Comments by "" (@diadetediotedio6918) on "My Zig Experience | Prime Reacts" video.

  1. 13:30 Why? I think it's quite obvious that certains workarounds would be provided by the community in any given language, this is a truth for serialization (as an example) in almost any language out there, C#, Kotlin, Java, Rust, C/C++, even Zig. Error handling is literally a very complicated task and having a community-driven lib for making things easier is 'ok', that's why we have things like macros in first place
    21
  2. 9:19 Nah, borrow-checker prevents some data racing conditions too, the predictability of the memory state, and it is more concise, but it is a powerful feature to be reminded of something.
    6
  3. 3:31 This is more obvious, if you don't write the documentation for your crate then there will not be one, it is true for Zig and any other languages tho
    5
  4.  @mattmurphy7030  I can certainly understand that some languages are more complex than others, and that some have more layers of abstraction than others (and even that is controversial, some people would say that C is simpler than Python for example, due to the "machine obviousness" of the language), but this does not imply that this window of lack of understanding and stream of consciousness does not exist in <any language>. Something being simpler to get involved doesn't imply that there won't be an engagement process once you've left a project. And for all intents and purposes, saying that Rust is not "the simplest language" should imply what? Can you tell me which is the simplest language? Because that's a dangerous game (and I'm not saying it is, but that kind of statement needs a greater rational sieve than what's being put here).
    2
  5. 1:28 This is true in almost any languages out there, so why it would be a valid criticism? Write a moderatedly complex project in Zig and Rust and forgot about it for 2-3 weeks, you will see that is not the language itself that will drive you into the project but the way you structured your code
    1
  6. ​ @mattmurphy7030  See? @Matt Murphy, this is the kind of people I was talking about: @Robert Lawson They adore the past and think that simplicity means this
    1
  7. 28:00 I use Brave, btw
    1
  8. 32:38 That's a good criticism
    1