Comments by "Scott Charney" (@scottcharney1091) on "WatchMojo.com" channel.

  1. I wonder how many people understood that.
    57
  2. Keep in mind that some of these controversies go back a long way.
    4
  3. Oooo, oowoooooo. It's a parody that's better known than the original.
    2
  4. No Jimmy Savile? No Gary Glitter?
    2
  5. *you're
    2
  6. Clever.
    1
  7. It's a jab at the film, and the man who made it, based on the way that the film was justly received.
    1
  8. It's said in the video: "The Carters."
    1
  9. Don't talk to the police without a lawyer.
    1
  10. No, it shows that reality and facts have a certain bias. One need not be an Obama supporter to know that.
    1
  11.  @craigstewart1532  It depends. You're making a serious case of apples versus oranges; say what you want about Moore's polemical films, but D'Souza is off-the-charts deluded. Interestingly, he's wrong on more than one level. He makes assertions/conspiracy theories that aren't even controversial; they're simply untrue and even nonsensical. Meanwhile, like most of the things that Obama's detractors claimed about him, I wish that many (not all) of D'Souza's claims were true! What a difference that would make! Where to start? I wish that Obama had actually displayed any hint of an "anti-colonial" bias. That would be a good thing, inasmuch as imperialism is evil & the US was birthed in such a struggle. Maybe then his administration wouldn't have helped topple Honduras's government, helped dismember Libya, gotten involved in Syria, helped the Saudi mass-murder in Yemen, etc. There was no "socializing & destroying" of the US economy! He's a Wall Street Guy; a member of a neoliberal capitalist party. The accusations about him transferring wealth to Brazil & elsewhere is bizarre nonsense. The accusations about him being a tool of some Muslim conspiracy is even more ridiculous. There's no creeping, spreading Caliphate. Do the math, among other things. Had he actually wanted to reduce the US imperial presence in the world, that would be extraordinary and wonderful. If he wanted to make things right regarding the victims of said imperialism, that would be shocking & similarly wonderful. Had he wanted to minimize or even eliminate nuclear weapons (which are useless; even imperialists like Kissinger and Powell say this) I would have been joyous. Similarly, had he the audacity to do something just and decent regarding Israel, let alone "throw them under the bus," I would cheer. D'Souza has a history of cruelty (among other things) going back to his days at Dartmouth. He's never apologized for trafficking in bigotry, propagating the Dixiecrat Fallacy, and spreading conspiracy theories about various and sundry things (Soros? Seriously? Smearing him regarding the Holocaust is profoundly offensive, & also illogical. If Soros was somehow funding Antifa, who battle against Nazis, he would never have been a collaborator, right?). Interestingly, he was laughed at by conservatives for his assertion that the "cultural left" motivated (or even caused) the 11 September attacks. Please disregard people like this. https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Dinesh_D%27Souza
    1
  12. No he was not. To an extent, I wish that he was.
    1
  13. No he did not, and you don't need to be an Obama supporter to see that.
    1
  14. Precisely!
    1
  15. No, it's controversial when it's wrong on the facts, which even people who are not Obama supporters can see.
    1
  16. What are you referring to, specifically?
    1
  17. Titled, not entitled. Those are two different things.
    1
  18. Yeah, he is one of those Indian Christians from (or with one or both parents from) Goa, hence the Portuguese name. He's got such a record of lies that I think he's one of those people who don't even realize that they're lying. One doesn't have to be an Obama supporter to know that.
    1
  19. What are you referring to, exactly?
    1
  20. No, they're reporting on the way that "documentary" (made by someone busted for campaign fraud, by the way) was justly received. That guy is the kind of person who doesn't even realize that he's lying, and he does it again and again. I protested against various actions of Obama (from the left), but I've no patience for lies.
    1
  21. This video contains even more reasons to hate golf. I love the carts, though.
    1
  22. There's a video clip I saw growing up, probably in the mid-90s, that I would love to see again. There was a coach, or other major figure in college sports (basketball, or perhaps football) who becomes so angry at a press conference that he becomes nearly incoherent with rage, and I think some woman comes up to calm him down. When shown later, maybe in a "best of the year" countdown or something, the host simply responds with "Ohhhhkay."
    1
  23. No he was not, though in some respects I wish that he was.
    1
  24. Biased, not bias. Also, the phrase would be "biased against conservatives."
    1
  25. It's "what is a rake."
    1
  26. Gender and sex are two different things.
    1
  27. Yes, as, among other things (like facts), context makes a big difference.
    1
  28. No, he's been right about almost nothing, and you don't have to be an Obama supporter to know that.
    1
  29. Good point.
    1
  30. ?
    1
  31.  @ND-kh5yw  No, see the final line in the comment.
    1