Comments by "" (@yellowtunes2756) on "The Telegraph" channel.

Ukrainians shouldn't live in cities since their army is using civilian infrastructure as military bases, training camps and ammo depots according to amnesty international. Therefore every civilian casualty is a fault of those civilians? Did I understood your logic correctly?
14
Ukraine also has no right to bully Russian speakers. But the first thing the new Ukrainian regime did after the coup in 2014 - banned the Russian language as the second official in eastern Ukraine
7
@anthonyhulse1248 courage isn't the first word coming to mind when I see videos about Ukrainian militia kidnapping people off streets to throw them into the military
6
Leopard 2 is the best western tank btw
5
@marisabenson1222 he literally quoted the head of the Ukrainian negotiation team and one of the leaders of Zelensky's party, who said it in camera. Just because someone information doesn't fit your propaganda - doesn't mean it's not true.
5
 @gregrobbins6487 Same goes for intelligence workers, spies, satellites, maintenance teams and equipment operators?
4
 @p90497 they can. But I'm not sure why anyone would send troops to die in another American proxy
4
@SpringIsBACK why? Guys operating satellites and radars to provide intelligence for the army are more useful than someone who can take a trench. Basic infantry is the most common and the most expandable resource in the war
3
@waltersobchak1719 Ukrainians shouldn't live in cities since their army is using civilian infrastructure as military bases, training camps and ammo depots according to amnesty international, so anything can be a legitimate target. Therefore every civilian casualty is a fault of those civilians? Am I following your logic correctly?
3
@youareliedtobythemedia Crimea isn't a warzone, it's 100km away from the front line
3
 @philipmain5701 ISW is literally quoting Ukrainian mod and Ukrainian commanders for their "estimations". And it's owned by Nuland's husband
3
It's a civilian bridge
3
@Zdraviski Ukrainians shouldn't live in cities since their army is using civilian infrastructure as military bases, training camps and ammo depots according to amnesty international, so anything can be a valid target. Therefore every Ukrainian civilian who sees soldiers in his city agreed to be blown to pieces and it means that civilian casualties isn't Russian fault. Am I following your logic correctly? No, it's mainly used by civilians, millions of people using it every year. Military can use barges and railroads
3
@antheus76nla according to amnesty international Ukraine uses schools and hospitals as military bases
3
 @annetteschneider2301 loosing by taking ground at record speed while inflicting so many casualties, that Ukraine can't even replace them despite snatching people off streets?
2
It's a standard conscription of 18 year olds for military training. They aren't fighting in Ukraine and they train just like Koreans or Israelis. Russian society is aging just like any European country, but they have 140 million people anyway
2
Krinky was worse
2
@christopherodonovan some versions of c300 have ability to hit ground indeed. They cannot be intercepted by anti air systems. And there's no point in keeping them anyway because Russia almost completely switched to newer c400, while Ukraine barely has any aircraft left
2
Ukraine can also just let go of the regions, which don't want to be part of Ukraine anyway
2
 @Dommifax neutral status and limited military isn't that bad. Especially considering that Ukraine already gave up half of their resources and will pay the debt for the next 100 years
2
I love how much westerners hate democracy when they disagree with people's choice
1
@Sylvie_M And Ukraine relies on people, which they kidnapped off streets and thrown into the military by force, to walk for 15km to supply the frontline by foot instead of using donkeys and golf cars
1
2yo bot account What genocide? In 2 years in Ukraine less civilians died than in 1 month in Gaza. It's one of the rare conflicts where more soldiers have been killed than civilians. Look at casualties of any NATO war and stop acting like Russia is even remotely as evil as the west
1
@kreb7 1m per year is less than 3k per day btw, it's basically nothing. And EU is taking this million out of their own stock, they won't be able to replace it
1
@atg2186 1 billion to ramp up production, it doesn't mean that they're able to produce 1m shells a year. For example France will double their artillery shell production to 2000 per month. Which is enough for Ukraine to fire for entire morning of one single day of entire month. Go figure
1
 @anthonyhulse1248 pretty much 70% of the globe population (India, China, Africa) are pro Russian. Even here majority of the comments are pro Russian
1
Ukrainians shouldn't live in cities since their army is using civilian infrastructure as military bases, training camps and ammo depots according to amnesty international. Therefore every civilian casualty is a fault of those civilians. "They have been warned before"
1
@christopherodonovan again, certain types of c300 rockets were designed to hit the ground. If certain target was important there's nothing weird about them immediately using c300 rocket instead of sending plane which takes a lot more time. Also those rockets, due to their speed, cannot be intercepted. So there's zero reason not to use them
1
@ТопКлубняк на лодке подвезли
1
@trevorroberts9584 Russia had 3-4 layers of dragon teeth connected together. Try to drive over them lol
1
@Einnstadten and? Attacking such defences is still a lot harder than attacking random trenches and minefields, but Ukraine struggles with them for 2 months already
1
@Einnstadten I mean, they lost 50% of their Bradleys and 20% of their best Leopard 2 tanks. Plus god knows how many soviet equipment. Casualties are colossal anyway. And also any slow grind benefits Russia greatly because Russia has huge advantage in artillery and air force
1
Can't wait to see Russian soldiers making selfies next to "invincible" NATO tanks. Don't forget to learn excuses like "Ukrainians were barely trained"
1
@B3B3TTER air superiority and air supremacy is about dominating enemy air force, not flying freely over enemy air space. According to pentagon - Russia makes 200-300 sorties per day, compared to 2-3 sorties of Ukraine. So Russia does have air supremacy And Ukraine at the start of the war had 250 of c300 systems which are superior to any NATO air defence system in speed and range
1
 @stream2watch They would pay nothing because Putin never invaded a single country that wasn't bombing civilians at Russian borders
1
 @Dommifax neutral status and limited army has nothing to do with being a vassal state. Unlike giving up half of your future resources to US or being in debt for the next 100 years
1
@QwoaX Russia targeted electrical infrastructure after Ukraine blew up bridge the first time. And there's zero evidence that Russia blew up that dam. Just like there's zero reason for Russia to blow it up randomly, instead of during Ukrainian d day
1
@DasJev so if Russians built McDonald's on Crimea it would also be a military structure? Pls, tell me more
1
@DasJev no, McDonald's is still in Russia, they just changed owners. Food is the same, stuff is the same, everything is the same, name is different
1
@kerdart351 so it was ok for Russia to bomb that pizza restaurant few weeks ago because soldiers used to eat there?
1
@snuffeldjuret not when it comes to war crimes
1
@terrancedactielle5460 3600 according to who? Ukrainian war propaganda? Challenger isn't better than t72, it's just different. It has smaller gun than t72, thicker armour, but it's also a lot bigger and easier to hit, plus it's heavier and will have troubles with Ukrainian mud after every rain
1
@DeadDolphinMan Putin haven't invaded a single country that wasn't bombing civilians at Russian borders. So if your country doesn't plan some racial cleansing - nothing to worry about
1
@TheInfamousMrFox Ukraine was bombing civilians at Russian borders for years, how is Russia evil for stopping them?
1