General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Asmongold Clips
comments

Comments by "" (@diadetediotedio6918) on "Asmongold Clips" channel.

@Helldog6 "They" who lol? You are just spitting generic bs. The situation <is clearly> specific here.
65
@bluegamer4210 ["it's okay to be white" is a bit of a weird thing to say considering White people have historicly been the oppresors] Bro, this does not make <any sense at all>. Almost ALL races were oppressors in the history at some point, you don't remember how Gengis Khan caused the death of fricking 40 million of people? Or how slavery in the west started literally by europeans buying slaves from the africans itself (because of conflicts between groups)? The point of the question is very simple, to check if the model has bias, and it clearly has, the question "it's okay to be white?" is not bad on itself, it is not more weird than also asking "it's okay to be black?" because at the end of the day nobody should ask if it is "okay" to have some immutable characteristic that has nothing to do with who you are.
42
Which is a problem.
16
@talimancern7724 This is called an <anomaly>, it is not the normality but rather an accident.
10
@drantigon Not necessarily, it can be technically reverted. It can also get back faster if you get fat again if I remember correctly, but definitively possible to cure in some cases.
10
@Synical02 > You can be threatened and sexually harassed in a irl job idk what your point is. Now you are just being ignorant by comparing this with having an entire audience composed of literal thousands and millions of random people.
10
@allex975gaming > he said his friends make thousands of dollars as a comparison to normal jobs Okay but actually what was the problem?
5
It was not an extremely bad take anyways, people are mostly overreacting <as always>.
5
Being employed by someone else also has this, you can just get another job or pursue an enhancement in your carrier. All in this world comes with a cost nonetheless.
4
@cagxplays9602 1. In this specific case, the question is literally about politics, she is clearly a communist. 2. What the frick are you saying? I live in brazil and this bs is exactly like this here every single time, there's nothing inherently wrong with americans in this regard that is not also present in other countries.
3
Oh, and know what's better? 3. Literally the notion that everything is political is commonly proclamed by socialists.
3
@TheEntity_DBD This can also be seen as an abusive behavior, and probably there is some law against this as well. I don't agree with those laws, but I would absolutely kick the people that were saying to me to kick this guy from my restaurant, money is not above everything for everybody.
3
Call out what bro? You don't discuss with crazy people, the other game devs are doing the right thing on not trying to convince them, otherwise who knows what they would do, they are like crazy afraid dogs.
3
@ironmaiden93ofangmar Plot twist: You are not in position to judge his actions
3
@OutsiderLabs USA.
2
@Psych1_- This is not strictly true, if he was not 'capable of making rational decisions' then he would not had wanted to get out in the first place and would simply agree with staying in the experiment. This was not what happened. Also, there's a range in which you are still pretty rational unless you had not slept for closer to the human sleep deprivation limit. He just wanted money and that's it, if it was the case.
2
yeah
2
> "Freedom of speech is not the same as freedom from consequences" It kinda literally is. There is no point on saying this catchphrase when you live in a positivist state that can turn <anything> into a crime. By your definition north korea also has plenty of freedom of speech.
2
 @infamous6283 that was a good one, nipah~☆!
2
bad idea.
2
 @zeri3889 That's why these are anomalies, they should not be treated as a problematic to the normal cases just like you don't say people don't see the reality because some have schizophrenia.
2
Steps 1 and 2 are basically the equivalent.
2
@user-df4kf6fg7h It does not stop crime because nothing would, since man is man there are crimes, it will not change with a law. You have the punishments to make justice, not to "stop further crimes" (wich is a consequence of the law to some degree, either way).
2
A lot of diseased africans would gladly trade their life for the people that can worry their tomorrow, so what is your point again? It is just a measurement thing.
1
@Fam98K far from truth
1
@Garoslol Well, people are generally dumb so I don't know what he expected, you should always expect the worse interpretation possible from internet
1
@Rasta796 and this means...?
1
@frank2453 > The difference is that in those jobs, you don't decide how long or hard you work. You don't get to choose your coworkers. You literally choose. You just don't cherrypick them, but you can totally choose the people you will work with and the type of job you will do because <there are many>. The question is that you want absolute choice over everything and this is something you will only have if you have a differential with the other people. And that same differential is what enables people like Asmongold to be able to "decide how long or hard they work" (not really, but I'll get along). You are just removing things from him that makes he able to be where he is and then saying "oh look at his privileges, most people can't do it this exactly way and that's why he's being unfair", in reality most people have nothing to show.
1
@frank2453 I'm brazillian, but my takes are not based on the "america job market", they are about job market in general. In my country things are even worse, the 1% of the population here earns what is equivalent to the ~50%+ of america. And my points are not entangled with your same job, they are general in the sense that you are not forced to stay in your job, objectivelly speaking, so you "choose" your coworkers in the sense that you can literally find another job (if you are not picky, you can get one very fast). The final point about the thing that will give you more power being your differentials still holds as well, I did not said streaming <is the same> but you cannot remove the attributes of someone and just say "he's objectively better so he cannot say nothing" because he have what he have not because of just his job as streamer but also because of these differentials that most people lack to begin with.
1
I don't know since the world became such as something being illegal = something not happening. The state is not a force of nature and people break laws literally ALL the time.
1
 @giampaolomannucci8281 Yes, it does. Because the other way around is an inversion of the natural rights of each one.
1
@zeri3889 anomalies.
1
@simohayha4152 Lol, "real world" work can also be <anything> that is physically possible can can get you people paying. The unique difference is that streamers won their money by entertaining people while other people won their money by doing things that serve some purpose that will pay the investments on the business and prevent it from bankrupcy.
1
@simohayha4152 Yes. I mean this as well, because people are watching <Asmongold> watching other people's content, not the other people's content directly, they are doing so because they find it amusing and they find it objetively better than watching the content directly (and even I recognize this, I also watch people that watches other peoples things because it is funny). In the end of the day they are providing entertainment for these people <that's literally why people watch them>.
1
@simohayha4152 Lol, my comment was removed. But yeah, I mean it. People like to watch things Asmon is watching, this provides amusement to them, and that's why they are watching it with Asmon and not directly.
1
@F34RDSoldier805 You cannot fully ignore people in streaming job as well, you are just being overly naive here. Because if you do so for a significant time you will lose on viewers and popularity, and depending on what you do you will also loose on <much> money because sponsoring also requires social interactions of this kind.
1
Yeah, this is the bad end coming, "The world is now brazil", these people are just complaining instead of actually doing something to solve the problems they see.
1
@zeri3889 disfunctional reproductive organs*
1
@Zakjuh The easiest thing on this world is to dismiss someone takes and say they are saying things because they don't experienced it. But you just don't know.
1
@araamahasla555 Or I will not go bankrupt and I will continue serving my customers and the world will keep spinning around. I already act like this, I am not bankrupt, things are going well. The end.
1
@araamahasla555 I own my company, even if it is not a restaurant I make decisions based on my morals very often. I am also not "playing" against anyone, markets are not zero-sum games where everyone is trying to destroy eachother at every single step, mutual benefit is possible/happens and you can continue living without being the richest person in the world. You have a very sad and inactive way of seing things, I must say.
1
@pretzels1208 People have a hard time distinguishing between something not being illegal and something being good, this is a disease caused by the modern state. There is not a single morality in doing something because you can be arrested or sued if you don't do that thing.
1
he is on a real job right now
1
> i think it's a fantastic idea to listen to someone's opinion about real life topics and politics who spends his whole life in his parents' attic I don't think it is a good idea to listen to <anyone> position about real life topics and <politics>, because people don't know shit about their own lives, and they surely don't know shit about greater topics or other peoples lives.
1
This is a bad idea, when a loud minority is unionized they tend to spread their crazyness much more effectively to other people. This is how the whole sjw thing got to this point by now.
1
@giuseppebonatici7169 You are just seing the bright potential side of it, I'm seeing it with the lens of "a loud minority unite is worse than a majority dispersed". What exactly do you think that happens when a minority of progressives join together and start scheming? I think you might fastly find that this is probably the cause of why the gaming industry (and others as well) is being contamined with this all over the place
1
@bubbajoe117 I don't know much about the gamergate, but for a first google on it the posts about it looks very tendencious, but I'll study the case. Nonetheless, what was your point?
1
What happened :?
1
Always a socialist.
1
Normal people often forget it as well when they think their lives are bad and how that streamer guy had god complex, but forgetting of how blessed we are compared to people over a century ago (and compared to basically all people in extremely poor countries).
1
So it is more like a human problem.
1
Well, they are normal people, it is not because some arbitrary metric says you are top 1% you are suddenly part of a whole different existencial realm.
1
@markmckeown87 No, it kinda is. You just don't think free speech should exist, instead of trying to corrupt expressions and words use more appropriate expressions and words.
1
@E.V.A.N-COProductions What?
1
@conorstewart2214 > [Why shouldn’t we take steps to help and protect people with disabilities to stop them from becoming totally outcast from society and left to fend for themselves through no fault of their own?] This is more of my problem here. There is this seemingly impossible to fix confusion in peoples minds, caused by the modern notion of the state as being somewhat responsible for the common good and being the "representative of people", that if you don't prohibit something by the absolute force of the law then you are not "taking steps to prevent a problem". In reality, making a law is not solving any problem, laws can only punish people when they exhibit specific behaviors, they cannot teach them their behaviors are wrong, they cannot lead to a more moral society. I am not saying we should discriminate against this man, neither that the people that discriminate should go unpunished, but that creating a law to do this or using the force to impose this view on people is not what we should do to solve the problem. > [Do you really want to live in a society where it is every man for themselves and no one has any compassion or empathy for anyone else?] See? You related my "having a law for this is a problem" to "you want to live in a society without compassion or empathy", how am I supposed to answer you when your worldview is already stablished around the fact that if we don't try forcing people to be moral by arresting them or suing them we are being imoral ourselves? Forcing people to accept others is not compassion nor empathy, there is not a single fraction of morality when you do what you do because there is a law preventing you to do otherwise. This don't mean I'm saying "we should do nothing", but until this first part is sorted out everything I will say here will sound like an abomination to you.
1
@conorstewart2214 How am I supposed to answer you when all of your worldviews are based on the notion that, because I said having a law for something is a problem, I'm implying that we "should not take steps to solve the problem"? If your morality is already grounded in forcing people to obey by force what can I say that will convince you that this is a bad idea? I have many problems with laws, one of them being the fact that having a law don't imply in a more moral or just society, you are not doing anything good for nobody if the sole reason you are allowing the disableds in your stablishment is so you are not punished by the state.
1
@jankrnac3535 and?
1
@G0dspeedwastaken There are other things to it as well, but this is a good take. You can do the same with these people complaining and just tell them about people in africa literally dying of starvation and dehydration and a bunch of shitty diseases, compared to this their "labor intensive and soul draining" jobs would be a breeze.
1