Youtube comments of Jack Burton (@JackBurton-qp4hc).

  1. One of the many shocking aspects is that the PO can conduct a criminal investigation independently of the police. How does one ensure the process is not therefore biased? Well we already know the answer to that, don't we...
    127
  2. No you do not believe the children. They stated that it was Ella Drapers then boyfriend, Abraham Christie, who TORTURED them over several weeks in Morocco to make them say the false allegations. Abraham Christie already had 37 convictions for child abuse , drugs, violence and dishonesty. YOU don't believe the children when they are saying a KNOWN CHILD ABUSER abused them. Get a grip
    26
  3. Plus the DUI's...
    26
  4. "Man assaulted 3 police… set free." He is police bail, he is not "free". At least get basic facts right.
    22
  5.  @catedinburgh4824  It was 10 years ago, they are adults and can talk as they wish. Maybe they don't want to entertain the conspiratards.
    17
  6. The children stated that it was not their father, it was the mothers then boyfriend, Abraham Christie, who had 37 convictions for child abuse, drug offences, violence and dishonesty. The children described how he had TORTURED them into making the false allegations. Get a grip.
    16
  7. @Anthony-iu8wu You wouldn't know a fact if it slapped you in the face screaming, "I am a fact". You would have handed the children back to their actual abusers, their mother and her child abusing boyfriend who tortured them into lying.
    16
  8.  @peacefulwarchief3961  "of course not. Why would I" Because a KNOWN CHILD ABUSER is the one that TORTURED them into making the false allegations. The children are literally telling you that a KNOWN CHILD ABUSER made them say it. YOU DON'T BELIEVE THE CHILDREN
    15
  9. That's an abbreviation of three words.
    14
  10. It's not an escalation, it's a special mission!
    14
  11. So you don't believe the children when they stated that the known child abuser Abraham Christie tortured them?
    13
  12.  @WillyWillerton  Grow up.
    12
  13. They are still subject to the same laws that you and I are. The officer committed a criminal offence.
    11
  14.  @Certi-S  You don't sound mentally ill at all.
    9
  15. ...and parenting, my life coaches were mum and dad!
    9
  16. @dm9022 She was murdered by an out of control police officer. There was ZERO justification for his actions.
    9
  17.  @basilboris  " I would have done it to be honest." Then you would be jailed for it. The force used was disproportionate and hence a criminal act. It was not use of reasonable force, so can not be used as a defence.
    9
  18.  @williamshaw5388  Because Trump showing that the USA is weak would be a genius move, right?
    8
  19. Ella Draper paid for the polygraph. She paid to get the result she wanted in a heavily edited video. It was made for gullible people like you @Mario36724 The rest of your comment is nonsense.
    8
  20.  @BaseballPlayer0  He has been charged with First Degree Murder. Those who have seen the video and have all the evidence disagree with you.
    8
  21. The media has had it in for Bailey since he took them to court.
    8
  22. With a pot in her hands?
    8
  23.  @Steven_Williams_  Such as switching a pot of water off?
    7
  24.  @englishguy215  "As a 70 year old man I completely agree with you." Oh get a room will you! ;)
    7
  25. "body language".....Christ on a bike another "expert"....
    7
  26.  @Anthony-iu8wu  Because the police already knew the allegations were false. Ella Draper's then boyfriend, Abraham Christie, was a known child abuser. Coincidentally the officer interviewing the children had dealt with Christie's pervious child abuse case, it must have been a real shock to Christie when he found that little gem out, likely why he did a runner abroad to avoid arrest again. The police do not investigate people when they know an allegation is false. It helps if you know the basics of the case before commenting...
    7
  27. The children later stated that it nonsense and it was the mothers then boyfriend, the known child abuser Abraham Christie, who actually abused them. Abraham Christie already had 37 convictions for child abuse, drug offences, violence and dishonesty. You do "believe the children" when they later stated that a known child abuser tortured them into making the false allegations, yes?
    7
  28. @delmns The family state that she was flying to Ireland because the boiler wasn't working. Bit odd when you consider that she had her housekeeper to open the cottage for a repair guy a week earlier. Would you really fly all the way to Ireland and drive all the way there on the 20th, leaving your son just before Christmas, to check on a boiler repair when you already had a housekeeper having already done it a week ago? The housekeep stated, "I got a heating repairman from Bantry and he fixed the problem and repaired the boiler. That was more than a week before Sophie arrived". Nah, there is something more to the December visit THAT close to Christmas, it certainly isn't this boiler repair that had already been done the week before. Why would she ask people to go with her to check a boiler?
    7
  29. What a sad life he must have posting the real names of this innocent woman, and that of her child, who's lives have been utterly devastated by this hoax. Stick to uploading your trainspotting videos Scott.
    7
  30.  @acb5245  The French court used Marie Farrell's testimony, which is lies and she admits it is lies.
    6
  31.  @Charle-kv7yu  You would have handed these children back to their actual abusers, Abraham Christie and their mother, Ella Draper.
    6
  32.  @jenniferelyse5134  Way to take a comment out of context to score points on the Internet. The OP wasn't talking about fiction writing.
    6
  33.  @lynnflynn5591  Not necessary in England!
    6
  34. So you are saying that as the children are now adults, they are remaining quiet about all this? Yeah sure! Cool story bro! I'm going with, they are adults now and want to put all this hoax behind them and are getting on with their lives. They probably don't want nuts like you tracking them down.
    6
  35. DNA may be found yet.
    5
  36.  @beaustur  It isn't opinion, it is FACT. Maybe educate yourself on this case before you reply?
    5
  37.  @royrogers3133  She's using the pot as a shield doofus!
    5
  38. While possible, perhaps he simply did not. We do know that Alfie (or Shirley) did quickly inform others by telephone though, any of us would I suppose. A person who knows them stated that she knew of the murder an hour after discovery and she lives in Cork City! She stated that the guards have never wanted a statement from her.
    5
  39. Jules has consistently stated that he was innocent. Her daughters hated him, yet even they gave statements in support of him.
    5
  40. When as a result of brain injury, they do not take "weeks or months to form".
    5
  41.  @jscott8110  "We’re not allowed to defend ourselves in the UK." You are in fact, it is Common Law. I have no idea why such nonsense like yours gets repeated.
    5
  42.  @Jack-hy1zq  What evidence did Bailey destroy? The coat that police said he burnt on the bonfire but was actually taken as evidence by them and cut for samples? They lied. I t was in their own evidence room.
    5
  43. So when the children later said it was the known child abuser, Abraham Christie, who tortured them into making the false allegations, you believe them, right? Because, "any one can tell the children were telling the truth". The Abraham Christie that had 37 convictions for child abuse, drugs, violence and dishonesty. You do believe the children when they said that a known child abuser had tortured them into lying, yes?
    5
  44. So if you were accused of a crime, but innocent, you would still be guilty because no smoke without fire, right? Are you really that naive?
    5
  45. The court hearing was in 2015. It found Ella Draper and her then boyfriend Abraham Christie had TORTURED the children over several weeks in Morocco to make them say the false allegations during a custody dispute with their father. They then made 20+ videos where they can be heard prompting and coercing the children into giving testimony, I have seen these and it is blatant. Abraham Christie was already know to the police, having 37 convictions for child abuse, drug offences, violence and dishonesty. It is the 80s/90s Satanic Panic again. It has been known for 30 years that children can in fact be coerced into making all sorts of wild allegations. Fortunately the professionals know this even if clowns on social media don't and then go on to believe this BS.
    5
  46. Don't meet up with two French men hiding out from organised crime either. The gang may come looking for information... ...oh and keep your knickers on, don't drop them for every bloke that gives you attention and then take them back to the cottage like she did Bruno and who knows who else...
    5
  47. If Ukraine is good at one thing then it's showing how ineffective Russian forces really are. They have done so without air superiority too, something that a Western nation would absolutely have.
    5
  48. Get a grip.
    5
  49. The first hit would be the canister wouldn't it? The cluster munitions having more drag hitting the actual target later.
    5
  50.  @blueflyingpenguin1929  Get a grip.
    5
  51. No, you don't believe the children at all. The children stated that it was not their father, it was the mothers then boyfriend, Abraham Christie, who had 37 convictions for child abuse, drug offences, violence and dishonesty. The children described how he had TORTURED them into making the false allegations. YOU do not believe the children when they are saying that a KNOWN CHILD ABUSER did it. YOU would have handed them back to Abraham Christie to be abused. YOU are part of the problem.
    4
  52.  @lewismacdonald1516  I am aware of other that anybody can bring private prosecutions, however the point is that the PO were doing so with the evidence being their own system as you point out.
    4
  53.  @lewismacdonald1516  Indeed. Had it been a police investigation then the system would have to have been scrutinised as part of the evidentiary gathering for the DPP. The PO is unique in having these powers, it is WAY more than any other organisation who may want to prosecute a criminal case. Did you know the PO has access to the Police National Computer? That is an example of how unique the PO is compared to others! It has these powers but does not have to go through the DPP to have the evidence tested before a prosecution is started, that is a fundamental flaw and should be removed from the PO.
    4
  54.  @elliegreen4738  Why do you insist on lying? You know there are witness statements saying that the scratches were there before the murder. Why do you repeatedly lie about knowing that?
    4
  55. "To be fair ,four men had assaulted three Police. Breaking a policewoman's nose and hospitalising two other Police." Had that footage been of a member of the public, then they would be in prison. In Common Law, you have the right to use reasonable force, that was not reasonable force the officer was using to defend themselves. It is that simple.
    4
  56. Because there was a C4 documentary released. Not rocket science, is it.
    4
  57. Indeed. Lost without water. If combined with Ecstasy for example, he would be in real trouble very quickly. Alcohol would be bad enough on its own.
    4
  58. Brian McGinley must be a Guard, he constantly spams every video on YT about this case.
    4
  59. It's a park...
    4
  60. Why do you need to see her face and identity? You are literally missing the point of why it is hidden.
    4
  61. It's about time we told the yanks to go forth and multiply the next time they want the UK to extradite a person to the USA.
    4
  62. "She died in a lunatic frenzied attack by a madman." I would not assume man. The cold case team were investigating claims that a male friend of Sophie had a jealous wife. "Marie Farrell contacted the Gards. She didn’t need to." So? "14 year olds don’t make up stories of confessions to murder." It was his mother that made a statement attesting to what her son had heard. The boy didn't even mention the conversation he had with Bailey after it took place, so not exactly traumatised was he. In fact he still accepted lifts off Bailey! He has never attended any court hearings and has never made any claims since, it has always been his mother. " Christmas trees do not leave scratches" Yes they do, try climbing one, topping one and then dragging it home. Jules' daughters both made statements attesting that he had scratches before the murder. Another person witnessed him dragging the tree home. "Sophie mentioned the name Ian Bailey to friends in France." No, she did not. "A whole load of circumstantial evidence builds a compelling case." No it does not. Hence why the Irish prosecutors refused to even charge Bailey, twice!
    4
  63.  @davidmccarter9479  Facts matter, even if you don't care about them and would convict a potentially innocent person. It is frightening that people like you can serve on a jury when you lack simple critical thinking skills.
    4
  64. Do you have evidence that clothes were burnt after the murder? I'll wait...
    4
  65. Then why is the officer being charged?
    4
  66. It did go to court in March 2015! How do you think we know that it was actually the mother, Ella Draper, and her then boyfriend, Abraham Christie? The Christie that was a known child abuser having 37 convictions for child abuse, drug offences, violence and dishonesty.
    4
  67. He's an adult you numpty.
    4
  68. No, you don't believe the children at all. The children stated that it was not their father, it was the mothers then boyfriend, Abraham Christie, who had 37 convictions for child abuse, drug offences, violence and dishonesty. The children described how he had TORTURED them into making the false allegations. YOU do not believe the children when they are saying that a KNOWN CHILD ABUSER did it. YOU would have handed them back to Abraham Christie to be abused. YOU are part of the problem.
    4
  69.  @BaseballPlayer0  She was clearly mentally ill, the officers should take this into account. It was murder, simple as that.
    4
  70.  @Vincent-dc6ku  The officer is a firearms officer, they are trained not to react to the same human responses and emotions as us because they have a firearm. Which bit of it being a criminal offence to kick and stomp on a persons head is it that you do not understand?
    4
  71.  @brianmcginley2743  Patrick Lowney specifically stated that it was NOT Bailey, stop spamming this BS.
    4
  72.  @hannah42069  The CPS (DPP) has the power to take over a prosecution. He's just as incompetent as the rest when he was head of it.
    4
  73. The French investigation found a male profile on her boot, had it matched Bailey he would obviously have been charged.
    4
  74.  @colmanlong1032  He was not even charged in Ireland where it matters. It was the French farcical trial that convicted him. One of the reasons was the French court used Marie Farrell's statements that she had seen Bailey near the scene. Of course they did this knowing that she had admitted it was lies. That is French "justice" for you. Convicting a person of murder using statements that they know was a lie. Outrageous miscarriage of justice and simply would not be acceptable in Common Law used in the USA, UK and of course Ireland. The fact that Sophie's husband was friends with the French President had nothing at all to do with them wanting a conviction.... 🙂 It was basically a show trial, something that China and North Korea would do.
    4
  75.  @colmanlong1032  No idea!
    4
  76. Karl Heinz Wolney
    4
  77.  @jesclifford88  "the professional who offered help with the river and diving had found where her body was on day 2 but the police didn’t want to know…they royally messed it up!" Utter nonsense. Peter Faulding found a target on sonar, the police dived in clear water with an unobstructed riverbed and found branches. Two independent sonar experts stated that there was a low probability of the image shown to them as being a body. It is literally BRANCHES but Faulding has been hawking his BS around, he's gone quiet about providing evidence for his ridiculous claim. This is the Peter Faulding that categorically stated that Nicola was not in that river, then claimed that he found her within hours. Why are you listening to that clown? Stop repeating conspiracy claptrap.
    4
  78. Dr. Hodes conducted two examinations, producing five reports. She significantly amended her final report down to fissures of a possible normal variant. You are wrong. Stop listening to online BS. YOU are part of the problem.
    3
  79. Ultimately this ended up being a tad tedious and ended up going nowhere. Disappointed.
    3
  80.  @adamdaniel9110  I have watched all 22+ of the ORIGINAL interviews, have YOU ? Ella Draper and the known child abuser Abraham Christie can clearly be heard prompting, coercing and asking the children leading questions.
    3
  81.  @beaustur  It isn't my opinion it is the 2015 court case that you clearly know nothing about. Here you go from the court: 165. This is a summary of my salient findings –  Neither child has been sexually abused by any of the following – Ricky Dearman, teachers at Christchurch Primary School Hampstead, the parents of students at that school, the priest at the adjacent church, teachers at any of the Hampstead or Highgate schools, members of the Metropolitan Police, social workers employed by the London Borough of Camden, officers of Cafcass or anyone else mentioned by Ms Draper or Mr Christie.  The children’s half brother, his father and stepmother – Will and Sarah Draper – are likewise exonerated of any illicit or abusive acts involving the children.  There was no satanic or other cult at which babies were murdered and children were sexually abused.  All of the material promulgated by Ms Draper now published on the internet is nothing other than utter nonsense.  The children’s false stories came about as the result of relentless emotional and psychological pressure as well as significant physical abuse. Torture is the most accurate way to describe what was done by Mr Christie in collaboration with Ms Draper.  Both children were assaulted by Mr Christie by being hit with a metal spoon on multiple occasions over their head and legs, by being pushed into walls, punched, pinched and kicked. Water was poured over them as they knelt semi-clothed.  The long term emotional and psychological harm of what was done to the children is incalculable. The impact of the internet campaign is likely to have the most devastating consequences for P and Q. So much for your "intermediate skills in deciphering body language" nonsense.
    3
  82. That used Marie Farrell's lies that she had seen him. Lies that she admitted that were lies and the court knew were lies. Is it acceptable to you that a criminal court used known lies to convict a person for murder? Maybe it's something to do with the family knowing the French president who personally got involved....
    3
  83.  @brianmcginley2743  Brian McGinley it is YOU that has stopped replying since being exposed as the troll. You accused people of being Bailey yet they are still commenting after his death. YOU stopped posting in embarrassment of being wrong and have run away. Sad spamming t0sser.
    3
  84. Get a grip.
    3
  85.  @anonamoss78  Sure you did, l00n.
    3
  86. For those left wondering....Crime Story - 1986.
    3
  87. @scrappinrappin "because they were programmed at the same time. No two are abused the same, so expect some similarities but not exact. " This is a point I made back in 2015 when the allegations came out and people said how could they know so much detail. I pointed out that it was clearly scripted because the children were saying exactly the same as each other.
    3
  88.  @dannylad1600  The voices in her head...
    3
  89. It was proven to be false allegations. Court hearing was in 2015. Maybe educate yourself?
    3
  90. It's not the Wi-Fi, it was End to End Encryption. It was Snap reading the messages as they are stored plain text when on their servers. Snap are reading all your "private" messages. Think about that the next time you think you are sending a "private" message to your friend, wife, husband, lover etc. Some employee is reading your texts.
    3
  91. LOL!
    3
  92.  @WyreForestBiker  Body language is pseudoscience. Utter nonsense.
    3
  93. Does your nurse know you have access to Wi-Fi?
    3
  94.  @whatdoiknow1005  You say "looked after", I say oppressed. My pet dog is "comfortable and well looked after" but kept on a short lead.
    3
  95. Intelligence expert Philip Ingram isn't as clever as he believes, that isn't a professional hit, it is a personal grudge.
    3
  96.  @jimmelton5846  Way to miss the point. Given the choice the police would not have issued the statement. If you want to point fingers, blame the person who was about to sell the story to the media forcing the FAMILY to release the information. You are further embarrassing yourself, but you are of course free to comment from ignorance and continue to do so.
    3
  97.  @Hedman61  There are no other children claiming anything. It was only the two that were tortured by the known child abuser. This is online BS, stop believing it without question!
    3
  98. He's a townie that underestimated the tough and dangerous volcanic terrain. There is no great mystery.
    3
  99. It has been known for 30 years that children can be coerced into making such allegations. You have clearly never heard of the 1980s/90s Satanic Panic.
    3
  100. She was using it as a shield due to the officer pointing his weapon at her. Watch properly.
    3
  101.  @srbilliot7400  How do you know it was never investigated?
    3
  102.  @srbilliot7400  Nonsense, it has never been stated on the news that it was never investigated. There was literally an investigation and court hearing in March 2015. Stop listening to conspir@cy BS.
    3
  103.  @papilo2  @dm9022 should join the police, they'd fit right in.
    3
  104. @debbiejames3096 Wrong, the context is clear. The person was on the floor and no threat to the officer. It is irrelevant what happened before, once a person is of no threat then the use of reasonable force is no longer arguable as self defence, that was NOT reasonable force, therefore it is illegal.
    3
  105. "Why does Fujitsu continue to get ANY contracts from UK companies or the Government?" Because they are BILLION pound contracts and corporate "gifts" given to decision makers in government procurement go undeclared.
    3
  106. Indeed, the Abraham Christie who had 37 convictions for child abuse, drug offences, violence and dishonesty... The "wonderful" mother, Ella Draper was then later busted for drugs smuggling in Gibraltar!
    3
  107. Point out where you saw her throw the water rather than it being spilt. The camera does not lie, but you are.
    3
  108.  @EleventhMonkey  "as someone who is on the rivers regularly, I can tell you that it is very easy to find an object like a body." I can tell that you are utterly clueless. It can take days, weeks, months, years or never. You can literally look at any past case online to see how long a body can remain not found.
    3
  109.  @3am.chapters  What evidence? The coat was not burnt, the police took it. It is documented by them that it was taken and cut up for analysis in their lab. People like you are the reason innocent people are in prison, you believe utter nonsense without bothering to fact check it.
    3
  110.  @irishguy200007  "Did Bailey or someone on Bailey's behalf burn clothes and footware?? Yes" Not quite. Jules stated that she cleared out the studio house, burning items such as a mattress. She said November, Bailey said early December. The police said that there was nothing of evidentiary value in it. "did Bailey have suspicous cuts on this hands?? Yes" Jules' two daughters testified that he got the injuries from cutting down a tree BEFORE the murder. So they are not suspicious at all.
    3
  111. Yet here you are, contributing to his revenue by leaving a comment.
    3
  112.  @ange1098  It is not for your weird sick entertainment. Police have viewed it and that is enough. Get a grip.
    3
  113.  @NigelShepherd-z7k  "But what do I know?" Nothing, as you are not part of the investigation team.
    3
  114. "what makes a cyber-stalker" "basically someone that is a stalker but all online" ...Christ-on-a-bike...
    3
  115. 1,313 homeless died in 2022, why is this one news?
    2
  116. Routinely arming police officers would mean criminals routinely arming themselves. You've missed the whole point of why officers themselves state that they do not want to carry firearms.
    2
  117.  @FlytoColombia  Get a grip. He has tasers pointed at him and from the position of his arms looks like he had already been tasered. He was zero threat.
    2
  118.  @thpark8189  "Arguably there was, depending on what preceded it." Wrong, kicking the head and stomping on it is NEVER deemed reasonable or proportionate use of force. You will go to prison for it.
    2
  119.  @davidanderson7138  Calm down Nancy, he was being arrested for affray not terrorism.
    2
  120.  @boostar155  "Given his previous violent actions it's completely understandable for the officer(s) to continue to view him as a threat until such point as he was actually restrained with cuffs." What is not acceptable and in fact ILLEGAL is to kick and stomp on his head. What is it about that act being ILLEGAL is it you clowns don't understand? It is ILLEGAL for ANYBODY to kick and stomp on a person head, regardless of what happened.
    2
  121. @conflictmagazine5412 "Jack Burtan is Ian Bailey! Watch how he defend himself in the comments section here and on all similar videos." Since Bailey is dead and I am here commenting, it makes you look an utter clown.
    2
  122.  @MCE851  Except I am commenting after Bailey's death. Which makes YOU the clown.
    2
  123. No they can't. It was not the network, it was Snap themselves.
    2
  124. @brianmcginley2743 Brian McGinley looks an utter idi0t now that Bailey is dead but the commenters he accused of being Bailey are still commenting. Brian has been exposed as the nasty cyberbully and troll who has stalked me around YT for a year, replyng to my EVERY comment with the accusation, just because I have a different opinion. Well Brian, are you going to reply here and apologise?
    2
  125. Can we fix what they have been doing to Doctor Who now please?
    2
  126.  @danh5637  When I found out it was Oracle I thought database. Have no idea though, just from my experience as a DBA in the 90s.
    2
  127.  @spirituallysafe  LOL
    2
  128. ...and send two, not a bunch of them.
    2
  129. "but she already made the threat to do bodily harm" Except she didn't.
    2
  130.  @brianmcginley2743  "Meet the murderer ian bailey.... aka Jack burton." Oh dear, don't you look silly now that Bailey is dead.
    2
  131.  @brianmcginley2743  Briand McGinley it is you that has gone quiet because those you accused of being Bailey are still commenting after his death. YOU have stopped posting comments though, funny that eh!
    2
  132.  @VarunSharma-tj2wy  While it is E2EE on the network, the messages are stored in plain text on their servers. It is images and videos that are not stored and kept only on the devices. Of course they don't tell you that your "private" text chats are accessible and sent to law enforcement. Do not use them for text messages, it's that simple.
    2
  133. You clearly have no idea how difficult the terrain is to search. The reason they say the body was found with Jay's clothing & belongings is because it has not been officially shown to be his body yet, but the clothing & belongings suggest it is him. It's not rocket science, is it!
    2
  134. I feel this way too. His moments of insanity are the highlights of an otherwise dull episode.
    2
  135.  @chantelantoine4386  All you have demonstrated is your utter ignorance.
    2
  136.  @brianmcginley2743  Looks like you are avoiding the people you accused of being Bailey who are now still commenting.
    2
  137. Yeah the officer should indeed stop breaking the law. That was not reasonable force, so can not be used as an argument for self-defence.
    2
  138.  @El.Cid17  Except of course if it was you.
    2
  139.  @ngc-fo5te  Except you can see it from the stance and body position. Coupled with the fact that she admitted to police that she did it. You can see her hand on the cyclist if you look carefully using a fame-by-frame view.
    2
  140.  @JazzyFunkaHolic  "Im living in Cologne with lots of cultures and WE dont have THESE problems. So maybe its a UK problem." In Cologne only around 35% are migrants and half of that figure are Italian and Polish. Only 7-10% of the total Cologne residents are from Muslim states and most are from moderate Turkey, not the more extreme states. If you think there is any comparison between Cologne and the issues in the UK caused by actual true multi-culturalism, then you are deluded. Cologne is VERY white and Catholic.
    2
  141. What are you on about?
    2
  142.  @JaggersLips  Your question is irrelevant. A FAO is subject to the same use of reasonable force law as any other person is, in a uniform or not.
    2
  143.  @volks86  What?
    2
  144. You obviously miss the irony of you outing yourself as a left-wing l00n.
    2
  145. The offence was affray, not terrorism. You may wish to understand the basic facts before commenting. The officers conduct was criminal.
    2
  146. Coal is burnt to produce coke, the demigods snort coke to produce energy. I should be a writer for Synder's films.
    2
  147.  @sr6424  Been there, got the T-shirt. People really have no idea how many Horizons there are out there with teams of people reconciling. It doesn't help when December is the year end and the system go-live is the Christmas break.
    2
  148.  @jimmelton5846  That'll be the "useless" police that had a working theory of Nicola being in the river and she was found in the river...
    2
  149. Bailey is dead, but here I am. Idi0t.
    2
  150. Typical YT commenter, not getting the facts before making a clown out of themselves.
    2
  151. @jcwguy8426 I'm guessing that you missed the part where it was the officer who asked her to attend to the pot on the stove. Can you point out where you see her throw the water rather than it simply split from her dropping it? Good luck with that claim. Had she thrown it, what exactly do you think would have happened? She was behind the counter, the officer was in no danger. She would likely have the hot water over her. Simply stepping back was the obvious solution, not shooting her in the face.
    2
  152.  @TheLuminousOne  The dense ones are those who ignore the known child abuser Abraham Christie.
    2
  153. Even is his mobile is missing, they don't need his mobile to do that.
    2
  154.  @BaseballPlayer0  I very much doubt a jury watching that shocking video will return an innocent verdict. That officer is going to be spending a lot of time in prison.
    2
  155.  @BaseballPlayer0  Grow up, what are you, five?
    2
  156.  @MrsThollo  They do so for the plea deal. He is going to be in a concrete box for a long time.
    2
  157. Or you could watch his positive reviews that are also on his channel...
    2
  158.  @jscott8110  Using a knife is reasonable defence IF the attacker has a weapon and it can be reasonably shown that you believed your life to be at risk. You are oversimplifying a law that you clearly don't understand.
    2
  159. Christ on a bike, not this again? It was only 2ft near the bank it was 6-9ft as you get further out. It is 15ft nearby. Why do people like you believe what armchair detectives tell you, it is bizarre.
    2
  160. Search for Abraham Christie that is the known child abuser who tortured the kids into lying. He was Ella Draper's boyfriend at the time during the dispute with the innocent father.
    2
  161. This "expert" is clearly not qualified, he is clueless!
    2
  162.  @Jay30-z1s  The virtue signalling is strong in comments. They will quickly move on to the next social media drama to "care" about.
    2
  163.  @brianmcginley2743  Still here Brian, unlike you that ran away when exposed as a troll Brian McGinley.
    2
  164. I reckon he did not know his partners camera was on.
    2
  165. Under English Common Law a person can only use proportionate and reasonable force to defend themselves or others, this includes police officers. His actions are likely going to be deemed not proportionate and reasonable, therefore it is a criminal act and he will be charged for it.
    2
  166.  @fantasyboxing71  You've called out @brianmcginley2743 for obsessively spamming the comments section and it's only him going around saying commenters are Ian Bailey, but you believe him? He's obviously a troll.
    2
  167.  @fantasyboxing71  What a strange attitude.
    2
  168.  @fantasyboxing71  Why is it logical for Ian Bailey to be using fake accounts when he is on other social media platforms using his real name? The guy is so full of himself he clearly does not hide is identity.
    2
  169.  @fantasyboxing71  Grow up.
    2
  170.  @fantasyboxing71  You sound as bad as Brian.
    2
  171.  @fantasyboxing71  You are not getting this are you. I AM NOT IAN BAILEY You are literally listening to the troll Brian who calls EVERYBODY that does not agree with him, Bailey.
    2
  172.  @fantasyboxing71  That'll because they are both my account and despite me saying this to Brian on several occasions, he still rambles on about it like he has made some stunning discovery. I use two due to YT shadow banning comments, you have to stop posting for a while and swap to another. Comments from my other account are not showing up. He is convinced that I am Bailey because another troll like Brian changed their display name to the same as mine and started posting that they were Bailey and he fell for it. Unfortunately Brian is a bit thick and doesn't know you can change your display name to whatever you like.
    2
  173.  @fantasyboxing71  "BTW... of you look at other videos on this murder, you will see an account called jackburton admitting he is ian bailey and is guilty of this murder, check it out." sigh
    2
  174. Axel Muganwa Rudakubana
    2
  175. I don't believe you...oh wait.
    2
  176. Yup, unless you are willing to put your home up for sale and lose it, plus pay the winners court costs, you have little chance against a large organisation. British "justice".
    2
  177. I got this question once. I said nothing and looked questionably at the back of my car, shrugging my shoulders. It made him come up with a reason, which was a nothing burger, he checked my tyres and I was on my way. I knew that it was the overtake on the left that I had done on the motorway approaching the exit. But I was ready with Rule 163 and he likely knew he was on dodgy ground after I remained silent.
    2
  178. She was on the floor, behind the counter, you clown.
    2
  179.  @6079_SMITH_W  "reasoned speculation, not malicious ignorance." Because accusing the mother of being involved is "reasoned speculation"?
    2
  180. She did not throw the pot at the officer. She was on the floor cowering behind the counter! The only place water would have gone is over herself you clown.
    2
  181. They tick the right boxes and divert blame elsewhere.
    2
  182.  @christalmeth613  "To be honest I don't ever go looking for dead bodies. But I would expect the experts to find one over a member of the public." What you expect is not the reality. Once a body is not found during the initial search it is usually a member of the public who finds it. Joggers and dog walkers roam isolated spots, hence why they tend to be the person to discover a body, in a river or on land.
    2
  183.  @ItsAv3rageGamer  Xielo Maruziva is a recent UK example. They knew exactly where the poor lad fell in and exactly when.
    2
  184. It may mean that the remains are simply bones and a pile of clothes.
    2
  185.  @morganw_  It didn't "come from nowhere". Quite why people like you don't believe the children when they state that it was the KNOWN CHILD ABUSER Abraham Christie that TORTURED them into making the false accusations, is a mystery to me! The guy already had 37 convictions for child abuse, drugs, violence and dishonesty. He had only known Ella Draper for 3 months when she let him move in and start the abuse of these children. Ella Draper and Abraham Christie tortured the children for weeks in Morocco to make them say all this BS. During the court hearing they both fled the UK to avoid arrest, she abandoned her children 9 years ago and has not bothered to see them since. She was busted for drugs smuggling in Gibraltar. Stop believing utter nonsense. It was literally a KNOWN CHILD ABUSER that did this, not the innocent father.
    2
  186. The Boys fanboi triggered alert!
    1
  187. "Steel or laser are no threat to them" Well actually...
    1
  188. Who's this "we" you speak of? You mean "I".
    1
  189. Because murdering everybody except the main bad guy makes total sense...
    1
  190.  steve-kl9iv  You are arguing with the, it's always somebody else's fault, generation.
    1
  191. You don't vote for a Prime Minister, you voted for your local Member of Parliament.
    1
  192. "She turned hostile and threw the pot of water at the officer. " Show the evidence. I'll wait...
    1
  193. Indeed, I would be very suspicious of all that too, I'd be thinking the guy is on steroids.
    1
  194. @TheSooperGoose "but when you point to the original Alien and say there were three separate explosions when it very clearly is just replaying the explosion three times, I have lost all respect for your opinion." You don't know Alien as well as you think you do then. The self destruct charge was the first explosion, the fuel is the second and then that huge refinery material was the third. Read the screenplay before you criticise people who know more about Alien than you do...
    1
  195.  @hellboy1976  Ow My Balls!
    1
  196. "this is becoming like nicola bulley" Yes, a bunch of armchair detectives spreading b0ll0x theories and then being proved wrong. Next!
    1
  197. Whoosh!
    1
  198. Except it's sh!t compared to earlier episodes in the series.
    1
  199. We do know the context, they were being arrested for affray, a minor offence. Hence why the officer is going to prison.
    1
  200.  @rgrimshaw7850  Ironic that you go on about context and then take my comment out of context. It is a minor offence compared to the terrorism that you were inferring that actually never happened because it was AFFRAY.
    1
  201.  @El.Cid17  It was stated that it was affray. At least understand the basics before you comment.
    1
  202. You don't see anything graphic.
    1
  203.  @gothmog2441  I heard on the news that the PO losing that power is being called for.
    1
  204.  @MillillioN  Agreed, home defence should allow the use of spray, batons and the like to be part of the reasonable force legal defence.
    1
  205. "UK Police do not have the habit of going around kicking people’s head in for no reason…" Can you be any more naïve? They don't usually get caught on camera.
    1
  206. "The officers acted proportionately" Clearly they did not, hence why the officer has been suspended. The force was no longer proportionate once the person had been subdued, which they clearly were. That is the law and the police are not above it.
    1
  207. If it is so clear cut then why is the officer being charged?
    1
  208. More firearms is not the answer. See USA.
    1
  209.  @firenze5555  Obsession? Yet despite keep extensive diaries there was no mention of Sophie in them. Misogyny? Since he only knew her by sight, how so?
    1
  210. PO and RM are separate companies. PO is owned by the Government.
    1
  211. The outcome of all this is that the officer is meant to use proportional and reasonable force when detaining a person. This was not, this was a criminal act. The police officer is subject to the same Common Law as those not in uniform.
    1
  212.  @sherbertufo5247  Because the question is silly. The police can continue to use proportional and reasonable force when detaining a person. It is how they are trained and it is the same law that applies to you and I too when defending ourselves and others. This was not proportional and reasonable force.
    1
  213.  @sherbertufo5247  The law is not "rubbish" and is very clear on the use of proportional and reasonable force. Hence why the officer has been suspended. Your ignorance of the law is not my problem.
    1
  214.  @sherbertufo5247  That law is there to protect YOU.
    1
  215.  @sherbertufo5247  Again you miss the point. It does not matter what YOU think you have or have not done, it is what the OFFICER thinks. If an officer thinks you have broken a law, the law that you think rubbish is there to protect YOU from getting YOUR head kicked in by the officer. What is it you fail to understand?
    1
  216.  @sherbertufo5247  Point out where I stated that the person on the floor had not broken a law. It is irrelevant, it does not justify the criminal act of the police officer that followed. It is not surprising that you don't understand the law and you are perfectly entitled to remain ignorant of it.
    1
  217.  @sherbertufo5247  Are you attempting to make some sort of point? I do not see the relevance of an anecdote about bouncers committing a criminal act?
    1
  218. Fortunately English Common Law does allow the use of reasonable force to defend yourself. Perhaps you should educate yourself.
    1
  219. Axel Muganwa Rudakubana
    1
  220. The full video has been out for some time. It is as it appears. He escalated the situation and murdered her.
    1
  221.  @Ironpetals2964  Other than Homelander, Ep4 was cr@p
    1
  222. A terror attack is one where the motive is religious or political. You simply fail to understand the term.
    1
  223. One of the SPMs stated that they were both positive and negative, leaving a negative balance in his case. So yes it is indeed possible that some positives exist.
    1
  224.  @TheBladereddragon  "The only this you are right on is your simple." Would you like to try again using English?
    1
  225. You must be fun at parties.
    1
  226.  @c.m5043  Get a grip.
    1
  227.  @carljthatsme94  It was, it is why he is on the floor!
    1
  228. "This lady threatened to throw boiling water on the cops, which made the officers draw their weapons…" Provide the evidence for that assertion. I stopped reading at the point as you are wrong. That is what the OFFICER claimed.
    1
  229.  @ChillandVersatile  "Her body language CLEARLY showed signs of her ready to throw that hot water from the pot onto the officers." No it absolutely does not!
    1
  230.  @williamshaw5388  I am impressed that you can type with Pootin' c0ck down your throat. Well done comrade.
    1
  231. It is irrelevant what happened before this clip. The law is clear on reasonable and proportionate use of force.
    1
  232. If it was left to people like the police would go around kicking your head in just because they wanted to. It is a criminal offence for ANYBODY to kick and stomp on a persons head. You will go to prison for 1 to 3 years as this officer will find out.
    1
  233. Are you going to pay for thousands of miles of fencing for every river, canal, stream etc in the UK?
    1
  234.  @melgrant7404  You do know that you are the tax payer, right?
    1
  235.  @melgrant7404  You still pay taxes.
    1
  236. "The mother's body language..." Body language is a crock of sh!te. Stop watching clowns on noobtube who claim to be "experts".
    1
  237.  @NewDimensions2025  It is literally on the video that you can watch.
    1
  238.  @firenze5555  Ireland quite rightly did not charge him, twice, due to their own prosecutors stating that the evidence did not warrant it. Maybe listen to the prosecutors? If even the prosecution say the evidence is not there, then it must be really weak. What happens in France is irrelevant, they have no jurisdiction in Ireland. You believe that country X should be able to convict a citizen from country Y for an alleged crime committed in country Z and do so without the accused having any defence or even being at the trial. Oh and they used Marie Farrell's statement knowing that she had lied. That opinion is stupid It is literally the definition of a Kangaroo Court and something that North Korea would do. It is even worse when you find out that none other than the French President was involved in getting the case before the court due to the family influence in politics. The whole thing stinks, but people like you lap it up.
    1
  239. While correct that it was Fujitsu who built a system with these bugs, it was the PO who knowingly brought criminal cases. I am sure that inquiry will also investigate who at Fujistu knew.
    1
  240. Yet here you are.
    1
  241.  @johnk1000  You watched it.
    1
  242.  @johnk1000  "How do you even watch this dribble" YOU did. Irony.
    1
  243.  @johnk1000  Yet you watched it.
    1
  244.  @johnk1000  Meaning you answered you own question, "How do you even watch this dribble". irony.
    1
  245.  @johnk1000  "how can you watch it consistently?" I don't. YOU watched it. That is irony you are missing.
    1
  246.  @johnk1000  Where have I defended him? Would you like to read my comments properly?
    1
  247. Maybe in the Synder cut we'll see them shovelling coal into the boilers...in slo-mo.
    1
  248. The Dunning–Kruger effect.
    1
  249. The dictionary definition is not used to define the crime in a legal setting. Words can have more than one meaning, amazing huh?
    1
  250.  @AhmadHussein-j5u  Why the presumption?
    1
  251.  @AhmadHussein-j5u  Why do you assume that I am?
    1
  252. "Put your faith in Jesus and follow him" I'd use Google maps.
    1
  253. It is the same guy. He was proven wrong then too as somebody else demonstrated they could get in it!
    1
  254. I am astounded that people think a decomposed body that is likely just bones would be still wearing clothes. After animals have had a go, what do you think the remains and clothes are going to be like?
    1
  255.  @courtneysquill8843  Why do you believe they were not on the body?
    1
  256.  @courtneysquill8843  Remains is used because that it what it was, not a whole body. Hence why clothes were with the remains. English not your strong point?
    1
  257.  @courtneysquill8843  The body was decomposing! What is it you fail to understand???
    1
  258.  @courtneysquill8843  You have just made my point why the body was referred to as remains...sigh.
    1
  259.  @courtneysquill8843  What are you on about?
    1
  260. You mean the investigators that said she had fallen in the river that she was found in...
    1
  261.  @royrogers3133  Point out where she lifted it above her head. Good luck with that.
    1
  262.  @sp-pz8uc  The shark was wearing a Rolex, got miffed that Jay stole it, and pushed him off a mountain.
    1
  263. About as incomplete as your knowledge of the law. Once a person is no longer a threat the use of reasonable force as a defence is no longer justified. The officer is a criminal and will be judged for this assault. He is subject to the same Common Law as the next person.
    1
  264.  @tinzz1234  It is likely in the T&Cs when you join Snap. I have not looked, but it'll be in the small print that they can do it.
    1
  265. None of what you described was in the original video!
    1
  266. "Why do the separated twins have the same hairstyle?" Because there will be some telepathic link revealed later in the series that made them go to the same hairstylist and use the same hair products. Don't you know anything about the Disney female empowered Galaxy? Call yourself a fan?
    1
  267. A cyst can be caused by head trauma. Please don't comment on a subject you know nothing about!
    1
  268. "The law is independent from parliment and will reman so." Not quite. Parliament makes the laws, the judiciary put them into practice. If Parliament decides to bring in legislation that these people are innocent, it can do so.
    1
  269. It appears your comment quickly did not age well!
    1
  270. There is no need for the "full story". The officer did not use reasonable or proportional force to detain. That was a criminal act right there on camera, nothing prior to it justifies it in any way. The law is clear on what is reasonable or proportional force. He is absolutely going to prison at some point for it.
    1
  271.  @yonner1000  Utter nonsense. FOs are subject to the same English Common Law that every other person is. It is literally why the officer is facing criminal charges!
    1
  272.  @yonner1000  He is being interviewed under Criminal Caution, that only means charges are to follow. He is subject to the same law as you and I, which bit of him being suspended and interviewed under Criminal Caution for his criminal actions is it you fail to understand?
    1
  273.  @yonner1000  Yeah you keeping thinking that if it allows you to sleep at night. That guy is going before a judge.
    1
  274. She didn't threaten them.
    1
  275.  @brianmcginley2743  LOL​ @brianmcginley2743 ​Brian McGinley, don't you look stup!d now that Bailey is dead and the people you accused of being him are still here commenting.
    1
  276.  @brianmcginley2743  LOL ​ @brianmcginley2743 ​Brian McGinley, don't you look stup!d now that Bailey is dead and the people you accused of being him are still here commenting.
    1
  277. "A lot of people are saying that the Firearms officer is not allowed to take his hands off the gun, so must use his feet to subdue the suspect." That is not true.
    1
  278.  @srs4148  The irony of you believing this hoax when it is on social media is obviously lost on you...
    1
  279. "She was going to throw that hot water" You haven't watched the video. Watch it before you further embarrass yourself.
    1
  280. Karl Urban's British accent is far more horrendous.
    1
  281.  @MM.64  LOL!
    1
  282.  @MikeJH82  Now, now, stop it with all your common sense comments!
    1
  283. Because you missed the whole rant about how the writing was terrible with its huge plot holes?
    1
  284.  @kevinlewis9369  Plot holes are possible in early episodes due to lack of internal consistency.
    1
  285. After being out in the sun and picked over by the wildlife, bones and clothes may be all that's left. It is the media way of saying that it isn't a body any more.
    1
  286.  Beezlebug-db2sk  He was being arrested for affray, there was no weapon, get a grip!
    1
  287.  @thecasualfancorner  Get a grip. You have no idea how dangerous that terrain is, you would be the same sort of clown as he was.
    1
  288. It puzzles me that. Some Christian she is!
    1
  289. Yes by reporting that clown Peter Faulding's "expert" opinions. He was the one that suggested that she was not in the river, which set off all the armchair detectives. Then after she was found in the river this "expert" said she was not in, he changed tack. He then later claimed that he found her within hours, in the river that he said she wasn't in!
    1
  290. I agree in general, however when the whole point of a system is to specially detect fraud, it would be easy to assume it was a success. Those who knew about the problem likely lied to those lower down the food chain who saw the occasional sub-post office issue out of the 11,000 branches. To most in the PO, it was doing exactly as it was designed, catching fraud.
    1
  291. Axel Muganwa Rudakubana
    1
  292.  @YoureEasyToTroll  God moves in mysterious ways, or some of the usual bollox the religious will come out with to explain why their invisible sky daddy did nothing again.
    1
  293.  @JT-km6th  Stats don't lie, but can be manipulated and cherry-picked. Define "London" as many parts of it will have a far higher incidence of violent crime than other areas of Britain.
    1
  294.  @JohnSmith-sm7ez  Define "London" rather than being vague as it covers some of the wealthiest parts of the UK. Link to these stats. You are missing the point. I'll wait...
    1
  295. You are all missing the actual story here. British Intelligence have access to your end-to-end encrypted messages. You should be demanding HOW.
    1
  296. At the time, 200 out of 11,500 branches was not a significant number.
    1
  297. The law is the law. The officer is no different to any other person under English Common Law. Once subdued, the person on the floor was no longer a threat. Under Common Law the use of force to defend oneself and others has to be reasonable and proportionate. What happened before the video is irrelevant due to the person being subdued when force was being used. The assault on the seated person was also unreasonable and disproportionate, therefore criminal too.
    1
  298. What happened before the video is irrelevant. The officer did not use proportional and reasonable force so committed a criminal offence.
    1
  299. Imagine getting this triggered over somebody being triggered over a fictional TV show.
    1
  300. If you actually knew police officers here, you would know that they are disgusted by officers such as the thug in this video. The violence went way beyond proportional and reasonable force, it was criminal. That kick would get you 1 to 3 years in prison.
    1
  301. "God works in mysterious ways" So mysterious it doesn't do anything at all.
    1
  302. Well I want our police officers to conduct themselves in a lawful manner. This officer was not, so must face the consequences of his criminal act. You do agree that police officers should not be above the law, yes?
    1
  303.  @PoopyShaw-rf7nc  You didn't answer the question. You do agree that police officers should not be above the law, yes?
    1
  304.  @PoopyShaw-rf7nc  So in your World there should be no restriction on officers beating YOU then, right? or They should be subject to the law and not abuse their powers of arrest.
    1
  305. @shall4810 Since @random6809 is still commenting after Bailey died, you look a right m0r0n.
    1
  306. Libel isn't speculation.
    1
  307.  @DMDyoutube123  Then you haven't read all the comments.
    1
  308.  @justonecornetto80  Operation Olympos has been running since 2020!
    1
  309. " If you enjoy Sci-Fi you'll enjoy this." I thought it was sh!t, the reason I did so was because I enjoy Sci-Fi.
    1
  310.  @LightCobraEU  The OPs sarcasm when over your head.
    1
  311. Arming is escalation. You arm the citizens, the criminal gets armed. You want to be armed? Live in the USA and see the result.
    1
  312. @allyboy1839 The facts are know, they are literally on the video. A person can been seen on the floor, that person is of no threat to anybody. The officer kicks them in the head and then stomps them on the head. That is illegal as it is no longer reasonable force under Common Law. You may wish to get some sort of basic grasp of the law.
    1
  313.  @El.Cid17  The thug is clearly the officer.
    1
  314.  @jamesmc1272  Kicking a persons head and then stomping on it is not reasonable force. The officer is about to quickly find that out when he is charged and put before a judge.
    1
  315.  @AcerbicDelicacy  He was arrested for affray not terrorism. Stop being so melodramatic and making excuses for the officers criminal behaviour.
    1
  316.  @TheBladereddragon  Officers are not trained to kick people in the head and stomp on it. You clearly know nothing about their training. The head is a red zone. Please do not comment on a subject you are clearly ignorant of.
    1
  317.  @allyboy1839  You clearly do not understand the law if you believe that a kick to the head and then a stomp on it is reasonable and proportionate. A kick to the head will get you a prison sentence regardless of the circumstances of why you did it.
    1
  318.  @haileennevsmom09  However the highest probability is that he walked in the mountains and fell, people are clowns, don't underestimate how much a clown they can be.
    1
  319. Or she was scared, cowering for her life and she dropped the pot as the officer was demanding!!
    1
  320. Yes the police officer should obey the law, he didn't though and that is the point.
    1
  321. What is your solution?
    1
  322.  @segretoesconociuto  What do you think would happen if firearms were readily available to everybody?
    1
  323.  @segretoesconociuto  I'll ask again. What do you think would happen if firearms were readily available to everybody?
    1
  324.  @segretoesconociuto  I am more concerned about by neighbours having access to firearms.
    1
  325. Will Russia?
    1
  326.  @nedsantos1415  The Russian GDP has risen because of the war. It isn't "real" growth. Paying the soldiers, buying ammo and equipment and would you believe compensating families for the dead and wounded are what is driving GDP growth. 40% of their GDP is actually flowing into the military budget. That is simply not sustainable.
    1
  327. That is literally the satirical bit....
    1
  328.  @RobinWilson-r5e  Any abuse that occurred was done by Ella Draper and Abraham Christie, the known child abuser. The father had not seen them for three months and the injuries were recent.
    1
  329.  @peacefulwarchief3961  Oh you certainly have a medical condition alright.
    1
  330.  @juliebratts767  So when the children later stated that the known child abuser, Abraham Christie, tortured them into making the false allegations, you don't believe them? The Christie that already had 37 convictions for child abuse, drug offenses, violence and dishonesty? Which is more likely? 1. The police made the children withdraw the allegations for no apparent reason. 2. A KNOWN CHILD ABUSER Abraham Christie, tortured them into making the false allegations because he is, well, a known child abuser. Think carefully about it before replying, you'll look less of a clown.
    1
  331. Nobody has ever claimed that doing X will, "stop violent attacks" though. Limiting access is about REDUCING it. There can be no doubt that gun deaths would be far higher if there was no control over guns.
    1
  332.  @acb5245  You are free to embarrass yourself too. You must have seen what happened to Brian McGinley when that tool did it. He has stopped posting now in embarrassment. But hey, if you want to be proved an equal m0r0n to him, then go right ahead making utterly m0r0nic accusations because you are unable to challenge facts.
    1
  333. Why compare with the USA? That is a very low bar. The British police are held to a much higher standard, firearms officers to an even greater standard for obvious reasons. This officer was completely out of control. His actions went way beyond the use of reasonable force. He will quite rightly appear before a judge as his actions were criminal.
    1
  334.  @bernadetteflynn5005  Feel free to present the evidence against Bailey that you have but the prosecution do not. The prosecution that tore apart their own police investigation and refused to charge Bailey, twice. I suspect your "evidence" will be the same nonsense repeated by the ignorant watching Netflix and reading Nick Foster's laughable, inaccurate, and biased book. When even the PROSECUTION say that the evidence is not there, we should be listening to them. Nick Foster is a grifter and you fell for his lies, he literally leaches off the families grief.
    1
  335. Burning huge amounts of stuff takes a huge amount of air. Not quite the thing you'd want to do on a space vessel!
    1
  336. What, " despicable measure"?
    1
  337. "So many dudes allergic to vagina trying to make it Star Wars fault" Would you like to retype that into something comprehendible?
    1
  338.  @TheDavecroft  It was fine for me, what makes it unwatchable?
    1
  339. Except they were being arrest for affray, so did know it was not terrorism. Hence why the officer has been suspended due to his criminal act.
    1
  340. Axel Muganwa Rudakubana
    1
  341. "She doesnt love it.." So she says...
    1
  342. She'll be fine. Look online for videos of what happens in your country and you'll see plenty of bad videos. Then ask yourself the same question about your country, if you see what I mean? You only see the bad rare stuff on the news. She will be perfectly safe, it is safe country.
    1
  343. Why would the cyclist get reported for using a shared pedestrian cycle lane?
    1
  344.  @ngc-fo5te  The women admitted in her statement to making contact.
    1
  345.  @ngc-fo5te  You asked "what push". If you are not interested in the facts, then don't ask for them. Next time I'll not bother helping you out. Fck me...
    1
  346. Came here for the Acolyte got cancelled comments.
    1
  347.  @imyounick  Get a grip.
    1
  348. Axel Muganwa Rudakubana
    1
  349. What ITV did not show and should have is that Lee Castleton (who lost and had to pay 300k court fees) agreed to let his sub-PO be run by somebody else and they had the same issues. Yet the PO still refused to accept that Horizon was the problem even though it was happening to the person THEY put in Lee's sub-PO to run it! How utterly ridiculous!
    1
  350. Their job is not to break the law.
    1
  351.  @stephenblack3228  The officer committed a criminal offence. He will be looking at between one and three years in prison.
    1
  352. Erm, no. It is clearly a kick to the head and a stomp, hence why the woman was protecting his head.
    1
  353.  @El.Cid17  what?
    1
  354.  @El.Cid17  You miss the point, if the police are free to do as they wish, it is THEY that decide if YOU broke the law and they are then free to kick YOU in the head. That is what you are proposing.
    1
  355.  @MartinHorbury  19 years old are fighting in wars right now.
    1
  356. Maybe it will mean you snowflakes will finally stop whining on and on and on? The irony.
    1
  357.  @firenze5555  "There was a lot of evidence which rightly convicted Bailey of murder." Such as?
    1
  358. Why would they want to give a hoaxer a platform? They should be in jail.
    1
  359. By somebody who knows a criminal act when they see one.
    1
  360.  @jimbutcher4897  That is irrelevant to the law. It was a criminal act.
    1
  361.  @jimbutcher4897  What?
    1
  362.  @jimbutcher4897  What are you on about? Whatever the person is accused of does not justify an officer committing a criminal act. Grow up.
    1
  363.  @jimbutcher4897  I am not the one condoning criminal behaviour by the police.
    1
  364.  @grossbird9371  "the whole show is political satire??" No it isn't. The OP is correct, the early episodes were subtle enough to be understood, but entertaining enough to be ignored.
    1
  365.  @grossbird9371  The OP is correct, the politics has absolutely ramped up in latter episodes. It has lost the nuance and subtly of earlier episodes to the detriment of the series.
    1
  366. Conspiracy l00n alert!
    1
  367.  @BrenThen4367  She fell in and drown. Get a grip.
    1
  368.  @BrenThen4367  What?
    1
  369. Of course it took hours to sink so it depends on what is meant by sinking. The generally accepted version is that they played until the forward boat deck was flooded, I'd imagine it is quite difficult to play once the ship deck is not level. The violinist had his case strapped to his body when found. Playing that late in the sinking is close enough for it not to be a "lie", more of a timing thing, conflicting accounts, and of course media spin.
    1
  370.  @henryyeoh8610  I suspect it is a long list...
    1
  371.  @Threadbow  Utter nonsense. Faulding has gone very quiet about this so-called evidence he has. He is a clown.
    1
  372.  @whatdoiknow1005  In other words, I am correct.
    1
  373. Ask Ronnie Pickering.
    1
  374. "Anybody worth their salt in IT would immediately have concluded there were serious flaws in the system because so many SPMs could not possibly have turned rogue overnight and it is entirely incredible that the helpline were not reporting case statistics upward." Presumably the Horizon system was brought in to replace manual or less robust systems (see what I did there?) that could be hiding fraudulent transactions or innocent mistakes made by the SPM or their staff. Those IT staff who genuinely did not know about the flaws would be led to believe that these issues have always been there and the new system has done exactly what it was designed to do, found them. You are correct that it is not logical that, "so many SPMs could not possibly have turned rogue overnight", but it is logical that a new system designed to do exactly that has found those who have always been doing it when the old system was open to abuse/error. As for the helpdesk, perhaps the tickets were closed with the reason given as user error, because the system didn't make mistakes, did it. ;-) No reported system errors meant no investigation into the issue, because it did not exist...
    1
  375.  @realcapitalist1462  Doubts about what?
    1
  376.  @realcapitalist1462  YT quietly censoring comments again, what a surprise! I am not defending Horizon as it indefensible. I am merely pointing out that when a system that is literally designed to catch fraudulent activity is implemented in a branch, and then did, it would not surprise anybody who implemented it. To those who were not aware of the fault, it was a success. It was catching some dodgy SPMs when rest of the 11,000 PO branches were not having any issue. Unless you were very senior in the PO/Fujitsu you would not have seen any pattern emerging as you had no access to the number of issues. So no, I don't agree at all that, ""Anybody worth their salt in IT would immediately have concluded there were serious flaws in the system because so many SPMs could not possibly have turned rogue overnight...." Of course some IT people will have known simply because they were part of the cover-up.
    1
  377.  @realcapitalist1462  I have not "gone away" I replied and it disappeared as yours did. So stop with your childish comments.
    1
  378.  @realcapitalist1462  YOU started with the abuse. "I note he's gone away!"
    1
  379. When you put a new system into a branch that is designed to catch fraud, it would not be a surprise to get a increase in reported fraud by branches.
    1
  380. Being armed means that they should be in control of their emotions. This officer should not be anywhere near firearms.
    1
  381. Wrong, he did not use proportional and reasonable force hence why he is suspended and will be facing criminal charges at some point.
    1
  382. Your mum.
    1
  383. There was nothing "creative, funny and accurate" about Musk spreading a false report that rioters were being sent to the Falkland's, the guy is a clown.
    1
  384.  @Zennsunni  "Killing children is always bad, you should never do it" If you knew that Hitler and Stalin would murder millions and had the chance to kill them at birth saving those millions, what would you do?
    1
  385.  @royrogers3133  Grow up, what are you? 5?
    1
  386. LOL
    1
  387. You all appear to put much faith in your belief of what a 19 year old clown from a town would do in the dangerous mountainous countryside that he had no knowledge of. He underestimated the dangerous terrain and fell, there is no great mystery about it.
    1
  388.  @michaelmckibbin9665  "what are you not allowed to say? " I am not allowed to say it, which is the point the OP was making!
    1
  389. When your body rots and gets picked apart by animals, your body and clothes are what's left.
    1
  390.  @biggee-kf2ny  "show me one animal" Because they don't exist, right. SIGH
    1
  391. You are clearly ignorance of the law. Force has to be reasonable and proportionate. The person on the floor was no longer a threat. It is irrelevant what occurred before the video.
    1
  392. GMP is a religion of peace?
    1
  393.  @keith8609  Then they will go to prison as you would had you done it.
    1
  394.  @jimmelton5846  The police issued a statement at the request of the family due to the families concern that somebody close was selling it to the media. When you know the basics of the case, free to comment on it. Until then it's best you be quiet to save further embarrassment.
    1
  395.  @jimmelton5846  Learn the facts before commenting and being critical of the wrong people.
    1
  396.  @jimmelton5846  Facts such as?
    1
  397. "Security is the most important thing , privacy can go for a toss" In that case can I install CCTV in your property just in case you do something illegal? I mean, YOUR "privacy can go for a toss", right?
    1
  398.  @TJSaw  Whoosh! Way to miss the point!
    1
  399. "A father of three who shouted at a police dog and used racist slurs has been jailed for 20 months for violent disorder. Bradley McCarthy was sentenced on Tuesday after he was caught on video "threatening" left-wing protesters at an anti-immigration rally in Bristol. Bristol Crown Court heard he played a "prominent" role in trying to goad police, and had "aggressively" shouted at a police dog." 20 MONTHS? For that? The guy is clearly a racist thug with a criminal record, however Putin would be proud of the UK right now, that sentence for merely being shouty and racist is worrying. What also bothers me is that I can't recall 500 people from the other side being sentenced for the hate they spew out, do they get a free pass?
    1
  400. Because there is cross-party agreement that this war should be funded.
    1
  401. Likely doesn't want to get his head kicked in by this officer for not paying it.
    1
  402. too soon?
    1
  403. It's a ravine, you need to be a mountaineer to go down it!
    1
  404.  @courtneysquill8843  It isn't unusual at all. It is a ravine.
    1
  405.  @courtneysquill8843  I don't think you understand what a ravine is. Unless a dog was lowered 100ft down the mountain, it would not detect a body.
    1
  406.  @courtneysquill8843  Dogs are not mountaineers with equipment. The fact that I have to point this out to you is bizarre.
    1
  407. You'll be even more shocked at there being an 11 acre park in Trafford Park then. Not many know about it!
    1
  408.  @catedinburgh4824  They are adults not children.
    1
  409. Get a grip.
    1
  410.  @viridescentchanneledguidance  You are clearly mental.
    1
  411. What does age have to do with anything?
    1
  412.  @deeray4637  Well yes it is hard to understand because you offered zero context to your comment. Who are these oldies in comments saying that he was, " your average innocent guy"? Oh wait, you just made that up...
    1
  413. Nobody is agreeing with this "expert", where he is from is irrelevant, so why bother mentioning it?
    1
  414.  @You.are.boring.me.now2024  Way to take the OPs comment out of context to score cheap Internet points. Clown.
    1
  415. Grifting
    1
  416. Irrelevant. Had you done it you would be jailed from 1 to 3 years.
    1
  417. Dumb teenage townies that have zero understanding of how dangerous the terrain is.
    1
  418.  @sal78sal  We can absolutely judge him, and he is about to be judged!
    1
  419.  @sal78sal  We do know there was no threats, it's literally on the video.
    1
  420. Because he is young and stupid. Never underestimate stupid.
    1
  421. "and suddenly she jumped up and over to the stove, walking swiftly behind the officer to the hot water." Except she didn't. Had you watched properly you would know that it was the officer who told her to go to the stove.
    1
  422.  @icie4u  Are you thick? It is literally in the video. The officer told her to go to the stove!
    1
  423. They sucked a lot of air too, making them a strange choice for a space vessel where breathable air would be valuable.
    1
  424. Stay away from windows Zelensky!
    1
  425. Axel Muganwa Rudakubana
    1
  426. Human remains is what is left of a body that is decomposed and picked apart by wildlife. It's not hard to figure out.
    1
  427.  @dm9022  When you grow up you'll understand what mental illness is and how police should de-escalate not escalate and murder. She was literally cowering on the floor, afraid. He then shot her in the head.
    1
  428. Have you checked the local take-aways?
    1
  429.  @Jchi737  End to End Encryption literally means it IS private on Wi-Fi or any other network. Without access to the keys, you can not break the encryption while in transmission across any network and it is not what they did in this case. You don't have access to the keys as they are generated on each device and not stored anywhere. The text messages are encrypted up to the point they get to the Snap servers, they are then stored on the servers unencrypted and Snap have access to them. You clearly don't understand what End to End Encryption is, your transmissions are absolutely uncrackable and private as long as there is no middle-man such as Snap servers.
    1
  430. On the TV it was shown that despite the PO auditors not finding any evidence of theft and reporting that there was none, the investigators pursed a case based on Horizon data.
    1
  431.  @spectrumboy5992  "He was literally on airport wifi." The messages are encrypted end-to-end. The network you are on is irrelevant, it is literally the point of encrypting the messages end-to-end! There is much more to this, Snapchat are clearly reading everyone's "private" messages and forwarding them to local law enforcement. Their so-called end-to-end encryption is a lie, they will be filtering messages for key words.
    1
  432. I'd forgotten that I had watched Obi-Wan Kenobi. Disney output is THAT bad...
    1
  433. No, it's because this series is sh!t compared to earlier episodes.
    1
  434. He said something along the lines of I hope you aren't going to throw that at me and she rebuked him for making such an absurd suggestion. He then scared her by pulling his weapon, she ducked and he murdered her.
    1
  435. Stalin was an ally of Hitler's and wanted expansion into the west, he had no interest in helping anybody except himself. He only became an ally of the west after Hitler invaded Russia. After that, had the western allies not prevented it, his army would not have stopped in Berlin, it would have rolled through Europe. When Germany was being carved up, Churchill warned the US President about Stalin, but he did not listen, hence the Cold War. Putin = Stalin.
    1
  436.  @SuperStockist-lc6pj  What?
    1
  437.  @brianmcginley2743  LOL ​ @brianmcginley2743 ​Brian McGinley, don't you look stup!d now that Bailey is dead and the people you accused of being him are still here commenting.
    1
  438. I much prefer Dune 84 to the recent mess they made of it.
    1
  439. It depends on your constituency. If you are in a Labour majority now, voting for anybody other than who came second at the last election is a wasted vote. If you are in a Conservative majority, vote for them to keep the second runner out. I very much doubt that voting for Reform would get what you wish for in your constituency, you are likely handing the MP that you don't want, a win.
    1
  440.  @debbiejames3096  The law is clear on the use of proportional and reasonable force. It is the reason the officer was suspended and will face criminal charges. Your ignorance is your problem.
    1
  441. "My grocery store opens automatically" Or does it? Have you been tested for Midichlorians?
    1
  442. What happened before is irrelevant. The person was no longer a threat, therefore the use of such force is no longer reasonable under Common Law. That is the law and the officer broke that law, his violence was disproportionate and he is going to prison.
    1
  443. "Why does it take a TV docudrama to make things happen?" Because people don't read the news. This is not new and has been reported for over 10 years.
    1
  444. I've started to FFwd past Frenchie scenes.
    1
  445.  @DCDPM  You are an emigrant in the context of a discussion for those who have moved from the UK to another country, expat being the common usage term. With English clearly not being your strong point, it's probably best for you to leave for another country to try their language.
    1
  446. In a hundred years from now it may just be...
    1
  447.  @charlesd3a  In the Sophie case there were initially over 50, in just 10 days there was only one. How is it even possible to properly investigate 50 down to 1 in just two weeks? If you search for Karl Heinz Wolney you'll come across articles on the other suspects that never get mentioned like him, another is George Pecout. The cold case investigation also mentions that Sophie had met with two French men who were hiding out from a criminal gang. There is a lot more to Sophie's life that is not mentioned, such as that, the affairs she had, the pending divorce, her husband having a child born just a year after her death and so on. The criminality of the people who gave statements against Bailey doesn't get mentioned either. There are some real shady "witnesses" when you dig into them. One of them alleged that he was bribed with drugs and money to give a statement. The police were investigated and found to have removed pages from their jobs books, missing evidence, missing key statements etc., they were even secretly recorded discussing possibly altering statements, no evidence was found of it though, but they did discuss it, so did they? Who knows! The detectives from that time refused to cooperate with the investigation into them.
    1
  448. It is not possible to make it look any worse than it was.
    1
  449. You just know that GHD saw that and are developing it right now.
    1
  450. Hey Valleygirl, I thought you were dead according to Brian McGinley? Haha!
    1
  451.  @anand.suralkar  Speaking from experience? 🙂
    1
  452. ​ @brianmcginley2743 ​ LOL ​ @brianmcginley2743 ​Brian McGinley, don't you look stup!d now that Bailey is dead and the people you accused of being him are still here commenting.
    1
  453.  @fantasyboxing71  @brianmcginley2743 ​Brian McGinley looks really stup!d now that Bailey is dead and the people he accused of being him are still here commenting.
    1
  454.  @fantasyboxing71  I'm still breathing and did say that he was a troll and stalker. He has been cyberbullying me for well over a year just because I have a different opinion. He has not replied to my comments, I wonder why eh?
    1
  455.  @brianmcginley2743  "Meet the murderer, ian bailey aka @jackburton" Meet the idi0t Brian McGinley, who has accused me of being Ian Bailey for months, How stupid do you feel now Brian, he is dead and here I am!
    1
  456. Because you being a mountain search and rescue expert and all that.
    1
  457. You know that Tenerife isn't in England, right?
    1
  458.  @Vodka_loverr  "A situation where hundreds of peoples' lives are at stake and youre concerned about privacy breach" That is a very slippery slope. The same argument could be used to monitor every individual "just in case". How could you possibly object to somebody monitoring all your communication, right? Hundreds of peoples lives could be saved, yes? How about they put cameras in your home, "just in case"?
    1
  459.  @debbietaylor5183  Your daughter is clearly not the "so many people" the OP has seen then. What is it that the OP said is "not true", what has your daughter got to do with what the OP claimed?
    1
  460. It is difficult, mountainous, volcanic, terrain, covered in bushes.
    1
  461. "So what the hell do people want?" I want police officers that use proportionate and reasonable force to defend themselves and others. None of which is on the video. It is not part of their training, not sanctioned and frankly, it is a criminal act which the officer is likely to be charged with as any other person would be under English Common Law. A twisted world would be uniformed thugs being able to decide for themselves if a person gets their head kicked and stomped on, perhaps such an officer will decide that you or your family are next? The law is very clear on this matter, hence why the officer is suspended and likely facing criminal proceedings.
    1
  462. Human remains are the remains of a body. What do you think happens to a body left out in the sun? Of course the clothes would not be on a rotted and decomposed body ate by animals...
    1
  463. The Wi-Fi network is not capable of unencrypting messages, it is the Snap servers that store them in plain text. It was nothing to do with Wi-Fi, you can't crack the encryption.
    1
  464. Because they don't have it doofus!
    1
  465. Do you know any of that is fact though?
    1
  466. Germany are literally part of the EU and you are complaining about Ukraine? Do you whine about Japan too?
    1
  467. Which is irrelevant. Proportional and reasonable force was not being used, therefore the officer was committing a criminal act. Had YOU done that you would be in prison for 1 to 3 years.
    1
  468.  @hannah42069  It's a pity that Keir Starmer didn't do anything about it when he was Director of the CPS at the time. The CPS should have taken over the prosecutions, so why didn't he?
    1
  469. ...and if you believe somebody to be crazy, don't ask them to handle a pot of boiling water in the first place!
    1
  470.  @BalthazarEngonga1  Sarcasm just whooshes over your head, doesn't it...
    1
  471.  @BalthazarEngonga1  You deleted your comment. Do you think it wouldn't get noticed?
    1
  472.  @Ray-555  Bodies eventually get found, amazing huh? It's almost like it never happens in other missing person cases....oh wait, it does, all the time!
    1
  473. Both can be true. Fleeing in fear AND accident.
    1
  474. No context is required, the officer kicked a subdued person, who was lay on the floor, in the head and then stomped on it. That is a criminal offence as it is not proportional and reasonable force. He then kicked a similarly subdued person, that is a criminal offence as it was also not proportional and reasonable force. The evidence of these criminal acts is literally on the video and it is irrelevant what occurred prior to the video. The law is very clear on this.
    1
  475.  @loulou7188  What is it that you are unclear about? The law is that you may use reasonable and proportionate use of force to defend yourself and others. A police officer is subject to the same English Common Law that another person is. They are not above the law, they adhere to it. The officer committed a CRIME on video. Nowhere in the law, nowhere in their training, is it acceptable to kick and stomp on the head of a subdued person. How can this be made any more clearer to you? YOU could be next.
    1
  476.  @loulou7188  You miss the point that it does not need to be a police officer with a gun and that if you feel you are correct you may argue with an officer, who then overreacts and kicks YOUR head in. This is why we have laws, to prevent YOU from getting a kicking from a police officer who takes a dislike to you for whatever reason.
    1
  477.  @loulou7188  Careful who you don't agree with, it could be a police officer that then kicks you in the head.
    1
  478. Indeed, if he considered her to be a potential threat, then why ask her to handle a pot of boiling water? Then why approach her when she did have it?
    1
  479. WTF is wrong with yank police? They are out of control.
    1
  480. Without Sybil Danning's boobies.
    1
  481.  @S-North  Colour is irrelevant. It was indeed assault and the officer is facing a prison term.
    1
  482. Nice bit of trolling there @Nefylym!
    1
  483. Down a ravine where the dogs don't go. You need to be a mountaineer to reach the body.
    1
  484.  @gigigigi1508  It isn't an accusation, it is a fact on record.
    1
  485.  @gigigigi1508  On the courts records, you know, where the facts are.
    1
  486.  @gigigigi1508  YOU started it. Facts matter.
    1
  487.  @gigigigi1508  The facts in the court hearing. Are you really this thick?
    1
  488. Indeed. On another note the amount of people who wear headphones while riding a bicycle is bizarre.
    1
  489. A body is sometimes difficult to find. Not sure what is mysterious about that?
    1
  490. " cant take her seriously" By coincidence, I can't take your comment seriously.
    1
  491.  @circle2867  I'm not the conspiracy l00n.
    1
  492. Utter bollox.
    1
  493. Why are you reading reddit in the first place?
    1
  494. Utter nonsense. His hands was on a TASER which was pointed at a subdued man on the ground. Did you actually watch the video before spouting that BS? We don't need "the full details". The officer committed a criminal offence because he was not using proportional and reasonable force. He literally broke the law on video.
    1
  495.  @christalmeth613  You clearly miss the point that searching for a body is not as simple as you believe it to be.
    1
  496.  @christalmeth613  You are not making any sense. "if you know about it" Know about what? "why are the search teams not considering it" Considering what?
    1
  497.  @christalmeth613  I am not incorrect, what are you on about? Stop being cryptic and answer the question.
    1
  498.  @christalmeth613  In other words I am correct and you are scurrying off. No matter.
    1
  499.  @christalmeth613  Your ad hominem certainly makes for a compelling argument.
    1
  500.  @christalmeth613  "if I wanted to debate with Children I would got to Tiktok. Come back when you finish School." It was literally in your reply.
    1
  501. "You dont take that route through choice. Why did he leave the road ?" Of course you do, never underestimate a dumb townie in the countryside doing dumb things.
    1
  502. Go there and search the volcanic terrain yourself, you'll soon see how a body can be missed. Of course you'll need mountaineering experience and all the gear, but you think it's easy, right? They aren't searching a grassy field...
    1
  503. @petertaylor2504 Utter nonsense, they were being done for affray not terrorism, doofus!
    1
  504. "The video also shows the woman attacking the officers with boiling water. " No it doesn't.
    1
  505.  @toyrobotus  You know it can be both, yes?
    1
  506. Or not brown.
    1
  507. @NFFCMod Clown.
    1
  508. Their job is to act within the law, this officer did not.
    1
  509. Disarm the attacker of what? He was lay on the floor with a taser pointed at him. He was arrested for affray not terrorism, stop with the racism.
    1
  510. Except she didn't. Did you actually watch the video?
    1
  511.  @inquisitorkrieger8171  I have seen the full videos, you are wrong, hence why those who have also seen the videos have charged him.
    1
  512. Police officers know that their job may get them killed. People cooking in their own home don't expect to be killed by police officers.
    1
  513. "Just because he used brute force on a man punching a woman in the face breaking her nose doesn't mean he's wrong. " Does in fact. It is not only wrong, but a criminal act, hence why he is suspended. Had you done that, you would be in prison for 1 to 3 years.
    1
  514. What are you on about you clown, Rochdale is in Greater Manchester.
    1
  515.  @jimduffy1967  No I mean England as officers are armed in Northern Ireland, hence why I made the distinction between England and UK. That's what you get for trying to score points, you make yourself look foolish.
    1
  516.  @michella8059  Why do you assume that all avenues are not investigated?
    1
  517.  @michella8059  Which does not mean that they are not investigating other avenues.
    1
  518. Defending her from who? The guy he had tasered and was lay on the floor? Get a grip!
    1
  519. He is now being interviewed under criminal caution. That is the first step to criminal charges.
    1
  520. Emigrants when discussed in the context of those leaving here (the UK).
    1
  521. You do, you left a comment!
    1
  522.  @sassykulturesurridge5885  LOL!
    1
  523. Kathleen Kennedy likely knows where bodies are buried.
    1
  524. The officer is clearly guilty, it is on the full video.
    1
  525. What has the officers skin colour got to do with it? Your r@cism is showing.
    1
  526.  @kelvinilla  "That means airport WiFi they were connected to must have been able to intercept their plain text messages and triggered an alarm." Nope. The text messages use End to End Encryption, but are stored on Snap servers in plain text as their server is the other "end", nothing to do with the Wi-Fi. The server then forwards it, encrypted, to the next device. It is Snap that are monitoring them and within 30 minutes they alert the authorities.
    1
  527. Speculation is fine. Libel is not.
    1
  528.  @joerobinson1672  I am not talking about what is factual though. If you believe that the speculation has been factual, then you need to read more comments.
    1
  529. "Bruh, if its in a hard accessible area then isnt that suspicious in itself?" Did IQ levels take a dive recently? The body was found in a hard, inaccessible area. Falling INTO that area from a mountain is the easy part.
    1