Youtube comments of Laird Cummings (@lairdcummings9092).
-
9900
-
My grandmother had a near-fetish for canning. She raised three boys through the Depression as a single mother, and growing & preserving her own food was their saving grace. Up to the time my father was in his 70s, he grew truck gardens and harvested mass quantities of base staple foods. Tomatoes, sweet potatoes, potatoes, pole beans, peas, peaches and grapes, and squash of multiple types.
While she lived, my grandmother marshalled my siblings and myself as her minions, canning and pickling and preserving. Peach preserves, grape jelly, canned marinara sauce and tomatoes, even pickled watermelon rind - we had literally years-worth of such 'put up' when she passed. More than two years after she passed, we still had a few jars in the pantry.
And yes, it was still good. She had mad skills at canning.
3000
-
2500
-
2400
-
1700
-
1600
-
1400
-
1300
-
1200
-
1100
-
962
-
838
-
833
-
795
-
786
-
772
-
665
-
662
-
656
-
647
-
627
-
612
-
609
-
573
-
563
-
545
-
506
-
482
-
478
-
460
-
450
-
435
-
429
-
422
-
415
-
399
-
395
-
394
-
394
-
392
-
364
-
351
-
341
-
331
-
330
-
321
-
305
-
296
-
285
-
283
-
283
-
282
-
281
-
280
-
261
-
256
-
255
-
248
-
247
-
242
-
233
-
232
-
226
-
218
-
216
-
205
-
202
-
201
-
199
-
197
-
195
-
190
-
190
-
189
-
182
-
180
-
179
-
176
-
168
-
166
-
165
-
164
-
164
-
163
-
160
-
159
-
158
-
158
-
157
-
152
-
145
-
143
-
143
-
143
-
141
-
140
-
139
-
138
-
135
-
130
-
130
-
127
-
126
-
125
-
125
-
124
-
123
-
123
-
122
-
122
-
121
-
121
-
121
-
119
-
119
-
119
-
118
-
117
-
116
-
116
-
115
-
112
-
112
-
111
-
110
-
110
-
109
-
"Match" in naval parlance is not a wooden lucifer, but rather a length of slim rope or cord, impregnated with potassium nitrate, producing a long length of slow-smoldering, long-burning, but very hot ember. It would be manipulated by a slender length of wood with a notch or cleft at the end, called a 'linstock.' Lit match or matchcord would be coiled very carefully in the inside of a bucket such that the burning end would depend over the center of the bucket, which would be partially filled with sand. The buckets themselves had a base wider than the mouth, being very stable by this design. Thus arrayed, it's fairly safe. Unless someone should upset the bucket, say, by stumbling over it. Even then, kicking a bucket (pun deliberate) isn't much of a risk - seasoned wooden decks are not much likely to take flame. A scorch mark, quickly to be holystoned out, would likely be the only result. Unless there's a secondary source of kindling - such as bundles of bedding straw. This straw would be the Devil's very workshop, and a terrible blaze is sure to follow.
109
-
107
-
106
-
106
-
104
-
Many moons ago, when I was in high school, we still had a mandatory, class; American Government. One of the requirements was to spend a class day observing the county court. The one case that has ALWAYS stuck with me was a DWI case, where the defendant pled guilty. The Judge sentenced him to two months, each Sunday (i.e. 8 days) pushing a wheelbarrow ten times around the courthouse with a load of gravel, and a sign detailing his offense.
Seems to me that it was a brilliant sentence - The courthouse was, in those days, in between two heavily trafficked roads. The convict was not removed from work or his home, the county didn't have to pay for incarceration, he got a physically demanding reminder of his crime and was subjected to humiliation - I'll note that I personally think some levels of humiliation can be a very useful thing, depending on context. Also, EVERYONE who saw him - and that would be a lot pf people! - has a visceral reminder that there are some rules you ought not break.
104
-
103
-
103
-
103
-
103
-
102
-
100
-
99
-
97
-
95
-
94
-
94
-
94
-
93
-
93
-
93
-
93
-
90
-
89
-
87
-
86
-
85
-
85
-
84
-
83
-
83
-
83
-
83
-
82
-
82
-
82
-
81
-
80
-
80
-
80
-
79
-
78
-
78
-
77
-
76
-
76
-
76
-
Pretty sure the T-54/55 tanks are being sent to serve as stop-gap SP Artillery. The older tanks have mounting points for gunner's quadrants milled into the receiver. All it takes is a quadrant and a bit of math to turn these tanks into artillery. More modern tanks may also have these points, I don't know for sure, but these old tanks absolutely do have them.
Russian artillery is on its last legs, with the tubes shot out with the huge volume of fire. Refurbishing the mounts and re-sleeving the tubes takes time. With thousands of guns needing refurbishing, well, off Russia needs a substitute.
The T-54/55 has a 100mm gun, basically equivalent to the Western 105mm. Russia has a LOT of 100mm ammo, including new manufacture.
Acting as SP artillery, the T-54/55 will NOT be subject to direct anti-tank fire, so their age and vulnerability to modern AT weapons is a moot point.
Is this a good solution for Russia? Not really, but they don't have anything else, and it's not a totally stupid idea.
76
-
75
-
75
-
75
-
74
-
73
-
73
-
73
-
72
-
72
-
70
-
70
-
70
-
70
-
70
-
67
-
67
-
66
-
66
-
66
-
65
-
65
-
65
-
64
-
64
-
64
-
63
-
63
-
62
-
61
-
61
-
61
-
60
-
60
-
59
-
59
-
59
-
58
-
58
-
57
-
57
-
57
-
57
-
56
-
56
-
56
-
56
-
56
-
55
-
55
-
55
-
55
-
54
-
54
-
53
-
53
-
53
-
53
-
53
-
53
-
53
-
53
-
52
-
@Stettafire in practical terms, yes, but in strict definition, no.
"To optimize" means to make something more optimum, or closer to perfect. "Highly optimized" means very efficient. But in reality, pushing busy, intricate actions closer to 'perfect' when human actions and interpretation is highly involved quickly reaches the point of work overload and conflicting, simultaneous, even out of sequence, actions.
In short, if everything goes exactly right, then no problem. But any hiccup means the whole thing collapses.
51
-
51
-
51
-
51
-
51
-
50
-
50
-
50
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
Moscow is claiming that they were outnumbered 8-1 in the Kharkiv Oblast. Given the usual Russian propaganda practice, that probably means that the Ukrainians had about 80% of the Russian forces, but concentrated those forces heavily to obtain local superiority. Or, alternatively, they stupidly pulled SO many troops that they emptied their positions.
This is, oddly, not an indictment of the Russian forces - the soldiers, at least - once a rout starts, you either must contain it immediately, or you must get EVERYONE out as fast as possible. Cascade failure is a pernicious thing, and if you want to save anything, you need to step sharply back and get to a stable condition. Of course, that means you wind up surrendering a LOT of your gains and goods.
No, the indictment here is against the Russian leadership.
First, they fell for the Ukrainian's brilliant bit of theater in Kherson - A real counter offensive, not just a pretend one, but a real offensive also designed to lure Russian forces out of position. EVERYONE fell for that - Western Analysts, media, and most certainly Russia. Western high military leaders probably knew it was coming, and it's known that the US War College has been helping game the counter offensive, so certainly, high US, and probably NATO commanders as well, knew what to expect. Security on this? IMPRESSIVE! Because of the bizarre nature of Putin's War, it is an undeclared war, and Russia cannot actually - legally - fully mobilize. So, to gain reserves and reinforcements, it's faster and easier to shift troops from elsewhere on the front lines.
Ukraine understood this, and exploited it brilliantly.
Second, the Russian leadership has done a shit job of motivating their troops. This goes all the way back to Putin, and his attempt to destroy Ukraine 'on the cheap.' When the Russian command re-organized their troops, they pulled their best and sent them to Kherson. Left behind were the second raters, the unreliable mercenaries, and only in just a fraction of their original numbers. Un-motivated troops will crack when presented with the kind of conditions that a terrifying combined arms assault presents. When the front lines begin to crumble, un-engaged units will crack and run too, to avoid being overrun. A small crack and an unexpected advance is bad enough, but when a primary defense line that the soldiers are relying upon to hold gets flanked and rolled up, confidence shatters, and then so do the units.
Third, Russian command and control SUCKS. So does their ability to act flexibly in the face of change. Initiative is almost entirely lacking. Contrary-wise, Ukrainian forces have a very much more 'Western' outlook, with initiative encouraged and flexible response as a key concept. Rigid command and control is VERY bad at dealing with rapid changes,* and the failure of the defense lines outside Balakliya is exactly the kind of thing that Russian-style leadership handles worst. Additionally, looking at the defense lines seen in aerial footage shows clear signs of unskilled low-level leadership; straight trench lines, poor camouflage, squalid conditions in base camps, and generally bad fieldcraft** tells me that the local NCOs are just not up to the task.
*As an example, the failure of Russia's open air-mobile opening gambit on 02-24-2022 was just a tragedy. Once the attempt to seize deep airfields failed, the assaults should have been cancelled and recalled. Instead, transport after transport filled with some of Russia's most elite soldiers were fed into the teeth of an active and alert Ukrainian defense - to die in flaming wrecks, never having even got out of the aircraft. All those bright young men, dead and lost to an inflexible command structure. Russia is throwing its future into the fires; a bloody human sacrifice for no gain.
**Honestly, an average US Boy Scout troop has vastly better camp discipline, sanitation, hygiene, and fieldcraft than most of these camps seen on video.
49
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
47
-
47
-
47
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
44
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
43
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
42
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
41
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
40
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
39
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
38
-
37
-
37
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
36
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
33
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
32
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
29
-
29
-
@realulli Skill at picking companies isn't engineering or technical skill. It's reading reports and financials skill. Which is just what you'd expect from "rich family" background. Reading a spreadsheet and analyzing the markets does not in any way, shape, or form, make you an engineer or scientist.
Then we take a look at Musk's "Hyperloop" 'revolutionary' transport system - which was a shitty copy of a lame theme park ride, which, by Musk's own admission was intended to scupper high-speed rail in California, and you can see that he's absolutely CRAP as an engineer - and an anti-environmentalist, working to line his own pockets - AGAIN, what you'd expect from 'rich family' background.
So three successes? Yeah, if you throw enough shit at the wall, some of it will stick.
As for the game, Pffft. THAT is the hook you're going to use? Please. Amateur programming of a crap game doesn't make you even a software engineer, much less an electrical, mechanical, or aeronautical one - Hell, I have have done - and can still do - programming, and I wrote a game too - TRS-80, but back then, that made me one of the elite. That said, I sure as hell wouldn't claim credit outside my area of knowledge, and neither should you, for Musk.
Face it, Musk is just a somewhat less crap version of Donald Trump. More power to him, for actually doing something with the family money, but don't worship him - he hasn't earned it.
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
@Cybonator not true.
Not even remotely true.
One: squadrons were already patrolling home airspace; retasking didn't change costs, nor availablity of deployed aircraft.
As for effect of bombs falling, we know EXACTLY how many people were killed. We know EXACTLY how many fires required firefighting response. It doesn't matter in the least how many balloons made it across, we know the EXACT impact on our end (hint: if a bomb blows up and there's no one around to be hurt, does anyone give a shit?).
Japan launched thousands of those balloons, each and every one a skilled work consuming man (or woman) hours, materials, and resources, for dick-all impact on the other end. They didn't stave off the end of Japan's empire for even a single second. Utterly wasted and useless effort, despite your fantasies.
That wasted effort and those resources would have been much more effectively used fighting fires, or repairing buildings, or manufacturing local defenses, or even put to work making aircraft or aerial bombs. THOSE efforts might have made some kind of difference. Instead, it was all thrown down a rat hole.
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
@mortisCZ it makes a difference. Poor, if you're thoughtful, doesn't mean deprived. We also raised cull lambs from local farms, again for the food. Between the fowl and the sheep, and the large truck garden we kept, we actually ate pretty well. No new clothing, lots of second-hand shop purchases, but we had full bellies. We all learned to cook, and cook well. No store-bought bread, when the base ingredients were so much cheaper. Which meant that sourdough pancakes and sourdough bread were common. Duck stops laying eggs? Roast duck, home-made Peking duck, etc. Goose for holiday meals. Lamb in many forms...
There were a lot of us kids (part of the reason money was so tight), but that also means a lot of free labor tending the garden and livestock.
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
@theenzoferrari458 in a large number of cases, large companies need formal repair request mechanisms, because the person who can order the repair (and resultant costs) is well-sperated from the problem that needs fixing.
And this isn't even bad design; take a large warehousing operation, for instance. You've got, say, a half dozen forklifts, a score of power jacks, a couple trailer tugs, and maybe a couple score power lifts, and a hundred or more employees, all in a 200,000 square foot facility. Letting the maintenance manager know that a tug failed on the swing shift means that you either rely on the person you tell about a problem remembers to pass it on to the night shift, who remembers to pass it on to the maintenance manager in the morning, or you call it in when you wake up, if you remember, or you submit a trouble ticket. Easy to guess which method is the least painful and most reliable.
And that's just for one discreet location. What if it's four warehouses in three states? You probably only still need one maintenance manager, but now he's probably not even in the same state as you.
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
A couple things:
The marks on the portside bow appear to be actual cuts, not just pre-cut marking, similar to cuts on the starboard bow, of which you have much closer images.
It's clear that they're getting bow section ready to drop very quickly as soon as they're ready to start the bow section swap; when the time comes it will be very, very fast to complete the cuts. As you noted, time in drydock equals big money.
Also, the cuts are very wide to prevent binding or interference once the section starts to drop. The section will twist to some degree as it is cut away, so the large relief of the cuts prevent problems in pulling it away.
Second thing: the plastic deformation of the hull plates of the bow can, with a bit of metallurgy and math, give you a very close approximation of the energies involved (and actual speed) at the moment of collision. I'm flabbergasted.
Excellent work, and keep it up!
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
@luciusdomitiusaurelianus5334 pontoon bridges across an active shipping lane? Unlikely. Not impossible, but extraordinarily difficult. To start, that's an extremely high-volume bridge link, and pontoon bridges don't handle high volume well. Second, it's 12 miles long. Not impossible, but supremely unlikely and expensive. Third, well, you'd need a swinging section of the bridge to deal with ship traffic, which adds immeasurably to the engineering challenge.
Oh, and the pontoon bridge would need to be able to cope with sea ice.
So: technically possible, but I don't think Russia can, nor will they try, to swing that. Faster and cheaper to replace the damaged spans.
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
My scout troop and district did winter survival camping most winters - "Operation Icicle."
Despite only mildly severe weather, excellent equipment, and experienced scout leaders, and minimal camp-keeping tasks only, we were, occasionally, forced to bail. One notably bad camp, it was barely below freezing, but a hard rain fell, and EVERYTHING froze - with running icy water flowing over everything. Even breaking camp was a nightmare, and getting our gear to the rally point took hours.
So - even with all the right gear and skills, winter can still kick the best-prepared troops asses.
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
@walmorcarvalho2512 all true, and yet still wrong. The ability to refuse illegal orders requires that the troops are properly trained to recognize which orders are indeed illegal, AND to have the moral fibre to actually make that call. It is the duty of their officers to ensure that training happens. If leadership fails in its duty, you don't blame the followers, you blame the leaders.
That is EXACTLY what happened at Kent State. A green, poorly-trained officer in charge of green, poorly-trained soldiers panicked. Indeed, its unclear if the officer panicked, or one of his troops did first.
Those troops were not well-trained. It was their officer's duty to see to that. He was too green to do what was needed. It was the officer's leaders duty to make sure he was capable doing the necessary training - he wasn't, and they didn't. It was their superior's job to NOT place incapable troops in a fraught position, and he failed too.
The fish rots from the head, and you clearly do not understand what happened, nor how it came to happen, and your simplistic answer shows your lack of knowledge and reflection.
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
@notahotshot taking a dump isn't generally crucial to the plot - except when it is, they do show it (ref 'Lethal Weapon'). Shooting, on the other hand, is often central - and yeah, it's off-putting when they get it wrong, especially since they can and do get it right (ref 'Lethal Weapon,' 'John Wick,' 'Dirty Harry,' etc.). In fact, done right, reloading improves the story by adding tension, drama, and opportunities for plot development.
It's lazy storytelling, and a failure of craft.
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
@Getpojke a 'truck garden' is like a normal produce garden, but with an emphasis on produce that can be sold. Watermelon, squash, pumpkin, tomatoes, potatoes and sweet potatoes... You will find formal and informal roadside produce stands are extremely common in America, especially rural America.
'To truck' is to engage in commerce, business, or other advantageous interaction with another person. Hence 'truckers;' people whom move things from place to place for pay or barter. Whilst the UK has lorries, the US has trucks, those transports being the primary tool of people who move things, especially agricultural goods, from place to place. Hence also 'trucking companies,' larger formal organizations that do the same.
Likewise, phrases like "I'll have no truck with that person;" to declare that you'll not work with or engage in commerce with a specific person or group of persons ("I have no truck with bigots," as an example).
Thus, your question gets not just a definition, but also a language and culture lesson, too. 😉
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
@lizard944 I beg to differ. I reported to a Civil Engineer at NAVSTA Philly, and whilst technically I had a military superior, my civilian boss controlled my tasking, jobs, and and yes, my leave. Which made him my superior in every manner that mattered.
Likewise, when my father was Chief Engineer, SPO, HEL, Aberdeen, he had not one, not two, but four NCOs working directly for him.
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
Moscow is claiming that they were outnumbered 8-1 in the Kharkiv Oblast. Given the usual Russian propaganda practice, that probably means that the Ukrainians had about 80% of the Russian forces, but concentrated those forces heavily to obtain local superiority.
This is, oddly, not an indictment of the Russian forces - the soldiers, at least - once a rout starts, you either must contain it immediately, or you must get EVERYONE out as fast as possible. Cascade failure is a pernicious thing, and if you want to save anything, you need to step sharply back and get to a stable condition. Of course, that means you wind up surrendering a LOT of your gains and goods.
No, the indictment here is against the Russian leadership.
First, they fell for the Ukrainian's brilliant bit of theater in Kherson - A real counter offensive, not just a pretend one, but a real offensive also designed to lure Russian forces out of position. EVERYONE fell for that - Western Analysts, media, and most certainly Russia. Western high military leaders probably knew it was coming, and it's known that the US War College has been helping game the counter offensive, so certainly, high US, and probably NATO commanders as well, knew what to expect. Security on this? IMPRESSIVE! Because of the bizarre nature of Putin's War, it is an undeclared war, and Russia cannot actually - legally - fully mobilize. So, to gain reserves and reinforcements, it's faster and easier to shift troops from elsewhere on the front lines. Ukraine understood this, and exploited it brilliantly.
Second, the Russian leadership has done a shit job of motivating their troops. This goes all the way back to Putin, and his attempt to destroy Ukraine 'on the cheap.' Un-motivated troops will crack when presented with the kind of conditions that a terrifying assault presents. When the front lines begin to crumble, un-engaged units will crack and run too, to avoid being overrun. a small crack, and an unexpected advance is bad enough, but when a primary defense line that the soldiers are relying upon to hold gets flanked and rolled up, confidence shatters, and then so do the units.
Third, Russian command and control SUCKS. So does their ability to act flexibly in the face of change. Initiative is almost entirely lacking. Contrary-wise, Ukrainian forces have a very much more 'Western' outlook, with initiative encouraged and flexible response as a key concept. Rigid command and control is VERY bad at dealing with rapid changes, and the failure of the defense lines outside Balakliya is exactly the kind of thing that Russian-style leadership handles worst. Additionally, looking at the defense lines seen in aerial footage shows clear signs of unskilled low-level leadership; straight trench lines, poor camouflage, squalid conditions in base camps, and generally bad fieldcraft tells me that the local NCOs are just not up to the task.
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
Andrew Cummings yeah, kinda. Like a lot with firearms, though, "it depends."
Finding specific firearms in .25 cal can be hard, because it's an unpopular caliber; 'weak' is an understatement. Once, it was very much more popular, but that ship sailed long, long ago. GOOD quality .25 handguns are almost entirely antiques. You can get new guns in .25, but those are either rather spendy, or are mostly crap.
So, if you want an obscure piece like a .25 Melior, well, it's a hunt. And that's a large part of the fun... Searching for a 'unicorn gun' can be like going detective and solving a mystery. I'm that way about Mausers - filling a gap in my collection is always a huge 'score!' moment for me.
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
@verdebusterAP No.
If you know anything about shooting, that cartridge, the 12.7x114, is a very clever adaptation of marrying a precision A-Max 12.7 bullet to the very high-capacity 14.5x114 case, producing a precise-shooting long range solution. It is in NO WAY 'cheaped out' - these guys knew exactly what they were doing. In a smaller format, look at the .416 Barrett - a .50 BMG case necked down to a .41 caliber bullet. In each case, you have an over-capacity case driving a smaller bullet which has better ballistic performance, producing a more accurate grouping at long range.
As for the rifle itself, well - it may look like an angry tube, and that's because that's exactly what it is. It is designed very specifically to be a precise, low-rate-of-fire heavy rifle. Nothing fancy - everything that is needed, and nothing that is not.
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
@FerretKibble it's the ever-endless quest for commercial advantage.
Deliberately growing melons for thinner rinds means more weight of useable pith. Likewise, hybridization for fewer seeds. Current commercial watermelon is extremely sweet, tends towards seedlessness, and is unfortunately easy to accidentally split.
I prefer heirloom 'sugar baby' melons, which are about cantaloupe-sized, or a bit smaller, intensely sweet, and have rind a bit over a half-inch (1.3 - 1.5 cm) thick. At that size, they don't split easy, are basically single-serving per melon, and the rinds are a good thickness for chopping into pickles. Larger, thicker-hulled melons are also good, if you plan on bigger chunks of pickle.
Pickled watermelon rind is a translucent pale green, with an appearance similar to Turkish Delight, but with a crisp/firm tooth and a tart-sweet flavor.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
It seems highly variable, depending on region. In the north, for instance, after the rout it looks like some professional officers have taken over, conducting intelligent defense and counter-offensive actions in the face superior Ukrainian firepower. They're still losing, but losing in the most conservative manner they can manage.
By comparison, in the Wagner Group area of operations, near Bakhmut, they appear to be running purely caveman tactics. Consequently, massive casualties and gratuitous destruction are order of the day.
This says some damning things about Russian officer corps and their training, and treatment - punishing officers for sensible conservation of their troops is how you get rid of competence.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
@ColdGhost01 US Armed Forces combat survivability in WWII (out of 1,000): 8.6 were killed in action, 3 died from other causes, and 17.7 received non-fatal combat wounds.
Yes, as I stipulated, some combat formations suffered outrageous losses; paratrooper formations absolutely suffered disproportionately. Checking my numbers, they did have a horrible survival rate, but they were also a very small percentage of the overall force - context matters.
On the other hand, my thesis holds up: joining the military was in no way a death sentence. Joining a high-risk formation might be, but overall, no.
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
@sealove79able they didn't avoid the bill. They paid for it in the costs to duplicate the tooling, disassemble and measure EVERYTHING, then assemble the clones. Engineering time, materials costs - including research into materials properties as well as development of tools, machines, foundries, and mills necessary to reproduce those materials - plus flight analysis and assessment - AND dealing with the overhead costs that Soviet bureaucracy inevitably involved, all that was one HELL of a bill.
Truthfully, it was a MASTERFUL engineering accomplishment - and completely unnecessary. Soviet aircraft engineers were extremely capable. It would have made more sense, and cost much less, to have simply flown the B-29, noting its performance and capabilities, and build a new aircraft from scratch that could duplicate or exceed its accomplishments.
Which, amusingly, is exactly what another design group did, producing a perfectly capable performance match for less cost.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@themeatpopsicle my wife was, until recently, office manager for a large regional IP lawfirm. You barely even began to touch on just how huge and complex the IP factor is. This is part of the disruptive effect I was talking about earlier.
Ideally, IP owners would license files for limited production runs, allowing engineers and designers to get paid, whilst the layman gets cheap repair parts.
Open source, of course, is going to be a huge segment, and a lot of skilled designers, artists, and engineers who cannot currently break in to the money stream will get a chance to shine.
Or flop.
IP theft is already rampant, and copyright law is grossly inadequate and falling further behind every day. Many IP owners are digging in their heels, instead of seizing the opportunity. Wild is a massive understatement.
We haven't even begun to see the way the world is going to change.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@davem2369 and, by your statement, it's clear you don't understand. No fault of yours, you understand - you're just not clued in to the context.
America is a Federated Republic, meaning that it is a collection of what amounts to fifty co-equal mini-nations. Each one is largely self-soveriegn and both legally and traditionally responsible for their own affairs, save for foreign policy, defense, and interstate commerce. And indeed, many states maintain their own foreign affairs departments (usually called something else, usually, for legal reasons).
The Federal Government is huge and intrusive, but would be MASSIVELY larger if they tried to take on state-level responsibilities. It's a trade-off between local autonomy and national cohesion. It necessarily introduces inefficiencies but that is part of the price we accept, almost unconsciously, to maintain our social contract.
Let us add to the above, the fact that the US is VAST compared to European nations, basically as large as all of Europe combined. If you look at the EU, what do you have? Dozens of sub-states, each with their own policing systems and local solutions... Not all that different, in effect, from the US.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
In 1815, you've got two problems: First, people didn't yet know what was needed, and Second, work like this fowling piece are bleeding-edge technology for the time, requiring extraordinary effort and expense to realize.
Even today, there are things we could do, that we don't, because it is economically infeasible, despite being technically possible. Things like metered liquid propellant to create much-desired caseless weapons, for instance.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
Most sailors, if issued a weapon, will be issued a long arm, either rifle or shotgun. The sidearm is an officer's weapon, more a badge of rank or duty. Enlisted sailors are expected to carry the effective fighting weapons. Since it's not there to be combat effective, a lighter weapon will serve just fine.
Sometimes, the pistol is literally there to let people know who is in charge; pulling Officer of the Deck watch, even as a senior enlisted, I was issued a pistol. My Petty Officer of the Watch got a shotgun, as did the Messenger of the Watch. But those were tucked up in a locker unless and until needed. That pistol sat on my hip all watch long, so people could tell at a glance who was in charge, and yeah, a lighter pistol would have been nice (duty weapon was a 1911 + two spare magazines).
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
I'll add to the above, this: The 'local autonomy' issue continues downwards; American government is highly distributed and decentralized. Anything that can be delegated generally is delegated to the lowest practical level. And, again, sometimes duplicated.
This delegation and local autonomy are why we have almost 20k policing agencies. Coordinating all that, as you can guess, is a nightmare. But I'd rather have my own, local, county police and sheriff (two different agencies, same territory, different sets of responsibilities) than one, say, run from New Jersey. I know the local guys, and if they make a habit of pissing us off, we can replace them. Without having to cross the damn river. 😝
5
-
5
-
@Ghastly_Grinner Seriously , it's clear you're not a firefighter, nor have sailed a wooden vessel. Those fire buckets are good for only putting out a blaze in the very instant it started. True, large, heavy structures of seasoned wood take some time to catch, but with the addition of bundles of bedding straw, you've got a conflagration. Lighter stores, such as canvas and tarred line would catch light quite easily, being resistant to being extinguished. These would convey the fire to heavier wood, which would be VERY resistant to being extinguished (try throwing a bucket of water into a large bonfire, see what happens). Meanwhile, the burning straw would make close approach to the fire impossible, and throwing buckets of water onto blazing straw tends to cause the straw to scatter, sending fire and embers everywhere (I have thrown water into burning straw - NOT the best idea!).
Now add the fact that the pine tar used as a preservative and caulking agent EVERYWHERE on the vessel would be melting and running like water in every direction - whilst burning. It's like liquid napalm.
The fire is not surprising. The loss is not surprising. It's the extended defense of the lower decks and powder room that are astonishing - I've fought fires on naval vessels, and they're TERRIFYING. Leading a body of men into such a conflagration, using primitive tools, and inspiring them to stay is an act of unimaginable courage and leadership. Every man jack who went below and stayed were heroes of towering stature.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@bubba200874426 it's a very fast, very light round. It's not intended to be a main battle round. It's essentially the same role the .30 carbine was intended for - and while the .30 is no .30-06, it turned out to be vastly useful.
5.7x28 upsets very quickly in flesh, doing ugly damage. It's not 5.56x45, but then it's not supposed to be, either. 9mm doesn't do shit against the armored 5.7 was supposed to defeat and 5.7 NATO loading is actually more lethal than 9mm anyway, but, as we've seen in Ukraine, the armor it was intended to defeat is mostly a fiction anyway.
The biggest reason that armies are sticking with 9mm is that 5.7 is a logistical digression - it's an extra expense and complication not needed. Why buy an exotic new round when we already have a shitton of adequate weapons and ammo already? Especially since it's a distinctly secondary role?
(This was, by the way, the successful argument against .45ACP)
I shoot 5.7x28 entirely for the fun of it. It has exactly zero place in my home defense planning. I don't care if it's not a wunderwaffe.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@seanbigay1042 in the GREEK Navy, there was the Helenic Navy Gato-class submarine 'Poseidon.' Diesel boat from WWII. NOT a class-name. Later, the Germans built a series of diesel boats for the Hellenic Navy under the class name 'Poseidon.' STILL not boomers, and they've never been to Hawaii.
The UK had a Poseidon boat, too - but that was a Parthian-class boat.
But in the US Navy? Nope. First: No class name of that sort in the USN. Second, "Boomer" is an unofficial nickname for a Fleet Ballistic Missile ('FBM') submarine - there is no actual "Boomer" class, and the entire category are "FBMs." Fourth, boomers launch SLICBMs, of which the Greek Navy has exactly Zero. Lastly, every American FBM submarine is nuclear, and not a tiny 1200 ton diesel boat.
So, NO.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@Privat2840 the US has already developed and deployed the VAMPIRE (an actual acronym - go, Army bureaucrats!), which takes existing and relatively cheap Hydra rockets, puts a seeker guidance unit in the fuse well, and pairs a box launcher of four with a tracking laser and a guidance unit, all of which are on a pallet that you can stick in the bed of a full-size pickup truck.
Still more expensive than a drone, but considering the operational risk of drones, extremely cheap at the price.
Several such pallets have already been delivered to Ukraine.
Perfect for drones, slow-flying helicopters, and random ground targets of opportunity. Basically, it's a Bubba SAM.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@davebruneau6068 you REALLY don't read for comprehension, do you? 1st: I DID NOT weigh in on whether the story was true, or not - I merely had the HORRIFIC temerity to suggest that you a) have zero evidence for your negative stance, and b) pointed out factors and possibilities to consider, that neither of us know. 2nd: having failed to comprehend or appreciate the point I made, you invented a story in your mind about what I really said, and posted as if that lie were a fact, despite evidence present that demonstrates it to be a lie. 3rd: I assess you to be one of those folks that think unfounded skepticism is a virtue; it isn't - no more than unfounded credulity is. 4th: you then invented more lies, ad hominem, to create a strawman that has zero foundation in ANYTHING.
In short: you are a liar, and a fool.
Oh, and you argue... Badly.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@hanshazlitt4535 so, here's the problem:
First, are you using the same metals and alloys? Different materials have different properties - steel isn't just steel; some steels are harder, more wear-resistent, but they also might be more rigid - too rigid, bashing against other parts - or more brittle and prone to breakage, or too springy and prone to giving inadequate support. That's just the start of it, too. Use the wrong material, and a part might bend, or stick, or warp under temperature changes. It goes deeper than that, too.
Now, dimensions; how precise are the parts in your sample? Are they worn? Are they maximum tolerance, or minimum? Or a mix of both? When measuring, where do you choose as your starting point? Which dimensions are critical, and which can afford a bit of slop? Remember, the copies of the sample parts will, themselves, suffer some variation. Adding variation on top of variation, you get important changes to the final dimensions, to the point where key parts no longer fit where they belong. 0.001 here, plus 0.001 there, all in random directions, and suddenly you've go parts that interfere with each other, or don't reach where they're supposed to reach...
It's all highly frustrating, and much harder than it looks - kinda like a xerox of a xerox is never as crisp as the original.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Modern .32acp defense loads run around 300 meters per second, up to 370 for some REALLY hot loads. That's from standard length test barrels, roughly half the length of this pistol. You're going to get more - I'm NOT sure how much more - here. GUESSING, I'd suggest maybe 20% more - but you sacrifice bullet mass in the faster rounds. Not a lot of literature out there on long-range, or long barrel, ballistics in .32acp. One thing is certainly true though; low bullet mass - even for the heavier, slower loads - will mean a rapid fall-off in performance.
What data that is out there suggests that you should respect the terminal ballistics, especially at close range. At any reasonable self-defense range, .32acp will leave you hurting.
On the positive side, recoil is minor, and as a fairly small cartridge, it can go in small guns. What's the first rule of the gunfight?
Have a gun.
So... Not my first choice, but if you choose it, I'm not going to sneer.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Surprisingly efficacious, actually.
Not terribly expensive, though a poorer working class family would struggle a bit. Once ice factories became common, you could order up block ice, just like you had your milk delivered, and it would be brought to your home or business. Ice wagons were a common sight at one time. Everyone, pretty much, had an ice box (proto-refrigerator) and ice pick, which you would use to 'chip one off the ol' block' (ice being usually delivered in block form) for use.
I'm fortunate to have known my grandmother, who was born in the 19th century; lots of her old turns of phrase lead to questions, which lead to informative stories. To her dying day, refrigerators were 'ice boxes' to her.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
I've done enough UnReps to have real respect for Bernoulli. Bernoulli WILL screw you if do not respect him. Add in the huge sail area of a large, fully-laden container ship, and you have a very challenging maneuvering problem. Wind on the stern quarter, especially, is problematic in this scenario, as the stern is the biggest point of leverage, center of leeway resistance-wise.
A couple ounces of force per square foot doesn't sound like much, but multiply that across the tens (hundreds!) of thousands of square feet, and you've got a powerful enemy.
Add in the suction from Bernoulli, and well, yer right proper fooked, ain'cha?
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@warhorse03826 in effect, they did, upon invasion, opening the armories to anyone who showed up.
Ad-hoc arming of the citizenry though, does not an effective Reserve make. When Russia invaded, it was years too late to go 'Swiss.' Recall that all Swiss Reserves are trained, are required to stay in practice, and are subject to periodic refresher training. Undoubtedly, had Ukraine possessed such a system, it would have been extremely helpful, but that's wishful thinking and water under the bridge.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@tokul76 yah, no. The OKW, and the Reich in general, kept pretty solid records, not to mention the rather exhaustive investigations, interviews, and cross-checking conducted by the victors. Hitler & friends (Goering, Goebbels, et al) really did play silly buggers. Not to mention, there was the constant scheming by various industrial favorites (Porsche comes immediately to mind) messing things up. When allowed to do their job by the politicians and political flag officers, the command staff were well-trained and capable.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Well done! No critiques from me this time. 😜
(Edit: ONE critique - Tina Barber started working on the breed back in the 1970s - it's more like fifty years of development work. )
Some observations / comments, though.
~ When someone asks me the difference between a German and and a Shiloh, I say: "A German is a working dog that makes a great companion. A Shiloh is a great companion that can work." It's a subtle distinction, but an important one. Shilohs are generally just less intense and less driven - which is not to say that there isn't some wide variation in drives. Shilohs are - generally-speaking - very good with children and other dogs. Cats depend on a particular dog's prey drive.
~ Aside from size, the other principle variation that separates Shilohs from Germans is the less-angulated hips, and the straighter, higher top line. This is deliberate. An angled pelvis does, within limits, give greater launch power for leaps and jumps. Unfortunately, many kennels have taken this to an excessive extreme. Shilohs are deliberately moved away from this feature.
~ I've owned four smooth coat Shilohs, and I far prefer this coat due to the greater ease of maintenance and general comfort of the dogs in warm weather. Plush coat dogs, of which I've owned three, can really suffer in the heat. Either coat will shed heavily, but smoothies don't mat.
~ On plush coats, the 'pants' region is ALWAYS at risk of matting, ponds, or no. I have a sizable creek near my house, and the dogs LOVE to swim, but the plushies need to be brushed out IMMEDIATELY afterwards, but even on routine days, I'll spend a half hour making sure the 'pants' are brushed out.
~ EVERY last Shiloh I've ever known has been a snuggle bug. 100+ POUNDS of snuggle-bug! You have been warned! 😁
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@mr.fahrenheit310 there is a big fat myth here that needs dispelling, NOW. "Prop" is short for 'property,' as in 'owned by the studio.' 'Prop' does not automatically mean 'fake.' All three guns on the weapons cart were live, real, fully-functioning Colt SAA handguns - which were also props.
But, to answer your implied question, YES, even fake guns. Even toy guns.
PERIOD.
Safety isn't conditional or situational, it is a mindset, a habit, and a lifetime discipline. Never get into the habit of treating even facsimiles in a casual manner, and you will never have to learn what Alec Baldwin's going through.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Jedi2155 sorry, I put a link in my earlier response; YT does not like links to external knowledgeable sources. 🙄
So - to cut it short: bullshit. Check the "shots-per-casualty" stats on ANY Army, in ANY war, and learn the error of your ways.
Artillery is the primary killer. Literally tens of thousands of bullets, or more, are fired to produce one casualty. The VAST majority of bullets fired are to suppress and fix enemy forces, to allow either maneuver elements to close, or to allow time for artillery to range and do their work. The applies to the Canadians, the British, the Germans, Russia, Ukraine, the United States, and everyone else.
But I guess I cannot expect actual knowledge from a Putin shill.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Russia is burning their future in this, Putin's War. Their young, the best and brightest, and being destroyed. These young men could be mechanics, plumbers, businessman, engineers, nurses, doctors, teachers... Instead, they're a net drain on Russian society, unable to contribute, or just simply being dead.
It'll be a generation or more before Russia even begins to recover from the brain and labor waste.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
In Tolkien's allegory, Saruman was corrupted by industrial thinking, and had established industrial methods on a large scale; reference what he tried in the Shire - tearing down nature and traditional craftsmanship to replace it with industrial revolution style machinery and mass production. Likewise, elves were allegorically guardians of artisanship and tradition; Sauron (and Saruman as his corrupt tool) was the proponent of impersonal, destructive, soulless and uncaring 'progress.'
Tolkien didn't much care for modern industry, and longed for his idealized 'kinder, gentler' good old days. The Shire was his allegory for his fantasy lifestyle.
So... How did Saruman make enough armor? Industrial mass production. Stamp forges. Casting mills. Thousands of slaves, toiling away over industrial forges in filthy, hot, dangerous work halls... All the industrial revolution production that Tolkien loathed. And, of course, fit and finish suffered. It was all one size fits all, and if you were outside the 85th percentile for an Uruk-Hai, well too bad - your helmet and armor are going to chafe, bind, just not work for you; and too bad, so sad - you're also a disposable cog in Saruman's war machine.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Cancer McAids oh, absolutely. They had to create new tools, new alloys, new processes... It would have been much easier to take performance data and general concepts, and use those to inform creating a similar aircraft, instead of a clone.
Give the Soviets their due, the TU-4 was only 750 pounds heavier than the original (<1% difference), and that might easily be because they armed it with 23mm cannon, instead of 20mm.
On the other hand, the effort was not wasted; the Soviets gained immense knowledge through the process, really boosting their aeronautical institutional knowledge, as well as jump-starting their strategic bomber program.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
King Shepherds are not mixed breed or mutts - They have a well-established registry, with extensive ancestry and genetics information maintained by a professional organization. They
are divergent from Shiloh Shepherds, but share the same basic origins. The breed diverges from German Shepherds some fifty years ago by way of three crucial outcrosses: An Alt Deutscher Hund by the name of Artus; a White Shepherd from Hoofprint Kennels named Orbit, and a Giant Malamute named Secret Sampson Woo (which is an incredibly fun name to say!).
Without being a specialist, the primary differences between Kings and Shilohs will be that all Kings are plush coat, a bit stockier, and a bit shorter; Meanwhile Shilohs can be plush OR smooth coat, come in ALL coat colors (Solid white to solid black, and everything in between!), and tend to be a bit more lean, and a bit more tall.
Shilohs and Kings both tend to be VERY talkative.
The primary distinction, as I like to say, is: German Shepherds are working dogs whom make great companions, whilst Shilohs (and by extension, Kings) are companions whom can work. Subtle, but very important distinction.
Edit: My source is: Member of SSDCA, I knew Tina Barber, and I've owned seven Shiloh Shepherds over the last 23 years. I have two Shilohs currently in my household - One a Black and Tan plush, and the other a Buff and Cream smoothie.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@kyle857 having been inside the beast, as well as closely connected to major players in the R&D world (ARPA, DARPA, BRL, HEL, and others) yeah, it really does apply. The military is less xenophobic than it used to be, but there did, and does, exist a strong element of xenophobia where it comes to equipment. I know (knew) some of the players involved in the M9 Beretta search, the ACR project, the advanced warrior project, the Abrams M1 development (original mark), the ECWCS clothing, and the Bradley IFV concepts. Along with others. I used to cut the grass of the guy who created the Kevlar pot helmet, a close friend and subordinate of my father. I even have hunks of armor samples from those projects as paperweights on my desk. Hell, I wear some of the old ECWCS prototype gear when it gets cold enough... Yes, it's that durable that it is still useful all these years later.
Yes, a LOT of foreign tech is involved in these. In EVERY case it was an uphill battle. Not only did the foreign gear have to prove capable, it had to prove that it was clearly superior to gear that might be domestically created in the reasonable future. Even then, xenophobic reactions were common. I can still hear a certain general officer profanely asserting that no one was going to arm HIS soldiers with "Gay Elves;" that being the approximate American pronunciation of the German pronunciation of G11, in reference to the G11 participation in the ACR project.
Yeah, it looks cosmopolitan on the surface. The surface hides a LOT of bigotry and xenophobia. It gets better all the time, but it's built on a DEEP history, and in WWII, it was very much present.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@dragondude9637 more corruption; debauchery can be sustainable, presuming that everything else works. But it wasn't just corruption; the Roman empire suffered from being too large. Communication with the far rim of the empire was slow, so command and, control, and - important! - regulation suffered. The second part of that is that the mere existence of Rome forced otherwise pastoral tribes to organize and develop - including taking on elements of Rome that they found could fit; poor communications meant that when the tribes rolled over the border, response was too slow. Corruption meant that when response did happen, it was weak, poorly led, and ill-supplied.
Still, the Eastern Roman Empire - Byzantine Empire; the still-existing rump of the original Roman Empire, the Roman empire had lasted over two millennia, in one form or another.
Not too shabby.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Seth9809 child model 12ga are harder to find, and are, honestly, over-powered for home defense. As in: too much lead moving downrange. 20ga is the sweet spot for do the job without OVER doing the job. Honestly, .410 would work, if you're well enough trained, but 20 gives you enough punch that if your shot placement isn't 'just so,' it'll still have the desired effect. The small size is an asset, not a detriment, in moving in small spaces like hallways - this is not urban combat. This is home defense.
So, no. I reject your assessment.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Agree, it can be repaired - and likely too fast for comfort - but it is a huge psychological blow, especially with all the Russian tourists in Crimea. Try to hide this from the public, Putin!
Logistically, it puts Russia on the back foot. In Crimea, and Kherson, Russian quartermasters will be 'robbing Peter to pay Paul,' and that logistics shortfall will take months to correct, after the bridge is repaired. This is a significantly disruptive event, but not a definitive one.
More important is the psychological effect, and the diversion of resources necessary to repair and increase defences on the bridge, plus the logistics bottleneck created by having to careful inspect every truck crossing the causeway.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@AtlasJotun there's nothing preventing a reproduction rifle being built to handle modern loads - indeed, I doubt it would be any other way. The major difference between modern .45-70 and .30-30 lies in the ballistics and modern loadings. The .45-70 makes an excellent heavy brush cartridge. It's not a long range choice, but rather a smasher that can put heavy game down in close conditions. There is a good range of bullets available for it, and if I wanted something that would really put a big, pissed-off, hog in the dirt, that's high on my list. Contrary-wise, the .30-30 has a pretty limited selection of bullets. It's not as heavy as the .45-70, nor is it as effective at longer ranges as, say, a .270.
I was quite deliberate in my choice of options.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Psiberzerker I'm well-known in this channel. You come in and throw accusations - which you did, with some real english on them - you're going to get disdain. You want civility, be civil.
Shipboard counter-sniper is exactly what I stated previously. Someone starts shooting at the ship, my job was to throw enough lead at them, accurately enough, either drive them off, or pin them down for a close assault team to fix their little red wagon. Permanently.
Chief Burdette had some fun ideas in that; drilling a hostage situation on the weather decks of a squadron submarine? (Yes, unlikely, but hey, Drill Monitors are weird) Burdette's response: "Cummings, go take your rifle down to the paint barge, shoot that SOB in the back." Somehow, that wasn't the answer the Monitors were looking for. After a few cycles like that, with the Chief finding increasing amusing ways of breaking the scenario, all of which would have worked just fine, the Monitors gave up. I liked working for the Chief. He had no respect for authority, and a very devious mind.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I've been extremely critical of these useless bathtub toys from the very beginning. ANY working sailor could tell they were a shit idea from the very conception; only a politician - in or out of uniform - would go for these, because they were always a boondoggle designed to line peoples' pockets with graft.
Whoa, look! I was right!
If we NEEDED the capability in the combat regime, there were off-the-shell vessels that were quite capable - Singapore, for instance, has a class of vessel that fits the space, and are actually tested, proven, and functional. But noooo... Can't have something not designed in the US! Heaven forbid! Not Invented Here!
Feh.
All we needed was a license, and they could have been built in the US, but Admirals have massive inflated fragile ego problems. I won't even get started on Congress' graft issues.
Crooks, the lot of them.
Disclaimer: I WAS a working USN sailor. I could have told the idiots involved how to avoid most of the problems. Oh, wait - I, and tens of thousands of other sailors, DID tell them!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
"Where do you store the food?"
"Everywhere."
Truest of true facts.
At the beginning of a run, we literally walked on our food. Heavy cans were stacked on the decks, and planks laid over them. Frame bays, piping runs, light fixtures, cable bundles, and in every other possible niche, there'd be food. When I wanted to add a pack of powdered cocoa to a mug of truly nasty engine room coffee, I'd reach above the Reactor Plant Control Panel, where there'd be a mesh bag stuffed with packets.
Our food wasn't any more special than regular navy food, but our cooks learned to work magic with limited, degraded ingredients. You can, in fact, make quite edible bread with powdered milk and powdered eggs - It just takes skill and practice. One cook even managed to make sheet cakes with those ingredients.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Calling absolute BULLSHIT on your implication that submarines are always dimly lit.
Bullshit.
Bullshit.
Bullshit.
"Rig for Red" is only in Control, and only when going to PD at night.
"Rig Dark" is only for surfacing at night on patrol when you're going to man the bridge, and a vanishingly rare occurrence.
Control is usually dimly lit - with white light - to reduce eye fatigue on the watchstanders; the rest of the time, and the boat, it was quite well illuminated with fluorescent lights.
Berthing spaces were usually dim, too, for obvious reasons, but they too lit up brightly on frequent occasions. Far too often, IMO.
Ops compartment? Engineering spaces? Galley, mess decks, wardroom? Lit right the fuck up.
~ qualified in submarines
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It's going to take more than a government collapse; Russia needs a major cultural revolution, and that's going to take a LOT of time and effort.
In America, we talk about "Joe Six-Pack," the notional average American. It's the attitudes and beliefs of Joe Six-Pack that act as the keel and rudder of how the country goes; he stabilizes its political and social course. If you want to change course, you need to get Joe Six-Pack on board with the plan.
Same, in Russia (or any other country); Ivan Vodka is going to need to want to change course, if Russia is ever going to become a stable and moderate nation. The problem is, eight decades of 'communism' and two decades of Putin have taught Ivan Vodka to plow straight ahead, without looking for any alternatives. Getting his attention, and convincing him it is time to change is going to be a monumental task.
God speed, and I hope it happens, but I don't think it will happen anytime soon.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
the Russian diplomats might have been in the dark, but the UK, German, US, Norway, Finland, and Sweden all knew, and warned Ukraine and the world. So if he was truly ignorant, he must have had his head in the sand.
Still, he did the right thing, and did it early, so I'll give him a pass.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Sailor here;
Not being able to rescue the sailors is not a sure sign of incompetence. The bad facts of being a sailor often mean that you are far from rescue, and sea rescue is an extremely difficult operation that is nothing even remotely like ground evacuation. Hypothermia can kill VERY fast, and even if a rescue flight were launched instantly, by the time the rescuers reached the site, everyone would already be dead, given current Black Sea conditions.
As for the crew escaping the vessel itself, well, it was subjected to numerous VERY violent explosions in close sequence; that destroys soft equipment like life rafts, and leaves the crew physically disoriented and disabled; very poor conditions for self-rescue. The ship sank very quickly, and would have trapped some crew, as well as taking life boats and rafts down with it.
So - The loss of all hands is almost certainly due to the conditions of war at sea, rather than incompetence.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Napoleon gets bad press, but that's because 1) he scared the winners very badly, and 2) he lost.
In many ways, Napoleon was modern, thoughtful, dynamic, and inventive. He set up and followed through on a system of incentives for new, practical innovations, he created efficient government, and he helped drive industrial and agricultural development.
If it weren't for that whole 'losing' bit, he would be remembered as one of the great leaders of the industrial revolution.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@richardpark3054 Occam's Razor absolutely applies.
The OP posits an incredibly high-risk, extremely complicated operation in exchange for the destruction of a minor target as a substitution for an already offered, simple, and demonstrably possible explanation.
The Razor always favors the least complicated solution that meets all known factors.
Special Forces are not magic. They are extremely expensive to train, supply, and field. They are, by definition, extremely limited in numbers. Use of such a force on minor target would be stupid. The Ukrainians are manifestly not stupid. You presume two legs of the tower were severed, but I see no evidence of that, and neither do you. You saw an explosion and the tower fell.
The idea that this was an infiltration attack is not quite impossible, but is so unlikely as to be ludicrous and ridicule-worthy.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Actually, the Battle of Brody, in Ukraine, 1941, had the largest single engagement of armor. In Kursk, specifically the Battle of Prokhorovka, considered by many to be the largest tank-on-tank engagement, Germany had 294 tanks and assault guns, whereas the Soviet Union had 616 tanks and assault guns. At Brody, the German army had 750 tanks and assault guns, whilst the USSR had 3500. That makes Brody, by far, the largest tank-on-tank engagement ever. No one talks about it much, though, because 1) the Soviet tanks were older, mostly obsolescent vehicles, and the German tanks weren't much better. Also, the Nazis won that one. That doesn't mean that Kursk had fewer vehicles, or was smaller, just that actual fleets of tanks directly engaging in a single action against each other, Brody was larger.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I've said it a hundred times, and I'll continue saying it; Russia is feeding its future into the flames. Their best young men are dying like flies, removing future machinists, mechanics, lawyers, farmers, scientists, and leaders. Every day, Russia's future becomes more bleak.
Edit: Russian bureaucracy would make Franz Kafka vomit in horror.
Second edit: Failing to document the soldiers' presence in Ukraine allows Russia to deny death benefits, survivorship benefits, pensions, veterans' care, and so on. Also, KIA that are not 'officially' in Ukraine don't count against war casualty numbers. Again, it's a bureaucratic shuffle to avoid bad news (which is a career ender in Russia), public dismay, and to shuffle war costs to other departments which allows yet further obfuscation. Kafka would shit.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Interior grain (fuel body) topology can be much more complicated than your basic description - as I'm sure you're aware. There may be multiple cavities, or the cavity might be star shaped, or other, even more complicated and exotic shapes, all with the intent of maintaining a constant combustion surface area. A constant combustion surface area means a constant thrust during boost phase, simplifying many control and construction considerations. Rather than a fuel migration, I think it more likely that there was an internal crack in the grain, or maybe an air pocket, either of which would - briefly - alter the burn physics, producing the change in thrust axis, as you describe. Ultimately, I think your temporary asymmetric thrust theory is sound, and most likely, but the cause is more likely to be physical defects - cracks or voids - in the grain rather than fuel migration. Of course, uneven fuel mixing when casting the grain is possible, but I think that less likely; Mixing the materials prior to the pour isn't all that much more complicated than mixing paint.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Squid here. Submariner type, too.
Generally-speaking, the food was the from the same source(s), but the cooks on submarines tend to be of higher skill - If they're not, they come up to speed VERY quickly. That said, list angle is still something with which to contended - We still bust Ray's chops over his infamous "List Cake." One side of the sheet cake was a quarter inch thick, and VERY well done. The other side was 3+ inches thick, and rather under-cooked. Then he went and leveled the whole thing off with icing. 😧
Thanksgiving and Christmas meals are taken VERY seriously. For morale purposes, a proper holiday meal is absolutely unparalleled - and screwing it up is a career-limiting move. One year when the Supply Officer screwed up the bird order, the cooks raided the Officer's Mess to get enough turkey to feed the Enlisted Mess.
With the sweet potato liquid, you should be able to reduce it down before adding the sugar, rather than casting half aside.
Marshmallows... Meh. Leave or take.
Now, I use unsulfured molasses, but this would be much more efficient, considering that everything in the dish is common in the supply line.
1
-
The cooks on the boats could do AMAZING things with 'powdered everything.' Fresh bread every day underway was standard, and even the most grueling schedule can be borne, if the food is right. You VERY quickly run out of fresh, and make do with wet and dehydrated, and canned - Turning 'snake eggs' (canned potatoes) into something edible is just the beginning. Plastic ice-cream, powdered eggs, pastries, pies, and cakes MADE with powdered egg and powdered milk... I could fill the page with examples.
At one point, we pulled off of what we were doing to get an injured sailor into Yokosuka Naval Base, and once he was on the tug, they passed us over a score of crates of fresh fruit. The first five crates made it to the Mess Deck empty - every man in the working party took a 'tax' before passing the box on. Best working party, EVER.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@JohnDoe-wx2oo soba noodles and Udon most often, but ramen too. Actually, after Udon, I eat cellophane noodles second most often, but those are Chinese.
I'm fortunate enough to live in a University town, with a very large first-line university. We have MANY asian students and visiting faculty, and consequently have a wide range of Asian food resources, from Thai, to Filipino, to Indian (in many different regional variations), to Chinese, japanese, and Korean. The only thing we're missing is Mongolian - I'd do many things to get some real Mongolian Barbeque, I'll confess!
In general, Chinese ethnic food is second only to Mexican ethnic food, when you're talking "exotic" food in America. Actually, Italian ethnic food is so common as to be considered routine, with Irish and Greek being close contenders. But college students across the nation swear by, and live on, Ramen noodles. 😉
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Made this, this evening.
Pretty much clone-correct, and VERY popular with the family.
Observations on my effort;
- less time on sauteed vegetables. A touch overdone, albeit still good. Just could be a bit better.
- I generally use Worcestershire sauce instead of soy. Went a touch heavy, but again, first try, so mistakes are going to happen. Again, I'm the only one who noticed, so... Maybe it's just me?
- brown the chicken a bit longer next time. Again, I'm the harshest critic, so maybe I should stop looking for problems?
Overall, delicious, and I've already been asked to put it 'in the rotation.' 😉
A leisurely hour and a half, no difficult steps, just kind of a relaxing meal to prepare. Served mine up with sourdough bread, to sop up the remaining sauce. Yum.
🙂
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
You are giving Russian Media too much credit.
You need to recall that the Kremlin has its thumb heavily on the scales there; many channels are outright owned by the government, and the rest are heavily encumbered with censorship rules which give the Kremlin de facto control over content. As it stands, the Kremlin is playing to the domestic audience whom are ignorant, lack adequate access to fact-checking, and are already capture by the official propaganda machine. In addition, the secondary audience are external clients of Russia, and Russian apologists. They're counting on a public which is apathetic, ignorant, cannot - or will not - bother fact checking, and will quickly forget the content anyways.
So yeah, those Russian reporters ARE waking up and planning on lying.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Angie H. it's a ring, generally worked from a large nut, as a way to keep oneself occupied during slack time while on patrol. Take a large steel or inconel nut, work on it with files, sand paper, and other hand tools until you've turned into a ring. Most go with simple single or triple facet rings, like a signet ring, maybe with some images worked into the facet, but I've seen some high art too. All depends on your patience, the amount of slack time you've got, and you innate artistic skills.
Mine tend to be fairly plain.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Element905 they had to operate it. Now, one thing that is common to EVERY soldier is that they love to bitch about their equipment. Whine, kvetch, snivel, and complain. That is, unless the kit is really solid. And I'm not talking about "public venue, the officers are watching," either - I'm talking "hanging about in my basement, over a case of beer." If, in that environment, a soldier says a bit of kit is right decent, then you can be sure, by God, that he actually likes it.
So... Over rate? I doubt that. You on the other hand? Give me some bone fides for your assertion, or you're just a troll.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1