Comments by "Scott Charney" (@scottcharney1091) on "" video.

  1. Some of them had guns, more firearms were stashed nearby, don't forget the explosives, some had blades, and of course there were hundreds of blunt instruments, tasers, sprays, etc. Why do I have to explain this?
    5
  2.  @dwu9369  If your eyes are lying, then why believe them? It's ridiculous.
    5
  3. Whataboutwhataboutwhatabout... There's a big difference between civil unrest and a coup attempt.
    2
  4.  @Jaco059  Get out of your bubble.
    2
  5. No it doesn't.
    2
  6. Whataboutwhatabout... It's not a catastrophe. It's legal to seek asylum.
    2
  7. Investigating such a historic, potentially catastrophic event is pretty important.
    2
  8. Ray Epps has nothing to do with anything. Get off the conspiracy theories.
    2
  9. True, and beside the point.
    2
  10. It's a very big deal. That much evidence takes time.
    1
  11. 2021. The reason it's gone on so long is because it's not fake at all. There's a lot for them to go through, to put it mildly.
    1
  12. Thou doth protest too much.
    1
  13. The riots occurred before J6, so I'm not sure what you're trying to say. In any case, there's a big difference between civil unrest and a coup attempt.
    1
  14. If that happened, it was the work of some cops who collaborated with the attackers. Most of the cops, more than I imagined, fought bravely.
    1
  15.  @kriswithakhogan8926  I can't tell what you mean by that, whom you're implicating, etc.
    1
  16.  @R4V3NBUDS  No, I watched a lot of it, and there was nothing about Hunter Biden's laptop containing information like that.
    1
  17.  @R4V3NBUDS  How so?
    1
  18.  @R4V3NBUDS  This makes absolutely no sense.
    1
  19. You have not been paying attention.
    1
  20. There might have been some cops who collaborated with the attackers, but for the most part entry was very violent. No, they were not cordial and obeying ropes, and people really need to get off of that Epps conspiracy theory.
    1
  21. There's a big difference between civil unrest and a coup attempt.
    1
  22.  @zekezeikitsune2339  I hope that you're being disingenuous. I mean really, where to begin?
    1
  23. Evidence?
    1
  24. Regarding?
    1
  25. They asked GOP lawmakers to participate.
    1
  26. That's hyperbolic.
    1
  27. The vast evidence speaks for itself.
    1
  28.  @anthonyoer4778  Yes, it was delayed by the Pentagon.
    1
  29. How come? It's attracted tons of attention, and rightly so.
    1
  30. Thou doth protest too much.
    1
  31. Most of the cops fought bravely, but a few may have collaborated with the attackers.
    1
  32. Nothing? Are you serious?
    1
  33. That's reasonable, but Patrick Henry was a reactionary theocrat.
    1
  34. And rightly so. This was historic.
    1
  35. Get off this nonsense about Epps!
    1
  36.  @selftrue670  It's not 2-plus years.
    1
  37. 2 years, and they had to sift through/accumulate an avalanche of evidence.
    1
  38.  @crispinfornoff206  Justice for a months-long attempt to overturn the election, that's what.
    1
  39.  @jakeroberts7435  It looks like you should have.
    1
  40. No such thing.
    1
  41. For?
    1
  42. Investigating such things is part of their duty.
    1
  43. How so?
    1
  44. What other side? Marjorie Taylor Greene's side, in which she implies that the attackers should have succeeded?
    1
  45. Why? What do you mean?
    1
  46. ?
    1
  47. And?
    1
  48. Would *have
    1
  49.  @terrymohler163  What does that have to do with it? I grew up in the south also. The phrase is "would have."
    1
  50. Embarrassed about this? Why?
    1
  51. ?
    1
  52.  @jakeroberts7435  What's your problem? People were hiding, texting loved ones, etc.
    1
  53. On what grounds?
    1
  54. Yes, and she was breaking through the last line of defense before reaching the people trapped in the gallery. Re: Epps, I don't know, but so what?
    1
  55. That describes Trump & company trying to overturn an election.
    1
  56. No evidence.
    1
  57. It's not BS. This volume of evidence takes a lot of time.
    1
  58. Some of the attackers had guns, other firearms were stashed nearby, don't forget the explosives, some were caught with blades, and there were hundreds of blunt instruments, sprays, and tasers. They came within a few feet and a few moments of lynching lawmakers & others, preventing certification of the election, and causing a constitutional crisis.
    1
  59. How so?
    1
  60. ?
    1
  61. You've been paying no attention.
    1
  62.  @joywolfram1654  On top of that, most of the participants were from the Trump administration!
    1
  63. You haven't been paying attention.
    1
  64. They asked GOP legislators to participate.
    1
  65. Ok, what's in this hidden video?
    1
  66. So you endorse the attempt to overturn the election?
    1
  67. They're preparing the report. What's your point?
    1
  68. I don't know, where? More importantly, what difference does that make?
    1
  69. You know how Election Day comes long before Inauguration Day, right?
    1
  70. You're being silly.
    1
  71. What "rest" would that be?
    1
  72. Get off the conspiracy theory.
    1
  73. They asked Republican legislators to participate.
    1
  74. How so?
    1
  75. There's nothing much to investigate. There's a big gap between civil unrest and a coup attempt. Most of the casualties were inflicted by cops, vigilantes (ramming and shooting), accelerationist/provocateur types (Boogaloo), and apolitical lumpen.
    1
  76. He was impeached twice. What waste? The evidence is voluminous, most of it coming from Trump administration personnel themselves.
    1
  77. Not so. The coroner/M.E. said that all that was done to Sicknick during the attack led to his stroke(s). Four more officers committed suicide later.
    1
  78. The amassed an enormous amount of evidence, have made it available for the world to see, and are about to publish it. Hopefully the chain of events won't stop there.
    1
  79. Regarding?
    1
  80. Indeed, he's so childish.
    1
  81.  @joannemcardle1848  Anarchists hate Trump!
    1
  82.  @Chester-yu1tm  What the hell do you mean, "taught by Barack to hate his own country?"
    1
  83. Clown show?
    1
  84. Zero? You've paid no attention.
    1
  85. That's projection.
    1
  86. I don't know. Despite the cost, it sure is important to get to the bottom of such an event, I'll tell you that.
    1
  87. It will be, just like the 9/11 report.
    1
  88. It's "Democratic."
    1
  89.  @Notthisguyeither  True, I love pointing out to people that Orwell was a socialist and an Antifa icon, who survived a bullet through the throat battling against Franco's fascists in Spain.
    1
  90. No BS involved.
    1
  91.  @Soma81  Based on?
    1
  92. Civil unrest is a far cry from a coup attempt.
    1
  93. ?
    1
  94. Self-important? The events are of critical importance.
    1
  95. It isn't a trial. It's an investigation of mountains of data & evidence.
    1
  96. There was a lot to go through.
    1
  97. Get off the Epps conspiracy.
    1
  98. Come clean about?
    1
  99. How so?
    1
  100. How so?
    1
  101. There's no evidence of that.
    1
  102. Indeed, it was much worse.
    1
  103.  @dikhurtz2406  Among other things, sedition. Did you see the news over the last few days regarding the texts sent to Mark Meadows? Did you see any of the hearings? J6 was the culmination of a months-long effort to overturn the election.
    1
  104.  @GIspecialty  Have you been paying attention? I mean, where to begin?
    1
  105.  @GIspecialty  Russia? Did you see the Senate Report? The Ukraine call was genuine. He's not being impeached now; while his actions have been investigated regarding criminality during his presidency, he can of course still be held accountable as a private citizen. "Kangaroo Court" is a tired "snarl phrase," the committee members asked for Republicans to participate, and the vast majority of the evidence is coming from Trump administration insiders. "Keeping this country in an uproar for liberal political gain" sounds like when (for example) people tell marginalized groups to "know your place," "be civil," and that sort of thing. You know, "stop getting uppity," "work within the system," etc. For one thing, riots are (if you'll pardon the cliche), the cry of the unheard. For another, "American people being attacked" describes, more often than not, the actions of the police, vigilantes (shooting and ramming), accelerationist/provocateur types (Boogaloo etc.), and apolitical lumpen. That accounted for most of the casualties. Regarding property destruction, I may disagree with some of the choices of targets, but in a world where property is valued more highly than people are, it's a legitimate tactic. "Products of the disgusting liberal party" is ridiculous. You're right about "disgusting liberal party," but not in the way that you think. The Democrats are a neoliberal capitalist imperialist party, reformist at best. They're not about to create civil unrest intentionally as any form of rebellion/uprising, nor for gain. They do incite civil unrest due to the results of their own neoliberal policies (in common with the Republicans, of course). I'm not "trained by these cowards," as I hope you can see. The border? Yes, I wish both parties would stop supporting rightist regimes in Latin America and elsewhere, along with neoliberal trade agreements that push people into the migrant stream. Asking for asylum is perfectly legal, by the way. Indeed, I wish that borders didn't exist (the benefits of that would be off the charts, and that's not just a leftist position), but we build to that. Inflation is a global problem that has little to do with the White House. Energy prices have risen sharply in part due to Russia's aggression in Ukraine. I could indeed go on. I do indeed have an argument, lots of them in fact.
    1
  106. You know the line from MacBeth, about how "the lady doth protest too much?" That describes the MAGAts here.
    1
  107. The traitors are those who tried to overturn the election.
    1
  108. Indeed; worse than that, it was a coup attempt.
    1
  109. You didn't pay any attention, did you?
    1
  110. How so?
    1
  111. ?
    1
  112. For?
    1
  113. Finalizing the report is not old news.
    1
  114. How so?
    1