Comments by "" (@yellowtunes2756) on "How is the war going? — Mid-December 2022" video.

Do you know exact percentage of intercepted targets by Russian anti air? Why are you saying that their anti air is nonexistent if they have best air defence in the world by far? There's no evidence that Russia uses c300 rocket's to hit the ground. As we saw in Poland - those rockets can fall and kill people without anyone aiming for them (of course if we assume that Ukraine wasn't trying to start ww3 by deliberately killing civilians in Poland). Also, only few c300 launchers can hit the ground. And Russia replaced 70% of c300 with c400 few years ago
2
@ebrim5013 i mean, Russia indeed has fastest rockets in the world by far (nothing NATO has is even close to kinzjal, while Russia has far better things) and best air defence, also by far (even old soviet s300 has better range and speed than any NATO air defence)
1
@tuehojbjerg969 that's not how it works. Russia has 10 to 1 artillery advantage in Bahmut according to Ukraine, while 80% of casualties in any war are caused by artillery and other bombs. So no-one is "attacking into machine guns", Russia bombs those machine guns and then sending their troops. So yeah, Russian losses a lot smaller than ukrainian ones
1
@tuehojbjerg969 Vadym Skibitsky, the deputy head of Ukraine's military intelligence told to The Guardian that Russia has 15 to 1 artillery advantage on the battlefield. It was in the summer, but nothing has changed since then, NATO is sending too little equipment and too little ammo How do you know that Russians are doing human wave tactics and loosing 300 dead each day in Bahmut alone? Do you think that if that was the case - they would have made more rapid gains? Between "Russia is barely attacking and gaining little ground" and "Russia is storming machine guns head on" you have to choose one Btw, if you want to know what's happening on the other side - you need to listen how they whine about something. For example pro Russian telegram channel Повернутые на Z Войне recently posted video from UKRAINIAN tv channel where ukrainian soldier was saying that Russian are attacking with small groups at night, shelling ukrainians with artillery while Ukraine doesn't have an answer for it.
1
@tuehojbjerg969 according to Washington post and their interview with Ukrainian soldiers from Kherson offensive - during those attacks Ukraine lost at least 5 times more soldiers than Russia. Do you think that Washington post or Ukrainian soldiers are nazis and spreading propaganda? Not all ukrainian soldiers are nazis, don't offend them lol 80% of casualties in any war are caused by artillery and bombs. Russia has more artillery, tanks, planes, helicopters and rockets. USA since 2021 sent to Ukraine 940k dumb 155mm shells and only 4200 GPS guided shells. So only 0.4% of Ukrainian shells are hitting target with precision, everything else is also takes "hundreds of shells to hit a target". Do tou think that Russia used less guided shells than 4200? Do you think Russia has less precision ammunition than they used long range rockets? Why? Also Russian artillery is equal or superior to everything that NATO received from Ukraine. For example himars is just like smerch or Tornado s, tho Russian versions have more rockets. Pzh2000 just like koalitsya sv but Russian version has less crew members. "Attackers always have higher casualties" - no. Name one middle eastern country USA invaded in last 30 years where they would have had higher casualties than defenders. Can you name a single country that lost less soldiers than Germany in ww2 when Germany was attacking? It's about fire power, not about "defender attacker". Especially in modern war. Even in Verden battle in ww1 attacking German force lost less soldiers than defending France You know nothing about this war or wars in general
1
@tuehojbjerg969 accuracy isn't about artillery, but about shells. Only 0.4% of ukrainian shells are precise. What artillery are you referring to? All artillery serves different purpose. For example solncepek hits huge area and burnes everyone even inside trenches. Smerch can also hit a huge area or can be as precise as himars (5m radius). It all depends on shell that is used for every particular situation Again, do you think that Russia used less than 4200 precise rounds? And why do you think that way? Russia mobilizing troops because before mobilization every soldier could have cancelled their contracts and leave the frontline with paycheck. Also because Ukraine had like 7 mobilization waves and greatly outnumbered Russian troops on the battlefield. Even if not a single Russian soldier was dead - they still would have needed a mobilization If Russia has more tanks than Ukraine - obviously Russia will loose more tanks. For example in Vietnam USA lost 10000 aircrafts against 300 aircrafts of North Vietnam, does it mean that Vietnam had better planes and helicopters? Also there's no such thing as ukrainian tank, they are all Soviet Russia has by far better rockets (nothing is even close to speed of Russian kinzjal while Russia also has Sarmat which is 5 times faster than kinzjal), air defence and extremely good artillery. Can you name artillery piece that doesn't have superior or equal Russian analogue? Well, except for m777 because stationary artillery is shite and Russia uses koalitsya sv to do the same thing, but without getting destroyed
1
@tuehojbjerg969 Russia doesn't have massive technological advantage but has massive artillery advantage I have no clue what you meant in your first sentence about Germany in ww1 because it was barely English. But if it was possible for Germany to have less losses than France in ww1 while doing human wave tactics against trenches and literally run towards machine guns - surely Russia can have less losses than Ukraine because of 10 to 1 artillery advantage
1
@tuehojbjerg969 Vadym Skibitsky, the deputy head of Ukraine's military intelligence said that Russia has 15 to 1 artillery advantage on the battlefield in interview to The Guardian. Just because you don't know something - doesn't mean that it's Russian propaganda. Where can i find video where ukrainian soldier says that Russia doesn't have huge artillery advantage? I would love to see it myself Again, difference between 10 and 100 meters is in shells, not in artillery. Do you think Russia used less than 4200 precise round? Yes or no? Because every other artillery needs to shoot in general direction of target and then correct it's fire with drone. Even dumbest artillery shells with huge spread like grad can hit very close to target after some correction.
1
@tuehojbjerg969 again, before mobilization soldiers could have leave army at any time after canceling their contract, while Ukraine had like 7 mobilization waves. Even if Russia haven't lost a single soldier - they would have needed mobilization anyway. By your logic, since Ukraine had tons of mobilization waves - they are loosing a lot more soldiers than Russia that did only 1 mobilization wave Do you know how artillery works? If shell isn't gps or lazer guided - it can't hit certain point on the map, it needs correction with drones. Without correction or guided missiles - any artillery is inaccurate. Are you slow? According to Ukranian deputy of minister of defence in summer - Ukraine lost 50% of their heavy equipment while all NATO supplies only covered 15% of their losses. And it was when NATO actually sent Ukraine heavy equipment in decent quantities
1