Youtube comments of Neodym (@neodym5809).
-
729
-
578
-
335
-
327
-
302
-
246
-
243
-
216
-
214
-
192
-
184
-
178
-
155
-
152
-
146
-
138
-
134
-
132
-
129
-
126
-
125
-
124
-
116
-
99
-
99
-
98
-
94
-
86
-
85
-
83
-
80
-
76
-
75
-
74
-
74
-
73
-
70
-
70
-
67
-
67
-
66
-
66
-
65
-
65
-
65
-
61
-
60
-
58
-
58
-
58
-
55
-
54
-
54
-
53
-
52
-
51
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
48
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
45
-
44
-
44
-
43
-
43
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
@Ararune If the US would introduce a Universal health care system, be it single payer like the UK NHS or a Bismarck system like France or Germany, health care costs overall would be reduced for drastically. I give you the main reasons:
1. If you are covered, you will go to the doctor earlier, therefor treatment costs are cheaper. In the current system, as you often have to pay thousands of Dollars before the insurance covers anything, therefor you delay any visit as long as possible. This alone cuts costs massivly.
2. red tape. What treatment is paid by the insurance, to what fraction, is the doctor covered, is the hospital covered? A bureaucratic nightmare and enormous costs. Completely gone, as all doctors and hospitals are covered, as well as all accepted treatments.
3. treating the problem, not the symptoms. Which brings us back to life expectancy. The US opioid crisis is the root of the reduction in US life expectancy. Its reason is that opioids are cheaper than treating the cause.
4. Extra costs like advertisement are massively reduced.
5. Costs for drugs and treatment are massively reduced, as they are not negotiated individually for each insurance and each hospital, but on block.
If you do not believe me, just compare each of those factors. USA vs. Canada/GB or USA vs. France/Germany, depending if you prefer the single payer or the Bismarck system.
By the way, you also have free choice of doctor, hospital and treatment in those systems, too.
38
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
35
-
35
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
Tariffs are not the main issue that will drive costs. Take medicine: The cost to certify a new drug is significant, no matter the market size. Currently, if a drug is certified in one EU country, it can be sold in all. From next year on, a drug has both to be certified in the EU and UK, costing similar. If it is a drug for a disease only few people get, it might not be worth it to certify it for the UK market, so the drug will not become available.
Take chemicals: to register a chemical, extensive testing and certification is necessary. If it is chemical the UK does not use much, it might not be worth it, so the UK gets cut of this supply as well.
Aviation: every piece of equipment requires certification. UK certification's will no longer be valid in the EU next year, so every product you want to sell in the EU and UK will double in certification costs.
Foods: sanitary and phytosanitary checks will become necessary. These are not tariffs, but expensive, as documentation, experts and labs are required, as well as delays in shipment.
Tariffs are a minor issue compared to mutual recognition of standards.
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
@meamzcs It is dumb. If you are not a millionaire already, and you rely on your wages, as you need to be healthy to work to cover your cost of living, going private is risky. Your family members are not covered, if you become sick and can not pay the insurance fees anymore, you will be put in a basic tariff with LESS service. Any service the private insurance offers can also be bought by paying out of pocket, or add additional insurances.
In case of an emergency, you will get exactly the same care and service, no matter what insurance you are in.
Your health will not be better protected by private insurance. You just get more comfortable chairs, beds, and food.
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
Giedrius Narmontas It is not so much EU interference in UK internal matters I am talking about, but how to handle UK breaking UK-EU treaties. Phil is often complaining why the EU is not being more aggressive towards the UK. I think he misses the bigger picture.
What would happen if the EU persuades the court case, putting more pressure on? What would it gain? Short term, nothing. Johnson and his crew would love the conflict, while the DUP would use it as ammunition to prove the point that the Northern Irish protocol is not working to increase its support in the next NI election.
On the other hand, what happens if the EU just waits for a couple of more months? In the next NI election, Sinn Fein most likely will take the majority, and by that, gain massive control over NI matters, especially custom controls (which are currently blocked by the DUP). So the problem literally sorts itself out for the EU, NI will happily implement the protocol and London can only watch while to parts of the Union (Scotland and Northern Ireland) will be more loyal to the European Union than to the UK.
And the EU does not even have to make its own hands dirty, simply the forces inside the UK will accomplish everything it needs.
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
@Ararune Well, in the US, costs for such a scan may be $1000. Can you pay that out of your pocket?
What you fail to mention is that waiting times are not an issue of Universal healthcare, but of under funding. And for state employed doctors:
there is the Bismarck system. Doctors, hospitals, they work private, either self employed or for a private company. Only in case of state owned hospitals, they are employed by the state (which is the minority). Therefor they offer you the scan quickly, as that is the way they make their money.
I am tired of the myth that universal health care results in long waiting times. It does not. In countries that deliberately under fund their health service for political reasons (hello, NHS!) that might be the case. But in all other cases, it works, it delivers quick and cost efficient results, and nobody goes bankrupted due to their healthcare bill.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@mrsmerily There is a difference between shortages (EU) and critical shortages (UK). The former is having less than optimal, the later is having to few to deliver what is required.
The electricity and gas prices in the UK risen by a bigger percentage than in the EU, due to Brexit. Or look at gas prices, 200% in the EU, 400% in the UK. This extra increase is the Brexit dividend.
Furthermore, Brexit also decreased productivity of drivers due to the loss of cabotage. While pre Brexit, a lorry driver would have delivered goods from Rotterdam to London, taking new goods and driving to Manchester, while than traveling back from Manchester to Brussels, now only 2 trips instead of 3 are allowed. And due to the EU border checks (UK has postponed theirs again...), the last trip may be skipped, too, so only 1 delivery instead of three.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@krollpeter Macht es Sinn, viel in einen Berufszweig zu investieren, den es Mittelfristig nicht mehr geben wird? Das ist halt die Frage.
In GB sind die Arbeitsbedingungen für LKW Fahrer außerdem sehr viel schlechter als in Deutschland: keine WCs/Duschen, kaum Restaurants, LKW Parkplätze sind kostenpflichtig, längere Arbeitszeiten. In GB ist der Respekt vor nicht universitären Berufsabschlüssen ebenfalls nicht vorhanden, in Deutschland schon.
Marketing ist außerdem nicht überflüssig: Apple, Nike, Addidas, diese Firmen sind hauptsächlich aufgrund ihres Marketings so groß und reich geworden. Man mag über den Nutzen für die Menschheit streiten, in unserem kapitalistischen System ist Marketing für die Geldvermehrung nützlich.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Russias losses are massive, a third of their deployed forces in Ukraine has been destroyed. Considering Russias problems with morals and logistics, as well as its massive economic problems, I doubt they have the capacity to keep their gains. Especially when Ukraine starts using superior equipment from the west.
Furthermore, the hardship Russians have to endure due to sanctions is much more severe than for Europeans. Europeans have to pay more for gas, but russia now lacks supplies in essentials like medicine. They will lose their ability to operate commercial flights (Boeing/Airbus embargo), their factories will fall apart due lack of maintenance and parts, they even get massive problems in food supplies (Russia needs to import 90%+ of potato seedlings, for example).
Ukraine can not accept Russia staying in its territory. Any cease fire or peace would only be temporary till Russia believes it is time to strike again. Therefor, the only way forward for Ukraine is to win. No other options, as Putins goal is the extinction of Ukraine.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@donkykon2094
2021
Tesla: 936,172 and 21% share (vs 23%)
SAIC (incl. SAIC-GM-Wuling): 609,730 and 13% share
Volkswagen Group: 451,131 and 10% share (vs 11%)
BYD: 323,143 and 7% share
Hyundai Motor Group: 216,562 and 5% share
21% market share is respectable, but it is in decline. Far from being the BOSS. Considering it is only the EV market, and not the total car market, which changes the picture:
Toyota Motor Corp 10,495,548 (same) +11.8%
2 Volkswagen Group 8,610,100 (same) -5.5%
3 Renault Nissan Mitsubishi Alliance 7,680,014 (same) -1.3%
4 Hyundai Motor Group 6,667,085 +1 +5.0%
5 Stellantis 6,583,269 +1 +5.2%
6 General Motors 6,291,000 -2 -7.9%
7 Honda 4,121,000 (same) -6.5%
8 Ford Motor Company 3,942,000 (same) -5.9%
9 Suzuki 2,763,000 +1 12.9%
10 BMW 2,521,514 +1 +8.5%
Not even top10.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Adi Adindas you Said no Country would accept EU jurisdiction in general. Please cite the passage of your initial post referring to a Canada style deal. I gave you examples of countries which did, thereby proving you wrong.
About Canada, Japan, SK: none of these countries can trade by Lorry on a huge scale with the EU, due to geographic distance, therefor loser rules are enough to protect EUs single market integrity. Furthermore, when the EU negotiated with them, their state aid rules as well as any other area of the level playing field were already well established, so the EU could adjust the agreement accordingly. The UK meanwhile is either unable or unwilling to tell the EU its plans in these areas, and as a result, the EU does not know how much UK rules will differ from EU rules, and as a consequence, has to be more careful.
Last but not least: why did the UK agree to follow much stricter Japanese state aid rules, but not EU ones? Where is the logic?
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@suhasrao671985 Problem for Russia is, it cut itself of from Western technology, which was essential for Chinese rise. And China is so far unwilling to provide its own to Russia, out of fear of western sanctions. So Russia would have to build a lot of things from the ground up, which is costly, takes a long time and provides lower quality. Overall, this route will lower Russian living standards compared to status quo ante feb 2022.
Considering that such essential parts like aerospace, railway, gas- and oil industry, car industry, agriculture are dependent on western technology, I do believe that the Russian central bank is right to expect a decline similar to the 1990s.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Considering I added a citation, the answer would have been just one google search away from you...
but anyway, may I simply post the abstract:
The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of forward collision warning (FCW) alone, a low-speed autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system operational at speeds up to 19 mph that does not warn the driver prior to braking, and FCW with AEB that operates at higher speeds in reducing front-to-rear crashes and injuries. Poisson regression was used to compare rates of police-reported crash involvements per insured vehicle year in 22 U.S. states during 2010–2014 between passenger vehicle models with FCW alone or with AEB and the same models where the optional systems were not purchased, controlling for other factors affecting crash risk. Similar analyses compared rates between Volvo 2011–2012 model S60 and 2010–2012 model XC60 vehicles with a standard low-speed AEB system to those of other luxury midsize cars and SUVs, respectively, without the system.
FCW alone, low-speed AEB, and FCW with AEB reduced rear-end striking crash involvement rates by 27%, 43%, and 50%, respectively. Rates of rear-end striking crash involvements with injuries were reduced by 20%, 45%, and 56%, respectively, by FCW alone, low-speed AEB, and FCW with AEB, and rates of rear-end striking crash involvements with third-party injuries were reduced by 18%, 44%, and 59%, respectively. Reductions in rear-end striking crashes with third-party injuries were marginally significant for FCW alone, and all other reductions were statistically significant. FCW alone and low-speed AEB reduced rates of being rear struck in rear-end crashes by 13% and 12%, respectively, but FCW with AEB increased rates of rear-end struck crash involvements by 20%. Almost 1 million U.S. police-reported rear-end crashes in 2014 and more than 400,000 injuries in such crashes could have been prevented if all vehicles were equipped with FCW and AEB that perform similarly as systems did for study vehicles.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@Mensch003 Meerwasserentsalungsanlagen ist die teuerste, extrem energieaufwendige und umweltschädliche Methode, um Trinkwasser zu erzeugen. Man nutzt diese nur, wenn man keine andere Wahl hat. Und Deutschland hat die Wahl. Ich zitiere das Umweltbundesamt(Wasserressourcen und ihre Nutzung):
Deutschland ist ein wasserreiches Land. Im Jahr 2016 wurden mit rund 24 Milliarden Kubikmetern Wasserentnahme nur 12,8 % des Wasserdargebots genutzt.
Deutschland hat einen großen Puffer bezüglich Wasser. Es ist kein Landesweites Problem, sondern ein Regionales (Verteilungsproblem). Lösung wäre hier schlicht eine bessere Vernetzung, um Gebiete, die unter Mangel leiden, mit Wasser aus Regionen mit ausreichendem Wasservorkommen zu versorgen. Abgesehen davon, dass der Wasserverbrauch in Deutschland seit Jahren rückläufig ist.
Bezüglich Wasserstoffwirtschaft: wenn wir im großen Rahmen Meerwasserentsalungsanlagen betreiben haben wir keinen Strom mehr übrig, um Wasserstoff herzustellen.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@SymptomOfNow I will tell you what happens: certain sectors of the UK economy will just disappear. Farming will be the first. Farming is dependent on seasonal labor, hard work, long hours, low wages. You can not increase wages in this sector too much, as who will pay 50 bucks for half a kilo of UK strawberries, if you can buy EU Strawberries for 5 bucks? Furthermore, the workforce lives in the cities, the farms are on the countryside. What Brit will leave his/her job for a couple of weeks, pay extra rent, dont see the family, for such a job?
So farming goes bust. Instead, food will be imported. You can see it already: UK can not, due to a lack of workforce, process its turkeys for Christmas. So UK turkeys get culled and turkeys from France and Poland will get sold to UK consumers. End of UK turkeys.
Pork is next. Germany already waiting to sell its pork to UK.
Are you ready to rely on other nations for UK food supply? Are you ready for UK farmers going bankrupted?
A final question: why does Switzerland both have the highest wages in the world and accepts Freedom of movement?
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@MrFreedomKG nein, denn Länder, die nicht in der EU sind, haben eine entsprechende Lagerinfrastruktur, um das zu kompensieren. Die Briten wiederum haben noch 2017 beschlossen, ihre Lagerinfrastruktur aus Kostengründen zu schließen und sich ganz auf die EU zu verlassen.
Die EU verlassen aber nicht drauf vorbereiten, dass ist das britische Meisterstück, das sich durchzieht. So wurde die Einfuhrung von Zollkontrollen, welche EU Länder seit Januar fur britische Waren Durchfuhren, von den Briten jetzt auf nächstes Jahr verschoben. Warum? Infrastruktur und Personalmangel. So geht es weiter im Energiesektor, im Gassektor, im Lebensmittelsektor, im Logistiksektor… britische Tankstellen schließen momentan, da es an Fahrern fehlt, sie zu beliefern.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@joshbentley2307 Ok, I take your challange (and appretiate it):
UK exports:
It is less than half of Germany. According to statista: Leading export countries worldwide in 2023, Uk is not fourth, but 13th.
Decacorns: UK has 3, Germany has one. In my opinion, rather meaningless in the grad scheme of economics.
"And it became the 3rd country (the other two are the USA and China) to have a tech industry valued over $1 trillion, it’s the tech centre of Europe."
Please elaborate what you mean by tech industry. If you go by "Medium and high-tech industry (% manufacturing value added) - Country Ranking", Germany is 6th with 60%, while UK is 16th with 48%. Considering that Germanys manufacturing base is bigger than UKs, so is its total value.
"And it will outperform Germany in the foreseeable future due to there manufacturing model relying on cheap Russian energy."
Germany`s economic model does only partly relied on Russian energy. Considering that russian gas supply is gone, and Germans economy only stagnated proves this point. It helped, but it was not essential. It takes some adjustment, but Germany`s economic power relies on education, infrastructure and a well developed mid sized industry base.
Feel free to correct me, or clarify if I misunderstood a point of you.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Not much due to the German system. The Greens would require a coalition to govern, either CDU, or SPD/FDP. Then, due to the German two chamber system, serious changes would have to pass the Bundesrat, where the 16 governments of the German states decide, only one of them is governed by the Greens. And finally, EU, where a German government would need to convince 26 other nations to agree.
Furthermore, it is already consensus in Germany to work towards a better environment, nothing exclusive to the Greens anymore.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@norrinradd3549 As my previous post disappeared (I suspect links are not allowed here) I will try it again differently. But if you want proof, fair enough, I would just kindly ask you to google:
How Churchill 'starved' India
written by Soutik Biswas
published by the BBC, 28 October 2010
I will present some quotes:
"Apparently it is more important to save the Greeks and liberated countries than the Indians and there is reluctance either to provide shipping or to reduce stocks in this country," writes Sir Wavell in his account of the meetings. Mr Amery is more direct. "Winston may be right in saying that the starvation of anyhow under-fed Bengalis is less serious than sturdy Greeks, but he makes no sufficient allowance for the sense of Empire responsibility in this country," he writes.
Amery, secretary of the state for India, and Wavevell, Field Marshal, two officials of the UK government.
Another one:
Mr Churchill turned down fervent pleas to export food to India citing a shortage of ships - this when shiploads of Australian wheat, for example, would pass by India to be stored for future consumption in Europe. As imports dropped, prices shot up and hoarders made a killing. Mr Churchill also pushed a scorched earth policy - which went by the sinister name of Denial Policy - in coastal Bengal where the colonisers feared the Japanese would land. So authorities removed boats (the lifeline of the region) and the police destroyed and seized rice stocks.
Direct order from Winston Churchill to starve Indians. Is this enough prove for you that the UK government was directly involved and responsible in making natives suffer and die?
2
-
2
-
2
-
@norrinradd3549 did you name one historian? Did you cite a paper or manuscript? No. So you did not provide a source, insofar that you told me to go to a library.
My opinion , as I mentioned before, is: the British Empire is just as bad, as Cruel, as inhuman as any other empire. Not better, not worse, just the same. So when you start with your whataboutisms or your personal insults, it only shows that you are emotional, Not rational, about this topic. Which is rather interesting because I doubt either of us participated in this actions, therefor have no personal stakes here.
Did I claim Gandhi to be perfect? I did not even mention his name once before.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@berndarndt9924 Den Wählern wurde sprichwörtlich das Blaue vom Himmel versprochen wenn Sie Brexit wählen. Aber viel relevanter ist doch, was die Personen, welche an der Spitze der Brexitkampange und jetzt in der Regierung sitzen vom Brexit wollen.
Ich empfehle Ihnen hierzu das Buch Briannia Unchained, dessen Autoren im britischen Kabinett (Innenministerin, Justizminister, Wirtschaftsminister...) sitzen. Darin wird unter anderem gefordert, Arbeitnehmerrechte auf indisches Niveau zu senken.
Außerdem ist die Idee des Brexits, EU Immigranten, die durch EU Recht geschützt sind und damit eben nicht einfach ausgebeutet werden können, durch nicht EU Personen auszutauschen, welche man von heut auf morgen aus dem Land werfen kann.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@dixonhill1108 No. While prices increase, not of the magnitude as in the UK. As both France and Germany actually have gas taverns to store gas in an significant amount, and their main source of electricity isnt gas, unlike UK, they are far less effected.
Furthermore, food prices will not increase much, as both countries can supply themself, while the UK is dependent on imports.
And there are NO shortages whatsoever, petrol and diesel, food, all available.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@markaxworthy2508 What did Cameron demand? Look it up. Not to reform the EU, but more exceptions, more rebates for the UK. And it was not the EU which said no. It were the 27 other nations.
I am really annoyed by this "The EU did" narrative. The EU consists of 27 nations, each of them with their own identity, as strong as the British one. If anything happens in the EU, than because these 27 members found an agreement. This is why the UK left: so used to centralism and London dictate, that the simple thought of nations cooperating as equals was not understood by the UK.
The UK had the best deal of all EU member states: exceptions with Schengen, Euro, and many more, as well as the rebate. But like a spoiled child, it was always crying for more and that the others are unfair.
How would the Dutch premier have explained to his voters why the UK deserves EVEN MORE without any benefit for the Netherlands? How would the German chancellor, the French president?
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@hannahg8439 Ok, now it gets interesting. What metric do you use to label a party left? Because that can be confusing.
The classic label of the workers (blue collars) party can not be it, because the Greens never were, and have no intention to become, a workers party.
Another label would be that of progressive, minority rights, all that. In that area, the Greens are most likely labelled as left.
Last, environmental issues. While it is the core of Greens ideology, as it has become mainstream, being a major topic for all parties except the AFD, this is nothing left anymore, at least in German politics.
From a more general standpoint, the Greens have a lot of conservative aspects that appeals to voters. They are a party mostly elected by academics/civil servants, females, middle age (35+) and of high income.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I would go further. Putin is holding blood and soil speeches, copying Germanys excuse for taking Sudetenland, and talks about spitting out anyone who dares to oppose him (in Russia) like a fly. Complement that with the total destruction of any opposition media or voice, the military training in schools by the Russian equivalent of the Hitler Youth (Junarmija) and the pure indoctrination on any level, there is no question that Russia is now fascist. Just apply Umberto Eco`s 14 questions:
The cult of tradition. “One has only to look at the syllabus of every fascist movement to find the major traditionalist thinkers. The Nazi gnosis was nourished by traditionalist, syncretistic, occult elements.”
The rejection of modernism. “The Enlightenment, the Age of Reason, is seen as the beginning of modern depravity. In this sense Ur-Fascism can be defined as irrationalism.”
The cult of action for action’s sake. “Action being beautiful in itself, it must be taken before, or without, any previous reflection. Thinking is a form of emasculation.”
Disagreement is treason. “The critical spirit makes distinctions, and to distinguish is a sign of modernism. In modern culture the scientific community praises disagreement as a way to improve knowledge.”
Fear of difference. “The first appeal of a fascist or prematurely fascist movement is an appeal against the intruders. Thus Ur-Fascism is racist by definition.”
Appeal to social frustration. “One of the most typical features of the historical fascism was the appeal to a frustrated middle class, a class suffering from an economic crisis or feelings of political humiliation, and frightened by the pressure of lower social groups.”
The obsession with a plot. “Thus at the root of the Ur-Fascist psychology there is the obsession with a plot, possibly an international one. The followers must feel besieged.”
The enemy is both strong and weak. “By a continuous shifting of rhetorical focus, the enemies are at the same time too strong and too weak.”
Pacifism is trafficking with the enemy. “For Ur-Fascism there is no struggle for life but, rather, life is lived for struggle.”
Contempt for the weak. “Elitism is a typical aspect of any reactionary ideology.”
Everybody is educated to become a hero. “In Ur-Fascist ideology, heroism is the norm. This cult of heroism is strictly linked with the cult of death.”
Machismo and weaponry. “Machismo implies both disdain for women and intolerance and condemnation of nonstandard sexual habits, from chastity to homosexuality.”
Selective populism. “There is in our future a TV or Internet populism, in which the emotional response of a selected group of citizens can be presented and accepted as the Voice of the People.”
Ur-Fascism speaks Newspeak. “All the Nazi or Fascist schoolbooks made use of an impoverished vocabulary, and an elementary syntax, in order to limit the instruments for complex and critical reasoning.”
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@antonrudenham3259 My bad, it were 7bn:
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/uk-gives-up-7bn-windfall-from-european-investment-bank-tq0qskgfc
There will be a custom border in the Irish sea, and Northern Ireland will follow EU regulations, not UK regulations. And regulations are far more important than customs (which is also ironic, as it will be less paperwork to trade from ROI to NI than from NI to rUK).
A worthwhile FTA? Japan, Canada, Singapore, South Korea, Mercusor, Vietnam, more than one. And good luck to the UK to have more FTAs than the EU, because they cover most of the globe already:
https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/infographics/eu-trade-map/
What cards does the UK hold? Why would it be, as a smaller entity, be a more interesting trading partner than the EU? As the UK is a service economy, that can not sell its services under WTO or FTA terms.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@teargass1849 the Video Said the Military is looking for a F35 replacement because it’s a failure, you say it is just the next generation. Alright, I am not deep enough in the topic to say who is right.
BUT:
You claim the F35 will be cheaper as it will replace lots of different aircrafts, resulting in simpler procedures and less complexity. At first, sounds good. I took the time to check the costs per flight hour, and this argument crumbles. A flight hour of the F35 costs more than three times of an F16, and still 20-30% more than a F15. It costs 4 times more than an A10. How can it be cheaper when it costs several times more to operate than multiple types of aircrafts (my source is Forbes, Aug 16, 2016, by Niall McCarthy). If you have a source explaining while cost per flight hour do not matter, I’m interested.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@scottwomack8905 I am not in love with any form of electric production, I am just stating fact. Nuclear fission is expensive, extremely dangerous, bad for the environment (uranium mining is the worst) and unreliable.
You are also wrong. 1990, 56.7% of German electricity production was by coal. 2000, it was 50.5%. 2010, 41.5%. And last year, it was 27.8%.
So nuclear is not replaced by coal, quiet the opposite, coal is reduced, too.
So please, don’t say I am in love when you are getting the basic facts wrong.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"As of 2019, as many as 2 million people had left Russia since Vladimir Putin became president, and many are entrepreneurs, creatives, and academics, the Atlantic Council, an international-affairs think tank, found."
Russian 'brain drain' of academic, finance, and tech workers 'might be the most important problem' for its economy, experts say
March 6, 2022
Business Insider
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@AndrasMihalyi Nuclear cant, either. Unplanned shut downs due to security reasons are common, as I mentioned, 30% shutdown of all reactors in France, unplanned. How is this reliable?
Furthermore, offshore wind is rather reliable, and with todays weather forecasts, you can also plan onshore and solar. Combine this with a storage technology like hydrogen, and you come rather close. This is not future talk, either, it is already working in countries like Portugal. And it is much quicker to build than nuclear plants, cheaper, too.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@איתןשי I call a party far right that puts Holocaust deniers onto its list so they become parliamentarians (google Gedeon). The AFD was flirting with far right figures under Petry (which costed her the leadership). They have turned worse ever since.
If you really want to go back to the conservative libertarian age of AFD, it is at the beginning with Lucke`s party of the professors. But that is a rather brief period.
Of course the political spectra is a relative one. You might be conservative in one place, a communist in another, and a Nazi in a third (sometimes even at the same place, just depending on the person you ask).
But for me, there are certain attributes that make a party far right: if their central message is hatred towards another group, be it ethnically, religiously or nationally while claiming that they themselfs are are superior, they are usually far right.
Israel politics is a mess I must say. I see a certain lack of common ground between the parties, fringe parties having too much power, overall corruption and mistrust. Which is to be expected in a part of the world under constant threat of violence and war. But I hope with Netanjahu gone, there is now a time to find peace and common ground.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I talked to some german women about her. They see her as back to the 50s, with the mindset that a woman has three priorities: Kitchen, church, children (a little more elegant in German, the three Ks, Küche, Kinder, Kirche). on top of that, her position on homosexuality and same sex marriage, areas that are not controversial in the majority of german population, disqualifies her to lead a center party.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@honkdatonk1819 nur zur Begriffserklärung:
Brennstoffzelle: Umwandlung H2 zu Strom
Elektrolyse: Umwandlung Strom zu H2
Beide Technologien haben hohe Wirkungsgrade (60%+)
Verbrennungsmotoren erreichen diese Wirkungsgrade nur, wenn sie die optimale Drehzahl haben. Also praktisch nie.
Wenn Sie den Aufwand fur die Aufreinigung von Uranerz mit der Herstellung einer Brennstoffzelle vergleichen (auch energetisch), so relativiert sich das extrem sehr schnell (das eigentliche Problem ist der Bedarf an Platin als Katalysator, welches teuer ist).
Ein weiterer Vorteil von H2 ist, dass es nicht nur als Energiespeicher verwendet werden kann. Auch als Rohstoff in der chemischen Industrie kann es Verwendung finden. Die Stahlindustrie will mittels H2 „grünen“ Stahl herstellen. Es kann auch schlicht ins Gasnetz eingeleitet werden und dann in Heizungen verbrannt werden.
Die Technik, auch Großtechnisch, zur Herstellung, Speicherung und Verwendung von H2 existiert. Sie findet auch bereits Anwendung. Jetzt müssen schlicht mehr Anlagen gebaut werden. Und bei einer AKW Bauzeit von 20+ Jahren, dessen Strombereitstellungskosten unsere jetzigen Stromkosten bereits um 50% übersteigen (Daten Hickley PointC) ist die Frage was von beiden klar beantwortet.
Die Politische Entscheidung wurde auch bereits getroffen. Ob die EU, Deutschland, Schweden, GB, Wasserstoff ist der Energieträger der Zukunft.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@francissalaets9721 A vaccination trains your immune system to detect the virus quickly and destroy it before it can multiply in your body. So with a strong immune system and a vaccine, there is little to no risk. The virus gets destroyed early.
If you have a strong immune system but the immune system does not know the virus, the virus will stay undetected for a while. Multiplying in your body and attacking more and more organs (in the case of Covid, usually the lungs). When the immune system then detects the virus, it can go into overdrive and starts to attack the organs, too.
Allergies are a different topic, again. Your body reacts aggressively to certain substances. So if you get jabbed, the immune system attacks the vaccine immediately, going into overdrive. But I would talk to other doctors. As with the selection of different vaccines (Biontech/Pfizer, Moderna, AZ) one might be right for your condition.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Yarsig Don`t worry, I am reading, and with interest.
1. Other countries have huge amounts of specialists, too, nothing unique to the US. Furthermore, compared to nations like Norway, Switzerland, or even Germany, both the number of doctors and nurses per capita are much smaller in the USA.
2. I guess a typo ;)
3. This is good nice for shareholders, but doesnt help the country or patients.
4. Again, good news to shareholders. But, if you compare where approved drugs come from, it roughly correlates with economic size. USA: 50% of the world market, and 50% of drug development. So it is highly debatable if the USA really delivers more drug development by paying more, as other countries develop an equal amount of new drugs, if normalized by GDP. I also think that recent developments in the mRNA vaccine department show that EU countries have the edge over the USA in certain areas (Pfizer is licensing the German mRNA vaccine by Biontech, which is the patent holder).
5. Again, good news to shareholders, but not for patients.
6. This is an interesting argument, but debatable. Deductibles are common in the USA (and almost non existent in a lot of Western countries) and a hurdle when it comes to seeking health care when sick. Which has negative side effects: by waiting before going to the doctor, your health becomes worse, and cure becomes more expensive. So there is an argument that universal healthcare would result in people seeking health care at an earlier stage, and by that, been treated with a quicker and cheaper method, actually reducing utilization rates (instead of an hospital stay, a couple of pills are enough).
About health care indicators as you mentioned: USA is really a mixed bag. You can pick the ones where it does good, but there are several where it is really bad. And rather basic ones, too. Maternal mortality rates are higher than in Turkey, and six times higher than in Germany. Mortality rate of under 5 year olds is also double of Germany. Not to mention life expectancy in general (which is in part, an result of the opioid crisis. But I argue that this crisis is a direct result of the US health system).
Always nice to have a civilized exchange of arguments and thoughts.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Rhetorical question? As the main answer is health care, and lack of sick pay. If you are ill, you usually have to pay doctors visits and treatment up to a cap (several thousand Dollars), and a singular visit already costs hundreds. If you need treatment and cant work, you dont get paid, losing income.
This usually results in a unhealthy behavior: you do not visit the doctor as long as possible, which means serious illnesses can develop beyond help (or much higher treatment costs). Second, where you just would stay home for 1-2 weeks in other countries to get healthy again (sick pay), in the US, you take opioids to be able to work. Which eventually turns into a addiction, and is the current reason why US life expectancy decreases.
Medical bills are the number one reason in the US for insolvency.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Gina Ryan The Vaccine? Which one do you mean? Biontech/Pfizer, Moderna, J&J, AstraZeneca, SputnikV, Sinopharm? Sell out to whom? USA, EU, Russia, China, Cuba, UK? You have to be more specific, as any country on earth, no matter which block they are part of, are vaccinating their people.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1