2244  , It's easier to fool the people, than convince them they've been fooled." Look how quickly freedom evaporated in the name of safety. 56,000 Americans die on average every year from the flu. That never bothered you before. It certainly didn't scare you. You never wanted GOVERNMENT checkpoints for travel during flu season. You never wanted to close all "non essential businesses" for your health. There's over 300 strains of flu and we have vaccines for 4 of those strains. The same four vaccines every year. Yet 90,000 have died worldwide from Coronavirus, and you've allowed your freedom to be stolen, because you don't have a government vaccine?! Perspective is needed. "Those willing to relinquish freedom for security deserve neither." Where does our freedom come from? If government tells you it's not safe to leave your home, and that directive is implemented by force, how can you claim you're a free American? How can you claim this is a constitutional republic? If you believe your freedom comes from the government, then your are no more than a slave, taking only what has been given by your Masters. You are resigned to live on your knees in preaceful slavery. "Give me liberty or give me death." These are not mere flowery words. They are the heart and soul of every person who ever died, because they would not live under the rule of tyranny. Those words are the measure of a person's conviction, and the key to breaking the heavy chains of slavery. They are the lifeblood of every person who can't breathe, unless they live free. Freedom is a very dangerous idea that terrifies our Masters, because it gives the individual the right to govern oneself. It negates the need for a government slave Master. It becomes the individual's responsibility to control their own life, to protect their own life. Freedom is abstract in theory, invisible to the naked eye, but it's absence is more than palpable. It's loss is crippling and overbearing. Those who live without it are broken in body and spirit. It's a strangling so harrowing and devestating that one might never recover. But despite the danger of freedom, billions were willing to die for this abstract idea throughout history, because it's value is beyond any currency. Our Masters know the value of our freedom, and they hate us for it. Freedom is never given. It has to be seized; stolen from the powers that would like nothing more than to keep us subservient and obedient. How can this be a government "for, of, and by the people", if the people have no right to object to the tyranny of a government which rules by fear and manipulation? When will you stand up and object to being ruled over by your Masters? When will you realize that your life has no value, if you cannot live free? Let me assure you, to wait would be a grave mistake. The loss of freedom is far more deadly than any virus or disease could ever be.
    1
  4242.  @MurderousLamb  , No, dear liar. The first recorded Covid 19 case was documented in Wuhaan in November 2019. Covid 19 had killed 95,000 in six months. That's about 3,599 people dying everyday. Starvation kills 9 million a year worldwide. That's nearly 25,000 people dying of hunger everyday, 365 days a year. 6 months of Covid 19, not 4. Can you really not do basic math? 🤣🤣🤣🤣 "you're responsible for your actions". Yes, finally a nugget of truth from the liar's tongue. What you just described is called freedom. I'm responsible for whether or not I work. I'm responsible for whether or not I isolate myself. It's my responsibility to protect my health, not the government's, dear walking contradiction. As long as I'm not hurting anyone, it's none of your business or the government's. If I've endangered any lives, name them. Who are my victims? Good luck with that since there are zero names being released of the dead Covid victims. Medicine says legally they can't inform the public of personal health issues that cause death. Ironically, doctors don't write obituaries. Family members do. Not a single obituary mentioning a loved one died of Covid. 15,000 deaths in America, not a single name of a single victim who died of Covid. Funnily enough, if this was a mass shooting, doctors can release the names of all the dead and tell you they were killed by gunshots. Are you choking on hypocrisy yet? It's not governments job to protect us from a virus. If it was, we would shut down the country ever year for flu. Are you suggesting we quarantine for flu every year, which you admit is more deadly? We most definitely should have shut down for swine flu in 2009 which killed 18,000 Americans and has a death rate of 10%. Why didn't we? No dear liar. Last year there were 646,000 flu deaths worldwide. 61,000 flu deaths in America. Stop lying.
    1
  4243. 1
  4244. 1
  4245. 1
  4246. 1
  4247. 1
  4248. 1
  4249. 1
  4250. 1
  4251. 1
  4252. 1
  4253. 1
  4254. 1
  4255. 1
  4256. 1
  4257. 1
  4258. 1
  4259. 1
  4260. 1
  4261. 1
  4262. 1
  4263. 1
  4264. 1
  4265.  @rusticpath2244  , you can only receive a government check for Covid if you pay taxes. Homeless/starving people don't pay taxes. How are they gonna get their money? They don't have bank accounts. Do you not understand how it works? Government has no money. Every dollar government has was legally stolen thru taxation. That's my own money the government is giving me. The audacity! That only puts you further in debt to the government. Trillions of dollars GOVERNMENT is handing out, and we'll have to pay it back. That's basic econ. The New York Times › health Coronavirus Test Kits Sent to States Are Flawed, C.D.C. Says - The New York ... https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/12/health/coronavirus-test-kits-cdc.amp.html&ved=2ahUKEwi4lYyTxtzoAhUqmuAKHdkRBDIQFjANegQIBhAM&usg=AOvVaw0GJ5WcUyDjTTvQRuc7ZiZp&cf=1 From the article: Some of the coronavirus testing kits sent to state laboratories around the country have flaws and do not work properly, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said on Wednesday. The kits were meant to enable states to conduct their own testing and have results faster than they would by shipping samples to the C.D.C. in Atlanta. But the failure of the kits meant that states that encountered problems with the test should not use it, and would still have to depend on the C.D.C.’s central lab, which could cause several days’ delay in getting results. “Obviously, a state wouldn’t want to be doing this test and using it to make clinical decisions if it isn’t working as well, as perfectly, at the state as it is at C.D.C.,” Dr. Nancy Messonnier, director of the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, said at a news conference on Wednesday.
    1
  4266. 1
  4267. 1
  4268. 1
  4269. 1
  4270. 1
  4271. 1
  4272. 1
  4273. 1
  4274. 1
  4275. 1
  4276. 1
  4277. 1
  4278.  @Gamer-ls8bo  , DermNet NZRANDOM TRANSLATE CLOSE SEARCH  Home»Topics A–Z»COVID-19 and dermatology patients COVID-19 and dermatology patients Author: Yan Ling Apollonia Tay, Medical Student, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand. DermNet NZ Editor in Chief: Adjunct A/Prof Amanda Oakley, Dermatologist, Hamilton, New Zealand. Copy edited by Gus Mitchell. March 2020. Reviewed by Dr Louise Reiche, Dermatologist, Palmerston North, New Zealand. Latest update 4 April 2020. World Health Organization (WHO) United States of America Centers for Disease Control (CDC) United Kingdom Government United Kingdom National Health Service Australian Government New Zealand Government Unite against COVID-19 New Zealand Ministry of Health CDC* New Zealand Government^ "The severity of COVID-19 is variable. Some people infected with the virus SARS-CoV-2 do not develop any symptoms. The most common symptoms of COVID-19 are: Fever Cough Shortness of breath Tiredness. Less common symptoms include: Body aches and pains Runny nose Loss of smell and taste Sore throat Abdominal pain Diarrhoea. Skin rashes have been uncommonly described in patients with COVID-19. They are reported to be similar to other viral infections: an erythematous exanthem, acute urticaria, or chickenpox-like blisters [3].  People with these symptoms, and those who have been in close contact with them, should not go to work and should strictly self-isolate, following local guidelines. Those with serious symptoms may need hospitalisation and mechanical ventilation due to viral pneumonia. Rash associated with COVID-19" https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://dermnetnz.org/topics/covid-19/&ved=2ahUKEwiQhpWW1t7oAhXSl3IEHWlxBtYQFjABegQIAxAB&usg=AOvVaw0ireP2mpRxpq7mKoZGKs25
    1
  4279. 1
  4280. 1
  4281. 1
  4282. 1
  4283. 1
  4284. 1
  4285. 1
  4286. 1
  4287. 1
  4288. 1
  4289. 1
  4290. 1
  4291. 1
  4292. 1
  4293. 1
  4294. 1
  4295. 1
  4296. 1
  4297. 1
  4298. 1
  4299. 1
  4300. 1
  4301. 1
  4302. 1
  4303. 1
  4304. 1
  4305. 1
  4306. 1
  4307. 1
  4308. 1
  4309. 1
  4310. 1
  4311. 1
  4312. 1
  4313. 1
  4314. 1
  4315. 1
  4316. 1
  4317. 1
  4318. 1
  4319. 1
  4320. 1
  4321. 1
  4322. 1
  4323. 1
  4324. 1
  4325. 1
  4326.  @matthewiles2660  , all the numbers are being inflated and distorted in an effort to excite intense levels of fear among the masses. None of the public figures and celebrities have been ill. They are ALL being paid to pretend they have the virus. This is their latest "gig". Notice that over 1% of all celebrities have Covid, yet celebrities make up less than 1% of country(America). Simply by the numbers, the fact that not a single celebrity has died of the virus goes against all statistics, logic, and rationale. They are disproportionately affected, yet 100% of celebrities survive. This "Scamdemic" was put into action in October of 2019. Look up "Event 201". Look into Agenda 21, and Agenda 30. Look into #filmyourhospital. Ordinary citizens are exposing empty hospitals, as the media proclaims they're "overrun", further describing them as "war zones". This couldn't be further from the truth. I'm a nurse and freelance at several hospitals. I've seen first hand the lies being told by medical staff. Please research. Don't believe me. Verify it yourself, and when you've done that, share the truth with everyone you love and care about. This is going to get much worse. I don't say that to be alarmist, only that you should be prepared. I don't know you. I don't know if you practice any type of faith. But may I suggest something? If you don't know Jesus, now would be the time to introduce yourself. Blessings to you, dear friend. May you continue to seek the TRUTH, and may TRUTH always spur us to righteous action. Stay brave and free.
    1
  4327. 1
  4328. 1
  4329. 1
  4330. 1
  4331. 1
  4332. 1
  4333. 1
  4334. 1
  4335. 1
  4336. 1
  4337. 1
  4338. 1
  4339. 1
  4340. 1
  4341. 1
  4342. 1
  4343. 1
  4344. 1
  4345. 1
  4346. 1
  4347. 1
  4348. 1
  4349. 1
  4350. 1
  4351. 1
  4352. 1
  4353. 1
  4354. 1
  4355. 1
  4356. 1
  4357. 1
  4358. 1
  4359. 1
  4360. 1
  4361. 1
  4362. 1
  4363. 1
  4364. 1
  4365. 1
  4366. 1
  4367. 1
  4368. 1
  4369. 1
  4370. 1
  4371.  @thomasjackson2223  , Under cross-examination on Nov. 20, Sondland said that no one had told him that the hold on aid to Ukraine was tied to investigations and that he simply presumed that the connection existed. Volker, who had contact with both Trump and the Ukrainians, testified that the aid was never conditioned on investigations. While the House impeachment proceedings aren’t a formal trial, where hearsay and presumptions would be promptly cut off by defense counsel, Democrats and a number of media outlets have nonetheless appeared to treat the hearsay and presumptions as evidence of impeachable conduct. For those of you keeping score at home, the effort to accuse our president of coercion, extortion, or bribery with these witnesses, as we now come to closing session of this, basically breaks down as follows: We have [State Department official George] Kent and Ambassador [to Ukraine William] Taylor who spoke of hearsay—their hearsay of these matters that they’ve said that they had heard—were all statements that they’d heard from others who have also testified in front of us, so there’s no one that’s missing, there’s no one out there,” Turner said. “Kent and Taylor said that they basically heard it from Morrison and Sondland. Morrison indicated that he’d heard it from Sondland. Sondland testified yesterday that he’d heard it from no one on the planet.” Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Ukrainian Foreign Minister Vadym Prystaiko have both said they were never aware of a connection between the hold on aid to Ukraine and Trump’s request for investigations; Trump has also denied any connection. As pointed out by Turner, Hill testified earlier in the hearing that, “based on questions and statements I have heard, some of you on this committee appear to believe that Russia and its security services did not conduct a campaign against our country.” Hill’s statement appeared to have been aimed at Republicans on the committee who have questioned witnesses about Ukraine’s interference in the 2016 U.S. election. During the hearing, Turner produced a copy of the report compiled by the committee’s Republicans on Russian active measures in the 2016 presidential election; Republicans unanimously voted in early 2018 to release the report to the public. The first sentence of the report states, “In 2015, Russia began engaging in a covert influence campaign aimed at the U.S. presidential election.” Turner noted that, with a little research, Hill could have avoided the mistake of relying on “questions and statements I have heard.” “This is a problem with no matter how convinced we are, Dr. Hill. No matter how we believe we know that what we’ve heard is true, it is still just what we’ve heard,” Turner said. Turner also pointed to the single piece of evidence that may prove to be direct. In testimony contradicted by Volker, Sondland said he was told that a White House meeting between Trump and Zelensky was conditioned on investigations. “You guys want to be the laughing stock of history to impeach a president of the United States because he didn’t take a meeting?” Turner asked. “Please undertake that.”
    1
  4372.  @thomasjackson2223  , After three years in which Democrats accused President Trump of a host of criminal acts — from bribery and extortion to campaign finance violations, obstruction of justice, conspiracy and even treason — they have finally introduced articles of impeachment that allege none of those things. Not only have they dropped the charge of bribery, the words that gripped Washington — “quid pro quo” — don’t even appear in the document. This is a major retreat by Democrats, who have effectively admitted the president did not commit any statutory crimes. Indeed, this will be the first presidential impeachment in history in which no statutory crimes are even alleged. In that alone, Trump can claim vindication. Instead, Democrats settled on two noncriminal allegations: obstruction of Congress and abuse of power. Both charges are farcical. Take obstruction. Democrats claim Trump engaged in “unprecedented” defiance of congressional subpoenas and “sought to arrogate to himself” the right to withhold documents and witnesses “as well as the unilateral prerogative to deny any and all information to the House of Representatives.” Please. If anyone is “arrogating” “unilateral” power to themselves, it is House Democrats. Democrats seem not to understand that the legislative and the executive are equal branches of government. They do not get the last word when a president invokes executive privilege. When a dispute arises between the two branches, the president has a right to appeal to the third equal branch of government — the judiciary. Trump did that, as is his constitutional right. If he appealed to the courts and lost but still refused to cooperate, then Congress would have every right to charge him with obstruction of Congress. But Democrats refused to wait for judicial review. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) actually said, “We cannot be at the mercy of the courts.” Excuse me? And Democrats are accusing Trump of being “a threat to the Constitution”? Democrats are doing exactly what they accuse Trump of doing. As Professor Jonathan Turley told Democrats on the Judiciary Committee “We have three branches, not two. … If you impeach a president, if you make a high crime and misdemeanor out of going to the courts, it is an abuse of power. It’s your abuse of power.”
    1
  4373.  @thomasjackson2223  , Guess what? The same Democrats now seeking to impeach Trump for obstruction of Congress backed Obama’s obstruction of Congress, when Eric Holder defied confessional subpoena. Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.) wrote, “The White House assertion is backed by decades of precedent that has recognized the need for the president and his senior advisers to receive candid advice and information from their top aides.” Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) said the effort to hold Holder in contempt for refusing to comply was “politically-motivated.” Pelosi called it — wait for it — worse than a “witch hunt.” By the plain language of the Democrats’ articles of impeachment, Obama committed an impeachable offense. And yet today, Holder — the man at the center of Obama’s obstruction scheme — has the chutzpah to write that Attorney General William P. Barr is “unfit to lead the Justice Department.” What a disgrace. As for abuse of power, this will be the first presidential impeachment in history in which no violations of the law are even alleged. The justification for impeaching Trump without a statutory crime is that impeachment is a political, not legal, proceeding. Fair enough. Democrats held weeks of hearings to convince the American people that Trump’s alleged abuse of power rises to the level of impeachment and removal. Instead, their slipshod inquiry convinced Americans of the opposite. In October, before the hearings began, the Quinnipiac poll showed that a 48 to 46 percent plurality of Americans supported impeachment and removal; today, after the hearings, voters are opposed by a margin of 51 to 45 percent. In key swing states, a Firehouse/Optimus poll found that impeachment and removal is now opposed by 51 percent of voters in Michigan, 52 percent in Pennsylvania and 58 percent in Wisconsin. This is the definition of failure. Earlier this year, Pelosi said she was “not for impeachment” because “unless there’s something so compelling and overwhelming and bipartisan, I don’t think we should go down that path.” She was right then. Democrats should have listened.
    1
  4374. 1
  4375. 1
  4376. 1
  4377. 1
  4378. 1
  4379. 1
  4380. 1
  4381. 1
  4382. 1
  4383. 1
  4384. 1
  4385. 1
  4386. 1
  4387. 1
  4388. 1
  4389. 1
  4390. 1
  4391. 1
  4392. 1
  4393. 1
  4394. 1
  4395. 1
  4396. 1
  4397. 1
  4398. 1
  4399. 1
  4400. 1
  4401. 1
  4402. 1
  4403. 1
  4404. 1
  4405. 1
  4406. 1
  4407. 1
  4408. 1
  4409. 1
  4410. 1
  4411. 1
  4412. 1
  4413. 1
  4414. 1
  4415. 1
  4416. 1
  4417. 1
  4418. 1
  4419. 1
  4420. 1
  4421. 1
  4422. 1
  4423. 1
  4424. 1
  4425. 1
  4426. 1
  4427. 1
  4428. 1
  4429. 1
  4430. 1
  4431. 1
  4432. 1
  4433. 1
  4434. 1
  4435. 1
  4436. 1
  4437. 1
  4438. 1
  4439. 1
  4440. 1
  4441. 1
  4442. 1
  4443. 1
  4444. 1
  4445. 1
  4446. 1
  4447. 1
  4448. 1
  4449. 1
  4450. 1
  4451. 1
  4452. 1
  4453. 1
  4454. 1
  4455. 1
  4456. 1
  4457. 1
  4458. 1
  4459. 1
  4460. 1
  4461. 1
  4462. 1
  4463. 1
  4464. 1
  4465. 1
  4466. 1
  4467. 1
  4468. 1
  4469. 1
  4470. 1
  4471. 1
  4472. 1
  4473. 1
  4474. 1
  4475. 1
  4476. 1
  4477. 1
  4478. 1
  4479. 1
  4480. 1
  4481. 1
  4482. 1
  4483. 1
  4484. 1
  4485. 1
  4486. 1
  4487. 1
  4488. 1
  4489. 1
  4490. 1
  4491. 1
  4492. 1
  4493. 1
  4494. 1
  4495. 1
  4496. 1
  4497. 1
  4498. 1
  4499. 1
  4500. 1
  4501. 1
  4502. 1
  4503. 1
  4504. 1
  4505. 1
  4506. 1
  4507. 1
  4508. 1
  4509. 1
  4510. 1
  4511. 1
  4512. 1
  4513. 1
  4514. 1
  4515. 1
  4516. 1
  4517. 1
  4518. 1
  4519. 1
  4520. 1
  4521. 1
  4522. 1
  4523. 1
  4524. 1
  4525. 1
  4526. 1
  4527. 1
  4528. 1
  4529. 1
  4530. 1
  4531. 1
  4532. 1
  4533. 1
  4534. 1
  4535. 1
  4536. 1
  4537. 1
  4538. 1
  4539. 1
  4540. 1
  4541. 1
  4542. 1
  4543. 1
  4544. 1
  4545. 1
  4546. 1
  4547. 1
  4548. 1
  4549. 1
  4550. 1
  4551. 1
  4552. 1
  4553. 1
  4554. 1
  4555. 1
  4556. 1
  4557. 1
  4558. 1
  4559. 1
  4560. 1
  4561. 1
  4562. 1
  4563. 1
  4564. 1
  4565. 1
  4566. 1
  4567. 1
  4568. 1
  4569. 1
  4570. 1
  4571. 1
  4572. 1
  4573. 1
  4574. 1
  4575. 1
  4576. 1
  4577. 1
  4578. 1
  4579. 1
  4580. 1
  4581. 1
  4582. 1
  4583. 1
  4584. 1
  4585. 1
  4586. 1
  4587. 1
  4588. 1
  4589. 1
  4590. 1
  4591. 1
  4592. 1
  4593. 1
  4594. 1
  4595. 1
  4596. 1
  4597. 1
  4598. 1
  4599. 1
  4600. 1
  4601. 1
  4602. 1
  4603. 1
  4604. 1
  4605. 1
  4606. 1
  4607. 1
  4608. 1
  4609. 1
  4610. 1
  4611. 1
  4612. 1
  4613. 1
  4614. 1
  4615. 1
  4616. 1
  4617. 1
  4618. 1
  4619. 1
  4620. 1
  4621. 1
  4622. 1
  4623. 1
  4624. 1
  4625. 1
  4626. 1
  4627. 1
  4628. 1
  4629. 1
  4630. 1
  4631. 1
  4632. 1
  4633. 1
  4634. 1
  4635. 1
  4636. 1
  4637. 1
  4638. 1
  4639. 1
  4640. 1
  4641. 1
  4642. 1
  4643. 1
  4644. 1
  4645. 1
  4646. 1
  4647. 1
  4648. 1
  4649. 1
  4650. 1
  4651. 1
  4652. 1
  4653. 1
  4654. 1
  4655. 1
  4656. 1
  4657. 1
  4658. 1
  4659. 1
  4660. 1
  4661. 1
  4662. 1
  4663. 1
  4664. 1
  4665. 1
  4666. 1
  4667. 1
  4668. 1
  4669. 1
  4670. 1
  4671. 1
  4672. 1
  4673. 1
  4674. 1
  4675. 1
  4676. 1
  4677. 1
  4678. 1
  4679. 1
  4680. 1
  4681. 1
  4682. 1
  4683. 1
  4684. 1
  4685. 1
  4686. 1
  4687. 1
  4688. 1
  4689. 1
  4690. 1
  4691. 1
  4692. 1
  4693. 1
  4694. 1
  4695. 1
  4696. 1
  4697. 1
  4698. 1
  4699. 1
  4700. 1
  4701. 1
  4702. 1
  4703. 1
  4704. 1
  4705. 1
  4706. 1
  4707. 1
  4708. 1
  4709. 1
  4710. 1
  4711. 1
  4712. 1
  4713. 1
  4714. 1
  4715. 1
  4716. 1
  4717. 1
  4718. 1
  4719. 1
  4720. 1
  4721. 1
  4722.  @jenniferhampton5171  , if the work she needs to do was so important, she'd step aside, and let another DA take the case. She won't, because she did this for the dollars. "you are just astounding at your ability to know truth from a lie. It's truly remarkable!" This is called a "non sequitur". It's another logical fallacy of debate. An officer of the court would know that. Nathan Wade literally lied on his interrogatory statements of fact in his divorce. He then filed interrogatory statements of fact for this hearing, also about his divorce, which Fani signed off on as proof of their innocence. Mr Wade went back into the court filings, and changed his answers. He was asked if during his divorce he had ever been in any romantic relationships with anyone other than his wife during the course of the marriage, through the separation, and up to the present. He said "none". Then when Fani had to admit to their romantic relationship, he went back into the filings and altered his answers. In place of his answer that he never cheated on his wife, he plead the fifth. As a fake officer of the court, do you even know what the "pleading the 5th" means? I highly doubt it. When a defendant pleads the 5th, it means they are refusing to answer the question, based on the fact that the answer may incriminate them in a crime. "To be frank, you don't know what you are talking about, in spite of you arrogant self-assurance. You also have little experience in life, as your presumptions make clear. That's called projection and hypocrisy. Psychology 101. You're a textbook case. You literally just made nothing but presumptions about me, dear totally lacking self awareness. "I don't have 10k in my home safe, but I have a little under 8. I don't reveal that to others. That okay with you?" You've foolishly revealed you keep 8k in a safe in your home, Edna Lowery. Are you really this obtuse? Or is this just the desperate act of a YouTube content moderator pretending to be an officer of the court? I'm inclined to believe the latter. "Also, just FYI, I am an officer of the court" If you're an officer of the court, then I'm a Supreme Court Justice. "Your assertions are foolish, and although you are clearly literate, you do yourself and your intelligence no favors to pontificate where you have no experience." Are you talking to yourself in the mirror? Cause this is also projection and hypocrisy. Not to mention, it's yet another argument from authority, another ad hominem, and another non sequitur. Are you capable of acting else? Highly doubtful. Again, your parochial arguments are called "logical fallacies of debate". An officer of the courts should know that. "I hope you NEVER need a lawyer." I'm in my 40s. I've needed lawyers many times for various legal proceedings in regards to my personally owned business. I have a lawyer on retainer. Do you know what "retainer" means? 🤣🤣🤣🤣 "Leaving this forum now. I didn't expect to see mtg on Reddit, so I'm out! Cheers!" Another ad hominem, wrapped in a non sequitur, and covered in an argument from authority. All you have is logical fallacies of debate. You can't argue law, so you're clearly not a lawyer. You're clearly not a judge, because you know nothing about the authority of the law. Are you pretending you're a court reporter? Is that the kind of officer of the court you imagine you are?🤣🤣🤣🤣 You're not fooling anyone. You're leaving, because you can't defend your position. You're so desperate to win that you've decided to lie. That's the act of someone who has no idea what it feels like to win a debate.
    1
  4723.  @ednalowery9204  , Told you reverse psychology would work on you. "you are just astounding at your ability to know truth from a lie. It's truly remarkable!" This is called a "non sequitur". It's another logical fallacy of debate. An officer of the court would know that. Nathan Wade literally lied on his interrogatory statements of fact in his divorce. He then filed interrogatory statements of fact for this hearing, also about his divorce, which Fani signed off on as proof of their innocence. Mr Wade went back into the court filings, and changed his answers. He was asked if during his divorce he had ever been in any romantic relationships with anyone other than his wife during the course of the marriage, through the separation, and up to the present. He said "none". Then when Fani had to admit to their romantic relationship, he went back into the filings and altered his answers. In place of his answer that he never cheated on his wife, he pled the fifth. As a fake officer of the court, do you even know what the "pleading the 5th" means? I highly doubt it. When a defendant pleads the 5th, it means they are refusing to answer the question, based on the fact that the answer may incriminate them in a crime. "To be frank, you don't know what you are talking about, in spite of you arrogant self-assurance. You also have little experience in life, as your presumptions make clear. That's called projection and hypocrisy. Psychology 101. You're a textbook case. You literally just made nothing but presumptions about me, dear totally lacking self awareness. "I don't have 10k in my home safe, but I have a little under 8. I don't reveal that to others. That okay with you?" You've foolishly revealed you keep 8k in a safe in your home, Edna Lowery. Are you really this obtuse? Or is this just the desperate act of a YouTube content moderator pretending to be an officer of the court? I'm inclined to believe the latter. "Also, just FYI, I am an officer of the court" If you're an officer of the court, then I'm a Supreme Court Justice. "Your assertions are foolish, and although you are clearly literate, you do yourself and your intelligence no favors to pontificate where you have no experience." Are you talking to yourself in the mirror? Cause this is also projection and hypocrisy. Not to mention, it's yet another argument from authority, another ad hominem, and another non sequitur. Are you capable of acting else? Highly doubtful. Again, your parochial arguments are called "logical fallacies of debate". An officer of the courts should know that. "I hope you NEVER need a lawyer." I'm in my 40s. I've needed lawyers many times for various legal proceedings in regards to my personally owned business. I have a lawyer on retainer. Do you know what "retainer" means? 🤣🤣🤣🤣 "Leaving this forum now. I didn't expect to see mtg on Reddit, so I'm out! Cheers!" Another ad hominem, wrapped in a non sequitur, and covered in an argument from authority. All you have is logical fallacies of debate. You can't argue law, because you have no idea what the law is. You're clearly not a lawyer or a judge, because you know nothing about the authority of the law. Are you pretending you're a court reporter? Is that the kind of officer of the court you imagine you are?🤣🤣🤣🤣 You're not fooling anyone. You're leaving, because you can't defend your position. You're so desperate to win that you've decided to lie. That's the act of someone who has no idea what it feels like to win a debate.
    1
  4724.  @ednalowery9204  Told you reverse psychology would work on you. "you are just astounding at your ability to know truth from a lie. It's truly remarkable!" This is called a "non sequitur". It's another logical fallacy of debate. An officer of the court would know that. Nathan Wade literally lied on his interrogatory statements of fact in his divorce. He then filed interrogatory statements of fact for this hearing, also about his divorce, which Fani signed off on as proof of their innocence. Mr Wade went back into the court filings, and changed his answers. He was asked if during his divorce he had ever been in any romantic relationships with anyone other than his wife during the course of the marriage, through the separation, and up to the present. He said "none". Then when Fani had to admit to their romantic relationship, he went back into the filings and altered his answers. In place of his answer that he never cheated on his wife, he pled the fifth. As a fake officer of the court, do you even know what the "pleading the 5th" means? I highly doubt it. When a defendant pleads the 5th, it means they are refusing to answer the question, based on the fact that the answer may incriminate them in a crime. "To be frank, you don't know what you are talking about, in spite of you arrogant self-assurance. You also have little experience in life, as your presumptions make clear. That's called projection and hypocrisy. Psychology 101. You're a textbook case. You literally just made nothing but presumptions about me, dear totally lacking self awareness. "I don't have 10k in my home safe, but I have a little under 8. I don't reveal that to others. That okay with you?" You've foolishly revealed you keep 8k in a safe in your home, Edna Lowery. Are you really this obtuse? Or is this just the desperate act of a YouTube content moderator pretending to be an officer of the court? I'm inclined to believe the latter. "Also, just FYI, I am an officer of the court" If you're an officer of the court, then I'm a Supreme Court Justice. "Your assertions are foolish, and although you are clearly literate, you do yourself and your intelligence no favors to pontificate where you have no experience." Are you talking to yourself in the mirror? Cause this is also projection and hypocrisy. Not to mention, it's yet another argument from authority, another ad hominem, and another non sequitur. Are you capable of anything else? Highly doubtful. Again, your parochial arguments are called "logical fallacies of debate". An officer of the courts should know that. "I hope you NEVER need a lawyer." I'm in my 40s. I've needed lawyers many times for various legal proceedings in regards to my personally owned business. I have a lawyer on retainer. Do you know what "retainer" means? 🤣🤣🤣🤣 "Leaving this forum now. I didn't expect to see mtg on Reddit, so I'm out! Cheers!" Another ad hominem, wrapped in a non sequitur, and covered in an argument from authority. All you have is logical fallacies of debate. You can't argue law, because you have no idea what the law is. You're clearly not a lawyer or a judge, because you know nothing about the authority of the law. Are you pretending you're a court reporter? Is that the kind of officer of the court you imagine you are?🤣🤣🤣🤣 You're not fooling anyone. You're leaving, because you can't defend your position. You're so desperate to win that you've decided to lie and cheat, by blocking me from speaking for 48 hours. That's the act of someone who has no idea what it feels like to win a debate.
    1
  4725. 1
  4726. 1
  4727. 1
  4728. 1
  4729. 1
  4730. 1
  4731. 1
  4732. 1
  4733. 1
  4734. 1
  4735. 1
  4736. 1
  4737. 1
  4738. 1
  4739. 1
  4740. 1
  4741. 1
  4742. 1
  4743. 1
  4744. 1
  4745. 1
  4746. 1
  4747. 1
  4748. 1
  4749. 1
  4750. 1
  4751. 1
  4752. 1
  4753. 1
  4754. 1
  4755. 1
  4756. 1
  4757. 1
  4758. 1
  4759. 1
  4760. 1
  4761. 1
  4762. 1
  4763. 1
  4764. 1
  4765. 1
  4766. 1
  4767. 1
  4768. 1
  4769. 1
  4770. 1
  4771. 1
  4772. 1
  4773. 1
  4774. 1
  4775. 1
  4776. 1
  4777. 1
  4778. 1
  4779. 1
  4780. 1
  4781. 1
  4782. 1
  4783. 1
  4784. 1
  4785. 1
  4786. 1
  4787. 1
  4788. 1
  4789. 1
  4790. 1
  4791. 1
  4792. 1
  4793. 1
  4794. 1
  4795. 1
  4796. 1
  4797. 1
  4798. 1
  4799. 1
  4800. 1
  4801. 1
  4802. 1
  4803. 1
  4804. 1
  4805. 1
  4806. 1
  4807. 1
  4808. 1
  4809. 1
  4810. 1
  4811. 1
  4812. 1
  4813. 1
  4814. 1
  4815. 1
  4816. 1
  4817. 1
  4818. 1
  4819. 1
  4820. 1
  4821. 1
  4822. 1
  4823. 1
  4824. 1
  4825. 1
  4826. 1
  4827. 1
  4828. 1
  4829. 1
  4830. 1
  4831. 1
  4832. 1
  4833. 1
  4834. 1
  4835. 1
  4836. 1
  4837. 1
  4838. 1
  4839. 1
  4840. 1
  4841. 1
  4842. 1
  4843. 1
  4844. 1
  4845. 1
  4846. 1
  4847. 1
  4848. 1
  4849. 1
  4850. 1
  4851. 1
  4852. 1
  4853. 1
  4854. 1
  4855. 1
  4856. 1
  4857. 1
  4858. 1
  4859. 1
  4860. 1
  4861. 1
  4862. 1
  4863. 1
  4864. 1
  4865. 1
  4866. 1
  4867. 1
  4868. 1
  4869. 1
  4870. 1
  4871. 1
  4872. 1
  4873. 1
  4874. 1
  4875. 1
  4876. 1
  4877. 1
  4878. 1
  4879. 1
  4880. 1
  4881. 1
  4882. 1
  4883. 1
  4884. 1
  4885. 1
  4886. 1
  4887. 1
  4888. 1
  4889. 1
  4890. 1
  4891. 1
  4892. 1
  4893. 1
  4894. 1
  4895. 1
  4896. 1
  4897. 1
  4898. 1
  4899. 1
  4900. 1
  4901. 1
  4902. 1
  4903. 1
  4904. 1
  4905. 1
  4906. 1
  4907. 1
  4908. 1
  4909. 1
  4910. 1
  4911. 1
  4912. 1
  4913. 1
  4914. 1
  4915. 1
  4916. 1
  4917. 1
  4918. 1
  4919. 1
  4920. 1
  4921. 1
  4922. 1
  4923.  @philliplyles4720  , please explain this short list of Democrats accused of sexual assault. "And go" Harvey Weinstein Hollywood producer, Democratic mega donor, activist Accused of rape, sexual assault, harassment Louis C.K. Comedian, Democratic activist Accused of sexual misconduct Brett Ratner Hollywood director, Democratic donor Accused of rape, sexual assault, harassment Andrew Kreisburg Hollywood producer, Democratic donor Alleged sexual harassment Steve Jurvetson Co-founder of a venture capital firm, SpaceX board member, Democratic donor Accused of sexual misconduct Andy Dick Comedian, actor, Democratic donor Alleged groping, sexual harassment Hamilton Fish Publisher of the New Republic, liberal media figure Accused of sexual harassment Al Franken Former comedian, current Democratic senator Accused of multiple instances of sexual misconduct, groping Kevin Spacey Actor, Democratic mega-donor and activist Accused of attempted sexual assault of a teenage boy Rick Najera Director of CBS's "Diversity Showcase," Democratic donor Alleged sexual harassment Knight Landesman Publisher of Artforum, Democratic donor Accused of groping, sexual harassment Leon Wieseltier Editor at The New Republic, liberal media icon Accused of rampant sexual harassment John Besh Chief executive or Besh Restaurant Group, Democratic donor Alleged sexual harassment Lockhart Steele Vox Media editorial director, Democratic donor Accused of sexual harassment, misconduct Anthony Weiner Former Democratic Congressman In federal prison for sexting underage girls Bill Clinton Former Democratic President of the United States Accused of rape, sexual misconduct, impeached for perjury for lying about sexual misconduct Eric Massa Former Democratic New York State Representative Accused of sexual misconduct David Wu Former Democratic Congressman Alleged sexual harassment Eliot Spitzer Former Democratic Governor of New York Admitted to patronizing prostitutes John Edwards Democratic Senator, Vice Presidential candidate Encouraged his mistress to abort their love child to avoid a larger scandal Neil Goldschmidt Former Democratic Governor Admitted to sexually abusing a 14-year-old girl Paul E. Patton Former Democratic Governor After his mistress broke off an affair, Kentucky filed numerous violations against her business Mel Reynolds Former Democratic Congressman Convicted of raping a 16-year-old girl Brock Adams Former Democratic Congressman Accused sexual harassment, abuse, rape Robert Menendez Democratic Senator Allegedly had sex with underage prostitute(s) Al Gore Former Democratic Vice President, Presidential candidate Accused of sexual assault John Conyers Democratic Congressman Allegedly fired staffer who refused to sleep with him then paid $27,000 settlement to keep it quiet Charlie Rose Liberal journalist Fired for sexual harassment, groping, indecent exposure Glenn Thrush Liberal New York Times reporter Suspended for alleged sexual misconduct Just like a HYPOCRITICAL liberal, you accuse others of the crimes you're guilty of. Sexual assault is the favorite pastime of Democrats. How many women have you sexually assaulted? Don't pretend you haven't. You're harassing a woman right now. No doubt you assault women too. According to you, accusations are proof. Therefore, if I accused you of being a groping pervert, you are one. That's your broken logic, dear hypocrite. You are the pervert you decry.
    1
  4924. 1
  4925. 1
  4926. 1
  4927. 1
  4928. 1
  4929. 1
  4930. 1
  4931. 1
  4932. 1
  4933. 1
  4934. 1
  4935. 1
  4936. 1
  4937. 1
  4938. 1
  4939. 1
  4940. 1
  4941.  @331Grabber  , every time you show up, I'll post this, dear liar.  @331Grabber  , here's proof you're a little parrot, copying your intellectual superiors. I'm just gonna keep posting this every time you lie. Nikkisheers 1 day ago (edited) 331Grabber 331Grabber 2 hours ago (edited) "@Nikkisheers Triggered yourself lol." This is called projection, dear hypocrite. I destroyed you and your non argument 2 days ago. I must have hit a nerve, since here we are 2 days later, and you're still unhinged. For 2 days you've been boiling, stewing, and seething over your utter and abject humiliation. Your ego was so bruised and provoked that you sneakily came back in the hopes of redeeming yourself, only to be further humiliated. This is called desperate and pathetic, dear delusional. You lost, because you're a liar. Get over it. You're becoming a psycho stalker, dear liar. And why are you responding to yourself in the hopes I won't see your asinine and inept comments? This is called cowardice, dear psycho stalker. "You're the one who can't articulate your own point. " Really? I can't articulate my own point? Then why are you so angry 2 days later?🤣🤣🤣Pretty sure that was you, dear projecting, hypocritical liar, who failed to provide proof of your claims, because you're a liar. Where's your proof I'm wrong? I provided sources for all my claims. You've provided nothing but opinions, conspiracy theories, hyperbolic conjecture, and ad hominem attacks. None of which are evidence to support your lies. "You stupidly misquoted the Mueller report probably thinking no one would call you on your bullshit." YOU ARE A LIAR. I copied and pasted directly from CNN and NBC sources. Are you so mentally impaired that you don't know how copy and paste works? Clearly, you never read the Mueller report. I didn't misquote anything. I asked you to provide the quote that (you say) i "misquoted". You failed to do so, because you know you lied, and providing the quote would prove I'm 100% correct, as usual. You have no proof of your claims and no facts to bolster your argument. Provide the quote, dear liar. You can't, and so you keep spewing the same bullshit lie over, and over again. I quoted Mueller accurately and correctly. If you can't prove that I misquoted Mueller with actual fact sources, then you prove yourself a liar. So, thank you for being so accommodating, dear liar. All you had to do was provide the quote. I've been waiting for days, and you've yet to do so. If I'm so obviously wrong, it should be easy for anyone to prove. Unless one is a liar, like you. What exactly did I misquote? What is the correct quote? I'm still waiting, dear liar. By the way, nothing about me is stupid. My IQ was tested to be 149. Technically, I'm a genius. I'm so far out of your plebian league that you can't even come to the games, dear DELUSION PSYCHO. "I called you on it and the internet is forever." Yes, your lie is forever captured on the internet, unless you delete it, like the coward you are. Well done, dear simpleton. Do you imagine you're winning the argument, dear delusional? 🤣🤣🤣 Do you think no one else is going to see your lies, or how arrogantly stupid and clueless you are? No one has come to your rescue. No one is agreeing with you. Everyone sees your ineptitude, your projection, your hypocrisy, and your unhinged ignorance and malice. You poor, ignorant fool. Sad to be as despicable and duplicitous as you. Here's a clue: If you have to lie to win the argument, then you're incapable of winning. A fact, I'm sure, you're well aware of, as winning is sensation of feeling you've never experienced. "Fuck you. " Is this the best you got, useless, bloody cuntrag? How unimaginative and generic of you. Is this failure due to the fact that you're now further hindered by a dick in your ass, as well as your mouth? I told you, we can discuss facts, or we can hurl insults. Either way, you're gonna lose, mindless fucktard. If I was as intellectually starving as you are, I'd limit my comments to zero. Haven't you found that mass shooting yet? Here's a clue: look for a gun free zone.🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'm not going anywhere, psycho stalking, projecting, hypocritical LIAR. You're never gonna get the last word, dear coward. You can wait days, weeks, or even months to respond to yourself. I'm still gonna see it, moron. I'm making it my agenda to check this comment daily to see your cowardly comments. You've got nothing but lies, projection, and HYPOCRISY, as well as a dick in your mouth, and one in your ass. This is why you're trying to sneak in your inane, impaired, and inept replies. Pretty pathetic, dear cowardly cuntrag.🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣DYING LAUGHING AT YOU, LIAR!!!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
    1
  4942. 1
  4943. 1
  4944. 1
  4945. 1
  4946.  @331Grabber  , @331Grabber  , every time you show up, I'll post this, dear liar.  @331Grabber  , here's proof you're a little parrot, copying your intellectual superiors. I'm just gonna keep posting this every time you lie. Nikkisheers 1 day ago (edited) 331Grabber 331Grabber 2 hours ago (edited) "@Nikkisheers Triggered yourself lol." This is called projection, dear hypocrite. I destroyed you and your non argument 2 days ago. I must have hit a nerve, since here we are 2 days later, and you're still unhinged. For 2 days you've been boiling, stewing, and seething over your utter and abject humiliation. Your ego was so bruised and provoked that you sneakily came back in the hopes of redeeming yourself, only to be further humiliated. This is called desperate and pathetic, dear delusional. You lost, because you're a liar. Get over it. You're becoming a psycho stalker, dear liar. And why are you responding to yourself in the hopes I won't see your asinine and inept comments? This is called cowardice, dear psycho stalker. "You're the one who can't articulate your own point. " Really? I can't articulate my own point? Then why are you so angry 2 days later?🤣🤣🤣Pretty sure that was you, dear projecting, hypocritical liar, who failed to provide proof of your claims, because you're a liar. Where's your proof I'm wrong? I provided sources for all my claims. You've provided nothing but opinions, conspiracy theories, hyperbolic conjecture, and ad hominem attacks. None of which are evidence to support your lies. "You stupidly misquoted the Mueller report probably thinking no one would call you on your bullshit." YOU ARE A LIAR. I copied and pasted directly from CNN and NBC sources. Are you so mentally impaired that you don't know how copy and paste works? Clearly, you never read the Mueller report. I didn't misquote anything. I asked you to provide the quote that (you say) i "misquoted". You failed to do so, because you know you lied, and providing the quote would prove I'm 100% correct, as usual. You have no proof of your claims and no facts to bolster your argument. Provide the quote, dear liar. You can't, and so you keep spewing the same bullshit lie over, and over again. I quoted Mueller accurately and correctly. If you can't prove that I misquoted Mueller with actual fact sources, then you prove yourself a liar. So, thank you for being so accommodating, dear liar. All you had to do was provide the quote. I've been waiting for days, and you've yet to do so. If I'm so obviously wrong, it should be easy for anyone to prove. Unless one is a liar, like you. What exactly did I misquote? What is the correct quote? I'm still waiting, dear liar. By the way, nothing about me is stupid. My IQ was tested to be 149. Technically, I'm a genius. I'm so far out of your plebian league that you can't even come to the games, dear DELUSION PSYCHO. "I called you on it and the internet is forever." Yes, your lie is forever captured on the internet, unless you delete it, like the coward you are. Well done, dear simpleton. Do you imagine you're winning the argument, dear delusional? 🤣🤣🤣 Do you think no one else is going to see your lies, or how arrogantly stupid and clueless you are? No one has come to your rescue. No one is agreeing with you. Everyone sees your ineptitude, your projection, your hypocrisy, and your unhinged ignorance and malice. You poor, ignorant fool. Sad to be as despicable and duplicitous as you. Here's a clue: If you have to lie to win the argument, then you're incapable of winning. A fact, I'm sure, you're well aware of, as winning is sensation of feeling you've never experienced. "Fuck you. " Is this the best you got, useless, bloody cuntrag? How unimaginative and generic of you. Is this failure due to the fact that you're now further hindered by a dick in your ass, as well as your mouth? I told you, we can discuss facts, or we can hurl insults. Either way, you're gonna lose, mindless fucktard. If I was as intellectually starving as you are, I'd limit my comments to zero. Haven't you found that mass shooting yet? Here's a clue: look for a gun free zone.🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'm not going anywhere, psycho stalking, projecting, hypocritical LIAR. You're never gonna get the last word, dear coward. You can wait days, weeks, or even months to respond to yourself. I'm still gonna see it, moron. I'm making it my agenda to check this comment daily to see your cowardly comments. You've got nothing but lies, projection, and HYPOCRISY, as well as a dick in your mouth, and one in your ass. This is why you're trying to sneak in your inane, impaired, and inept replies. Pretty pathetic, dear cowardly cuntrag.🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣DYING LAUGHING AT YOU, LIAR!!!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
    1
  4947.  @331Grabber   @331Grabber  , every time you show up, I'll post this, dear liar.  @331Grabber  , here's proof you're a little parrot, copying your intellectual superiors. I'm just gonna keep posting this every time you lie. Nikkisheers 1 day ago (edited) 331Grabber 331Grabber 2 hours ago (edited) "@Nikkisheers Triggered yourself lol." This is called projection, dear hypocrite. I destroyed you and your non argument 2 days ago. I must have hit a nerve, since here we are 2 days later, and you're still unhinged. For 2 days you've been boiling, stewing, and seething over your utter and abject humiliation. Your ego was so bruised and provoked that you sneakily came back in the hopes of redeeming yourself, only to be further humiliated. This is called desperate and pathetic, dear delusional. You lost, because you're a liar. Get over it. You're becoming a psycho stalker, dear liar. And why are you responding to yourself in the hopes I won't see your asinine and inept comments? This is called cowardice, dear psycho stalker. "You're the one who can't articulate your own point. " Really? I can't articulate my own point? Then why are you so angry 2 days later?🤣🤣🤣Pretty sure that was you, dear projecting, hypocritical liar, who failed to provide proof of your claims, because you're a liar. Where's your proof I'm wrong? I provided sources for all my claims. You've provided nothing but opinions, conspiracy theories, hyperbolic conjecture, and ad hominem attacks. None of which are evidence to support your lies. "You stupidly misquoted the Mueller report probably thinking no one would call you on your bullshit." YOU ARE A LIAR. I copied and pasted directly from CNN and NBC sources. Are you so mentally impaired that you don't know how copy and paste works? Clearly, you never read the Mueller report. I didn't misquote anything. I asked you to provide the quote that (you say) i "misquoted". You failed to do so, because you know you lied, and providing the quote would prove I'm 100% correct, as usual. You have no proof of your claims and no facts to bolster your argument. Provide the quote, dear liar. You can't, and so you keep spewing the same bullshit lie over, and over again. I quoted Mueller accurately and correctly. If you can't prove that I misquoted Mueller with actual fact sources, then you prove yourself a liar. So, thank you for being so accommodating, dear liar. All you had to do was provide the quote. I've been waiting for days, and you've yet to do so. If I'm so obviously wrong, it should be easy for anyone to prove. Unless one is a liar, like you. What exactly did I misquote? What is the correct quote? I'm still waiting, dear liar. By the way, nothing about me is stupid. My IQ was tested to be 149. Technically, I'm a genius. I'm so far out of your plebian league that you can't even come to the games, dear DELUSION PSYCHO. "I called you on it and the internet is forever." Yes, your lie is forever captured on the internet, unless you delete it, like the coward you are. Well done, dear simpleton. Do you imagine you're winning the argument, dear delusional? 🤣🤣🤣 Do you think no one else is going to see your lies, or how arrogantly stupid and clueless you are? No one has come to your rescue. No one is agreeing with you. Everyone sees your ineptitude, your projection, your hypocrisy, and your unhinged ignorance and malice. You poor, ignorant fool. Sad to be as despicable and duplicitous as you. Here's a clue: If you have to lie to win the argument, then you're incapable of winning. A fact, I'm sure, you're well aware of, as winning is sensation of feeling you've never experienced. "Fuck you. " Is this the best you got, useless, bloody cuntrag? How unimaginative and generic of you. Is this failure due to the fact that you're now further hindered by a dick in your ass, as well as your mouth? I told you, we can discuss facts, or we can hurl insults. Either way, you're gonna lose, mindless fucktard. If I was as intellectually starving as you are, I'd limit my comments to zero. Haven't you found that mass shooting yet? Here's a clue: look for a gun free zone.🤣🤣🤣🤣 I'm not going anywhere, psycho stalking, projecting, hypocritical LIAR. You're never gonna get the last word, dear coward. You can wait days, weeks, or even months to respond to yourself. I'm still gonna see it, moron. I'm making it my agenda to check this comment daily to see your cowardly comments. You've got nothing but lies, projection, and HYPOCRISY, as well as a dick in your mouth, and one in your ass. This is why you're trying to sneak in your inane, impaired, and inept replies. Pretty pathetic, dear cowardly cuntrag.🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣DYING LAUGHING AT YOU, LIAR!!!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
    1
  4948. 1
  4949. 1
  4950. 1
  4951. 1
  4952. 1
  4953. 1
  4954. 1
  4955. 1
  4956. 1
  4957. 1
  4958. 1
  4959. 1
  4960. 1
  4961. 1
  4962. 1
  4963. 1
  4964. 1
  4965. 1
  4966. 1
  4967. 1
  4968. 1
  4969. 1
  4970. 1
  4971. 1
  4972. 1
  4973. 1
  4974. 1
  4975. 1
  4976. 1
  4977. 1
  4978. 1
  4979. 1
  4980. 1
  4981. 1
  4982. 1
  4983. 1
  4984. 1
  4985. 1
  4986. 1
  4987. 1
  4988. 1
  4989. 1
  4990. 1
  4991. 1
  4992. 1
  4993. 1
  4994. 1
  4995. 1
  4996. 1
  4997. 1
  4998. 1
  4999. 1
  5000. 1
  5001. 1
  5002. 1
  5003. 1
  5004. 1
  5005. 1
  5006. 1
  5007. 1
  5008. 1
  5009. 1
  5010. 1
  5011. 1
  5012. 1
  5013. 1
  5014. 1
  5015. 1
  5016. 1
  5017. 1
  5018. 1
  5019. 1
  5020. 1
  5021. 1
  5022. 1
  5023. 1
  5024. 1
  5025. 1
  5026. 1
  5027. 1
  5028. 1
  5029. 1
  5030. 1
  5031. 1
  5032. 1
  5033. 1
  5034. 1
  5035. 1
  5036. 1
  5037. 1
  5038. 1
  5039. 1
  5040. 1
  5041. 1
  5042. 1
  5043. 1
  5044. 1
  5045. 1
  5046. 1
  5047. 1
  5048. 1
  5049. 1
  5050. 1
  5051. 1
  5052. 1
  5053. 1
  5054. 1
  5055. 1
  5056. 1
  5057. 1
  5058. 1
  5059. 1
  5060. 1
  5061. 1
  5062. 1
  5063. 1
  5064. 1
  5065. 1
  5066. 1
  5067. 1
  5068. 1
  5069. 1
  5070. 1
  5071. 1
  5072. 1
  5073. 1
  5074. 1
  5075. 1
  5076. 1
  5077. 1
  5078. 1
  5079. 1
  5080. 1
  5081. 1
  5082. 1
  5083. 1
  5084. 1
  5085. 1
  5086. 1
  5087. 1
  5088. 1
  5089. 1
  5090. 1
  5091. 1
  5092. 1
  5093. 1
  5094. 1
  5095. 1
  5096. 1
  5097. 1
  5098. 1
  5099. 1
  5100. 1
  5101. 1
  5102. 1
  5103. 1
  5104. 1
  5105. 1
  5106. 1
  5107. 1
  5108. 1
  5109. 1
  5110. 1
  5111. 1
  5112. 1
  5113. 1
  5114. 1
  5115. 1
  5116. 1
  5117. 1
  5118. 1
  5119. 1
  5120. 1
  5121. 1
  5122. 1
  5123. 1
  5124. 1
  5125. 1
  5126. 1
  5127. 1
  5128. 1
  5129. 1
  5130. 1
  5131. 1
  5132. 1
  5133. 1
  5134. 1
  5135. 1
  5136. 1
  5137. 1
  5138. 1
  5139. 1
  5140. 1
  5141. 1
  5142. 1
  5143. 1
  5144. 1
  5145. 1
  5146. 1
  5147. 1
  5148. 1
  5149. 1
  5150. 1
  5151. 1
  5152. 1
  5153. 1
  5154. 1
  5155. 1
  5156. 1
  5157. 1
  5158. 1
  5159. 1
  5160. 1
  5161. 1
  5162. 1
  5163. 1
  5164. 1
  5165. 1
  5166. 1
  5167. 1
  5168. 1
  5169. 1
  5170. 1
  5171. 1
  5172. 1
  5173. 1
  5174. 1
  5175. 1
  5176. 1
  5177. 1
  5178. 1
  5179. 1
  5180. 1
  5181. 1
  5182. 1
  5183. 1
  5184. 1
  5185. 1
  5186. 1
  5187. 1
  5188. 1
  5189. 1
  5190. 1
  5191. 1
  5192. 1
  5193. 1
  5194. 1
  5195. 1
  5196. 1
  5197. 1
  5198. 1
  5199. 1
  5200. 1
  5201. 1
  5202. 1
  5203. 1
  5204. 1
  5205. 1
  5206. 1
  5207. 1
  5208. 1
  5209. 1
  5210. 1
  5211. 1
  5212. 1
  5213. 1
  5214. 1
  5215. 1
  5216. 1
  5217. 1
  5218. 1
  5219. 1
  5220. 1
  5221. 1
  5222. 1
  5223. 1
  5224. 1
  5225. 1
  5226. 1
  5227. 1
  5228. 1
  5229. 1
  5230. 1
  5231. 1
  5232. 1
  5233. 1
  5234. 1
  5235. 1
  5236. 1
  5237. 1
  5238. 1
  5239. 1
  5240. 1
  5241. 1
  5242. 1
  5243. 1
  5244. 1
  5245. 1
  5246. 1
  5247. 1
  5248. 1
  5249. 1
  5250. 1
  5251. 1
  5252. 1
  5253. 1
  5254. 1
  5255. 1
  5256. 1
  5257. 1
  5258. 1
  5259. 1
  5260. 1
  5261. 1
  5262. 1
  5263. 1
  5264. 1
  5265. 1
  5266. 1
  5267. 1
  5268. 1
  5269. 1
  5270. 1
  5271. 1
  5272. 1
  5273. 1
  5274. 1
  5275. 1
  5276. 1
  5277. 1
  5278. 1
  5279. 1
  5280. 1
  5281. 1
  5282. 1
  5283. 1
  5284. 1
  5285. 1
  5286. 1
  5287. 1
  5288. 1
  5289. 1
  5290. 1
  5291. 1
  5292. 1
  5293. 1
  5294. 1
  5295. 1
  5296. 1
  5297. 1
  5298. 1
  5299. 1
  5300. 1
  5301. 1
  5302. 1
  5303. 1
  5304. 1
  5305. 1
  5306. 1
  5307. 1
  5308. 1
  5309. 1
  5310. 1
  5311. 1
  5312. 1
  5313. 1
  5314. 1
  5315. 1
  5316. 1
  5317. 1
  5318. 1
  5319. 1
  5320. 1
  5321.  @shaunpatrick8345  , "Ultraviolet blood irradiation (UBI) was extensively used in the 1940s and 1950s to treat many diseases including septicemia, pneumonia, tuberculosis, arthritis, asthma and even poliomyelitis. The early studies were carried out by several physicians in USA and published in the American Journal of Surgery. However with the development of antibiotics, UBI use declined and it has now been called “the cure that time forgot”. Later studies were mostly performed by Russian workers and in other Eastern countries and the modern view in Western countries is that UBI remains highly controversial. This chapter discusses the potential of UBI as an alternative approach to current methods used to treat infections, as an immune-modulating therapy and as a method for normalizing blood parameters. No resistance of microorganisms to UV irradiation has been reported, and multi- antibiotic resistant strains are as susceptible as their wild-type counterparts. Low and mild doses of UV kill microorganisms by damaging the DNA, while any DNA damage in host cells can be rapidly repaired by DNA repair enzymes. However the use of UBI to treat septicemia cannot be solely due to UV-mediated killing of bacteria in the blood-stream, as only 5–7% of blood volume needs to be treated with UV to produce the optimum benefit. UBI may enhance the phagocytic capacity of various phagocytic cells (neutrophils and dendritic cells), inhibit lymphocytes, and oxidize blood lipids. The oxidative nature of UBI may have mechanisms in common with ozone therapy and other oxygen therapies. There may be some similarities to extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) using psoralens and UVA irradiation. However there are differences between UBI and ECP in that UBI tends to stimulate the immune system, while ECP tends to be immunosuppressive. With the recent emergence of bacteria that are resistant to all known antibiotics, UBI should be more investigated as an alternative approach to infections, and as an immune-modulating therapy." https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6122858/&ved=2ahUKEwi5086MvLzpAhUHTN8KHe3bCIoQFjAIegQIBhAB&usg=AOvVaw079lrrwBHvYoSw4zbgjfbS&cshid=1589772672925
    1
  5322. 1
  5323. 1
  5324. 1
  5325. 1
  5326. 1
  5327. 1
  5328. 1
  5329. 1
  5330. 1
  5331. 1
  5332. 1
  5333. 1
  5334. 1
  5335. 1
  5336. 1
  5337. 1
  5338. 1
  5339. 1
  5340. 1
  5341. 1
  5342. 1
  5343. 1
  5344. 1
  5345. 1
  5346. 1
  5347. 1
  5348. 1
  5349. 1
  5350. 1
  5351. 1
  5352. 1
  5353. 1
  5354. 1
  5355. 1
  5356. 1
  5357. 1
  5358. 1
  5359. 1
  5360. 1
  5361. 1
  5362. 1
  5363. 1
  5364. 1
  5365. 1
  5366. 1
  5367. 1
  5368. 1
  5369. 1
  5370. 1
  5371. 1
  5372. 1
  5373. 1
  5374. 1
  5375. 1
  5376. 1
  5377. 1
  5378. 1
  5379. 1
  5380. 1
  5381. 1
  5382. 1
  5383. 1
  5384. 1
  5385. 1
  5386. 1
  5387. 1
  5388. 1
  5389. 1
  5390. 1
  5391. 1
  5392. 1
  5393. 1
  5394. 1
  5395. 1
  5396. 1
  5397. 1
  5398. 1
  5399. 1
  5400. 1
  5401. 1
  5402. 1
  5403. 1
  5404. 1
  5405. 1
  5406. 1
  5407. 1
  5408. 1
  5409. 1
  5410. 1
  5411. 1
  5412. 1
  5413. 1
  5414. 1
  5415. 1
  5416. 1
  5417. 1
  5418. 1
  5419. 1
  5420. 1
  5421. 1
  5422. 1
  5423. 1
  5424. 1
  5425. 1
  5426. 1
  5427. 1
  5428. 1
  5429. 1
  5430. 1
  5431. 1
  5432. 1
  5433. 1
  5434. 1
  5435. 1
  5436. 1
  5437. 1
  5438. 1
  5439. 1
  5440. 1
  5441. 1
  5442. 1
  5443. 1
  5444. 1
  5445. 1
  5446. 1
  5447. 1
  5448. 1
  5449. 1
  5450. 1
  5451. 1
  5452. 1
  5453. 1
  5454. 1
  5455. 1
  5456. 1
  5457. 1
  5458. 1
  5459. 1
  5460. 1
  5461. 1
  5462. 1
  5463. 1