Comments by "" (@yellowtunes2756) on "" video.

  1. Ceasefire, which doesn't lead to peace, just gives Ukraine time to rearm. And Russia proposed total ceasefire multiple times on Christmas, but Ukraine refused. So why are you blaming Russia for it?
    7
  2. @williamzk9083  Putin isn't mobilizing anyone. 160k is a standard Russian conscription of 18yo for military training, which is happening every year in peace times. Those guys won't fight in Ukraine And why aren't you blaming Zelensky for kidnapping people off streets to throw them into the military? I guess he doesn't want peace according to you
    7
  3. ​ @SpaDeKo  There are no such thing as "illegal" claims. Whatever your army can hold is yours. Always been this way
    5
  4.  @digadeh  oh, I'm sorry for nterrupting idiots who spread lies and propaganda. Feel free to fact check me, I dare you
    5
  5. And Ukraine will never be in NATO
    4
  6.  @wyskass861  yeah, cos you can't argue reality. But you wrote 2 comments to me cos you're salty that reality doesn't fit propaganda you're consuming But anyway, you don't have to play my games. But you can fact check and learn something new. Maybe you will realise that particular media is lying to you and avoid it in the future
    4
  7. ​ @toja123 Have you seen his recent video about Kursk operation? He lied pretty much everywhere. For example he said that Kursk adventure forced Russia to move troops from the Donbas and helped Ukraine in the regions. But in reality Russia started taking land 10-20 times faster after Kursk offensive started
    3
  8.  @wyskass861  the weather is great, thanks for asking. But anyway, is there a reason why pro Ukrainian NPCs call "bots" and "trolls" everyone who disagrees with them? Can you point out where exactly am I wrong ?
    3
  9.  @jacqdanieles  Zelensky isn't protecting his country. His stated goal is to restore 1991 borders, despite locals fighting for independence for over a decade. I'm curious, if in 1991 USSR refused Ukrainian independence and started bombing them - would you supp6the USSR for protecting their country? Would you support China if they decided to restore their governance of Taiwan? For some reason, I think that your opinion isn't based on "one party is defending", but rather on "I support whatever side media told me to support"
    3
  10. Lies
    2
  11. ​ @worfoz  yeah, for believing the west for so long
    2
  12. Ukraine can do whatever they want, but it doesn't mean that other countries have to help them. Is there a reason why Russia should accelerate instead of evaporating Ukrainian forces slowly but surely? Considering that Ukraine can't keep up with losses despite kidnapping people off streets, Russian strategy is working
    2
  13. If Zelensky wants peace, then why did he ban negotiations by law? Why did he cancel negotiations in 2022? Why didn't he negotiate with Russia in 2019?
    2
  14.  @milanmarinkovic3016  no idea. It was a great way to prevent the war
    2
  15.  @benfuriaca2024  Ukraine also hasn't restored 1991 borders and gets further away from their goal every day. Russian goals won't be achieved until their victory. So why would you even write that nonsense? Especially since not a single Russian official ever said anything about 3 days - it was American general Milley, who said that Kiev may fall in 3 days without foreign aid
    2
  16. @tinylazer what sources would you suggest? All of them are biased towards one of the sides And what sources suggest that my facts are wrong? Does anyone imply that Ukraine outguns Russia? Or maybe that Ukraine grows their army with only volunteers? Is there any source that would suggest that fire power is one the main reasons for injuries? I don't need someone to tell me what to think, since I can draw conclusions from information in free access. So why are you so against the idea of using a brain? Why do you think my logic is bad?
    2
  17. He was negotiating in good faith since 2014. But Minsk agreements were fake, which Merkel Holland and Poroshenko all admitted. And unfortunately Boris Johnson ordered to cancel negotiations in 2022. Why should he believe NATO?
    2
  18. ​ @marynajensen786  Ты забыла про то, что Украина была польским вассалом, а Хмельницкий как раз восстание против вассалитета поднял Причем тут рабство, если Украина была таким же регионом России, как и курск или московская область? Слушай, а вот те украинцы, кого сейчас ТЦК с улиц похищают, они тоже рабы? Их тоже "используют в войнах" ? И какой народ в войнах не использовали? И какое к этом всему имеет отношение голод на Украине в 30е ? А голод в Поволжье в 20е какое то хитрое название имее? Во времена советского союза Украина была полностью восстановлена после Великой Отечественной. У вас развивались научные центры, самолетостроение, атомные электростанции, флот, ракетостроение, сельское хозяйство. Да и в общем населения росло. А когда решили против России пойти, то население с 14го года сократилось в 2 раза, а людей стали с улиц похищать свои же, чтобы в очередной котёл кинуть
    2
  19. @marynajensen786  А что, Украина не была обычным регионом? Каких прав не было у украинцев, которые были у сибиряков или кавказцев? Украинцы сейчас воюют не за свою страну, а за границы 91 года, вопреки мнению местных жителей, которые уже 10 лет вооют за свободу от Украины. Когда наши войска под Киевом стояли, то я вас даже поддерживал и митинговал. Но последние 2 года цель была не защита Родины, а захват Крыма и Донбасса вопреки желанию местных жителей "И если нужно заменят" - то есть украинцав устраивает ТЦК и их методы? Если похищение людей с улиц - не повод власть сменить, то я даже не знаю что сказать. Ни царей, ни императоров никто и нигде не выбирал, а не только на Украине. Выборы главы КПСС тоже были весьма условные, но это всего СССР касалось, а не только Украины. Так что у России и Украины выборы действительно появились только в 90е Ну вообще количество россиян после войны вырастет из-за нескольких миллионов людей в новых регионах. Ну да ладно
    2
  20. What are you yapping about? Before 2022 Russia was ok with the Donbas to be autonomous part of Ukraine. In 2022 negotiations Russia only wanted Crimea and for Donbas to be independent. Ukraine refused every time and now Russia will have 4 eastern Ukrainian regions as well. Every time Ukraine sabotaging or delaying negotiations - Ukraine is shrinking. It has nothing to do with Putin
    2
  21.  @rolfewert6154  geopolitics are more complicated than "stealing". What do you think about Ukraine not letting the Donbas and Crimea go, despite the will of the locals? Can you call it slavery? What do you think about Ukraine banning Russian language as second official in the Donbas? No, in Russia you will go to jail for corruption. In the west it's called lobbying and actually legalized
    2
  22. Those 160k aren't fighting in Ukraine, but go through standard military training similarly to Koreans and Israelis. Whomever told otherwise is lying to you and trying to brainwash you. Beware
    2
  23. Just like Ukraine with current ceasefire on energy infrastructure? Or grain deal? Or Istanbul Azov commanders deal? Or two Minsk agreements?
    2
  24. There are less civilian casualties in Ukraine in 2 years than in Gaza in 1 month. It's also one of the rare conflicts with far more combatant losses than civilian ones. Compare that to NATO's wars Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan, Vietnam or Palestine. Who's the psychopath again?
    2
  25. Yeah, that happens when one side doesn't want peace. Unfortunately Minsk agreements failed because Merkel Holland and Poroshenko all admitted that agreements were fake and were oy necessary to arm Ukraine for the war against Russia. Maybe if Ukrainian leaders weren't as stupid and id western leaders weren't so bloodthirsty - there would be no war now
    1
  26.  @benfuriaca2024  Yeah, Putin didn't expect Zelensky to be dumb enough to rely on unreliable NATO "allies" and continue the unwinnable war against nuclear superpower. No-one expected it to be fair But is there a reason why Russia should be in a hurry instead of evaporating Ukrainian soldiers slowly but surely?
    1
  27. @tinylazer  Russia gained 4000km² in 2024, but whatever. Wars aren't linear and you don't have to take entirety of the enemy country to win the war. What's more important is the acceleration. In 2023 Russia took 400km², in 2024 Russia took 4000km². While Ukraine is getting further from their objective. And without drastic changes - Ukraine will thave to sign capitulation and all those losses will be for nothing
    1
  28. @tinylazer  well, fighting the strongest country in Europe supported by entire NATO is indeed different than fighting rice farmers. Also, US was using Vietnamese as meat shields, which suffered the vast majority of casualties Russia is far from victory indeed, but it accelerates towards it. And Ukraine is accelerating away from victory while losing far more soldiers than Russia. Btw, how is this a stalemate if 1 side of the conflict accelerated 10 times in a year?
    1
  29. @tinylazer  Russia terribly outguns Ukraine. Russia constantly encircles Ukraine. Russia grows their army with only volunteers, while Ukraine has manpower shortages despite snatching people off streets
    1
  30. @tinylazer  that's the reason I don't use any sources - they're all biased and cannot be confirmed by me But we know that Russia has a huge advantage in artillery, aviation and rockets. They're also on par with Ukraine in drones. Fabs don't care if you're defending or attacking and the regular gun fire is responsible for around 5% of all wounds according to medics from both sides. So it doesn't matter if you're attacking or defending Why do you think that Putin would face any consequences for another mobilization? Especially since Zelensky isn't facing consequences for kidnapping people off streets and banned men from leaving the country. Are you implying that Zelensky has more ways of suppressing protests than Putin? But it's irrelevant to my points anyway. Russia is still growing its army with only volunteers, unlike Ukraine. It doesn't matter why Russia doesn't start another mobilization
    1
  31. @tinylazer  What sources do you prefer? Half of them is sponsored by NATO countries, other half is sponsored by Russia and their allies. There are no unbiased media. But what fact of mine isn't confirmed by both sides? Does anyone suggesting that Russia doesn't advantage in artillery, aviation, bombs and rockets? Does anyone imply that Russia falls far behind Ukraine in drones? Is there a single source that would suggest that Ukraine outguns Russia? Or maybe a single source that would suggest that gunfire is the leading cause of wounds? If not, then whey do you think that my conclusion (of Ukraine suffering more losses) isn't logical? Why do you value biased sources more than usage of your own brain?
    1
  32.  @benfuriaca2024  Russia benefits greatly from artillery and bombs. Those weapons require time. Alternatively Russia can mobilize 2 million soldiers and order them to go forward, plus force Belarus to dow the same. Is there a reason why Russia should do that? Different wars, different situations. There are far less places to hide in Ukraine, so fire power actually matters there. And Russia is outproducing entire NATO
    1
  33.  @benfuriaca2024  "Russia has not achieved it" - I responded to that sentence of yours. Because it is indeed stupid to say "one side of the ongoing war hasn't achieved it's goals" because the war is still ongoing. So yeah, Russia will achieve its goals only after they win But again, is there a reason why Russia should hurry up, mobilize millions, ask Belarus to join and try to win at any cost as soon as possible?
    1
  34. @benfuriaca2024  what Russia inviting Koreans to get some experience in modern warfare has to do with "Russia wants a quick win" ? There are very few large scale conflicts with only 2 participants Well yeah, no war is better than war. But since Russia hasn't resorted to harsh means to end the war faster - they're ok with the slow pacing conflict. And Russia will win the war precisely because they take their time and slowly push forward, while Ukraine is being pushed back despite kidnapping people off streets, banning men from leaving and canceling their passports abroad
    1
  35. Putin never invaded a single country that wasn't bombing civilians at Russian borders. Also far less civilians died in Ukraine than combatants, which isn't the case for any NATO war. For example more civilian died in Gaza in 1 month than in 2 years in Ukraine
    1
  36. Interesting. Did you know that in 2 years in Ukraine less civilians died than in 1 month in Gaza? Did you know that this war is one of the rare modern conflicts with more combatant casualties than civilian ones? Compare it to any NATO war like Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria or Vietnam. If you think Russians are fighting like rabid animals, then what do you think about Americans and Jews?
    1
  37. @Badry72  “It was clear to all of us that this was a frozen conflict, that the problem had not been solved, but that is precisely what gave Ukraine valuable time,” Merkel told Die Zeit She did say that. Why haven't you tried to fact check me? Maybe if you actually searched for information you dislike - you would be more informed now
    1
  38.  @Badry72  Unfortunately I can't see my original comment for some reason. But I'm sure that the meaning is the same Merkel, Holland and Poroshenko (who all admitted that Minsk agreements were fake) weren't interested in peace, they weren't interested in negotiations which could lead to such peace and they weren't interested in "solving the problem". They were interested in a war with Russia Russia, on other hand, had no reason to give Ukraine time to prepare. I'm 2014 Ukraine didn't had an army and Russia could roll over Ukraine. They could have also sent military to help Yanukovich deal with rioters. And yet Putin tried to negotiate. Which was a massive mistake because the west never had intentions to actually stop the conflict
    1
  39. @Badry72  it's called paraphrasing. You're welcome. If you're making a peace deal with the sole purpose to continue the war instead of solving the problem, which caused the conflict - your peace deal is fake and doesn't worth the paper it was signed on. So Merkel Holland and Poroshenko weren't negotiating in a good faith, unlike Putin
    1
  40.  @Badry72  it's called paraphrasing. If you're asking for peace solely because you want the time to prepare for war - your peace proposal is fake and doesn't worth the paper it was signed on. Merkel Holland and Poroshenko weren't negotiating in good faith
    1
  41.  @Badry72  it's called paraphrasing. If they had no intentions to "solve the problem" and the only reason for Minsk agreements were giving Ukraine time to prepare - then Minsk agreements were fake, while Merkel Holland and Poroshenko negotiated in bad faith. Not Putin
    1
  42. @Badry72  Huh? "express the meaning of (something written or spoken) using different words, especially to achieve greater clarity." - yeah, that's the definition of paraphrasing
    1
  43. @Badry72  and you still don't know what paraphrasing means
    1
  44. @Badry72  how else would you call a deal, where one side had no intention to fulfil it and where the sole purpose of the deal, was to give one side a time to break it ?
    1
  45. @Badry72  You haven't answered. Is there reason why you're avoiding the question? Those treaties ended after 2014 coup in Kiev when nazis got in power and banned Russian language as second official in the Donbas immediately after taking the power. But anyway, it doesn't excuse Merkel Holland and Poroshenko for signing agreement, which they had no intention to fulfil. They weren't negotiating in good faith and there would be no war if they wanted to prevent it
    1
  46. ​ @marynajensen786  ты же в курсе, что у нас никого не мобилизуют уже 2 года, а армия растет за счёт волонтёров? Ты перепутала стандартный призыв на военную службу (который ничего общего не имеет в текущей войной) с мобилизацией? Проходящих обучение призывников на Украину не отправляют Так ещё раз. Если вы признаете нашу власть над восточными регионами, то в остальную Украину войска не войдут. В чем тогда "ужасы оккупации" ? Ну и правда, что такого плохого Россия делает на подконтрольных территориях? Мы миллиарды вливали в Крым ещё до войны, миллиарды тратим на восстановление инфраструктуры в новых регионах. С улиц, в отличие от Украины и ТЦК, никого не хватают. По сути сейчас Россия - самое безопасное место для украинцев, так как их свои хватать и отправлять на бойню не будут. Ты в курсе, что в России больше беженцев из Украины, чем в любой европейской стране?
    1
  47. Lies. Putin proposed peace treaties since 2014. Ukraine needs to stay away from NATO and stop bombing civilians in rebel regions
    1
  48. @jacqdanieles  That's called hypothetical scenario. So please answer If Chechnya wasn't flooded with terrorists and radical Islamists, then I would support them in 1991 indeed. But no-one wants to have Isis on their borders, so I can understand Russia. Tho if Kaliningrad or Kamchatka decided to leave - I would support them unconditionally
    1
  49. @Zmok  That's how you fight for independence. It's almost impossible to win against a larger chunk of your former country, so you do need assistance from someone else
    1
  50. @ichodernicht8131  Ukraine was totally fine without an army before 2014 coup. Noone will invade you if you not gonna piss off your neighbours
    1
  51.  @Badry72  Donbas didn't wanted anything until 2014 coup in Kiev. But Turchinov announced "anti terrorist operation" against Donbas civilians on April 7, while Strelkov crossed the Ukrainian border only on April 11. So Ukrainian government started the war and the people of the Donbas were already rebelling before Russia did anything there I mean, Russia annexedthe Crimea only after Crimean parliament asked for Russian assistance and after it started a referendum to join Russia. While the Donbas wasn't even the part of 2022 negotiations. But yeah, imagine, Russians didn't like seeing Russians being killed at Russian borders
    1
  52. @Badry72  no, ATO started on April 13. But he announced it on April 7. The video is on YouTube and it was posted on April 7. Feel free to fact check me
    1
  53. @Badry72  "Turchinov ato April 7". You will see a multiple videos of bold guy (Turchinov) announcing ATO
    1
  54. @Badry72  that's a bad translation. On April 13 it officially started. But on camera, on April 7, he announced it. Have you found the video on YouTube? Have you seen the date of the posting?
    1
  55. @Badry72  "he didn't officially announced it at all" - he did it on camera Infront of Ukrainian flag on April 7. But yes, it was signed only on April 13. And yet the unrest started way before Strelkov crossed Ukrainian border because Turchinov even had to announce ATO before that
    1
  56. @Badry72  "anything else is your false interpretation" - he literally made a video to the nation and said that Ukraine will start an "anti terrorist operation" in the Donbas on April 7. It doesn't matter if they sighed the paper later or not. Crimea wasn't invaded. Local parliament asked for Russian help and later stared referendum. Russia sending mercs to the Donbas isn't different from NATO sending mercs to Ukraine. I'm curious, if Putin announced "SMO" on February 10 2022 and said that Russia will send troops to Ukraine, but Ukraine struck Russian troops before Putin officially started an "SMO" on February 22 - would you also say "omg, Ukraine hit Russia unprovoked, Ukraine started the war and they're solely responsible for everything" ?
    1
  57. So Ukraine sacrificing thousands in PR stunts without any military objectivesl whatsoever is a part of long term strategy? Interesting
    1
  58. And Ukraine violated this agreement anyway. If Zelensky doesn't want the war to end and the fighting is ongoing - why would Russia stopped bombing Ukrainian troops and ammo depots?
    1
  59. ​ @57thorns  Yeah, Russia will keep bombing ammo depots and military bases even in hospitals and residential areas since Ukraine keeps soldiers and ammo there. Which even amnesty international admitted
    1
  60.  @jpt3640  what's wrong with capitulation? That's what you do if you want to save your country and people from annihilation
    1
  61. Ah, yes, because not disclosing military plans is the same thing as lying during negotiations. Do you think Russians should have also created a trailer for their offensive, just like Ukraine did in 2022?
    1
  62. Ukraine can remain sovereign and forget about NATO + 4 eastern regions at the same time.
    1
  63. @somsil1243  Not sure about "perfectly happy " considering that Zelensky banned negotiations by law and cancelled negotiations in 2022 and refused to negotiate in 2019
    1