Comments by "Scott Charney" (@scottcharney1091) on "Investigation underway after victims of teen mob attack say Chicago cops refused to help" video.

  1. It's not either/or. This is partially off the subject, but the police are under no legal obligation to help anyone. The SCOTUS has ruled on this more than once.
    16
  2. It's true everywhere that the cops are under no legal obligation to protect anyone. The SCOTUS has ruled on this more than once.
    11
  3. The police are under no legal obligation to help anyone. The SCOTUS has ruled on this more than once.
    8
  4. It's not either/or. This is partially off the subject, but the police are under no legal obligation to help anyone. The SCOTUS has ruled on this more than once.
    7
  5. It's not an uncommon clothing design, but yes, it fits.
    6
  6. They didn't create these conditions.
    5
  7. The cops are under no obligation to help anyone.
    3
  8. The police are under no legal obligation to help anyone. The SCOTUS has ruled on this more than once.
    3
  9.  @conductor6577  That is not what they voted for. That's silly.
    2
  10. According to the SCOTUS, the cops are under no legal obligation to help anyone in particular.
    2
  11. You exaggerate.
    2
  12. No, they don't have anyone's back.
    2
  13. On the contrary, that sort of thing leads to more delinquency. I'm willing to bet that these kids experienced beatings growing up, and surely saw lots more domestic violence. There's a reason that every major medical organization in the world opposes hitting children (though it should be obvious).
    2
  14. The SCOTUS has ruled that cops are not obligated to help anyone.
    2
  15. *bear
    2
  16. It's not either/or. Besides, cops are not under any legal obligation to protect anyone, according to the SCOTUS.
    2
  17. Most of the city is fine.
    2
  18. The SCOTUS has ruled that cops are under no legal obligation to protect anyone.
    2
  19. I've learned some new slurs. Reported.
    2
  20. According to the SCOTUS, cops are not obligated to help anyone.
    2
  21. No, because there's news reporting and then there's commentary/opinion.
    2
  22. *there Also, according to the SCOTUS, the police are under no obligation to protect anyone.
    2
  23. Racist copypasta reported.
    2
  24. Those sorts of discussions are in different videos.
    2
  25. It's not either/or. Also, note that cops are under no legal obligation to help anyone.
    2
  26. Nor are they obligated to do so, per SCOTUS.
    2
  27. He's technically correct if they're under 18.
    2
  28.  @the-truth-hurts  Or perhaps look into alternatives to police as we know them.
    2
  29. According to SCOTUS rulings, the cops are under no obligation to protect anyone. Don't count on them for anything good.
    1
  30. Police don't do that in general. They're law enforcement; they show up after the fact and take notes, and they enforce petty regulations. According to the SCOTUS, they are under no obligation to protect anyone.
    1
  31. Most of the city is fine.
    1
  32. It's a news report, not a commentary/opinion piece.
    1
  33. Most of the city is fine.
    1
  34. @ghhv hgvhgv It's not either-or.
    1
  35. Was it political?
    1
  36.  @SamsungAndIphoneUser  *you're
    1
  37. *their
    1
  38. Are they actually engaged in a work slowdown?
    1
  39. That's what most of them are.
    1
  40. Orange, green, purple, yellow??
    1
  41. Cite?
    1
  42. What is all that gibberish?
    1
  43. Nobody voted for it.
    1
  44. *you're
    1
  45. Most of them are teens, and they were in a mob.
    1
  46. Paragraphs are your friend.
    1
  47. Most of the city is fine.
    1
  48. Were they actually defunded?
    1
  49. Disingenuous.
    1
  50.  @KN-eh2fh  The whole country didn't get looted. That's ridiculous. No entire municipalities got looted either.
    1
  51.  @nikicarrie4071  It was indeed wildly exaggerated. See my other reply: "The whole country didn't get looted. That's ridiculous. No entire municipalities got looted either."
    1
  52. It's not their fault exactly; it's just that people have the perception that cops are going to protect them. Note that the SCOTUS has ruled that the cops are not obligated to help anyone.
    1
  53. According to the SCOTUS, cops are not obligated to protect anyone.
    1
  54. Social workers have proven to be very helpful in many situations of the sort that cops don't have the training to handle (mental breakdowns and the like).
    1
  55. Due to SCOTUS rulings, cops are not obligated to protect anyone.
    1
  56. The SCOTUS has ruled that coppers are under no obligation to help anyone.
    1
  57. ?
    1
  58. Punctuation is your friend.
    1
  59. Would *have
    1
  60. Or anywhere, unless you want to be a bully with a badge and a gun.
    1
  61. According to the SCOTUS, police are under no obligation to do anything to help anyone.
    1
  62. It's not either/or.
    1
  63. Vehicular assault is nothing to reward; if only because it's so imprecise.
    1
  64. Cops shouldn't have any such immunity.
    1
  65. That's disingenuous.
    1
  66. What's that supposed to mean?
    1
  67. They're not under any obligation to help anyone anyway, according to SCOTUS rulings. I don't think that this is political.
    1
  68. You don't know that.
    1
  69. Not this racist copypasta again...
    1
  70. Was the CPD defunded?
    1
  71. Shines?
    1
  72. For what? According to SCOTUS rulings, police are not obligated to help anyone in particular.
    1
  73. Their hands aren't tied. There is no "blue flu." The fact is that the SCOTUS has ruled that police are under no obligation to protect anyone.
    1
  74. Most of the city is fine.
    1
  75. They are mostly teens, so why not?
    1
  76. According to the SCOTUS, police are under no obligation to protect anyone.
    1
  77. Cops don't know anyone's political stances. They aren't obligated to help anyone anyway.
    1
  78. This was a report on the police. Those matters you mentioned are in other reports.
    1
  79. I wish.
    1
  80.  @MH-ro1lg  There's no reason not to get vaccinated.
    1
  81. It's not either/or.
    1
  82. Huh huh huh "ass police" huh huh huh.
    1
  83. Nobody voted for this.
    1
  84.  @dripskee6443  No, of course they didn't. You're being silly.
    1
  85.  @dripskee6443  How does that constitute "voting for it?"
    1
  86. Were they defunded?
    1
  87. Nonsense.
    1
  88. No, this report is just about one aspect of this incident, the part involving the police. People expect the cops to protect them, when police are actually not obligated to do so.
    1
  89. Note also that the SCOTUS ruled that cops are under no obligation to protect anyone.
    1
  90. What does that mean? Jabonalopes?
    1
  91. Cops are under no legal obligation to help anyone, according to the SCOTUS. They may have decided that it would have been too unsafe to intervene, or they just didn't care.
    1
  92.  @robertjohnson5893  Were they defunded?
    1
  93. What's that supposed to mean?
    1
  94. No, that tends to provoke serious unrest! Seriously, how many examples do you need?
    1
  95. It's not that simple.
    1
  96. You're assuming facts not in evidence.
    1
  97. Were they actually defunded?
    1
  98. The cops are under no legal obligation to help anyone, according to the SCOTUS. If they think it's too dangerous, or they just don't care, they won't bother.
    1
  99. That's not really what they're saying. People just don't realize that cops are not obligated to protect anyone, per the SCOTUS.
    1
  100. That's silly. Overall, the Great Crime Decline that began in the 1990s is still with us, even with the upswing in homicides since the pandemic began.
    1
  101. The SCOTUS has ruled that cops are under no legal obligation to help anyone. Don't count on them.
    1
  102.  @FredDurst1  Reported.
    1
  103. Were they actually defunded?
    1
  104. If you look at the country as a whole, juvenile delinquency is much less common now. Kevin Drum has done some great work on this.
    1
  105.  @frizzlefry1921  We're talking about rates here, thus it's a per capita measurement. Changes in the Total Fertility Rate (or the Crude Birth Rate) don't make a difference.
    1
  106. Congo? Seriously?
    1
  107. ?
    1
  108. I've been telling people about that SCOTUS ruling, but that means that defunding doesn't change much in that regard.
    1
  109. This is a report about the police regarding this incident, but other reports are more focused on the perpetrators and the incident in general.
    1
  110. According to the SCOTUS, cops are under no obligation to protect anyone.
    1
  111. They did not.
    1
  112. You're being disingenuous.
    1
  113. Most of the city is fine.
    1
  114. The police are under no obligation to protect anyone. The SCOTUS has ruled on this more than once. Don't count on the cops for anything good!
    1
  115.  @safeandeffectivelol  It's true anywhere. Cops mostly show up and take reports and enforce petty regulations. According to the SCOTUS, they are under no legal obligation to protect anyone.
    1
  116. No; this is just a news report about one aspect of this incident.
    1