Comments by "Scott Charney" (@scottcharney1091) on "AJ+"
channel.
-
24
-
12
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Igor Horváth No, I did answer your question. You were asserting (if I understood you correctly) that women ought to be obligated to the embryo because they caused said embryo to exist, and I am pointing out that it doesn't matter. Embryos don't have personhood, unlike you and I.
Newborns have rudimentary behavior of personhood, and they're no longer inside a host organism. Somebody can be found to take care of them. I was afraid that you were going to reference The Silent Scream. That video was almost immediately found to be fraudulent: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Silent_Scream#Medical_community
Personhood refers to the characteristics that make killing wrong, all that is taken away when somebody is killed: The will to live, biological autonomy, sentience, etc. It's why you wouldn't react the same way to a fire that destroyed countless frozen embryos as you would to a disaster that killed a much smaller number of people.
Some animals are indeed sentient, and while the charges aren't murder or manslaughter, note that animal cruelty is definitely criminal.
1
-
1
-
1
-
Igor Horváth That's more than too much to wade through. I'll put it like this: Nobody minds not being born. (There's also a good case to be made that it's the ideal outcome.) There's nothing approaching a will to live, sentience, preferences, desires, and all the other things taken away when a person is killed. That's why we think that killing is usually wrong. Babies have rudimentary forms of this sort of thing, but, more importantly (and crucially), they're not in a quasi-parasitic relationship with a host organism that may not be willing to serve as a carrier. After delivery, somebody can be found to take care of a child; there's no more inextricable tie to the pregnant woman.
Very, very few of those characteristics (if any) apply to embryos or fetuses. There are dishonest and/or naive attempts to do so (like The Silent Scream, among other things), and unfortunately those catch on with certain audiences.
Now, as for all the "what abouts," those are case-by-case. Pardon the passive voice: Plugs are pulled all the time, extraordinary lifesaving measures are forgone, and decisions are made about the appropriate use of deadly force. People make those decisions every day; in fact, it could be argued that all of us do that in passive ways.
I think that I was referring to this article earlier; I'm not sure: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/when-does-consciousness-arise/
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@guardtheham1233 In large part due to the shaming and stigmatizing that the God Squad dishes out. Also, let's see- women abort formerly wanted pregnancies due to discovery of birth defects, changes (often severe) in their financial situation, abuse, and much more. Women have to scramble to get appointments, funding, time off work, childcare, care of other dependents, a place to stay, etc. They often need to make all of this happen without abusive domestic partners/family members finding out. All of this was bad even before the Dobbs decision, thanks to (frankly unconstitutional) TRAP laws, and it just got worse.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@nightnyungwe5945 I'm well aware of all of that. You make some errors; the Victorian era was a time of slow-but-steady decline in total fertility rates (births per woman). In fact, that's one of the things that led to the eugenic concerns we see in this video. Total fertility rates declined, and then declined at a faster rate, due to increasing education of girls, among other reasons.
Thankfully, the West isn't usually imposing these solutions anymore. Said solutions are being made available, and they're extraordinarily helpful. See the decline in Bangladesh's total fertility rate, along with India's and those of many other countries.
Africa's population is not an asset if they can't be adequately fed (among other things). Of course the problem is due to political factors, but that's unfortunately not going to change without massive tumult that would go on for a long time and be very destructive in its own right. That, and now the environmental factors are worse than ever before.
China's population figures were the object of scorn and derision when things looked hopeless. Note that the One-Child Policy only sped up the process that was already underway (family planning campaigns with far fewer dreadful elements were already in operation), it really served to empower the regime even more. China's demographics are not necessarily a source of strength today.
Keep in mind that I'm very pleased with the low (and often sub-replacement) total fertility rates in wealthy (and sometimes not-very-wealthy) countries. That needs to spread and continue. It's better for everyone who remains, and indeed it's better for all of the hypothetical people never even conceived/born.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Here we go again... The Nazis burnt Sanger's books. She and MLK lauded one another. Rosa Parks was on PP's board in the 1970s. Sanger worked with W.E.B. DuBois, and she didn't tolerate bigotry on her staff. She spoke to the Women's Auxiliary of the KKK because they asked her to, since their menfolk didn't want them to know about contraception. She later said that it was the weirdest experience of her life. The "word to go out" quote is out of context; that phrase meant that she didn't want people to get the wrong idea, which was easy to do considering the racial environment at the time. Besides that, her own writings show a lot of sympathy with the women of the Far East.
Even Edwin Black, author of "War Against the Weak," a history of American eugenics, one of Sanger's strongest critics, makes it clear that she was no racist. She was many things, many of them bad, but not a racist.
She also never was involved with any abortion; in fact, one of her goals with contraception was to prevent the dangerous illegal abortions being practiced at the time. Black women today have high abortion rates because they have high rates of unplanned pregnancy. They get abortions of their own free will; nobody is tricking them into it.
Besides that, embryos aren't babies anyway, but that's a different topic.
I'm tired of the lies.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1