Comments by "Scott Charney" (@scottcharney1091) on "Andrew Weissmann: The Supreme Court has given Trump the win" video.

  1.  @carljeffery7914  No evidence? Seriously?
    1
  2.  @jamessachs77  Ballet? If you mean "ballot," this case wouldn't do that.
    1
  3.  @91GT347  I'm not talking about the exhibits and whatnot. I'm referring to the obvious stuff that will almost surely be cited as evidence, things that we have already seen on video, in pictures, in recordings, etc., for many different charges.
    1
  4.  @pas3607  Cite that, please.
    1
  5.  @johngalt5887  You haven't been paying any attention for several years, apparently.
    1
  6. ?
    1
  7.  @High.Desert  This wouldn't prevent them from doing that.
    1
  8. You didn't listen.
    1
  9.  @jstewart3476  No, they have moved very quickly before.
    1
  10.  @AwkwardTruths These are unusual circumstances.
    1
  11. @ondollarman It is taking months, and they have moved much more quickly than that in the recent past. One of these Chris Hayes videos is all about that.
    1
  12.  @DrinkKool-Aid  Your username checks out.
    1
  13. No, what's on trial (or being considered as an appeal) is the idea that Trump is above the law.
    1
  14.  @Gandalf98  That's not just ignorant, it insults the intelligence of anyone outside of the cult.
    1
  15.  @Fuego-s8i False equivalence.
    1
  16.  @alphamoose4385  Which comment are you referring to?
    1
  17. Because if he should get elected, and there isn't a verdict before he's inaugurated, he can simply have DOJ abandon the case, pardon himself, etc.
    1