Comments by "" (@diadetediotedio6918) on "The Darkside Of Rust" video.

@anonymousalexander6005 ["Moral of the story is that being self-taught is rarely being well-taught"] Well this is really some elitist bullshit.
16
Pointers are "simple" when you get the idea, but the problem is more the distinction between variables and the values for most of the people I have seen struggling with them. Borrow-checker is very very very simple tho.
6
3:16 I think this has more to do with your coding practices. Even a C# program can be very ugly and hard to read depending on how you do it
4
2:25 Nah, totally not. This is mostly a problem with C++ itself. I have used Rust with C# interop and it was very pleasant.
3
@2khz Thus, these languages also "protect" you from how memory "actually works" in many senses of the term. The concept of a pointer does not exist for the computer, it is an abstraction that we created to give meaning to memory addresses. The memory addresses we use are not real either, they are hidden behind a layer of conversion from imaginary addresses to real addresses outside user-space. Furthermore, concepts like "double pointers" and memory indirection only exist because programming languages are an effective abstraction about how memory works. The only thing we can say is really neat is the fact that overall we're under a relatively thin layer before the hardware.
3
You are saying this is your opinion and at the same time speaking as if it were true, I would add an IMHO at the beginning of your comment.
3
@chrisdaman4179 I think you are feeling some sort of psychosis with these mysterious "rust people"
3
 @RenderingUser Of course we are talking about the pointers
2
I use interop with C#, is works very nice.
1
Linked lists are not a circular references structure
1