Comments by "Scott Charney" (@scottcharney1091) on "" video.

  1. The numbers aren't growing. These cases are being taken more seriously, and swept under the rug less often than in the past.
    52
  2.  @longdongsilver6298  Stop. It's not funny. Did you watch the video? This can really cause a lot of psychological/psychiatric damage. Do you think that this should be legal? What about man-girl, man-boy, woman-girl?
    43
  3.  @EmperorOfMan  Jealous? No, he actually cares about his son.
    38
  4. If they were being professional, they would.
    20
  5.  @u.2b215  Grooming compels people (especially children) to do something that they wouldn't want to do, and besides, they can't consent anyway. These people are defending her actions, and it's disgusting.
    15
  6. Because it's being taken more seriously now.
    14
  7.  @arneaud-e7q  That's still below the age of consent, and also wildly inappropriate considering the context.
    8
  8. Those jokes are wrong also. Even in cases where the younger person is at the age of consent, it's still wildly inappropriate in situations like this.
    6
  9. The luck was bad. This causes a lot of mental damage, and attitudes like yours don't help.
    6
  10. Not funny.
    5
  11.  @daliamontoya2783  There's nothing funny about this.
    5
  12.  @daliamontoya2783  You don't know what you're talking about.
    5
  13.  @razermouth  What's so funny?
    5
  14. I don't believe you. You're essentially calling the mother a liar.
    4
  15.  @janpierzchala2004  In cases at the age of consent, that's not as bad, but it's still very inappropriate, considering the teacher-student relationship.
    4
  16.  @davidr1122  Whose parents?
    4
  17. Watch it again, and pay attention. This is a terrible thing to do to a child.
    4
  18. Private schools are worse, if we're talking about religious institutions. Besides, schools are much safer than homes are. Most such abuse happens in homes, behind closed doors.
    4
  19. Did you not watch the video? The boy was traumatized, and this sort of thing can really mess up a guy's mind for years to come.
    4
  20. Yes, it's very serious! Were you paying attention?
    4
  21. Kids can't consent! Did you not pay attention?
    4
  22.  @robertjones2811  What do you mean by that?
    4
  23. It's not funny, and think of something original. He cares about his son.
    4
  24. No. He cares about his son. Watch it again, and pay attention.
    3
  25. That's not funny. Watch it again. Pay attention to the mother.
    3
  26. You're right, but of course girls (and I hope that you mean "women") are not objects that you "get."
    3
  27. Watch the video again, paying attention to the boy's parents.
    3
  28. It's being taken more seriously, hence the increased exposure.
    3
  29. I'm glad that we're more advanced on this issue here in the US.
    3
  30. It isn't. It's taken more seriously now, hence more reporting/prosecuting.
    3
  31. There's nothing new here. It's being tolerated less than in the past.
    2
  32. Pay attention to the video, particularly the mother's account. Doing this to a child usually causes(among other things) long-lasting difficulties with trust, boundaries, consent, and with forming healthy human relationships. Do you think that it should be legal? How about man-boy, man-girl, woman-girl?
    2
  33. True, but the father's phone call is a nice corrective to the awful men in the comments who think that it's great when teachers do this.
    2
  34.  @CobraaCommander  Speak for yourself.
    2
  35.  @annmoore8696  It's nothing new. More people take it more seriously now.
    2
  36. They discuss that in the video.
    2
  37. Think of something original, and watch the video again, paying attention this time. Doing this to a boy can cause serious mental problems for years to come. Do you think that it should be legal? How about woman-girl, man-girl, man-boy?
    2
  38. It's not funny.
    2
  39. That's not funny. Doing this to a child usually causes(among other things) long-lasting difficulties with trust, boundaries, consent, and with forming healthy human relationships. Do you think that it should be legal? How about man-boy, man-girl, woman-girl?
    2
  40. Say something original. He's not jealous. He cares about his son.
    2
  41. That's a non sequitur. There's not a single feminist out there who approves of this.
    2
  42. I have no idea what that means.
    2
  43. Stop. Pay attention to the video. This behavior causes a lot of psychological harm. Adults should not do this to children! Do you think that it should be legal? How about man-girl, man-boy, woman-girl?
    2
  44. Rubbing it in? Did you pay attention? This is a terrible thing to do to a child.
    2
  45. It's not funny. Think of something original. He's not jealous. He cares about his son, who was preyed upon.
    2
  46. That's a non sequitur.
    1
  47. Predators are ugly.
    1
  48.  @glockdude5472  Yeah, and that's part of the problem. If you knew how awful it is, you wouldn't respond that way.
    1
  49. They talk about that in the video.
    1
  50. You wish for assault? Doing this to a child usually causes(among other things) long-lasting difficulties with trust, boundaries, consent, and with forming healthy human relationships. Do you think that it should be legal? How about man-boy, man-girl, woman-girl?
    1
  51.  @ayeejaayy5848  Why?
    1
  52. @slablevcek Pay attention to the video, then reconsider. *too
    1
  53.  @Chevy3278  Being assaulted is not a case of "getting some."
    1
  54. Elsewhere. Be glad. Doing this to a child usually causes(among other things) long-lasting difficulties with trust, boundaries, consent, and with forming healthy human relationships. Do you think that it should be legal? How about man-boy, man-girl, woman-girl?
    1
  55. Anyone who cares about children.
    1
  56. I know the reference, but no, this is not nice at all. Nobody's snitching. It's terrible to do this to a child. Do I have to explain why?
    1
  57. @ifeelbetterabouthis.louis3 Nothing is funny here.
    1
  58.  @angelaperkins3555  Sure, it's not as bad in cases like that, but it's still wrong.
    1
  59. Temptations? She's a perv!
    1
  60. Why? Also: should *have
    1
  61. What's the reason for the smile?
    1
  62. That's not funny. The kid was in middle school, but that's beside the point. Doing this to a child usually causes(among other things) long-lasting difficulties with trust, boundaries, consent, and with forming healthy human relationships. Do you think that it should be legal? How about man-boy, man-girl, woman-girl?
    1
  63. They're pervs, that's all.
    1
  64. He was preyed upon! Doing this to a child usually causes(among other things) long-lasting difficulties with trust, boundaries, consent, and with forming healthy human relationships. Do you think that it should be legal? How about man-boy, man-girl, woman-girl?
    1
  65. There's nothing funny about this. You didn't pay attention to the video.
    1
  66. You didn't notice that this was from several years ago.
    1
  67. It's not new at all. I'm glad to see that it's being taken more seriously now. Also, in answer to your question, they're just pervs.
    1
  68. For one thing, that's a non sequitur. For another, do you realize where that quote came from?
    1
  69.  @sr2291  Watch it again. His mother describes how distressed he was.
    1
  70.  @u.2b215  We've made progress.
    1
  71. They're pervs. That's all.
    1
  72. It's nothing new. This sort of thing gets clicks, and there's less sweeping it under the rug than there was in the past.
    1
  73. Elsewhere. Doing this to a child usually causes(among other things) long-lasting difficulties with trust, boundaries, consent, and with forming healthy human relationships. Do you think that it should be legal? How about man-boy, man-girl, woman-girl?
    1
  74. Did you pay attention to the mother as she described how this affected her son?
    1
  75. It's nothing new. The tolerance for it has lessened.
    1
  76.  @screamy_  They're pervs, that's all.
    1
  77.  @Macky1101  She was already sentenced. Unless she somehow gets pardoned or commuted, it will be longer than that.
    1
  78. Because you were lucky. Doing this to a child usually causes(among other things) long-lasting difficulties with trust, boundaries, consent, and with forming healthy human relationships. Do you think that it should be legal? How about man-boy, man-girl, woman-girl?
    1
  79. The luck is very bad. Doing this to a child usually causes(among other things) long-lasting difficulties with trust, boundaries, consent, and with forming healthy human relationships. Do you think that it should be legal? How about man-boy, man-girl, woman-girl?
    1
  80.  @socal92871  Under the bus?
    1
  81. I hope that you're just trolling.
    1
  82. Your anecdote isn't data. There are girls who feel the same way, but that doesn't make it acceptable for adults to do this.
    1
  83.  @lex1216  Some people come out of the other end not feeling victimized, but individual accounts don't change the overall picture.
    1
  84. No. He cares about his son, who has been preyed upon.
    1
  85. Watch the video and pay attention. This causes a lot of mental problems, including severe difficulties with trust, consent, boundaries, and so on. Men get older, see kids of the age they were at the time, and get even more upset. Do you want this to be legal?
    1
  86. His mother said how upset he was.
    1
  87. It's nothing new. It's being taken more seriously, with less pushing under the rug.
    1