Comments by "nyctom08" (@nyctom08) on "Washington Post"
channel.
-
15
-
5
-
@youremyfavoriteelephant3950 You seemed to have missed the point of the comment you responded to. Unvaccinated people pose the exact same risk to vaccinated people as a vaccinated person with the virus. Vaccinated people do not spread the virus at a lower rate, a vaccinated person can be a super spreader as well as get hospitalized. Furthermore, not every unvaccinated person ends up in the hospital, if they did, the fatality rate would be much higher than 1%. Thus the logic that these mandates are needed to protect the population from the unvaccinated is complete bullshit.
If you want people to get vaccinated to protect THEMSELVES, tell them that, present the facts and sell them on that. If they're onyl a threat to themselves, they should have the right to make the choice, they shouldn't be forced. If I want to chop off my arm, I'm only hurting myself, its my arm, its my right to do with it as I please. The funny thing here is that is the same argument those who are pro-choice on abortion use, nobody has a right to tell a woman what to do with her body. Likewise if I tell a certain man cutting off his penis to "transform" is crazy I'd be called a phobe by these same people. So which is it? Do we have control of our own bodies or does whichever political party you favor have control of it?
2
-
1
-
@youremyfavoriteelephant3950 You say I'm making false equivalencies while at the same time you go off comparing apples to oranges.
Last I checked, every vaccine I took as a requirement for school was thoroughly tested over decades before I took them and none were covered by a federal government issued liability shield.
These COVID vaccines were created under the previous administrations "project warp-speed". The whole point of the program was to deliver a vaccine as soon as possible, preferably before the election to help Trump. To achieve this goal, the program eliminated testing hurdles those previous vaccines we took as children underwent and provided Big Pharma a legal liability shield.
Furthermore, by your logic, its ok to end a life before its even born because of the burden of a "lifetime of commitment" but its not ok to have a choice in being a lab rat for Big Pharma with no legal recourse if you happen to come down with a terminal illness that ends your life. That sure makes a whole lot of sense.
Yea yea I know, you're going to say the chances of that happening are low. You know what's also low? We all have a chance to slip and fall, yet we don't put all human beings in wheel chairs. So why does Big Pharma need a legal liability shield if the chances of their vaccines are safe?
Lastly, Democrats only used COVID as a tool to further endear themselves to you and sabotage the previous admin's election chances. They have no plan, they're literally using Trumps vaccines, they lied about not pushing mandates and here we are. Why let them continue to fool you?
1
-
1
-
1