Comments by "Scott Charney" (@scottcharney1091) on "2 arrested after Miami CVS employee beaten inside store" video.

@iloled2924 That's theft, specifically because it was begun in acts of aggression.
6
That means that all wigs should be permitted.
4
@_gonna_renew_my_sinew I caught that also!
3
Whom do you mean by "they?"
2
@jaycee30865 Without this what?
1
@Stuart267 *you're
1
@jamesrecknor6752 The lumpenproletariat rarely votes, so I doubt it.
1
@aliciaforeilly *losing
1
@cici-ht6px And?
1
@fragslap5229 Again, the lumpen tend not to vote.
1
@Kin511-u8k Who should mention it?
1
@TurboSquare2000 Them? Who's that?
1
@hardlines2635 You got in trouble for saying what?
1
@Punicia ?
1
@iloled2924 That's rationalization. Indigenous peoples are usually pretty unambiguous, and displaced people in general, whether indigenous or not, are entitled to justice. Are you familiar with the "Land Back" movement? It doesn't entail displacing people now, in case that's what you're thinking.
1
@iloled2924 It's usually pretty clear if there are any presently-displaced people disputing others' claims to indigeneity. There's no need, nor is it feasible, to trace such things back to the time of the land bridge. It looks like Land Back is active in several parts of the world, and is making some gains. That's very different from envisioning the fall of the Republic of Turkey to the Greeks!
1
@iloled2924 Re-read my comment. You completely missed the point. I'll try again: While it's obviously not feasible to go all the way back to the beginning, it is usually pretty clear where disputes over indigeneity are happening, and where they aren't. Did you look into Land Back at all? I see some accomplishments.
1
@iloled2924 You're using straw men there. The things you're mentioning aren't feasible anyway. The fact is that you're rationalizing atrocities, even genocide, that have effects even today. Simply acknowledging it is a first step, but it means nothing without action.
1