Comments by "Scott Charney" (@scottcharney1091) on "Code Blue Cam" channel.

  1. It's "would have," not "would of." Also, I'm not referring to him specifically, but behavior when arrested doesn't necessarily indicate anything. Nobody should talk to the police without an attorney.
    11
  2. Don't talk to the police without an attorney.
    4
  3. I'm not saying that he's not guilty, but no, that's not proof of anything. Don't talk to the cops without an attorney.
    3
  4. I don't think that most Americans say: "started the house on fire." That might be a Midwest thing; this takes place in Wisconsin. (In your second sentence: *whose.)
    2
  5. I'm not saying that he's not guilty, but no, that's not proof of anything. Don't talk to the cops without an attorney.
    2
  6. No, it does not. I'm not referring to him specifically, but nobody should talk to the police without an attorney! Silence does not mean that you are guilty; note the phrase "anything you say can and will be used against you."
    2
  7. There's not necessarily a connection between behavior while arrested and guilt. I'm not referring to him specifically, just in general.
    2
  8. That's not necessarily an indication of anything. I'm not referring specifically to him, just in general.
    2
  9. You can't defend yourself that way. Just don't talk.
    2
  10. I'm not saying that he's not guilty, but no, that's not proof of anything. Don't talk to the cops without an attorney.
    2
  11.  @bradallen8909  It's one of those words that YT sometimes detects, and then demonetizes the video. I think it's ridiculous also. I would get around it by saying things like "tried to off himself." People have been saying "un-alive" as a verb, but that sounds ridiculous to me.
    2
  12. Empathetic, more likely.
    1
  13. Deinstitutionalization began under Carter, but of course Emperor Reagan finished the job.
    1
  14. "Sasha" is a boy's name.
    1
  15. He's an ephebophile, not a pedophile, but that's beside the point.
    1
  16. Don't talk to the police without an attorney.
    1
  17. I'm not saying that he's not guilty, but no, that's not proof of anything. Don't talk to the cops without an attorney.
    1
  18.  @kuruptzZz  Saying something like "what's this all about?" won't help you. The odds of it being a fake cop, much less several, are very low!
    1
  19. Don't talk to the police without an attorney.
    1
  20. This is why social workers are often helpful.
    1
  21. Don't talk to the police without an attorney!
    1
  22. Don't talk to the police without an attorney.
    1
  23. It's not as funny as the "What is Drugs" guy.
    1
  24. I am surprised that this is not in Florida.
    1
  25. Don't talk to the police without a lawyer!
    1
  26. There's not necessarily a connection.
    1
  27.  @residentpotato6023  ?
    1
  28. Not to defend him per se, but don't talk to the police without an attorney.
    1
  29. This is off the subject, but the messages with adult couples are completely irrelevant. There's nothing illegal there, assuming no minors were involved. Also, indeed, don't talk to the police without an attorney.
    1
  30. I'm not saying that he's not guilty, but no, that's not proof of anything. Don't talk to the cops without an attorney.
    1
  31. Don't talk to the police without an attorney.
    1
  32.  @XxMidnightToker420xX  I agree. Also, the word is "saw," not "seen."
    1
  33.  @annehaight9963  That's pretty clever.
    1
  34. Would *have
    1
  35.  @Alex-ou4tn  You are welcome.
    1
  36. Don't talk to the police without an attorney.
    1
  37. Don't hallucinogens make most people less dangerous to others, although perhaps dangerous to themselves? That's part of the reason why Woodstock 1969 (and 1994, for that matter) were so much safer than Woodstock 1999.
    1
  38.  @Karla-m1y  *you're
    1