Comments by "Scott Charney" (@scottcharney1091) on "USA TODAY" channel.

  1. Winona forever!
    9
  2. Get an editor/proofreader! Polo? Seriously?
    7
  3. Such as?
    3
  4. Whataboutwhataboutwhatabout
    3
  5.  @michaelbruvolt4221  This isn't about any particular law, but I must say that today's youth aren't so bad.
    3
  6.  @dynamicdylan8926 Never mind the buses; I'm alarmed at how your school evidently didn't teach you punctuation!
    2
  7.  @Railroaders_For_Life *they're (twice)
    2
  8. Ban those dogs.
    2
  9. What does that have to do with Trump?
    2
  10.  @MrNotoriousROB  That's one thing to look for inasmuch as a candidate displaying logical inconsistency ought to become evident to fact-checkers. Verified information can be delivered by someone without the entire context, for example.
    2
  11. Don't talk to the police without an attorney!
    1
  12. This was a convention speech. The DNC hasn't happened yet.
    1
  13. There will be fact-checkers regarding the DNC as well.
    1
  14.  @joeg9112  I've seen them (in different formats) after Biden speeches as well. If they're less conspicuous, there's a good reason for that- observers have compiled tens of thousands of falsehoods from Trump. That doesn't mean, however, that journalists aren't fact-checking Democrats! They're not exactly hidden.
    1
  15. What are you talking about?
    1
  16.  @Ricobaca  *brakes
    1
  17. That's a fallacy.
    1
  18.  @Worklikeyoushouldbe  ?
    1
  19.  @Worklikeyoushouldbe  No. It's a logical fallacy to think that a preponderance of comments on a particular video demonstrates what's accurate.
    1
  20.  @Worklikeyoushouldbe  I have.
    1
  21. 1:10 Homosexuality prevents abortion!
    1
  22. Yes, as the DNC hasn't happened yet.
    1
  23. No, this is how fact-checking is done.
    1
  24.  @2ellas2  You have seen the lists of Trump's lies, right? There are tens of thousands.
    1
  25. That will happen.
    1