Comments by "Scott Charney" (@scottcharney1091) on "CNN"
channel.
-
64
-
32
-
17
-
13
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
@petem.3719 Nicolae and Elena Ceasescu went on trial after their government fell. It was a quick trial, just to make sure that the new government did their due diligence and everything was by-the-book. After that, those two were lined up against a wall and shot, and then Romania abolished the death penalty.
The Total Fertility Rate (births-per-woman, which is different from the birth rate, but that's off the subject) leapt up after the law was put in place, hence the notorious orphanages, but it came back down after a few years, as people found ways to get around it. Still, the situation was a mess. Have you ever seen the movie "4 Months, 3 Weeks, and 2 Days"? If you forget the title, search for "Romanian abortion movie." It's set in the 80s, when the regime was still in power (albeit in trouble), and it is riveting, about the quest for an illegal abortion, and the need to conceal it.
Watch it!
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
First, a world of free movement would be $78 trillion richer. Free markets, you see. Borders make everyone poorer. Even conservative economists acknowledge this. This is from The Economist, and they know what they're talking about: https://www.economist.com/the-world-if/2017/07/13/a-world-of-free-movement-would-be-78-trillion-richer
Second, how, exactly, are lower-skilled workers supposed to migrate to the US? https://reason.org/wp-content/uploads/files/a87d1550853898a9b306ef458f116079.pdf
Third, if you know anything about how horribly the US has treated and continues to treat Latin America, you might have some more empathy.
Fourth, I'ma laugh I'ma cry, if you don't see the need to apologize for genocide, you ought to re-think your life.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@billshiff2060 You haven't been paying any attention at all to the hearings, or the long process of discovering/compiling evidence, have you? The event was pre-meditated, and part of a multi-point plan to overturn a perfectly legitimate election. The attackers came within a short distance (40 feet in the case of Pence) and a few minutes of lynching lawmakers (among others), preventing the certification of the election, and causing a constitutional crisis. This was far beyond a minor disturbance! Even the battle itself was more than that.
Most of the casualties in the 2020 riots were the work of cops, vigilantes (numerous ramming and shooting attacks), provocateurs (Boogaloo etc.), and apolitical lumpen. They went on for months, all around the country, but the impact was nothing compared with, say, 1967-1968, among other incidents.
Also, the phrase is "shoo-in," and I don't watch CNN clips all that often, let alone the channel itself (I never watch TV per se).
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ericapoitras9223 Secular pro-lifers don't, but the religious ones (the majority) have become (or always have been) uneasy with contraception. For one thing, they have a problem with unmarried people having sex in general, and particularly sex without "consequences" (they sometimes use that term) in general. For another, many are convinced that the most effective contraceptives (IUDs and implants, often referred to as LARCs [Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives]) are actually abortifacients. Some say the same about emergency contraception as well.
They also subscribe to a concept called "risk compensation," in which a false sense of security leads to people acting in ways that end up harming themselves and others. It's studied in relation to (for example) protective gear in some sports. In this context, the idea is that people will get a false sense of security due to contraception, and have so much sex (or become lax about proper use) that eventually they will have a contraceptive failure.
Do a search for the phrase "contraceptive mentality," and you'll see what I'm talking about. For an early look at these developments, search for an article titled "Contra-contraception."
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I'm not saying that this is the motive, and I don't endorse such bans, but keep in mind that Maus is actually really racist. Spiegelman depicts all Polish non-Jews as pigs, not only the cops! Spiegelman of course is Jewish, and the symbolism of such an unclean animal is obvious. It implies also that the Polish non-Jews were not on the "food chain" of the Nazis, which is absolute offensive nonsense; Poles were one of the larger categories of Holocaust victims. Poland lost a large percentage of its population, both to the specific Holocaust (camps, Einsatzgruppen death squads, etc.), but also to violence from the German forces & collaborators more generally.
Spiegelman also depicts all Americans as dogs, regardless of race. Is this supposed to mean that Americans don't have racial divides?? Besides, all of this seems to buy into Nazi racial pseudo-science, categorizing people into biologically distinct "races" with incompatible characteristics. Did he really want to give the impression that he agreed with the Nazis that Jews are weak-but-dangerous vermin?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@icausedbidenflation9999 You're a troll, but what the hell: No, the vast majority of them broke in as the police tried to resist. A few of the cops may have collaborated with the attackers. Said attackers came within a few feet and a few moments of lynching lawmakers & staff, preventing certification of the election, and causing a constitutional crisis. Some were caught with firearms, other guns were stashed nearby, don't forget the explosives, others were caught with blades, and don't forget the hundreds of blunt instruments, chemical sprays, tasers, etc.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@NickKautz It's not a case of "looking for trouble." The groups are usually too big to just take sidewalks, and one has to attract attention. There was no reason for the drivers to feel threatened; they were not the targets of anything. Thus, driving through the crowd was a needlessly violent act.
There's the phenomenon of "road rage;" usually wildly out of proportion to the provoking circumstances. Did you ever see "Motor Mania" in driver's ed? (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motor_Mania)
As for your last assertion, you're asking people to place trust in a system that is stacked against them in a variety of ways, depending on what issue is at hand and who's involved. Spreading information, digitally and otherwise, is of course crucial these days, but it can never be successful on its own (and "slacktivism," like online petitions that organizations send around, are basically worthless). Contacting the offices of one's alleged representatives is not hopeless, but that too only goes so far. "Direct action gets the goods," as the old labor slogan goes. It was true then, and it's true now.
Without pressure from below, nothing changes from above. Women can vote and obtain contraception because so many were willing to put their bodies on the line. This country has a very violent labor history, with hundreds of workers being killed in strikes (at the hands of private detectives/security agencies & other company goons) as late as the 1930s. Then you have the life-and-death struggles of LGBT people, and much more.
Being quiescent and following the state's proscribed rules for activism is never successful. That's the reason for those stipulations to begin with.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
And that's what we Anti-fascists have been saying for a hundred years. When the IWW shot it out with the Klan, when our predecessors brawled with the fascists (and the cops who protected them, of course) all over Europe between the World Wars (trying to prevent the second one; this era is when the term "Antifa" was coined), when resistance movements fought back across Europe/Asia/Africa, when the Civil Rights movement in the US featured armed self-defense, when punk rockers and traditional skinheads battled against the Neo-Nazis who got into the skinhead scene, and so on and so on, up to the present day... You can't beat these people by ignoring them, or holding a peace rally on the other side of town, or whatever. They get more confident that way. They have to be stopped, by any means necessary, when they first appear.
Anti-Racist Action's Points of Unity, from 1988:
1. We go where they go.
2. We don't rely on cops or the courts.
3. Non-sectarian defense of other anti-fascists.
4. We intend to win!
Smash the fash! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BzgF5_v8lyA
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@daveharvey5764 The sawhorse barricade had already been removed (by unknown persons, but not Fields), and the crowd was moving and/or milling around. They only had permits to gather in parks (which they technically didn't need). There were no permits for marches and such, but even the Charlottesville authorities seemed to understand that sort of thing just happens, and it's not the end of the world. Yes, they were inconveniencing a couple of other drivers, but they would have been out of the way in a short time. These drivers didn't try to drive (even slowly) through the crowd. There was no reason to do so.
Fields hit one of these vehicles, which flew forward and hit another, hurting the passengers and striking more protesters. I know people (trained street medics) who tried to save Heather Heyer's life until the cops made them stop (I'm not sure that they could have saved her, but that's beside the point), and I know others who were mere feet away from the cars.
In a lot of countries, it's understood that spontaneous, wildcat demonstrations are going to hit the streets, whether the state gives its approval or not. Playing by the state's petty rules is not going to effect change (trivia time: this is the one way that "effect" can be a verb). That's how the rulers want it. Other drivers let the march pass by. This man could have done the same, rather than being a hothead. It's not worth possibly killing and/or maiming anyone else, and, for that matter, putting him and his passenger(s) in danger as well, should anyone retaliate.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1